KAOWAO NEWS NO. 86

 

An electronic newsletter for social justice and freedom in Burma

March 20- April 4, 2005


**********************************************

WOMEN SAVVY IN BUSINESS

MON LEADER NAI AUNG TIN FOLLOWS LATE PRESIDENT

ARE THEY HOMO SAPIENS? BY KANBAWZA WIN

INDEPENDENCE OR FEDERALISM? HARN YAWNGHWE

BURMA’S GOVERNMENT CLOSES TWO PRIVATE BANKS

VEHICLE PRICE GOES DOWN

DISPUTED HOUSES AT THREE PAGODAS PASS RELOCATED

BOMB EXPLODES AT THREE PAGODAS PASS BORDER

LOCAL TYRANT KILLED BY UNKNOWN GUNMAN

READERS’FRONT

 

********************************************

 

WOMEN SAVVY IN BUSINESS

(Taramon/ Sangkhlaburi, April 4, 2005)

 

Over 70 percent of the passenger cars that travel along the Thai Burma border to Mon State are owned and managed by women, said a young businesswoman from Three Pagodas Pass, the Thai Burma border town.

 

“Almost all passenger cars are managed by women,â said the businesswoman on the condition of anonymity.  The women are savvy in business ventures, much cleverer than man in doing business especially in dealing with the local SPDC authorities and checkpoints along the motor road, she said.

 

The road from the Three Pagodas Pass to Thanbyu Zayat is defined as a military offensive area where portering, illegal taxation and other forms of human rights abuse frequently occur. Vehicles are regularly confiscated by the Burmese army for transporting soldiers and army supplies.

 

“The women are better able to take control of the situation when dealing with the soldiers in negotiating bribes and other such activities while traveling along this motor route with their passengers.  The women managers can easily deal with these problems created by the BA the other businessman said.  

 

Even though the majority of Mon women traditionally spend their time with household chores, looking after the children and cooking, some important business activities in the community are controlled by Mon women, said the source from the border trading business.

 

Women have a good reputation for doing business, most of whom have very little education. Such as Ms. Mi Yein of Thanbyu Zayat Township, Ms. Mi Kyin Than of Rangoon and Ms. Maneewan of Sangkhlaburi are prominent tycoons in the Mon community.   

 

Many Mon women have been involved in the national movement such as joining the New Mon State Party and the Mon Women Organization.  However, these activists and politicians are more educated than the businesswomen and many have degrees from university and colleges in Burma.  

 

As well, Mon women work for the SPDC as teachers and civil servants, with female teachers outnumbering male teachers.  A former university student observed that nowadays more Mon women are attending universities than men in Burma.

 

***************************************************

 

MON LEADER NAI AUNG TIN FOLLOWS LATE PRESIDENT

(Kaowao, April 3, 2005)

 

A senior member of NMSP, Nai Aung Tin passed away on 2005, March 30 at noon local time in Kaw Dut, Ye Township, Mon State at his parent’s residence. He was 66 years old.

 

The humble and quiet nationalist Nai Aung Tin joined New Mon State Party in the early 1970s and served in various positions as Township Chairman, Secretary of District Administration, Foreign Affairs Committee, Central Committee and Central Executive Committee.

 

He was the second son of Nai Hla and Mi Hla Yin and studied Buddhism and Mon literature when in the monk-hood.  He received his B.A. degree at Rangoon University

 

In mid 1980s Nai Aung Tin led a Mon delegation with the National Democratic Front mission in the long march to meet with other armed alliances including CPB (Community Party of Burma).  Nai Aung Tin married late in life to a community leader and school teacher Mi Kyin Hla of Hamgam, Southern Ye; but she passed away at the jungle camp.  

 

He took a strong position against the NMSP cease-fire agreement with the military junta in 1995 and retired after negotiations believing that the agreement would bring about no results for the Mon, but rejoined in 2000 realizing that it was best to work with the party.

 

Min Thant Zin, his nephew from London, UK said, “I personally met him in 1996 after the ceasefire between the MNSP and the military government.  He spent a few days at our home and read some books and asked me many questions about my meditation, he was happy to chat with me. Over that short time we got to know each other very well.  He did many good things for the Mon and the MNSP because he was very honest and stayed away from the corruption. He was known for spending a lot of time studying especially trying to learn English; he always referred to his English Dictionary. I would like to learn more about him if others are able to share their experience with me.â

 

He left no personal property except some books, testimony to his passion for reading.  He was a committed patriot who devoted his entire life to the Mon national movement.  Nai Aung Tin spent most of his time in meditation and was an avid reader.

