TRAFFICKED FROM HELL TO HADES

 

 (DRAFT)

 

The plight of Rohingya women from Burma trafficked in Pakistan

 

A report from Images Asia, November 1999

 

 

“We have come all the way here, not just because we were trying to escape poverty and find a way to earn a better living like the Bangladeshis,

but because it was our only option to save our lives.”(Interview with a Rohingya woman in Karachi on 22.11.99)

 

 
INTRODUCTION

 

Overview and acknowledgements

 

With this report, Images Asia seeks to raise international awareness of the plight of Rohingya women from Burma[1] trafficked to Pakistan, an issue which, until now, has been completely overlooked.  The root cause of the situation may be found in the brutal policies of the Burmese military junta towards an entire people, the Rohingyas of Burma’s Northern Arakan State.  In particular, the denial of citizenship and related abuses have had far-reaching consequences, and this has led to the untold saga of thousands of people who have been rendered stateless, who are forced to flee from country to country in order to escape persecution and find a means by which they barely survive.  For the Rohingyas, being smuggled across international borders is the only option, and trafficking a risk that cannot be avoided.  Referred to as “aliens” or “illegals” everywhere, these people are denied any form of protection. Rohingya women, men and children are all affected, but not equally.  The prime focus of this report is the fate of the Rohingya women, who are extremely vulnerable at the hands of pimps and traffickers, and largely ignored by the international as well as the NGO community.

 

The present report has been prepared by a researcher from Images Asia who has extensive experience in documenting the human rights situation in Burma.  It is to be submitted to Ms Radhika Coomaraswamy, the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its causes and its consequences.   Images Asia hopes that Ms Coomaswarmy will no longer leave the plight of these women unheard, and that she will be able to address this issue in her report to the 56th session of the UN Commission on Human Rights in which her focus will be on trafficking of women.

 

This report considers the problem in a broad context: from the root causes in Burma, the circumstances in Bangladesh, the women’s journey across the Indian sub-continent, and their arrival and living conditions in Karachi.  Many obstacles had to be faced during the field research.  These included time constraints, general unawareness among local NGOs, the absence of shelters for rescued women – the Edhi Foundation ran the main shelter for women in Karachi, and none of the rescued Burmese women were accommodated there at the time of the field trip.  In addition, customary practices among the Rohingya community made it difficult to obtain first hand information.  While interviewing women in Karachi, the researcher was confronted by fearful members of the Rohingya community asking her whether the ultimate aim of this research was deportation to Burma.  This alienation can be easily understood if one remembers the involuntary character of the UNHCR repatriation programme from Bangladesh, where the majority of the women interviewed had previously been camp residents.  For this report, interviews with a total of 30 women were conducted: some in Bangladesh in March 1999, but mostly in Karachi, Pakistan, in November 1999.  The accounts bring to light an undeniable pattern of trafficking and expose the extreme vulnerability of the Rohingya women.  The report also includes information collected from a supposed ex-trafficker, and material compiled by several NGOs: LHRLA[2] in Karachi, UBINIG and Dhaka Ahsania Mission, in Dhaka.

 

This preliminary study is far from comprehensive, but is intended to be a first step in addressing human trafficking from Burma to Pakistan.  It would have not been possible without the valuable assistance of the well-respected Karachi-based NGO, Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid (LHRLA) who shared their expertise and documentation, and provided contacts among the so-called “Burmese illegals” around Karachi.  We also would like to thank Mr Noor Hussain, a Rohingya social worker from Arakanabad, Karachi, for his time and diligence in introducing us to many women of his community.   We also are grateful to many other individuals and NGOs in Pakistan and Bangladesh, as well as to the Rohingya women[3] themselves for their contribution in this research.

 

We hope this report will draw attention to the specific situation of Rohingya women victims of traffickers, and will render the issue of their trafficking to Pakistan, as well as their protection, a matter of urgency to be addressed.

 

Definition of trafficking

 

Internationally, there is no consensus regarding the term “trafficking”.  Historically, it has been referred to as the “trade of women for the purpose of prostitution” usually involving the crossing of international borders, but excluding other forms of trafficking.[4]  In 1994, the UN General Assembly stated that trafficking is the “illicit and clandestine movement of persons across national and international borders, largely from developing countries and some countries with economies in transition, with the end goal of forcing women and children into sexually and economically oppressive and exploitative situations for the profit of recruiters, traffickers and crime syndicates, as well as other illegal activities related to trafficking, such as forced domestic labour, false marriages, clandestine employment and false adoption.”[5]

 

Yet this UN definition is incomplete. It does not include boys and men who are also at times victims of trafficking, and the listing of situations should not be seen as exhaustive. A key element behind trafficking is coercion. However, there can be other situations where there is no coercion at the time of trafficking, but where a person, as a result of debt bondage, arrives later in a circumstance tantamount to slavery, such as being forced to work in appalling labour conditions.[6]

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

For an accurate understanding of trafficking of Rohingya women to Pakistan, one must look at the root causes of the problem, namely the status of the Rohingyas in Burma, and the oppressive policies they suffer there.

 

Since Independence, Burma has been destabilised by civil wars opposing various ethnic groups to the central government, a legacy, in part, of the divide-and-rule policies of the British colonial administration.  This instability led to a military coup in 1962.  Since then, the country has been ruled by a military junta which has implemented ruthless policies to quell any dissent.  In the 1990 election, the National League for Democracy (NLD) led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi won an overwhelming victory, but so far the military has refused to hand over power to the elected representatives.

 

As a result of four decades of military rule, Burma has been ravaged by economic mismanagement, insurgency problems remain unsolved, and border areas are left under-developed.  A wide range of human rights abuses, such as forced labour, arbitrary arrests and summary executions, is prevalent throughout the country.  It is unnecessary to recall the appalling human rights record of the military regime.  Since 1991 the UN General Assembly, most recently in November 1999, has adopted annual resolutions expressing concern over the deteriorating human rights situation in Burma.  The UN Special Rapporteur on Myanmar, Mr Rajsoomer Lallah, in his reports to the Human Rights Commission and the General Assembly has repeatedly issued strong conclusions and recommendations to the same effect[7].  In June 1999 the ILO decided to exclude Burma from its programmes and activities because of the pervasive use of forced labour.

 

As a consequence to the disastrous economic situation, forced labour and harassment by the military, migration and human trafficking from Burma to neighbouring countries have flourished.  In Thailand, in addition to over 120,000 refugees living in camps established along the border, up to one million Burmese migrants, most of them undocumented, are seeking a better means of livelihood. 

