Metal mining and other extractive operations
Individual Documents
Description:
"Villagers in Nat Gon and nearby villages of Hpa-an Township, Karen State panicked after noticing their water sources had turned black. They are now too scared to drink the water..."
Source/publisher:
KIC (Karen Information Center)
Date of entry/update:
2019-12-02
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
Local URL:
more
Description:
Dirty coal mining by military cronies & Thai companies, Ban Chaung, Dawei District, Myanmar.....Executive Summary: "This report was researched and written collaboratively by Dawei Civil Society Organizations and documents the environmental and social impacts of the Ban Chaung coal mining project in Dawei District of Myanmar?s Tanintharyi Region. Based on desk research, interviews with villagers, and direct engagement with companies and government, it exposes how the project was pushed ahead despite clear opposition from the local community. It documents the serious harm that has already been done to villagers? health, livelihoods, security, and way of life, and the devastating contamination of local rivers and streams. It calls for the suspension of Mayflower Mining Company?s permit and operations at Ban Chaung until this harm is remedied and the project is effectively evaluated, monitored, and regulated in compliance with Myanmar law and international best practice. It advocates that local villagers should be given the opportunity to take ownership of their own path to development. Formerly mired in conflict, resource-rich Tanintharyi Region is now opened up to foreign investment, and is threatened by a flood of dirty industrial projects including the massive Dawei Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and seven coal-fired power plants. Among these dirty projects is a coal mine in the Ban Chaung area of Dawei District. The project is located in a sensitive recent conflict zone, where administration and territory is contested between the Myanmar government and the ethnic armed resistance organization, the Karen National Union (KNU). Taking advantage of contested administration and weak governance in this area, Myanmar crony company Mayflower Mining used its high-level connections to begin coal mining operations without proper safeguards to protect human rights and the environment. The project was pushed ahead without an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and without the Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of local villagers. Mayflower Mining Company has a partnership with two companies from Thailand ? East Star Company and Thai Asset Mining Company ? that are operating on the ground in Ban Ban Chaung Coal Mining Report 2015 Chaung. Thai Asset has nearly completed building a road to transport Ban Chaung coal to the Theyet Chaung on the Tanintharyi coast, but its progress has been stalled due to a protest blockade by villagers. Meanwhile, East Star has already been operating a 60-acre open-pit mine at Khon Chaung Gyi village for more than three years, transporting nearly 500 tons of coal daily during the dry season according to local villagers. East Star has entered into a Joint Operating Agreement with Energy Earth Company, which will finance its mining operations and sell the coal on the market. May flower and its Thai partners plan to expand operations to mine for coal on at least 2,100 acres, threatening to take almost all of the local community?s agricultural land. Should it be allowed to expand, Ban Chaung coal mining would severely damage the health and livelihoods of approximately 16,000 villagers in the area, most of whom belong to the Karen ethnic group, and rely on fishing and farming. Indeed, many villagers are already suffering from increased pollution of air and water resources and land confiscations, of once productive agricultural land. East Star Company has dumped mining waste directly into the streams, causing fish to die off and local people to fall sick with troubling skin diseases. Uncontrolled coal fires, spontaneously combusting in waste and storage piles, have caused breathing problems in the community. An influx of outsiders along with the presence of the Myanmar military means local people no longer feel safe in their own villages. The project threatens the entire way of life of the indigenous Karen people of Ban Chaung, who have had their land passed down to them for generations. Although local people are overwhelmingly opposed to coal mining in their area, they were never given the chance to voice their concerns; only learning about the project once the bulldozers started digging on their land. Now, Ban Chaung villagers have joined together to challenge irresponsible coal mining in their area, and to call for alternative, democratic, and inclusive development in Tanintharyi Region."