 

********************************************

 

Commentary

 

Are they Homo sapiens?

(By Kanbawza Win)

 

Sawasdee, welcome to Thailand, previously known as Siam, has some of the world's most diverse flora and fauna and is a nature's lover's dream. The serene jungle lush and alive, snow- white beaches and crystal clear water with a fascinating world of colourful marine life is a paradise for tourist. Phuket, the largest island covering some 550 square miles is an ideal place. Hotels, motels and inns of world standard are studded along the beach of Thailand, can cater millions of tourists all around the world. But of late Tsunami has revealed the other side of the story when 30-meter high waves struck the southern seashore of Thailand and make bare the naked truth.

 

Casualties and destructions are all reported in the media but the concerned authorities endeavour to minimise it, lest the tourist would not venture and the TOT (Tourist Authority of Thailand) may lost its precious revenue. Compassionate and sympathetic individuals, governments and non-governmental organization poured in tons relief goods, services and millions of dollars to show their solidarity with the victims of Thailand. Driving along the roads of Phuket Island, one could witness all the hectic relief and rehabilitation works in progress. Over 70 participants from community-based, national and international non-governmental organizations from the tsunami affected areas have express their solidarity with the survivors and victims of this disaster, and acknowledge the tremendous empathy that has manifested in that area.

 

The Thai government took every possible step to ensure the grieving tourist families to locate the bodies of their loved ones, proper funeral and burials, deep sympathy and condolences etc. The Scandinavian countries whose citizens top the list are encourage to inaugurate their consulates in Phuket while the Foreign Ministry with the language experts are at the monasteries which served a huge morgue. Thousands of dead bodies, which are not buried on the shores, were divided into three categories, the Thais, the farang (Caucasian) and the Asians. Obviously, the local Thai and the farang could soon claim their bodies and able to perform their last rites before they were laid to rest. But nobody come to claim the Asian bodies. The bare truth is out of a total of 169,000 killed Thailand has confirmed 5,395 dead and more than 3,000 are Burmese.

 

Raison d'être is that they are Burmese workers and whenever one dares to claim the body or even venture to beg for the relief goods they are arrested and deported back to Burma. Once these unfortunate Burmese are on the other side of the border the Junta's authorities for trespassing the borders often arrest these workers. Up to this day more than 600 Burmese migrant workers has been repatriated. According to the report, a center has been set up in Phang Nga province, one of the six provinces of the Andaman coasts to help coordinate the "voluntary repatriation" of migrant workers. But how many of them are allowed to venture back is a big question.

 

The international mission formed by IOM (International Organization for Migration), the World Bank, UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCHR (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights) and UNDFW(United Nations Development Fund for Women) have often reported  that Burmese migrant workers were finding extremely difficult to get help, fearing discrimination, arrest and deportation. Vernacular Thai language press also fanned the flames of hatred by wrongly labeling them as looters. The meticulous scrutinizing found out that of that 17 persons caught for looting only three of them were Burmese who had to do this criminal job under compulsion by their Thai mafia.

 

When former US presidents Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, leaders of the American effort to help tsunami survivors, visited a devastated areas of Thailand they may not see a single Burmese worker, not that they were carefully orchestrated from coming to the foe but they belong to the alleys and back lanes where every morning, seven days a week, they have to gather before the light comes, a pick up truck pick them up and they were working hard in their respective work sites by the time the sun smile over the horizon. It was here that their better- half, accompany them with a suckling child or two to cook for their daily resilience. Poverty, marginalization, exclusion, conflict and discrimination amplify vulnerability of the Burmese in the disaster area were all evident in that area.

 

The Burmese workers of Phuket are categorized as 3 Ds workers because they are the one that implement all the dirty, degrading, and dangerous jobs. Dirty, but indispensable jobs like sewage, septic tanks, and toilet cleaners, undertakers, and morgue up keepers, where an average Thai would hesitate to take up the job, are all done by the Burmese migrant workers. Degrading tasks like house keepers, hard labours, (Kawsang), and very dangerous jobs like climbing high buildings or going down to the depth of the foundation where there is insufficient oxygen, or mixing dangerous chemicals etc are the kind of works which the Burmese are doing. Yet, in spite of these hazardous works they are not properly treated. They have to work much harder than an average Thai worker for long hours and more often than not are working half the salary of a Thai worker and double the working hours. The standard labour laws apply only in cities, where a VIP can see things and these migrant workers are at the mercy of their greedy employers.