 

Trafficking of Burmese women into the sex industry in Thailand has been comprehensively reported in previous publications of Human Rights Watch[8] and Images Asia[9].  However, trafficking of Burmese women has also taken place to India, China and Bangladesh.  There are an estimated 40,000 illegal Burmese migrants living in the State of Mizoram[10], and unknown numbers of Burmese sex workers can be found in Chinese border towns.  Many women are also lured into sweatshops where they work in slavery-like conditions as cheap or sometimes unpaid labour.

 

The Rohingyas: a people without a country

 

The Rohingyas are a minority group mostly living in the northern part of Arakan State in Burma, bordering Bangladesh.  They have generally embraced a conservative form of Islam.  Ethnically they are related to Bengalis sharing similar traditions, customs and religion.  In Burma, they express a distinct identity, and have resisted assimilation into mainstream Burmese Buddhist culture.  The majority of Rohingya people live in abject poverty, and suffer from severe lack of education and health care. 

 

Arakan was an independent kingdom until 1784, encompassing at times the southern part of today’s Bangladesh.  Rohingya Muslims and Rakhine Buddhists have co-existed in the region for centuries. 

 

Until WWII, the two communities did not show any sign of strong animosity.  But in 1942 the evacuation of the British created a political vacuum which gave room for accumulated ethnic tensions to explode.  Communal riots broke out in Arakan between Rakhine Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims.   After Independence, some Rohingya leaders formed a Mujahid movement and demanded autonomy.

 

But the situation of the Rohingya people only started deteriorating seriously at the time of the military take-over in 1962.  Since then they have become targets for harsh treatments by the state authorities. The first wave of migration out of Burma to Pakistan started in the years following the military coup.  In 1978, the Burmese government launched an operation called “Nagamin” (“Dragon King”) aimed at curtailing illegal infiltration into Burma.  It degenerated into abusive attacks on Rohingyas both by the army and local Rakhines.  This unleashed a mass exodus of Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh.  Massive illegal migrations to Pakistan coincide to this period.  In 1982, following the subsequent repatriation to Burma, the military junta amended the Citizenship Law.  This amendment clearly targeted the Rohingyas, making it almost impossible for them to be recognised as citizens. 

 

Again in 1991-92, the Rohingya people became the scapegoats of the military regime.  A ruthless campaign of gross human rights abuses, rape and excessive forced labour,[11] forced once again 250,000 people to take shelter in refugee camps in Bangladesh.  The third major influx of Rohingyas into Pakistan corresponds to this period.  From 1994 onwards, UNHCR became involved in the camps in Bangladesh and gained access to the Arakan side of the border.  As a result, a repatriation programme was initiated by UNHCR but its involuntary character was denounced by NGOs[12].  The repatriation has not been completed yet, and is presently stalled.  Since its implementation, new refugees and many returnees have continued to trickle back into Bangladesh[13], but these have not been allowed to settle in the camps and have to survive in extreme poverty in jungle areas or in the slums around Cox’s Bazaar, facing deportation by the Bangladeshi authorities.  Currently, an outflow –although less significant- of Rohingyas fleeing military harassment and economic oppression in Arakan is still ongoing, and trafficking to Pakistan continues unabated.

 

Despite being recognised as de facto refugees in the camps, there is no individual screening process available to Rohingyas under the UNHCR Refugee Status Determination in Bangladesh.  In Malaysia, for example, where they are able to apply for refugee status, only a few who could prove involvement in anti-government activities have been recognised.  Even though they are de facto stateless, the vast majority has seen their applications rejected, and thus cannot enjoy any form of protection.  Consequently they are treated as “illegal migrants” with all its implications.

 

UNHCR has identified six areas of major concerns that constitute a push-factor for the outflow of Rohingyas to Bangladesh[14]:

 

1.      Provision of Citizenship[15]: There is a direct correlation between the lack of citizenship and the root causes for displacement.  Lt-Gen. Khin Nyunt, Secretary no. 1 of the State Peace and Development Council, stated that “Suffice it to say that the issue is essentially one of migration, of people seeking greener pastures.  These people are not originally from Myanmar but have illegally migrated to Myanmar because of population pressures in their own country. … They are racially, ethnically, culturally different from the other national races in our country.”[16]  However, an historical analysis of the settlement pattern of the Rohingya people in Northern Arakan considers that nationality rights are for most of them a legitimate aspiration.  Although, following amendments in the Citizenship Act in 1982, they found themselves deprived of the rights inherent to citizenship. The analysis concludes that their present legal status amounts, in international law, to de facto statelessness.

 

2.      Freedom of movement: Rohingyas in Northern Arakan are not granted the same freedom of movement as other citizens/residents of Burma, regardless of their documentation.  They are being virtually confined to their village tracts.

 

3.      Compulsory labour: Although forced labour is a nation-wide practice, Rohingyas have been especially targeted for road construction work, building of military camps, portage for the army, etc.

 

4.      Compulsory contributions and informal taxes: Compulsory food procurement, extortion and arbitrary taxation are common practices and have disastrous consequences on the economic viability of the community.

 

5.      Land confiscation/Relocation of persons: The construction of “Model villages” to resettle Rakhine Buddhists onto Muslim land has been ongoing for many years.  Land confiscation, forced relocation, and forced labour are directly related to these programmes, and contribute to departures.

 

6.      Rice purchasing System: A deliberate rice deficit in combination with the high price of rice has constituted another reason for the outflow of people to Bangladesh.

 

In addition to the areas of concern mentioned above, the population is regularly subjected to systematic human rights abuses, such as arbitrary detentions, summary executions, assaults and rape mostly by military personnel and local authorities, but also from gangs of local Rakhine Buddhists, which generally operate with total impunity.

 

These human rights violations, and the deliberate policies of economic underdevelopment imposed on them, have led to mass exoduses of a people out of Burma to other countries, including Bangladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, as well as Malaysia and Thailand.

 

 

ROHINGYA WOMEN: STATELESS AND OPPRESSED IN BURMA

 

Interviews with Rohingya women from different social backgrounds reveal the subordinate status of these women in their own community.  They live under a relatively conservative interpretation of Islam.  Their level of economic and political participation is almost non-existent.  Women, even those belonging to the upper class, were not aware of any women’s organisations.  Multiple marriages are common, especially in the poorer strata of the community.  Most women are confined to their houses, and are only able to go out covered with a burka[17]. During the interviewing process the researcher frequently encountered difficulties in hearing the women’s voices as often men present would interfere and answer for them.  Similar experiences were shared by other colleagues[18].