Source/publisher:
Tarkapaw Youth Group, Dawei Development Association (DDA), and the Tenasserim River & Indigenous People Networks (Trip Net)
Date of publication:
2015-09-30
Date of entry/update:
2015-11-06
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Coal mining, Business and Human Rights (Burma/Myanmar-related), Metal mining and other extractive operations, Health impacts of "development" projects, Rights of indigenous peoples - Burma/Myanmar
Language:
Burmese (မြန်မာဘာသာ), English
Format :
pdf pdf
Size:
3.91 MB 3.9 MB
more
Description:
Dirty coal mining by military cronies & Thai companies,
Ban Chaung, Dawei District, Myanmar.....Executive Summary: "This report was researched and written collaboratively by Dawei Civil Society Organizations
and documents the environmental and social impacts of the Ban Chaung coal mining project
in Dawei District of Myanmar?s Tanintharyi Region. Based on desk research, interviews
with villagers, and direct engagement with companies and government, it exposes how
the project was pushed ahead despite clear opposition from the local community. It
documents the serious harm that has already been done to villagers? health, livelihoods,
security, and way of life, and the devastating contamination of local rivers and streams.
It calls for the suspension of Mayflower Mining Company?s permit and operations at Ban
Chaung until this harm is remedied and the project is effectively evaluated, monitored, and
regulated in compliance with Myanmar law and international best practice. It advocates
that local villagers should be given the opportunity to take ownership of their own path to
development.
Formerly mired in conflict, resource-rich Tanintharyi Region is now opened up to foreign
investment, and is threatened by a flood of dirty industrial projects including the massive
Dawei Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and seven coal-fired power plants. Among these dirty
projects is a coal mine in the Ban Chaung area of Dawei District. The project is located in a
sensitive recent conflict zone, where administration and territory is contested between the
Myanmar government and the ethnic armed resistance organization, the Karen National
Union (KNU).
Taking advantage of contested administration and weak governance in this area, Myanmar
crony company Mayflower Mining used its high-level connections to begin coal mining
operations without proper safeguards to protect human rights and the environment. The
project was pushed ahead without an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA)
and without the Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of local villagers.
Mayflower Mining Company has a partnership with two companies from Thailand ? East
Star Company and Thai Asset Mining Company ? that are operating on the ground in Ban
Ban Chaung Coal Mining Report 2015
Chaung. Thai Asset has nearly completed building a road to transport Ban Chaung coal
to the Theyet Chaung on the Tanintharyi coast, but its progress has been stalled due to a
protest blockade by villagers. Meanwhile, East Star has already been operating a 60-acre
open-pit mine at Khon Chaung Gyi village for more than three years, transporting nearly 500
tons of coal daily during the dry season according to local villagers. East Star has entered
into a Joint Operating Agreement with Energy Earth Company, which will
finance its mining
operations and sell the coal on the market. May
flower and its Thai partners plan to expand
operations to mine for coal on at least 2,100 acres, threatening to take almost all of the
local community?s agricultural land.
Should it be allowed to expand, Ban Chaung coal mining would severely damage the health
and livelihoods of approximately 16,000 villagers in the area, most of whom belong to the
Karen ethnic group, and rely on
fishing and farming. Indeed, many villagers are already
suffering from increased pollution of air and water resources and land confiscations, of
once productive agricultural land. East Star Company has dumped mining waste directly
into the streams, causing
fish to die off
and local people to fall sick with troubling skin
diseases. Uncontrolled coal
fires, spontaneously combusting in waste and storage piles,
have caused breathing problems in the community. An influx of outsiders along with the
presence of the Myanmar military means local people no longer feel safe in their own
villages. The project threatens the entire way of life of the indigenous Karen people of Ban
Chaung, who have had their land passed down to them for generations.
Although local people are overwhelmingly opposed to coal mining in their area, they were
never given the chance to voice their concerns; only learning about the project once the
bulldozers started digging on their land. Now, Ban Chaung villagers have joined together
to challenge irresponsible coal mining in their area, and to call for alternative, democratic,
and inclusive development in Tanintharyi Region."
