ICJ ruling shows Rohingya crisis rights and wrongs

Sub-title: 

Landmark initial ruling against Myanmar also raises doubts about UN impartiality and credibility

Description: 

"Given the persistent global publicity and intense lobbying on behalf of persecuted Rohingya refugees, a provisional decision handed down on January 23 against Myanmar by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague came as no surprise. The ICJ, the United Nations’ principal judicial organ, ordered Myanmar to take measures to stop killing and harming Rohingyas and to implement “all measures within its power to prevent genocide.” The ruling, likened in reports to a “restraining order”, said Myanmar’s government must further ensure that its military does not “attempt to commit genocide or conspire to commit genocide.” At the same time, ICJ judges underlined in dry legalese that the initial ruling would in no way prejudice the court’s dealing with the “merits of the case”, meaning it has not yet decided whether or not genocide was committed. The court did go further than requested by Gambia, the country which has brought the case to the ICJ on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), by ordering Myanmar to report on measures taken to comply with the ruling in four months and thereafter every six months. The initial ruling will add more international pressure on Myanmar to hold those responsible for alleged crimes against humanity to account, but will also likely cause the nation’s leaders to more deeply entrench their position of denial..."

Creator/author: 

Bertil Lintner

Source/publisher: 

"Asia Times" (Hong Kong)

Date of Publication: 

2020-01-24

Date of entry: 

2020-02-03

Grouping: 

  • Individual Documents

Category: 

Countries: 

Myanmar, Gambia

Language: 

English

Resource Type: 

text

Text quality: 

    • Good