SALWEEN WATCH HOTMAILOUT

 

December 1999 Vol. 4.

 

 

 

Contents:

1. SALWEEN DAM FACT SHEET,

Salween Watch,  November 17, 1999

 

2. WHAT'S THE DEAL HERE?

- Some arguments to show that the dams and elated infra-structure projects between Thailand and Burma are not illusions.  Salween Watch; 28th November 1999

 

3. Final Studies For Salween Dam Begun,

Shan Herald Agency For News, 8 December 1999, Issue No: 12 - 9

 

4. Alert issued over Salween dam decision,

Burma Courier No. 208 Nov 21 - 27, 1999 Based on an Images Asia bulletin & a news report in NLM:  updated to Nov 24, 1999

 

5. YEYWA, BILIN AND THAUKYEGAT DAM FEASIBILITY STUDIES PRESENTED,

New Light Of Myanmar,   11 November 1999

 

6.  SHAN PEOPLE DON'T WANT THE SALWEEN DAM: SHAN VILLAGERS: Shan Herald Agency for News. No: 11 - 17; Thursday, 25 November 1999:  

 

7. Statement of the Karen Youth Organisation on the 5 plans to build dams on the Salween River Karen Youth Organisation;  Central Executive Committee; 11 September 1999

 

8. RADIO MESSAGE FROM SSA SOUTH ON THE DAM PROJECT

 

9. MEETING POSITION ON THE PLANS BY THE BURMESE MILITARY REGIME TO BUILD A DAM ON THE SALWEEN RIVER IN SHAN STATE

Shan State Organisation, Chiang Mai, September 10, 1999

 

10. BURMA HINTS AT WORLD BANK TIES

From the World Bank's Development News November 16, 1999

 

11. JAPANESE BUSINESS INTEREST IN BURMA

BBC: 7 December, 1999

 

12. JAPAN OFFERS TO HELP REFORM MYANMAR ECONOMY, SPECIAL MISSION COMING

 Manila, Nov 28 (AFP)

 

13. OBUCHI WILL TALK TO MYANMAR LEADER

BurmaNet - November 20, 1999

 

14. ANALYSIS-JAPAN'S MYANMAR MOVES REFLECT CHINA WORRY

By David Brunnstrom, Reuters - BANGKOK, Dec 8, 1999 , as quoted in Burmanet 8/12/99 1999

 

15. Earthquake Hits China's Southwest

Associated Press, in Rangoon Post<[email protected]>24th November 1999,

 

16. WHAT YOU MAY BE ABLE TO DO ABOUT THE SALWEEN DAM PLANS:

Salween Watch suggestions and requests

 

17. SENIOR LEADER MAUNG AYE STRESSES SELF-SUFFICIENCY:  BBC Summary of World Broadcasts;  Myanmar, Rangoon, in Burmese 1330 GMT 22 Aug 99

 

 

 

1. SALWEEN DAM FACTSHEET

 

The most advanced dam studies are:

 

1) Tasang Dam

Location of dam:               6 km north of Tasang Bridge (linking Murng Pan and Murng Ton in southern Shan State); 80 km north of Thai-Burma border

Height of dam:                   188 m

Installed capacity:            3,300 MW (3/4 to be sold to Thailand)

Flood area:                          Reservoir will flood 230 km back up along the Salween River (until opposite Tangyan in Northern Shan State); several tributaries will be

                                                flooded, including the densely populated Nam Pang valley

Cost of dam:                       At least 3 billion US$

Developer:                           GMS Power Public Co. Ltd. (Thailand) Consultants include Lahmeyer International (Germany) and Electric Power Development Corporation (Japan)

Status of dam plans:         Feasibility Study has been completed (= Step 4 in the 5-step dam planning process). The Definite Plan survey, as suggested by the GMS company representatives, appears to have been started in the beginning of December 1999

 

[Important Note:  The developers, and various interested government and multilateral institution parties may already be using the Feasibility Study to find                                           financing from international banks to build the dam.]