 

The subordinate status of Rohingya women is also exacerbated by the current situation in Burma where men feel responsible for protecting their womenfolk from abuses by the military and by the non-Muslim community. Sajda, a 19-year old educated Rohingya woman, commented: “The major problem is rape.  Rape is very common.  We are not respected.  That is why women are too afraid to leave their homes and even work outside.  Often the military kidnapped girls and take them to their camps.  They are only released after being gang raped.  … Women sometimes work in the garden around their house, but they cannot go to the fields for fear of being assaulted.  Even in their house, women are not safe.”[19]

 

The majority of Rohingya women are illiterate.  They are usually not encouraged to receive education and at the most girls are sent to study the Qu’ran at the madrassah.  But in most cases no education facility is available anyway.  UNHCR has initiated programmes to improve education in Northern Arakan and felt compelled to offer an additional rice allowance to families with daughters in order to increase female attendance in the classrooms.

 

Health care is grossly lacking in the villages in Northern Arakan.  Rohingya women are often reluctant to visit government facilities, if any, as they are usually treated with contempt.  Furthermore, the restrictions on their freedom of movement prevent them from reaching clinics or hospitals outside their village tracts.  Many women are suffering from multi-parity, and infant mortality is also very high.   Zainab, the wife of a wealthy trader from Maungdaw, had just given birth and faced medical complications: “We face many problems for child delivery.  My sister-in-law died after giving birth in Maungdaw. I had my baby last month [Jan ‘99] and bled profusely after the delivery.  I decided to go to Akyab[20] for medical treatment.  For us, it is so difficult to travel anywhere, even to Akyab.  We have to pay so much money for a pass. They even discriminated among women.  When the boat arrives at the Akyab jetty, there are two gateways, one for Muslims and one for Buddhists, and we have to give so many bribes.  This treatment costs me 20,000 Kyats[21]: 5,000 Kyats for medical expenses, but the remaining 15,000 Kyats were for travelling costs.”[22]

 

Women usually do not have employment outside of their homes, and it is uncommon to see women working in the fields.  However, as an economic necessity, widows and women heading a household do take jobs as day labourers or housemaids.

 

Forced labour is generally not imposed on women, but the constant demands for forced labour on their husbands and male relatives, sometimes for long and repeated periods of time, deprive women and children from their daily earnings, and put a heavy toll on the economic survival of the whole family.  This situation can be so acute as to destroy the fabric of family life.   Some women have been expelled by their own relatives who could not afford to feed them.  Zobida is a 24 years old widow, mother of 4 children.  She was interviewed in Bangladesh: “My husband was always ordered to do forced labour.  About 5 months ago, my son was sick, so he refused to go.  The military came to pick him up and took him to the Chittapurika army camp where they shot at him.  Then the soldiers called me to carry him to the hospital, but he died on the way.  After he died, I stayed with my parents-in-law, but they could not afford to feed my children and me.  They told me that they no longer wanted to see me if I did not find a job.   I could not find any work, so I decided to leave.  Here I am a beggar.”[23].  Rubia, another young widow with 2 children, lived a similar drama:  “When I was 4 months pregnant, the NaSaKa[24] caught my husband, blindfolded him and took him away.  One month later, they sent someone to my house to return my husband's clothes.  I was told that he was dead without any other explanation.  After that, I went to stay with my 2 brothers, sometimes with one, sometimes with the other.  But most of the time my brothers were busy doing forced labour as porters or cutting wood in the forest.  And they could not provide for me.”[25]

 

The worst tool of oppression used against Rohingya women consists of rape and sexual assault. A UNHCR staffperson in Bangladesh told the researcher that “selective rape” triggered the 1991/92 mass exodus of refugees to Bangladesh.  Many women, in particular widows, stated that the safety of their teenage daughters led them to flee their homes in Arakan.  Rape cases have been documented in reports by Human Rights Watch and other NGOs.  Rape is not only committed by the military, but reportedly also by local Rakhines who are able to act with complete impunity, or by criminals believed to be backed by the military.

 

Two of the women interviewed by Images Asia in Karachi were victims of such atrocities.  A now elderly lady, Asia Khatun, had one of her breasts sliced off: “I left after they did this to me.  I was alone at home with my children while the men were working.  Some Maghs[26] came in to attack me.  They cut my breast with a knife and I fell unconscious.”[27]  Yasmin, a woman of 35, undressed to expose the scars on the lower part of her body: a stab wound in the pubis area, a large injury on her right buttock and another knife cut on her leg:  “I was raped by non-Muslims.  I was 12 or 13 years old at that time.  I had been working in the field and I was returning to my sister’s house.  On the way, 2 or 3 men assaulted me and they did this to me.”[28]

 

Although she did not explicitly admit to it, Farida’s testimony suggested that she had been raped too, and subsequently abandoned by her husband: “We, the women, used to fetch water at the river bank, and the soldiers used to come and make problems to us.  They would tear our burka off our faces.  Sometimes they raped women or attempted to do so.  My husband was taken as a coolie by the army.  When he came back home, I told him that I wanted to leave.  He didn’t agree and he kept the children.  I came here alone.”[29]

 

Forced relocation, usually without any compensation, is another push factor for departure described by Rahima, a widow with 2 sons, who arrived in Pakistan in 1997:  “The army took my husband as a porter and for two weeks they didn’t give him any food.  He died of beatings and starvation.  Other porters brought his dead body and I buried him.  After his death I worked cleaning houses.  We had a house and 3 acres of land to grow paddy and vegetables.  But within a few months the government took everything, our land and our house, to give to the Maghs [Rakhine Buddhists].  “You are not our people,” they told me, “You have no right to have land in Burma.  You should go away!”  I had some relatives in Pakistan and they invited me to join them.”[30]

 

 

ROHINGYA WOMEN: UNWANTED REFUGEES IN BANGLADESH

 

All Rohingya women, as well as men, who have been trafficked to Pakistan, have first come to Bangladesh.  In some cases women were coerced right from their villages in Northern Arakan, but the majority fell into the clutches of the trafficking network in Bangladesh. 