 

Today hundreds of thousands of illegal or undocumented Burmese working in different sectors and industries all over Thailand have been marginalized especially in the aftermath of the tsunami catastrophe They are unable to locate their missing loved ones or hold memorial services. It seems that Thailand has taken a page out of the Burmese Junta where basic human rights are concerned for the Burmese. One is not surprise to witness see that the military regime is doing nothing at all for its own people, and even refuses to acknowledge the extent of the disaster and refused to release the real figures of the tsunami’s impact. 

 

For the Burmese migrant workers it was something similar of jumping from the frying pan into the fire. They have come to 'Thailand just to eke out their living, even though they know that they will be ruthlessly exploited but far better than staying in the hands of the Junta where they are exposed to forced labour and forced relocation. Most of the Thai have exploited these unfortunate workers to the full very much encouraged by the Thai policy.

 

On my trip to Phuket I met a person who narrated to me that his employer and his friends have gone with the waves taking his employer card and that he has not reason to continue to stay. Obviously he wanted to head back home to Burma where he would like to lay down his head. But, the laws and the conditions are such that he is forced to work in Phuket tourist area. The Organizations that seriously tries to help these unfortunate workers like the World Vision and other compassionate organization were hounded out from the Tsunami hit areas. There are so many jobs to be done by these workers that the employer working hand in glove with the security authorities would prevent these Burmese workers from going back.

 

Of course this is natural by product of the local employers as they are out and out to exploit the human and natural resources of a neighbouring country spearheaded by the so called "Constructive Engagement" policy hatched decades ago by the Thai Generals. Even now, the new Thai Foreign Minister Kantathi Supamongkhon has indicated that he will not lift a finger to help the Burmese attaining democracy by not joining Malaysia to pressure the Junta by withholding the ASEAN chair. It seems that the Thai authorities are hands in glove in encouraging the employers for the continued exploitation of the Burmese workers by this Constructive Engagement policy. However, Thailand will continue to be an ideal haven if not heaven for the international tourist and will continue to flock Phuket area. But, they must take care that they will have to leave their conscience behind in coming to this area.

 

Phuket

 

*********************************************

Opinion

 

INDEPENDENCE OR FEDERALISM?

(By Harn Yawnghwe: Shan Herald: March 31, 2005)

 

The S.H.A.N. news article on 29 March 2005 reported the resurrection of the Shan Independence cause and a rejection of federalism, especially the 'tripartite dialogue' advocated by my late brother Chao Tzang and myself.  This is an issue that Shan leaders have grappled with for decades. It is not really about 'Independence' versus 'Federalism'. Who does not want to be free or independent? We all do. The question is more about what is best for the people of Shan State. What will end their suffering at the hands of the Burma Army? If federalism will, we should go for it. If independence is the only way to achieve it, we should go for it. Both independence and federalism are means to an end - the welfare of the people of Shan State.

 

But a nation's freedom depends on many factors - the cohesion of the people, the economic might of the nation, the military strength of its army, the vision of its leaders, and, more importantly, historical circumstances.  We have only to look at the fact that Thailand and Laos are part of the Shan or Tai family and that there are Shans, Dais, or Tais living in India, China and Vietnam to see that historical circumstances and world politics play a major part in deciding our destiny. It is not sufficient to argue that we should be independent today just because Shan kings ruled Burma from the 13th to the 16th century and we were independent before the British came in 1886.

 

World politics after the Second World War pushed the Federated Shan States into the Union of Burma. Our leaders had no choice. China was in the throes of a civil war. Thailand had sided with Japan during the war and was not looked upon with favour by the Allies, whereas Aung San had helped the Allies although he had been originally trained by the Japanese to overthrow the British. Knowing that they could no longer remain independent but had to join somebody, the ruling Saophas decided to join Burma and tried to make the best of a bad deal with the Panglong Agreement and the 10-year secession clause for the Shan State in the 1947 Constitution.

 

Critics of the Panglong Agreement have said that the Saophas wanted to protect their privileges and that my father wanted to become the president of the Union of Burma. These allegations are not based on facts.  The question of who should be president was never part of the agenda. In fact, Aung San almost walked out of the Panglong Conference because he was so infuriated by my father's insistence on the rights of the ethnic nationalities. The Saophas were, on the whole, not self-seeking feudal lords. They were definitely not protecting their privileges at Panglong. Since the 1930's they had been training young men to take over the leadership. They were in favour of democratization and in 1959 they gave up all their rights to rule to the Shan State Government.