Source/publisher:
Tarkapaw Youth Group, Dawei Development Association (DDA), and the Tenasserim River & Indigenous People Networks (Trip Net)
Date of publication:
2015-09-30
Date of entry/update:
2015-11-06
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Coal mining, Business and Human Rights (Burma/Myanmar-related), Metal mining and other extractive operations, Health impacts of "development" projects, Rights of indigenous peoples - Burma/Myanmar
Language:
English, Burmese (မြန်မာဘာသာ)
Format :
pdf pdf
Size:
3.9 MB 3.91 MB
more
Description:
"This Situation Update describes events and issues occurring in Shwegyin Township, Nyaunglebin District between October 2014 and January 2015, including gold mining, environmental damage, logging, militarisation, arbitrary taxation, and restrictions on villagers? freedom of movement. It also describes the changing human rights situation during the ceasefire period. According to the report, the overall human rights situation is improving in Shwegyin Township compared to before the signing of the Jaunary 2012 preliminary ceasefire agreement between the Karen National Union (KNU) and the Burma/Myanmar government. However, villagers report still being concerned regarding ongoing human rights abuses, Tatmadaw presence in the area, and the stability of the current preliminary ceasefire..."
Source/publisher:
Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG)
Date of publication:
2015-09-08
Date of entry/update:
2015-09-20
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
202.72 KB
more
Description:
"This Photo Set shows natural resource extraction projects occurring in K?Ser Doh Township, Mergui-Tavoy District in May 2014. Lead and coal mining projects have damaged the surrounding environment, negatively affecting villagers? livelihoods. Villagers in Hkay Ter village can no longer use the local river for their daily needs, as it has become muddy and polluted and at least one village has been displaced due to a coal mining project in Ka Neh Khaw village tract."
Source/publisher:
Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG)
Date of publication:
2015-02-04
Date of entry/update:
2015-02-27
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
more
Description:
China was variously described as plunderer and arch destroyer of Burma?s natural resources on the 38th World Environment Day today, by local people and environmental activists.Mindless logging and rampant mining in northern Burma by China for over two decades has led to widespread deforestation, pollution of rivers and land with Mercury used in gold mining. There is now varied ecological dysfunction that the country has to contend with.
060510-timber
Source/publisher:
Kachin News Group (KNG)
Date of publication:
2010-07-07
Date of entry/update:
2010-09-20
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
A report on mining in Burma. The problems mining is bringing to the Burmese people, and the multinational companies involved in it. Includes an analysis of the SLORC 1994 Mining Law.... ?Grave Diggers, authored by world renowned mining environmental activist Roger Moody, was the first major review of mining in Burma since the country?s military regime opened the door to foreign mining investment in 1994. Singled out for special attention in this report is the stake taken up by Canadian mining promoter Robert Friedland, whose Ivanhoe Mines has redeveloped a major copper mine in the Monywa area in joint venture enterprise with Burma?s military regime. There are several useful appendices with first hand reports from mining sites throughout the country. A series of maps shows the location of the exploration concessions taken up almost exclusively by foreign companies in the rounds of bidding that took place in the nineties.
Roger Moody
Source/publisher:
Various groups
Date of publication:
2000-02-14
Date of entry/update:
2010-09-09
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Category:
Foreign investment in mining, Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to business and investment (commentary), Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to the environment (commentary), Minerals and Mining - Burma (general articles and analyses), Metal mining and other extractive operations, Myanmar Mining legislation (texts and commentary), Laws, decrees, bills and regulations relating to extractive industries (commentary)
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Local URL:
more
Description:
Conclusion -- local participation and respected insiders:
If there is one certainty of fair and effective local participation in
environmental governance, it is that there is no universal monolithic
system of rules, regulations and processes simply awaiting implementation
and practice. Just as disparate copper-mining operations can differ vastly,
so too do local potentialities for environmental governance participation
(Medowcroft 2004; and, for a contrasting account, Leone and Giannini
2005). There are, however, two consistent features of effective local
participation in environmental governance: it must involve local people
and have, to some degree, cooperation and support from relevant
institutions and stakeholders. That is, it?s a multi-stakeholder affair,
and moreover one that presupposes the recognition of the right to
organise.
