[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Confusion about who's making threat
- Subject: Confusion about who's making threat
- From: pawtin@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 18:51:00
Subject: Confusion about who's making threats
To Ko Ko Aung and anyone else who might be swallowing his tripe:
Aparently sir you are confused about a great many of things and I'd like to
take this opportunity to clear the quite smoke and mirror filled air. Maybe
because you never grew up in a free society and the fact that you are a
running dog who likes to chew on the bones tossed out by a totalitarian
state, I might excuse the words of someone who is so confused about US law.
People have rights that canot be taken away, whether or not some money
grubbing junta scribes a law prohibiting a law against it or not; they are
the rights of all humanity. One of the most fundamental is the right of FREE
SPEECH and FREE PRESS. The First Amendment to the Constitution of the USA
was emplaced there specifically to protect those who may say or write things
that inflame the ire of certain persons, whether it be the state or the
individual.
True there are certain laws in this country that take a dim view of someone
proclaiming "I'll break your legs" or "I'll blow up your house," etc., etc.
But agitatory rhetoric is well protected in this country. Whether it makes
you angry or not, there's not a damn thing you can do about it. So please,
call the police, call the FBI, call the INS. Please tell them: "This guy is
making rude statements about the theiving, oppresive, totalitarian state I
work for. He's actually campaigning for democracy in SE Asia! And -- heavens
help us -- he said the f-word!" What you'll likely get is a yawn and a dial
tone.
If YOU continue to threaten ME with such things as arrest in this childish
and and hamhandedly ignorant attempt to intimidate,it is you who might find
yourself under the constant gaze of federal agencies. Go ahead and keep on
what you're doing, and parroting the words and actions of your thug bosses.
If you succeed in humiliating yourself (and thus the fellas who sign your
paycheque) you may just find yourself on the next plane over the Pacific --
diplomatic immunity or no. Piggyback enough ridicule that it smears the
other end of your leash and you might find yourself greeted with the same
fate that the SLORC/SPDC has inflicted on so may of the peace loving and
gentle people of Burma, all thanks to their greed and intolerance: a slave
labor camp or a short trip out to a shallow grave.
My advice to you, from the sincerest depths of my kindly heart: Shut your
f***ing noise hole! Either that or run quick and beg for asylum in this
country. I assure you you will will find US cops a thousand fold more
merciful tan the SPDC kind I know you'd like to sick on me.
My apoligies for what some may consider a lack of tact, but the arduous
plight of my people under the guns of their shameless oppressors has made me
monstrously angry over the years. I know what it's like to suffer under the
SLORC/SPDC thumb, and it is my sincerest hope that future generations of
Burmese won't have to endure what I and millions of other have. So again,
sorry if I'm rude, but those uncle-f***ing inbred SPDC basters deserve it!
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com