 

Whether at Panglong or today, the key question has always been what is best for the people of Shan State? Any decision we make will have consequences and we will be judged by generations to come as to whether or not we were correct.   I am not against those who want to seek independence. Who wants to be oppressed, have one's womenfolk raped, one's children and parents forced to work under appalling conditions, and be arrested or shot just because one does not obey an arbitrary order given by the Burma Army? Ask the Burmans. They do not want to be oppressed either. That is why so many have fled Burma. They cannot fight for independence because the Army is within their midst. But they can fight to change the system.

 

My questions to those seeking independence are these: Will we have more chances of success if we seek independence? Which country will recognize an independent Shan State? How will the government support itself? Will the new Shan State government be able to drive the Burma Army out of the Shan State? If yes, I will support it. I am also curious to know how the Burma Army can be defeated without bloodshed.

 

Of course, we are all outraged by the arrests of Hkun Htun Oo, Sao Hso Hten and others. And of course, I am outraged by the continued killing of our people and the raping of our women by the Burma Army. It is very painful to see our people suffering. But the future of the people of the Shan State is too important for us to allow our emotions to cloud our thinking. We need to think clearly and evaluate our options realistically. The question we should be asking is why the Burma Army arrested Hkun Htun Oo and Sao Hso Hten? Did they arrest Sao Hso Hten when he was leading the Shan State Army (North) or heading the Shan State Peace Council? No. Why not? Did they arrest Hkun Htun Oo when he was leading the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy and contested the 1990 election? No. Why not? Why were they arrested in February?

 

The generals are not afraid of wars of independence. They have perfected their technique of destroying the land and terrorizing the people to get at the armed few. They have also been amassing new weapons since 1989 to hit the remaining pockets of resistance. They are just waiting for the right time and the right excuse to put their plan to annihilate the opposition into action and win the praise of the world for eradicating drugs and terrorism. The generals, however, are very much afraid of politics. They know they cannot win in this field if people are free to really express their will. Just look at the 1990 elections. That is why they nullified its results. The generals are also very afraid when people unite. Their strategy has always been to divide and rule. Look at the KNU and the DKBA. Look at the KNPP and the KNPLA. Look at the KIO and the recently formed KSC.

 

Hkun Htun Oo and Sao Hso Hten's greatest crime in the eyes of the generals was that they tried not only to unite the Shans, but all the ethnic nationalities; not only the ethnic political parties, but also the ceasefire armies; not only the ethnic nationalities, but also the political opposition parties - including Burman leaders. This was something the generals could not tolerate. This shows that by working with all the peoples of Burma we are on the right path. We are hitting the generals at their weakest spot.

 

Another point to consider is that, after five decades of struggle, the United Nations for the first time acknowledged our status in 1994 by adopting a resolution calling for a 'tripartite dialogue' - the military, democracy advocates, and the ethnic nationalities. Prior to this, ethnic rights were not recognized. We were just rebels. But since then, our demands to have an equal say in Burma's future have been recognized as legitimate. Even Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations has said so. The arrests have also shown to the international community that the ethnic nationalities are reasonable and willing to have a dialogue but that the generals are the main obstacle to solving Burma's problems.

 

So are we in our frustration going to throw away everything we have achieved? Do not forget, our efforts have also thrown the Burma Army into disarray. Did they not just turn on each other? Was Khin Nyunt not arrested? Are Than Shwe and Maung Aye not distrustful of each other? Is there not confusion in the Burma Army ranks? This has never happened before in Burma's history. So, are we losing or are we winning?  The question before us then, is this. Do we fight the generals in the battlefield where they have superior military strength and ability or do we fight them politically where we have the superiority? Do we Shans fight the Burma Army alone or do we fight them side by side with others?

 

***********************************************

 

BURMA’S GOVERNMENT CLOSES TWO PRIVATE BANKS

(Cited from AP: 02-04-05)


Rangoon-- Two private banks in Burma accused by the U.S. of money laundering and links to drug traffickers have been ordered closed by the government for violating banking laws, the finance ministry said Friday.

 

In an announcement Friday night on state television, the Ministry of Finance and Revenue said the licenses of the Asia Wealth Bank and the Myanmar Mayflower Bank were revoked effective Thursday, March 31.

 

"It was found that these two banks have not strictly followed the banking regulations, thus their licenses were revoked effective March 31," said the announcement. It did not specify what the violations were.