Environmental conflict resolution is a tool for recourse and for
building common purpose? between stakeholders (O?Leary et al.
2004:324). Scholars note the importance of understanding the many
varieties of environmental conflict resolution interventions as complex
systems embedded in even larger complex systems? (O?Leary et al.
2004:324). In other words, the wider spatial, temporal, economic,
social, cultural and political contexts of the specific environmental
conflict resolution are relevant for building common purpose between
stakeholders. In Burma, conflict resolution is undertaken quite
differently from dominant Western models. EarthRights International
conducted research for five years on traditional methods of conflict
resolution and its relationship to resource-based conflict at the
local level in Burma. That research resulted in Traditions of Conflict
Resolution in Burma (Leone and Giannini 2005), which argues that
conflict resolution in Burma is based more on interpersonal respect
and a tradition of local respected insiders? than on assumptions of the
objectivity of third-party outsiders?. Whereas official administrative
and court-based proceedings provide a level of comfort and trust to
the Western sensibility, these are the very institutions and processes
that might cause local villagers in Burma to feel uncomfortable and
distrustful. The report contends that the prospects for peace and earth
rights protection? hinge on this respected insider model, adding that
such respected insider practices may serve as models for communitybased
natural resource management? (Leone and Giannini 2005:1–2).
Effective local participation in environmental governance in Burma
will necessarily involve a unique tradition-based paradigm developed
by local Burmese themselves.
While third-party outsiders are less likely to gain genuine traction
in communities in Burma, this is not meant to undermine the need
for objective third-party EIAs and environmental monitoring at largescale
mining operations such as Monywa. Rather, it simply indicates
the unique needs that must be considered for fair and effective local
participation in environmental governance of mining in Burma. While
administrative and judicial proceedings can make the average Burmese
villager uncomfortable, the same cannot be said for the rule of law and
justice (which are largely absent in Burma), which will be accepted
wholly by the average Burmese, particularly by those whose human
rights have been violated.
As Tun Myint (2003) has suggested, the successes and failures of
environmental governance are determined largely by how natural
resources are used and managed at the local level. This chapter
approached a genuine inquiry into the state of environmental governance
of mining in Burma motivated by a genuine concern for the natural
environment and the people of Burma who depend on it. It interpreted
current environmental governance of mining natural resources in Burma
as largely inadequate, weak and ostensibly favourable to corporate
interests over the public interest and the natural environment. Burma?s
economic, social, cultural, political and environmental future depends
on changing this.
Matthew Smith
Source/publisher:
2006 Burma Update Conference via Australian National University
Date of publication:
2006-12-31
Date of entry/update:
2008-12-30
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more
Description:
"Contemporary maps prepared by the State Peace and Development
Council (SPDC) place most of Nyaunglebin District in eastern Pegu
Division. Maps drawn by the Karen National Union (KNU), however,
place much of the same region within the western edge of Kaw Thoo
Lei, its term for the free state? the organisation has struggled since 1948
to create. Not surprisingly, the district?s three townships have different
names and overlapping geographic boundaries and administrative
structures, particularly in remote regions of the district where the SPDC
and the KNU continue to exercise some control. These competing
efforts to assert control over the same space are symptomatic of a broader
concern that is the focus here, namely: how do conflict zones become
places that can be governed? What strategies and techniques are used
to produce authority and what do they reveal about existing forms
of governance in Burma? In considering these questions, this chapter
explores the emergence of governable spaces in Shwegyin Township,
which comprises the southern third of Nyaunglebin District (Figure
11.1)..."
Ken MacLean
Source/publisher:
2006 Burma Update Conference via Australian National University
Date of publication:
2006-12-31
Date of entry/update:
2008-12-30
[field_licence]
Type:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Local URL:
more