 


2) Hutgyi Dam

Location of dam:               25 km from Burma-Thai border, near Pa-an

Height of dam:                   37 m

Installed capacity:            Only 300 MW

Note:                                     The dam would possibly form part of a scheme to divert water to Thailand

Flood area:                          Reservoir will flood back (about 30 km) up to the Thai-Burma border

Developers:                         Marubeni Corporation (Japan), Italian -Thai Development Public Co. Ltd. (Thailand)

Developers consultant:   NEWJEC (Japan)

Status of dam plans:         Pre-feasibility study completed (= Step 3 in the 5-step dam planning process)

 

 

Social and environmental effects of damming the Salween River

 

Around the dam site:

- During construction, cutting of new roads would lead to increased settler migration and deforestation

- The dam and related infrastructure is likely to be built with forced labour

- The huge labour force needed to build the dam would lead to sewage problems and forest clearance at the dam site

- Greatly increased militarization of the area by the Burmese Army to protect the dam is already underway - and is likely to worsen

 

Upstream of the dam

- Forced eviction of villagers from the flooded area with no likelihood of compensation (many tens of thousands of villagers have already been forcibly relocated above and around the dam site)

- Forest and wildlife would be submerged under the reservoir

- The ecosystem of  the water in the reservoir would be changed completely, killing off indigenous fish species

- The still water in the reservoir will cause an increased risk of water-borne diseases such as malaria

- The vast weight of the water in the reservoir will lead to an increased risk of earthquakes in the area (where there have recently been severe earthquakes)

 

Downstream of the dam

- Fisheries will be destroyed (due to inability to migrate, change in river flow, and water quality)

- Lack of sediment brought down by the river will deplete nutrients to sustain fish and other marine animals at the Salween estuary near Moulmein; this will seriously affect food supplies of local communities as well as commercial fisheries

- Reduced sedimentation will deprive large areas of fertile agricultural land of nutrient rich silt, causing greater dependence on expensive and toxic agricultural chemicals

- Reduced water flow will cause salt water to intrude up the river and underground, which will damage crops, soil and water supplies in Moulmein and all around the estuary.

- This is likely to cause die-back of the extensive mangrove forests around the estuary

 

Key Points for Consideration:

 

- Very serious human rights violations committed by the regime will bring discredit to any parties involved in the dam building (particularly Thailand)

- The military activities aimed at clearing the people away from the dam site have already resulted in huge numbers of displaced people, many of whom are terrorized, totally impoverished and desperately seeking refuge in Thailand

- The dams are being planned in a war zone where there can be no guarantee of security for the developers

- The costs of any dam on the Salween are likely to grow far beyond the already high estimated budgets, and will add to the indebtedness of the nation

- Thailand currently has a massive oversupply of electricity and has numerous other sources of electricity it can tap, including more environmentally sustainable ones for long-term supply.

- Relying on Burma's military regime for supplies of energy does not increase Thailand's energy security.

 

 

2. WHAT"S THE DEAL HERE?

 

SOME SALWEEN WATCH ARGUMENTS TO SHOW THAT THE DAMS AND RELATED INFRA-STRUCTURE PROJECTS BETWEEN THAILAND AND BURMA ARE NOT ILLUSIONS

Between October and mid-November 1999 Thailand and Burma appeared to pass through one of the most tense periods between the two countries in many years. This tension seemed to dramatically dissolve when Thai FM Dr Surin Pitsuwan made a single one-day trip to Rangoon prior to the ASEAN meeting in Manila. He came back saying in essence that the problems between Burma and Thailand were over. There are still big question marks as to what transpired to bring about such a rapid change in the Burmese military junta's tune. Aside from a “soft loan” of 300 million Baht [approx US$8 million] to make a 65 km stretch of the Asia Highway from Myawaddy towards Kawkareik, it has still not been stated what was offered to calm down the SPDC. It must’ve been very significant.

Burma suffers chronic daily power outages. There is nothing like a power cut in the middle of someone's favorite TV programme or the shutting down of the air-conditioners on a hot day that sends the message directly to the middle and business classes about the failure of the regime to solve the country's economic problems. It is also a major deterrent to any potential foreign investors.  It is therefore strongly suspected that a big part of the settlement of the Thai-Burma problem relates to dealings over electric power.

 

Two main possibilities seem on the cards. Firstly there are the plans to continue the studies for the Tasang site on the Salween, or even to build the dam. Secondly there is the building of a 230KV power supply line through Mae Sot -- MyawaddyPaan -- Bago/Pegu that would deliver some of Thailand's surplus power to Rangoon. Putting money into other studies and options is also a possibility, particularly in terms of helping with some of the development projects within Burma proper.