 

Over the last two decades, Bangladesh has been burdened by two mass exoduses of Rohingya refugees: in 1978 and 1991/92 (see details above).  Not surprisingly, the major influxes of newcomers in Pakistan coincide with these two mass exoduses.  The refugee camps were actually ideal recruiting grounds for traffickers.  UNHCR and NGOs providing assistance in the camps confirmed that human trafficking was thriving at the height of the influx.  This corroborates the testimonies of women interviewed in Pakistan who had in most cases transited through or resided in camps, often for several years, before embarking on the journey across the sub-continent.

 

From 1994 onwards, UNHCR initiated a programme of voluntary repatriation.  However, NGOs working in the camps questioned the voluntariness of the programme[31].  Many refugees complained of being coerced into signing for return under threats from Bangladeshi camp officials.  These pressures exerted on them often involved physical violence, verbal abuse and denial of food rations. These incidents and threats have also been instrumental in increasing the outflow to Pakistan.   Farida, allegedly raped in Burma, subsequently fled to a refugee camp in Bangladesh:  The Bangladeshi camp-in-charge used to visit us at night time and demanded us to show our ration card.  He told us that they were no more problems in Burma and that we will be sent back.  He put so much pressure on me, that I decided to go to Pakistan.”[32]   Another 29-years old woman now living in a Karachi slum recalled:  “We left the refugee camp because the food was not sufficient, the accommodation was bad, the authorities were harassing us and there was no job.  We had relatives who were already living in Karachi.  They wrote to us saying that we could get rice and fish there.”

 

UNHCR failed to achieve any fundamental improvements in the situation in Northern Arakan, and the “voluntary” repatriation programme took place when basic criteria for safe return were not met.  In some cases, women were forcibly repatriated, later returned to Bangladesh, and then headed to Pakistan.   Mobina, an elderly lady from Maungdaw, wept when she explained how 4 members of her family were killed in Burma: “They didn’t even allowed us to bury their dead bodies.  So we ran away to the refugee camps in Bangladesh.  But later we were forcibly sent back to Burma.  The Burmese authorities always repeated that we were not from Burma.  I decided to flee again to Bangladesh.  First I begged to get money, but later I went to Pakistan.”[33]

 

Thousands of Rohingyas who escaped across the Bangladesh border did not settle in the refugee camps.  After the UNHCR repatriation process started new arrivals were no longer admitted in the camps.  They went to swell the slum population of Cox’s Bazaar or stayed in hiding in the jungle areas, totally deprived of any humanitarian assistance. There are many instances of women being arrested, detained and deported back to Burma.  Because of the fear of deportation Rohingyas living outside the camps have become largely invisible and extremely vulnerable.  Their number is roughly estimated at 40,000. 

 

In order to eke out an existence, women beg, or send their children into the streets to beg.  Others survive collecting firewood and selling it to earn a few Takas[34], contributing to the depletion of the local environment, one of the arguments used by the Bangladeshi authorities to justify their expulsion.  Others work in the local fishing industry or find employment as domestic servants, often in conditions tantamount to slavery.

 

UBINIG, a Bangladeshi NGO, carried out a research among Rohingya women living outside the camps and reported various cases of disappearances of young girls.  Abductions of young women, rape and sexual assaults are thus not uncommon.[35]  We can easily conclude that the kidnapped girls are sold and trafficked either within Bangladesh itself or to other countries.

 

The local press has reported cases when the police ‘rescued’ Rohingya refugees on the verge of being trafficked to India.  In an interview with Images Asia, a staffperson from Dhaka Ahsania Mission (DAM), a Dhaka-based NGO, related a specific case in which they got involved: “In May 1998, a bus carrying 71 passengers, mostly women and children of various ages, was driving from Cox's Bazaar to Benapole (Indian border).  The driver got suspicious about the passengers he was carrying and when the bus stopped at a petrol station, he informed the police.  The police organised a road block near Jessore and intercepted the bus.  This way they found out that all the passengers were going to be trafficked illegally to India.  The passengers were taken to police custody.  Most of them told the police that they were from the Cox's Bazaar area.  However, when the police investigated the addresses that they had given, these were either non-existent or incomplete.  These women did not admit they were Rohingyas, but the police assumed they were.”

 

DAM is running a shelter for women and children rescued from trafficking near Jessore.  The police thus contacted them about this case, and delivered the Bangladeshi women to them.  However, the Rohingya women were not handed over, since they could not prove their identities.  At the time of the interview with DAM, in January 1999, they were still in detention.  Many reports of similar cases give cause for fear that these women may be imprisoned for an indefinite period of time, and may endure custodial violence at the hands of their jailers.

 

 

 

THE JOURNEY ACROSS THE SUB-CONTINENT

 

The journey across the sub-continent starts in the Rohingya’s homes in Arakan or in Bangladesh - whether in the refugee camps or elsewhere.  As explained by Mr Azad[36], a supposed ex-trafficker, a pimp or a human trafficker usually approaches the head of a family, offering jobs in Pakistan.  He proposes that he accompanies him back to Karachi.  If the head of the household agrees and says that he will come along with his family, the trafficker requests him to contact his friends and other relatives and to convince them to join as well.  He then forms a large group of 60, 100, sometimes more.  The family then sells all its possessions, principally land and house, in order to pay the amount of money required for the journey.  If the family is too poor and does not own any property to sell, it might borrow money from relatives and friends, or else the trafficker might agree to advance the cost of the journey.  He is well aware that once in Pakistan he can easily recover his loan by selling family members, especially young girls.

 

After she fled Burma, Mehmooda, a widow with 4 children, first tried to find a means to survive in Bangladesh:  “I first stayed in Cox’s Bazaar for about one year.  I worked cleaning houses and my children were selling fish.  It was hard to earn some money there and it was not sufficient for the 5 of us.  A man that we knew came to my quarter where many Rohingya people are living.  He offered us to accompany him to Pakistan where there are better jobs and prices are lower.  He demanded 10,000 Rs for my family.  As I could not pay, he said we could reimburse him as soon as we started working in a carpet factory in Karachi.”[37]

 

The group may be mixed, including both Bangladeshi and Rohingyas from Burma.  Once the group sets out on the journey, the participants have to do whatever the trafficker orders them to do.  They are completely at his mercy.  The traffickers always have contact with the border police.  The group usually travels by bus to a location near the Indo-Bangladesh border.  They arrive at the border at night, usually on foot, and the trafficker orders the people to wait quietly behind while he negotiates with the border police to let the group through.  He tells them the size of the group and bribes them accordingly.  The border police then leave their posts for a short while to allow the group to cross illegally.

