The persecuted Rohingya now have legal protection, but will it amount to anything?

Sub-title: 

The ICJ ruling on Myanmar is a rare bright point in a woeful international response. Unfortunately its powers are limited

Description: 

"On Thursday the internet in Kutupalong, a city-sized refugee camp in south-eastern Bangladesh, was switched back on for a few hours. The camp’s residents gathered around their phones as, 5,000 miles away in The Hague, the international court of justice (ICJ) delivered a ruling on Myanmar’s treatment of its Rohingya Muslim minority. They cheered as the court issued a set of legally binding obligations: that Myanmar’s military does not commit acts of genocide against some 600,000 Rohingya who still live in the country, and that evidence of past crimes remains intact. This was the first legal victory for Rohingya since 2017, when upwards of 700,000 were driven into Bangladesh in a campaign by Myanmar’s military that produced the most concentrated outflow of refugees anywhere since the Rwanda genocide in 1994. Responding to attacks by Rohingya militants on security posts in Myanmar’s Rakhine state in late August 2017, military units acted with such ferocity that, within two months, the country had been emptied of nearly half its entire Rohingya population. Those who made it to Bangladesh recounted how troops encircled villages at night and opened fire, cutting down those who fled. Satellite imagery revealed more than 380 destroyed villages, and in the year that followed, new security bases were built where Rohingya homes once stood. Yet until now, there had been little substantive international action..."

Creator/author: 

Francis Wade

Source/publisher: 

"The Guardian" (UK)

Date of Publication: 

2020-01-24

Date of entry: 

2020-02-03

Grouping: 

  • Individual Documents

Category: 

Countries: 

Myanmar, Gambia

Language: 

English

Resource Type: 

text

Text quality: 

    • text