 

A power transmission line joining Thailand and Burma project would serve as a very effective temporary bailout for the SPDC in its serious power crisis. It would also serve as a way for the Thais to relieve their debts to the SPDC, Total and Unocal over the Thai non-acceptance of the gas from the Yadana gasfield. Thailand needs to get rid of some of its surplus electricity that it can not use or sell, and which it has spent billions of dollars building the capacity to produce. This problem will become especially marked when the giant Ratchaburi Power Plant that was built to take the Yadana gas is completed in the near future.   

It also appears that the go-ahead may have been given for the Tasang Dam definite plan study. As of the opening weeks of December 1999 there are a number of indicators that this is the case. Representatives of GMS, the company holding the "developer" contract signed with the Burmese military owned Myanmar Economic Corporation, have again entered into discussions with various Shan leaders with a view to going in to do an SIA and EIA without disturbance. This they are highly unlikely to have done had the feasibility study been rejected, and without new money flowing to carry out further studies.

 

A large team of 39 surveyors entered the Shan State on the 7th of December to carry out. The representatives reportedly said that Rangoon University and Chiang Mai University are going to jointly do the study. [See article ____ reported by S.H.A.N.]

 

Another indicator is that an American professor who was involved in arranging a workshop in September that included dam builders, govt officials and academic engineers endorsing the dam construction that was called "Transboundary Waters: The Salween Basin", has returned to Thailand. He has written to three NGO's and one MP opposing the dam, saying that he wants opponents to express their views. These moves are viewed with deep suspicion as being a way of trying to cover for the would-be dam builders absolute neglect of the EIA and SIA requirements until the last moment. The professor is seen as being exploited by cynical interests aiming to "green-wash" the fundamentally unsound project. The return of the professor is also taken as another indicator that significant amounts of money have been approved to have the studies done by highly paid academics.

In regard to finance for the projects, especially the Salween dam, it is considered that finance from Japanese corporations, Japanese banks or even ODA are likely to be primary sources. Bearing out this assumption is the fact that in the past month  there has been an unprecedented number of high level Japanese political, NGO and corporate contacts with the Burmese regime.

 

Representatives from the "Japanese Federation of Economic Organisations Keidanren" were reported in SPDC media and the BBC to be visiting Burma to study the business and investment climate. The delegation included Mitsubishi and Mitsui, large corporations previously and currently involved in power sector construction in Burma. [See article ___ below] 

 

Japan's PM Keizo Obuchi discussed with Gen. Than Shwe at the ASEAN meeting in Manila about the possibility of resuming economic assistance to Burma under the SPDC regime. The meeting between the Japanese PM and the SPDC Senior General is the first meeting between leaders of a major developed country since 1988. [See article ___ below]

 

The subject of resuming economic assistance - and not just humanitarian assistance - to the SPDC marks a major change of policy. It indicates that Japan may be prepared to break the economic sanctions against the notoriously brutal and recalcitrant regime at a time when it is becoming increasingly undeniable that the military's rule has been a failure and that the country is bankrupt, largely as a result of the military's ineptitude. The continually rising inflation rate, food prices beyond the reach of even most of the so-called middle classes, the low real value of the currency, the frequent power failures, the increasing evidence of severe ecological damage (including floods and droughts) and the decayed state of the country's infrastructure show that the sanctions are beginning to really bite on the SPDC.

 

The Japanese LDP coalition government's move threatens to neutralise the real pressures for change the sanctions have slowly been able to build up to. This pressure has built despite the refusal of some countries to endorse the sanctions, and the acts of self serving generals and corporate apologists who have been doing business with the regime.

 

Japan has been the most overtly eager of all the Western and Western aligned countries to resume financing and aid to the SPDC. It has even given money towards the completion of the Rangoon International Airport under the unlikely guise of "humanitarian aid".

It is possibly also of significance that some of the Western governments, who have frequently been  uncomfortable with the idea of economic sanctions anyway (as borne out by their long vacillation over South Africa) raised the idea of a "Billion Dollar Carrot". This idea, mooted by a British MP about a year ago as a way to encourage the SPDC towards talking with the NLD and carried to Rangoon by the UN General Secretary’s representative, showed a weakening of resolve on sanctions by Western governments. Australia's conservative government has also initiated its own form of constructive engagement with the SPDC, despite strong criticism from the elected people's representatives. The World Bank has just released a critical report, which some members of the the SPDC have evidently acknowledged. These factors will have encouraged Japan to make its moves towards engagement.