 

Once in India, they are herded to Calcutta and board a train to New Delhi, or to Ajmer[38] in Rajasthan.    From there, they will continue their journey to the Pakistan border.  Two major routes are generally used to reach Pakistan: the fastest goes through Punjab.  The group travels by train to Amritsar in Indian Punjab and then crosses the border at Qusoor, on foot and always at night time, after the trafficker has negotiated safe passage in return for bribes.  From there the people walk to Lahore where they take another train to Karachi.  The other major entry point to Pakistan is the border between Rajasthan, India and Sindh, Pakistan.  In this region, the Thar Desert lies on both sides of the border.  The group treks on foot for 10 to 15 days from village to village across the Rajasthan desert.  They usually walk through the night, and rest hidden behind trees during the day.  Local villagers might guide them in exchange for money.  Here again, the trafficker will arrange the border crossing with the border security forces.  From there, they will board a bus and finally reach Karachi.  The whole journey across the subcontinent requires between 10 days to a month. 

 

However, accounts from women interviewed reveal that this journey is rarely straightforward, and many obstacles are encountered on the way.  In many instances, only of a third or half of those who join the original group actually reach Karachi.  Often, members of the group are arrested or get lost during the journey, and those people are always left behind.  Some disappears; others die on the way.

 

Sometimes, the trafficker sets up a large group of people, collects the money, and abandons the group on the way.  Mr Azad added: “In some cases, another trafficker might take over the abandoned group, especially if it consists of a majority of women and children.  He knows that, even though he is unable to extort more money from them, he will be able to sell them or make them work for him when they arrive in Pakistan.”

 

The group is sometimes subjected to serious abuses at the hands of the traffickers.  Additional money is extorted for various reasons along the way, people are left near starvation, and killings have been reported.  Rashida and her family paid a trafficker, but complained: “The journey was very hard.  We had to pay more money to the border police.  We were only given one meal a day.  When we crossed to Pakistan, the guide [the trafficker] ordered us to stay quiet while he was doing the negotiations for us.  Unfortunately one baby in our group started crying.  He grabbed the baby and threw him in the water.  The baby drowned.”[39]

 

Several women interviewed told that they lost family members during the trip across India.  Bano is a widow who fled Burma with her children, but arrived alone in Pakistan in 1996: “We stayed in Delhi for a while, but one day the police tried to catch us.  So we all scattered, and I lost all my children.  I begged there for several months but could not find them.  So I came here alone.”[40]

 

Women are especially at risk of sexual violence when crossing international borders.  Reportedly the Bangladeshi border police has been more lenient with Rohingya refugees.  Farida related that during her journey: “…Bangladeshi border officials questioned us, but we told them that we were from the refugee camps and that we were leaving Bangladesh.  So they let us go….”[41]

 

The border between India and Pakistan seems to be under tighter control.  Mr Azad even told us: “Usually these people crossed the Pakistani border at night time and on foot.  But there are many instances when the Pakistani border rangers arrested them and pushed them back to India.  The Indian border patrol sometimes fired at them.  But later they will try to cross again.

 

When the group is caught, women became targets for rape and sexual assault by border guards.  In 1997, Rahima paid a trafficker to be taken over to Pakistan:  “I was in a group of 60 people.  We travelled through Amritsar. When we crossed the border to Pakistan at night, the Pakistani border rangers arrested us.  They detained us for 2 days and pushed us back to India.  We tried to cross again but this time we were arrested by the Indian border guards.  They took all the young girls and raped them.  There were about 10 of them in our group, aged 12 or 13.  They kept them in a place under guard.  After two hours they were released and sent back to their families.  They looked almost dead.  Some were unconscious.  They were bleeding and wounded.  They couldn’t walk and we had to carry them to continue our way.”[42]

 

Mehmooda faced a similar situation in 1996:  “When we came here, my sister-in-law was also raped at the border checkpoint by the Indian police. She was a married woman and mother of 2 children.  We came in a group of 80 people, and 5 women were taken by the police and sexually assaulted. The other girls were all around 13 or 14 and still unmarried.  The police released all of them after a short time.  My sister-in-law had to be sent to hospital.”[43]

 

As confirmed by a senior Pakistani police officer, everyone crossing the Pakistani border illegally needs the services of a trafficker.  They are always working in connivance with the border authorities.  Another woman also named Mehmooda, who travelled with a disabled child, testified to this: “When we crossed the border into Pakistan we went to the commander’s house and we were sent by army truck to the nearest railway station.”[44]

 

 

ROHINGYA WOMEN: SOLD IN PAKISTAN

 

In a report dated March 1994, the Sindh police[45] estimated the number of illegal Burmese living in and around Karachi in 1993 at around 200,000, an increase of 700% from their previous survey of 1988.  The police records also indicate that Burmese (who are all Rohingyas) comprise 14%, and Bangladeshis 80%, of the total undocumented immigrant population in Karachi.[46]  Images Asia believes that the real number of Rohingyas in Karachi is likely to be much higher since many of them would conceal their origin in fear of deportation to Burma.  Rohingya community leaders in Karachi speak of a total Rohingya population of over 300,000.

 

Living conditions in Karachi

 

The Rohingya population in Pakistan is mostly concentrated in the suburbs of Karachi, including Korangi, Orangi, Landhi.  In these areas some of the Rohingya settlements are named after their place of origin, such as “Arakanabad”, “Burmi Colony”, “Arakan Colony”.  Others neighbourhoods have a mixed population of Rohingyas and Bangladeshis.  All these settlements receive regular visits from law enforcement agencies extorting protection money from their undocumented inhabitants.  Arakanabad is probably the poorest with about 5,000 people from Burma living in the harshest conditions.  This slum has sprawled near the seacoast not far from the main harbour.  The residents are entangled in a land dispute and might face eviction.  The houses are merely shacks made of bamboo, grass, and plastic sheeting.  Most of the slum dwellers are employed in the fishing industry, cleaning fish or peeling prawns, while some men work on the fishing trawlers.  There is only one clinic run by Jamaat-e-Islami[47], and the local physician confirmed that malnutrition is rampant, especially among children.  There is only one self-supported school.  Undocumented children are not permitted to attend government schools unless their parents pay a high bribe that most cannot afford.  Most children do not receive any education at all, and work in the prawn factories, or make carpets, to contribute to the meagre income of their families.  The researcher visited a prawn factory, which consists of a dark room where around one hundred children aged 5 to 10 were peeling prawns, squatting in the water all day.  For each bowl of peeled prawns they receive 10 Rs (20 US cents) and they usually manage to fill up 3 or 4 bowls per day.  Similarly, the carpet industry mainly employs child labour.