 

Both banks have been accused by the U.S. State Department of being involved in money laundering and having links to Southeast Asian drug trafficking groups.

 

In December 2003, Burma's military government said it had begun investigating the two banks under the provisions of new anti-money laundering rules which had just come into effect.

The investigation was supposed to take three months, and under the rules, the banks could have their assets seized if found guilty of money laundering.

 

The announcement did not say if the bank closures were linked to that investigation, whose results were not made public.

 

The rest of Burma's 18 private banks would continue operating normally, the announcement said.

It said central bank administrators would take over operations and begin the process of winding up the two bank's affairs.

 

Depositors could come to the banks beginning Monday to withdraw their money, the statement said, also warning people owing money to the banks to make their payments or face legal action.

No banks were open Friday because it was a banking holiday, the beginning of the new fiscal year.

 

Both the Asia Wealth Bank and the Myanmar Mayflower Bank had been ailing since a national banking crisis in February and March 2003, when there were panic withdrawals by depositors from most of the country's banks.

 

The central bank was forced at the time to temporarily ban money transfers and limit withdrawals. It was also reported to have made huge loans to several banks, including the Asia Wealth Bank, to help keep them solvent.

 

*************************************************

 

VEHICLE PRICE GOES DOWN

(Independent Mon News Agency: March 24, 2005)

 

When the SPDC authorities announced they would seize public cars without licenses by the end of March, the price of the cars dropped lower than motorbikes along the Thai Burma border area.

 

 â€œCoronaâ a deluxe car model produced in 1997 from Japan was 1, 500, 000 Kyat prior to the announcement, the price of the car dropped to 5, 000, 000 Kyat after orders were issued.

 

Another car called SURF made in 1998 is only 2, 500, 000 Kyat (2500 US) today. In the past, the trader bought them for around 7, 000, 000 kyat (7,000 US) or 8, 000, 000 Kyat (8, 000 US). 

 

The cars are cheaper than motorbikes; no one dares to buy those cars except some Buddhist monks.

 

“Only the monks have an opportunity to drive or ride in cars. The most luxurious cars on the road today belong to the monks. One had to pay 5, 000, 000 Kyat in the past, now they are a bargain at 1,500,000 Kyat today said, Nai Par, who is from Moulmein (Mawlamyaing), the capital of Mon State.

 

The SPDC authorities announced that cars without licenses driving in the country are illegal. After this announcement, many car owners stashed their cars in the outreaches of the forests and at plantations and covered their cars with haystack.

 

“Because I worry that someone will see my car, I hide it in a pile of haystack. The car for transporting passengers today is now eating hay a car owner, Nai San Khin told his friend secretly.

 

Some car owners stashed their cars for several months, but some decided to strip off some parts and sell them on the black market. Others have done some body work to make them look old, while others added fake licenses. Those with good relations with the commanders of South-East Military Command in Moulmein paid 500, 000 Kyat for each car and are able to use them. 

 

The seizing of unlicensed cars began after Lt. Gen. Khin Nyunt was relieved of his post as Prime Minister by the current SPDC commanders.  The SPDC accused Khin Nyunt who led the Military Intelligent faction as being involved in illegal car trading, the current SPDC leaders, Lt. Gen. Shwe Murn and PM Lt. Gen. Soe Win ordered that all cars exported from Thailand and China to be seized.    This order had a negative effect on border trading done by ethnic armed ceasefire groups and border business communities. 

 

***********************************************

 

DISPUTED HOUSES AT THREE PAGODAS PASS RELOCATED

(Kaowao, April 1, 2005)

 

The disputed houses at the Three Pagodas Pass Thai Burma border area are to be relocated after a meeting between the Thai and Burma Army.

 

In late March, the relationship between the Burma Army and Thai grew tense after the Burma Army issued an order to the Thai government to relocate about 50 houses from the border area.  Both the Thai and Burma armies were on alert and local civilians at the Three Pagodas Pass area were given a curfew notice by the Thai authorities not to travel at night due to possible clashes between the Thai and Burma Armies last week.

 

However, during the meeting on March 31, 2005 they agreed to relocate the houses in the disputed area. “I thought there might have been trouble, but they (Thai) agreed to it, the villagers have already started to move from the area,â said Nai Pa. 

 

The villagers have lived on the border line for over twenty years, most of them are local Mon people who have no citizenship or registration cards from either Thailand or Burma.

 

Many of them went back to Burma“I am concerned about the Mon temple there because it will be difficult for the monks who depend on the support of the Mon community,â said Ablai a local resident.