 

Put these seemingly disparate threads together and it is possible that a major deal has been quietly reached, or is coming together.

Some supporting points:

There must have been substantial contacts between the Burmese and Thai governments, and probably players from the corporate, diplomatic and multilateral organisational community in reaching the agreement. It has been pointed out that there was been a lot of traffic of businessmen shuttling between Burma and the Thai FM’s office in the lead-up to the settlement of the diplomatic conflict. The dam building companies are suspected to have played a prominent role.

The 230KV Mae Sot - Myawaddy - Pa-an - Bago Transmission Line, if built, would run along the same route from Mae Sot towards Pa-an as the Asia Highway that Thailand has offered the 300 million Baht towards. 

According to a leaked Thai government document dated January 1999 the power transmission project would be a Build - Operate - Transfer [BOT] project. It asserts that many businessmen have expressed interest in helping finance it. They noted the companies “GMS, EGCO, CITIC and others” as being keen. That GMS Power Development Co., the "developer" of the Tasang site, is involved in this offer is obviously suspicious.

The document notes that vital to the viability of the idea is (1.) the cost of the power to be sold to Burma by Thailand,  and (2.) the BOT company’s transmission charge. The SPDC’s raising of the price of power by 1,000%  is highly significant -- especially as it was done at one of the most politically sensitive times (ie: In the lead-up to the 8/8/88 anniversary and the 9/9/99 dates.) This is basically in line with the ADB consultant’s [Norconsult] recommendation to raise the price of power to reflect more accurately the costs of such business ventures and profit-taking. It probably also matches World Bank recommendations. At least before the price rise the demand was much higher than the supply. [It should however be noted that most people in Burma simply can not afford to pay so much for power, so many have returned to overuse of fuelwood.]

A power transmission line through Mae Sot to connect with the Burmese grid is directly in line with the ADB’s 1994 recommendations for the “Urgent Interconnection” of a sub-regional power grid and power sharing system. [Note: These are implicitly joined in the ADB consultant's recommendations to the Salween Dam studies. Indeed, the current series of studies of potential Salween Dam sites fit in perfectly with the ADB’s recommendation to study the hydropower potential of the whole Salween River.]

The official documentation states that one of the goals of the project is to deliver power to Burma from Tasang [3,600 MW] and Dawei [1,500MW] (the latter being a planned gas fired power plant to be located near the Tavoy deep-sea port and the Yetagon and Yadana gasfields). It says the power line would be "to import the present surplus power in Thailand, export back to Thailand in future."

Money used by BOT contractors could be privately raised, allowing the governments of both countries to avoid costs, also helping the Thai government evade some criticism. It is however still a possibly that there would be some government, multilateral bank or ECA {export credit agency] funding for the power line - and in the longer term even more so for the dams. Such financing is hard for opponents to trace, and even harder to stop. Indeed, some may think that the power transmission lines are not a bad idea anyway. Some may even think that the dam is not such a negative development. For those who do think this way, it is suggested that consideration be given to the reality that the dam is being used by the Burmese regime as a political, economic and environmental weapon in an attempt to subdue ethnic opposition - and that it has already had up to 300,000 victims - the internally displaced, and the refugees, and the hordes of "illegal migrants" driven from their homes in the Salween Basin.  The projects, particularly the dam plans, represent an exceptionally cynical example of a whole structure of unsustainable, inequitable and brutal form of development that supports oppression and inequity….

 Salween Watch; 13th December 1999

===================================================================

 

3. Final Studies For Salween Dam Begun

 

Shan Herald Agency for News, 8 December 1999, Issue No: 12 - 9

 

Source from the Thai border reported that Thai-Burmese group had entered  the Shan State yesterday to begin final studies on the Tasang Dam Project on the Salween.

 

The group of 39 included members from the GMS Power, EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) and Faculty of Geology from Rangoon University. The latter two were under contract by the GMS, said the source.

 

The Burmese team of 4, led by Dr. Min Sway, would find out the mineral potential up to 60 km downstream from the project site. EGAT, meanwhile, would be engaged in drilling rock samples on both banks at the site.

 

The purpose of the 7 month project was to draw up what the GMS Power termed as "a conceptual design", that would be studied by potential dam builders.