 

The migratory movement of Rohingya Muslims to Pakistan took off in the early ‘60s when the military grabbed power in Burma.  Since then, there have been two major increases of population in the settlements of Karachi in the late ‘70s and the early ‘90s, which are clearly linked to the two mass influxes of refugees into Bangladesh.  At presently the flow of newcomers seems to have slowed down, but still continues.

 

The trafficking business

 

In relation to trafficking, Pakistan is known as a sending, receiving as well as transit country.  However, the Government has remained insensitive to the plight of illegal migrants, and has largely ignored the issue of trafficking.

 

Since they are not recognised as citizens of Burma, and are consequently deprived of any form of documentation, it is reasonable to say that 200,000 or more Rohingya Muslims have been smuggled in one way or another into Pakistan.  Unfortunately no reliable data is available to give any approximation of the extent of the trafficking business.  According to Mr Azad, the supposed ex-trafficker: “In 1991/92, about 20 or 30 pimps and traffickers were bringing a group of people from Bangladesh to Karachi every month. But now it has decreased to 3 or 4 per month.  This trafficking has come to the knowledge of the authorities, and they have stepped up the control.  These activities have turned more clandestine now.  Maybe they have chosen to go to other destinations.  The pimps and the police are always working hands in hands.”  We have been unable until now to verify this information.

 

Interesting indicators were provided by LHRLA.  In their survey of women in detention in Karachi, 12% of them were found to be from Burma while 80% were Bangladeshi.  Another LHRLA’s research conducted between 1991 and 1993 also revealed that approximately 100 to 150 Bangladeshi women were brought into Pakistan as human cargo everyday.[48] If we apply a similar ratio to this figure, we can roughly estimate that an average of 12 to 18 Rohingya women were trafficked daily to Pakistan during the same period.

 

Following its survey in Karachi, the Sindh police has expressed concern over the impact of illegal immigration on law and order, and while it has identified the Afghans with arms smuggling and drug trafficking, it has associated Bangladeshis and Burmese with the flesh trade and prostitution.[49]

 

Mr Azad drew the portrait of a trafficker:  “He is Bangladeshi or Burmese, but has always Pakistani nationality. He is usually middle aged, between 30 and 50.  He is always living among his own community.  Often he is the owner of a pan [betel nut] stall or he is working in a restaurant.  Regularly he disappears for several months.  His family would explain that he has gone fishing at sea or that he is working in some far away factories, while he has actually gone back to Bangladesh or Burma to recruit and fetch another group.”  The pimps all have a strong link with the law enforcement agencies and have established an extensive network throughout the sub-continent.

 

When the group of Rohingyas finally arrives in Karachi, the trafficker usually takes them to a den[50].  Language barriers increase their vulnerability.  Those who have relatives in the city are sent to stay with them, and it is not unusual that the trafficker will first demand more money from the relatives before handing them over.  Women and children with no relatives are often sold into sexual slavery or domestic servitude after being married off to the buyer to legitimise their enslavement.

 

When the woman is auctioned off on the flesh market, she is paraded as a “commodity” in front of potential buyers, her physical attributes are appraised, her skills assessed, and the bargaining begins.  A reporter from the Urdu daily newspaper, Jang, witnessed this humiliating display.  She went undercover to buy a girl from a pimp called Nizam in Rajput Colony, in Karachi.  Here are a few excerpts from the conversation that she taped:

 

Jang:        Can I get a girl who can speak Urdu?

Nizam:    Of course, sister.  We get girls from not just Bangladesh, but also from Hindustan [India], Sri Lanka and Burma.  The girl we got from Hindustan will know Urdu.

Jang:        We want an unmarried girl… We want a virgin.

Nizam:    Sister, don’t worry, she will be unmarried.

Jang:        Will you arrange the nikah [marriage]?

Nizam:    Of course.  It will be a registered nikah from the government.  You will get the nikahnama [marriage contract] immediately… it comes with the girl.

Jang:        What if I buy the girl and then the police stops us at the railway station?

Nizam:    That is not possible.  There is no police station in Karachi that will keep you even for one minute.  I take full responsibility.  The police will say nothing.

Jang:        What about outside Karachi?

Nizam:    Where do you want to go?  … Wherever you go it is my responsibility - the police will not say anything.  When you buy the girl, the police in fact will drop you home.[51]

 

The selling price of a woman generally ranges from US$1,285 to US$2,428 depending on her age, beauty, virginity, education, etc.  A pimp earns on average between US$200 and US$229 net for each woman, and can make over 100 of such sales a month.[52]

 

Thereafter, the woman might be sold to someone else, forced into prostitution, or serving as concubine or slave to rural landlords.

 

During our field research, we were only able to collect a little evidence about the sale of Rohingya women.  Most of the interviewees seemed aware that it happens, but did not know of specific cases.  Sajda, a young educated Rohingya woman, was more informative: Non-accompanied women are facing many problems.  I have heard something about trafficking, but not much.  It is difficult to know about these things.  Some women disappeared on the way, and we will never know what has happened to them.  Here in Pakistan I have only heard of two cases.  Both girls had been sold into a fake marriage as soon as they arrived here.  Their relatives are actually living in our quarter.  But we only came to know about their cases years later, when their daughters came back to visit their family.  One of the girls was sold in Punjab when she was 15.  She got forcibly married and 8 years later she managed to come back to Karachi to visit her family, and she had 2 or 3 children.  The other girl was only 8 years old when she was sold and forcibly married.  She also came back after 8 or 9 years.  She was no longer able to speak our language, but of course she recognised her parents.”[53]

 

The sale of Rohingya women from Burma has never been exposed, while cases of Bangladeshi women caught in this human trade have been better documented.  Therefore, since Rohingyas and Bangladeshis are often trafficked together, it seems reasonable to assume that they have endured similar kinds and degrees of exploitation.   Mr Zia Ahmed Awan, the president of LHRLA, who is providing legal aid to both Bangladeshi and Burmese women in detention, confirms: “There is no reason to believe that their experiences are different.  Bangladeshi and Burmese have the same fate.  The petitions to the Court reflect this very clearly.”