 

*********************************

 

BOMB EXPLODES AT THREE PAGODAS PASS BORDER

(Kaowao, April 1, 2005)

 

A bomb exploded at the Three Pagodas Pass town at around 7:20 a.m. in the morning local time.

 

An eyewitness reported that a bomb exploded in front of the administration office at the Three Pagodas Pass border town but no one was injured or killed in the incident.  Nai Par (not his real name), a local businessman, said the explosion occurred after the meeting between the Burma’s Lt. Col Ye Naing and Thailand’s Sangkhlaburi township officer over the border dispute issue.

 

The cause of explosion is still to be determined.

 

But the local sources say that the Burma Army could be responsible or civilians upset with the government’s order to surrender their vehicles.  About 30 vehicles at the border town were confiscated by the authorities.

 

The relationship between the Burma Army and Thai has been tense since the Burma Army issued an order to the Thai government to relocate about 50 houses from the border area.  Both sides have been in a state of readiness and the civilians at the Three Pagodas Pass area were given a curfew notice by the Thai authorities not to travel at night due to possible clashes between the Thai and Burma Armies last week.

 

However, during a meeting on March 31 they agreed to relocate houses in the disputed area. “They agreed to relocate the houses requested by the Burma Army, many villagers have already moved out from the area,â said Nai Pa.  The villagers are local Mon people and have no status from either country (no citizenship registration cards).

 

********************************************

 

LOCAL TYRANT KILLED BY UNKNOWN GUNMAN

(Kaowao: March 30, 2005)

 

A well-known militia leader was assassinated along with his wife on his way to Thanbyu Zayat, southern Mon State, Burma, eyewitnesses reported.

 

Chairman of An Khae Peace and Development Council and militia leader Nai Nyein Maung (63 years) was killed together with his wife, Than Than Aye (42 years old) by an unknown gunman between Karoppi and Panga village of Thanbyu Zayat township in the morning about 9 a.m. local time on March 24, 2005, while the couple was returning home to Thanbyu Zayat town riding on a motorcycle.

 

An eyewitness came across the bodies of the couple shortly after the killing; the motorcycle engine was still running.  There was no sign of any gunman in the vicinity and no eyewitness reports of anyone witnessing the incident. The gunman or gunmen had been following the couple into an area where there were no witnesses.  

Nai Jaon Htow, a liaison officer of the New Mon State Party said the NMSP had no knowledge of who was involved in the killing.

 

Nai Nyein Maung was village headman for over twenty years and was infamous in Mon State for treating the villagers brutally under his rule; he was also leader of the Counter Insurgency Force to route out insurgents in the area.  He was notorious for corruption and brutal suppression against the local villagers and routinely tortured people who challenged his power or disobeyed him.

 

In the past, Nai Nyein Maung escaped a couple assassination attempts on his life.  He moved to Thanbyu Zayat for safety and frequently traveled to the village for administrative work and doing business with local authorities and military commanders.  With him in charge, his militia group was responsible for committing abuses such as extortion, extrajudicial killings, torture, and land confiscation.

 

According to villagers from An Khe, he killed people without a trail while his militia group was out patrolling in the remote area. The villagers, including NMSP members were arrested and tortured by his militia group. Some still remain at the police detention center.

 

*****************************************

 

READERS’ FRONT

 

Dear Readers,

We invite comments and suggestions on improvements to Kaowao newsletter. With your help, we hope that Kaowao News will continue to grow to serve better the needs of those seeking social justice in Burma. And we hope that it will become an important forum for discussion and debate and help readers to keep abreast of issues and news.  We reserve the right to edit and reject articles without prior notification. You can use a pseudonym but we encourage you to include your full name and address.

 

Regards,

Editor

 

*******************************************************

KAOWAO NEWS GROUP

 

Email: [email protected], [email protected]

Tel:  + 66 7 169-0971 + 66 1 561-0860          (Thailand)

Tel:  + 1- 403 - 248 2027                                (Canada)

http://www.kaowao.org

http://www.burmalibrary.org/show.php?cat=1215&lo=d&sl=0

Online Burma Library -- http://www.burmalibrary.org

 

ABOUT US

Kaowao Newsgroup is committed to social justice, peace, and democracy in Burma. We hope to be able to provide more of an in-depth analysis that will help to promote lasting peace and change within Burma.

Editors, reporters, writers, and overseas volunteers are dedicated members of the Mon activist community based in Thailand.

 

Our motto is working together for lasting peace and change.