 

Besides the risk of being sold, many Rohingya women become victims of slavery through debt bondage.  Those too poor to pay their passage have to reimburse the trafficker for the costs of the journey.  He places them and their children in carpet factories or other industries where they are forced to work for little or no pay until their debt is recovered.  Mr Azad confirmed that factory owners actually pay traffickers to provide them with slave labour.  Mehmooda, a widow with 4 children, is still paying off her debt of 10,000 Rs two years after she arrived in Karachi:  “Since we arrived here, two of my children are working in the carpet factory.  They only earn Rs 20 a day.  The rest of their wages is retained to pay back our passage.  I don’t work, as I have to take care of my disabled child.  My eldest son is a fisherman. He goes to sea for 15 days and receives 400 or 500 Rs for that.”[54]

 

Because of their undocumented status, Rohingya women constantly face arrest and imprisonment as illegal immigrants.  In their survey conducted in detention centres in Karachi between 1991 and 1993, LHRLA identified that 12% of the female prisoners came from Burma.  However, Mr Zia Ahmed Awan, president of LHRLA, recognises the difficulty in identifying their nationality, since Rohingya women frequently lie in their statements for fear of being deported to Burma.  The real percentage could therefore be much higher.  They are charged under the Pakistan Foreigners Act prohibiting illegal entry, and/or incorrectly charged under the Zina section of the Hudood Ordinance, which specifically forbids extra-marital sex including adultery or fornication.[55]

 

Female prisoners in Pakistan are often detained in the same jails as men in violation of Pakistani law, in overcrowded conditions and with inadequate facilities for women. They do not have even access to legal assistance. 

 

They are further victimised by police and pimps while in detention. Asia Watch, now Human Rights Watch, reported in 1992 that more than 70% of women in police custody in Pakistan are subjected to sexual or physical violence[56].  Pimps, with the aid of jail authorities, manage to see them regularly, harassing and threatening them so that the women would submit to their offer to get them released, and return into their grasp.

 

Fatima, an elderly lady now blind, whom we interviewed in Karachi, was trafficked to Pakistan and got arrested soon after crossing the border:  “My husband lost us while we were in India.  So I arrived in Pakistan alone with my 3 daughters.  Unfortunately we were caught by the police.  I was put in jail for 3 years with my 3 daughters.  First in Larkana jail, and later they transferred us to Karachi jail.  They were 35 other women from Burma with me there.  My son spent a lot of money to bail us out.”[57]

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

Rohingya women from Burma are trapped.  In Burma they are deprived of citizenship, and face wide-scale atrocities committed by the military regime.  In Bangladesh they are unwanted refugees, threatened with repatriation or deportation, and unable to meet their most basic needs.  For many, the only option left to them in order to survive is being trafficked to Pakistan to face an uncertain future that often holds further abuses.  During the journey across the subcontinent they can be caught in the web of ruthless traffickers.  At every stage of the trip they are vulnerable to sexual violence, physical abuse, as well as other forms of exploitation, whether in the hands of the trafficker, the police, border guards, or while in detention.  In Pakistan, some have been sold into slavery and prostitution, while many more survive as illegal immigrants in extreme poverty in the squalor of the Karachi slums.  Others have spent many years in jail, detained under the Pakistan Foreigners Act or under the Zina section of the Hudood Ordinance.

 

Wherever they are, Rohingya women are denied protection as well as assistance, and suffer the worst human rights abuses.

 

Most do not want to return to the brutal oppression in Burma.  One woman in Karachi told Images Asia:  Burma is my native country, and I love my country.  But in Burma we can’t even pray.  Here, we only have one meal a day, but we can live more peacefully.”[58]

 

Mobina, whose husband and brother were killed in Burma, said: “I will never go back to Burma.  Even if I need to survive on salt, I would rather eat salt here!”[59]

 

The traffickers are only part of a wider social, cultural, political, economic system of oppression, and it is this whole system that should be identified and addressed, rather than just part of it.  Many women interviewed did not say they had faced major problems while being trafficked to Pakistan.  In some way, the trafficker is sometimes seen as a saviour, and the Rohingyas need to use them to escape from their hell in Burma and in Bangladesh.  It is the oppression of the Rohingya women that makes trafficking a better option than staying where they are, and in this case the trafficker performs a needed service in facilitating the journey to survival.[60]

 

Rohingya women are not only victims of traffickers, but also, as our field interviews reveal, of:

-         the “system” of nationality, manipulated by the 1982 Burmese Citizenship Law,

-         the Burmese military who imposed on them a pattern of gross human rights violations, and a deliberate policy of economic underdevelopment,

-         the socio-cultural and religious background of their community,

-         the corrupt police and border guards whether in Bangladesh, India or Pakistan,

-         the political situation prevailing in the countries they fled to,

-         the legal system in Bangladesh and Pakistan which further victimised them, and,

-         UNHCR policies pursuing a political rather than a human rights approach, and which are simply a reflection of the international set-up.

 

The UNHCR’s “voluntary” repatriation programme, while basic conditions for safe return have not been achieved, has further alienated the Rohingyas.  As a result they do not perceive that they can rely on UNHCR for protection, whether in Bangladesh or back in Burma.   In dealing with the Rohingyas, UNHCR implemented such policies regarding their protection -a priority in UNHCR’s mandate-, that these have actually contributed to encourage trafficking to a third country as the only alternative for survival.

 

Given their situation of statelessness, and the fact that they have all fled their country of origin, Burma, because of well-founded fear of persecution, we believe that most Rohingyas meet the criteria that should qualify them for refugee status.

 

Until now, the voices of Rohingya women have been muffled, but with more exposure of the situations they face, we hope their cries will no longer be left unheard.  Measures need to be implemented urgently, and systems put in place to allow them to live in full human dignity, including programs that address their basic needs.  Their sufferings can no longer be ignored.  It is the international community’s responsibility to ensure that their fundamental rights are respected and guaranteed.

 

We hope this report will create awareness of the particular circumstances of Rohingya women, and will make the issue of their trafficking to Pakistan, as well as of their protection, an emergency to be addressed.

 

+++++

 



[1] Burma was renamed Myanmar by the military regime in 1989.  However, as many Burmese appalled at the junta’s human rights record prefer to use the name of Burma.  Throughout this report, we will refer to the country as “Burma”.

 

[2] Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid, Karachi.

 

[3] Some of the women’s names have been changed in order to protect their identity.

 

[4] Report to the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Radhika Coomasraswamy, to 53rd Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights, E/CN.4/1997/47 dated 12 February 1997, IV,A)

 

[5] UN General Assembly resolution 49/166 of 23 December 1994

 

[6] Vitit Muntarrbhorn, The Trafficking in Women and Children in the Mekong Sub Region

 

[7] Report of Mr Rajsoomer Lallah, UN Special Rapporteur on Myanmar to the General Assembly, A/54/440 dated 4.10.99, and to the UN Human Rights Commission, ref. E/CN.4/1999/35 dated 22.1.1999

 

[8] Asia Watch (now Human Rights Watch), A Modern Form of Slavery:Women and Girls trafficked into brothels in Thailand, 1994

 

[9] Images Asia, “Migrating with Hope, Burmese women working in Thailand and the Sex Industry”, Chiang Mai, Thailand, July 1997

 

[10] Images Asia, “All Quiet on the Western Front? The situation in Chin State and Sagaing Division”, Chiang Mai, Thailand, January 1998

 

[11] For details, see Asia Watch, “Burma: Rape, Forced Labor and Religious Persecution in Northern Arakan”, May 1992, as well as Amnesty International, “Union of Myanmar (Burma): Human Rights Violations Against Muslims in the Rakhine (Arakan) State”, ASA16/06/92, May 1992

 

[12] Medecins sans Frontieres, MSF France, “The Rohingyas: Forcibly Repatriated to Burma”, 22 Sep 1994, and MSF Holland, “Awareness Survey: Rohingya Refugee Camps, Cox’s Bazaar District, Bangladesh”, 15 March 1995

 

[13] Human Rights Watch, “The Rohingya Muslims, Ending a cycle of Exodus?”, Sep 1996, and “Rohinya refugees in Bangladesh, The search for a lasting solution”, Aug 1997

 

[14] Internal UNHCR document, “Myanmar Reintegration Program at a Cross-Roads, Notes on Issues of Concern to UNHCR”, not dated.

 

[15] Although we have reproduced the list of areas of concern from UNHCR, the summary of each of these points is our own, and does not necessarily reflect UNHCR’s positions.

 

[16] Letter from Lt Gen Khin Nyunt, Secretary 1 of SPDC to Mrs Sadako Ogata dated 5 February 1998.

 

[17] Black coat worn by Muslim women to entirely cover their body, including their face

 

[18] LHRLA, “Summary Report – Regional Conference on Trafficking in Women and Children in South Asia”, 1997, p.22-24

 

[19] Interview with Sajda, 19 – Karachi, Pakistan, 24.11.99

 

[20] Akyab, renamed Sittwe: the capital city of Arakan State

 

[21] Burmese currency – on the unofficial market US1 = approx.  300 Kyats in Jan 1999

 

[22] Interview with Zainab, 35 – Chittagong, Bangladesh, Feb 1999

 

[23] Interview with Zobida, widow of 24 – Cox’s Bazaar, Bangladesh, March 1999

 

[24] NaSaKa is the Burmese acronym to refer to the Burmese border authorities along the Bangladesh border

 

[25] Interview with Rubia, widow of 21- Cox’s Bazaar, Bangladesh, March 1999

 

[26] Derogatory term used by Rohingya Muslims to refer to Rakhine Buddhists

 

[27] Interview with Asia Khatun, Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[28] Interview with Yasmin, 35 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[29] Interview with Farida, 30 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[30] Interview with Rahima, 55 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[31] US Committee for Refugees,  “Voluntary repatriation or refoulement?” - March 1995 and Medecins sans Frontieres /F – “The Rohingyas: Forcibly repatriated to Burma” – 1995

 

[32] Interview with Farida, 30 - Karachi – Nov 1999

 

[33] Interview with Mobina – Karachi, March 1999

 

[34] Bangladeshi currency – US1 = Approx. 50 Takas

 

[35] UBINIG, “Vulnerability and Insecurity”, a study  among Rohingya women and children living outside the camps in Bangladesh, August 1998

 

[36] Interview with Mr Azad (not his real name) in Karachi in November 1999.  Mr Azad kindly accepted to talk to us in an open manner.  He had previously exposed the trafficking business in a BBC documentary.  He explained to us that he was brought up among traffickers.  There are reasons to believe that he was previously involved himself in this trade.

 

[37] Interview with Mehmooda, 45 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[38] Ajmer in Rajasthan, which houses the shrine of a Muslim saint, is a holy place for  Muslims, who  can easily be provided with accommodation and food as pilgrims.

 

[39] Interview with Rashida, 29 – Karachi, Nov 99

 

[40] Interview with Bano, 50 – Karachi, Nov 99

 

[41] Interview with Farida, 30 – Karachi, Nov 99

 

[42] Interview with Rahima, 55 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[43] Interview with Mehmooda, 30 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[44] Interview with Mehmooda, 45 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[45] In 1993, the Sindh police conducted a comprehensive survey on illegal immigration.  Their findings reveal that over one million Bangladeshis and 200,000 Burmese were living in Karachi without proper documentation.

 

[46] LHRLA, “Trafficking of women and children in Pakistan, The flesh Trade report, 1995-1996”, Karachi, and also Sanlaap, “Jonaki” journal, Sept 1997

 

[47] An Islamist extremist political group.  Jamaat-e-Islami has been offering basic social services among destitute as a means to propagate their ideology.

 

[48] LHRLA, “Trafficking of women and children in Pakistan, The flesh Trade report, 1995-1996”, Karachi

 

[49] Sindh Police and Citizens-Police Liaison Committee “Alien registration” – A joint presentation dated 8.12.1998

 

[50] Type of temporary shelter, used mostly to keep women

 

[51] LHRLA, “The flesh trade – Trafficking of Women and Children in Pakistan” , Karachi, 1993.

 

[52] LHRLA, “Trafficking of women and children in Pakistan, The flesh Trade report, 1995-1996”, Karachi

 

[53] Interview with Sajda, 19 – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[54] Interview with Mehmooda, 45 – Karachi, Nov 99 – Fishermen can usually earn a slightly better wage than factory workers, up to 100 Rs a day (=US$2).  It is obvious that her eldest son’ s salary has also been cut down to pay off the debt.

 

[55] LHRLA, “Trafficking of women and children in Pakistan, The flesh Trade report, 1995-1996”, Karachi

 

[56] Asia Watch (now Human Rights Watch), “Double Jeopardy, Police Abuse of Women in Pakistan”, May 1992

 

[57] Interview with FatimaKarachi, Nov 1999

 

[58] Interview with Aisha – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[59] Interview with Mobina – Karachi, Nov 1999

 

[60] This is of course in no way to justify the abuses perpetrated by the traffickers.