 

The project has stirred fear and opposition among the Shans, Karennis, Karens and Mons who live along the basin. The Karens have already issued a statement on 2 November saying "Since the present SPDC military dictatorship government is not a government elected by the people, it has

absolutely no right to undertake or give sanction for the building of such dams" and that "they must not be implemented without the approval of the Karen people".

 

The GMS Power, in the meantime, said there should be no undue worry by the local people, because funds for the construction would not be forthcoming until the social and environmental impact studies were completed and the people's opinion polled out.

 

///END\\\

For further information, please contact S.H.A.N. at:

Shan Herald Agency for News. P.O. Box. 15, Nonghoi P.O., 50007, Chiangmai, Thailand

Ph/Fax: (053) 807 121; e-mail: <[email protected]>

 

S.H.A.N. is a non-profit making, independent Shan media group. It is not affiliated to any political or armed organization.

 

 

4. Alert issued over Salween dam decision

 

Burma Courier No. 208,  Nov 21 - 27, 1999

 

Based on an Images Asia bulletin & a news report in NLM:  updated to Nov 24, 1999

 

CHIANG MAI -- A Thai-Burma border group that has been monitoring plans to develop the hydroelectric potential of the Salween river says a critical stage has been reached on proposals to build a huge dam and power station in eastern Shan state.

 

Images Asia (IA) issued a bulletin alert this week saying that the planning process for the Ta Sang hydroelectric project is now at the stage where a decision is necessary to proceed with the preparation of detailed plans for exploiting the river's enormous potential for producing electric power.

 

The site for the megadam on the Salween has been set a few kilometres from the Ta Sang bridge about 40 kilometres north of big bend that sends the river's waters flowing southeast towards Karenni state  If carried through as envisaged in feasibility studies, the huge concrete faced, rock-fill dam at the site would create a reservoir 230 km long reaching up to the Tangyan area in northern Shan state and would flood low lying areas in several tributaries of the Salween, including the densely populated Nam Pang valley.

 

With a dam head waterfall of 142 m and installation of generators having a 3,300 MW potential, it is estimated that  the Ta Sang facility would be capable of producing 23 billion kwh of electricity annually.  This would be three times the current potential for the whole country and almost six times national production at the present time.

 

Sources within GMS Power, the company that has been responsible for the feasibility stage of the planning process, have provided much of the information about the current status of planning for the project.  GMS is a subsidiary of the Thai construction conglomerate MDX, which entered into an agreement with Myanmar Economic Corporation to carry out the study two years ago.  MEC is a private company whose shares are entirely held by active military personnel in Burma.  MDX is also the main contractor for the costly new air terminal and outsized landing strip in Mandalay.

 

A decision on whether to proceed with the final, detailed and costly stage of technical planning could come as early as December, the IA bulletin cautions.  It would require the spending of millions of dollars and approval by governments on both sides of the Thai-Burma border. Eventually, Thailand is expected to use three quarters of the electricity produced at the Ta Sang facility, which could take up to ten years to complete.

 

The IA alert also revealed that senior members of the Shan resistance movement have been consulted about plans for the project.  It said that they are "under heavy pressure from the Thais to refrain from obstructing [it]".  Troops of Yordserk's Shan States Army, which has strong ties to the resistance movement, have been increasingly effective in challenging Burmese army control in central parts of Shan state that would be affected by the building of the dam.

 

Strong objections to any moves to proceed with planning and construction of the Ta Sang dam and another planned dam and power facility on the lower Salween at Hutgyi in Karen state were voiced at a meeting in October of representatives of over forty organizations representing the Shan, Lahu, Pa-O, Palaung, Karenni and Karen peoples who live in the Salween basin that would be affected by the development.

 

A joint letter signed by the organizations and four exiled members of Burma's parliament complained about being shut out of a workshop on transboundary waters held recently by academics, technical experts, Thai and Burmese government officials and multilateral banks.   While construction consultants and developers had been present, it said, "the indigenous peoples who would inevitably bear the costs of such development  [were] conspicuously lacking".

 

The letter warned that any damming of the Salween "would drown villages, disrupt agriculture and fisheries above and below the dam, . [and] be a grave hazard in an area that frequently experiences earthquakes".   It called for a process of consultation that  "fully recognizes and respects the human, civil and political rights of all the development affected peoples, ensuring their informed participation and fully compensating them for any losses incurred" and demanded that the process be open, transparent, honest and ecologically sound and sustainable.

 

If Burma's junta is close to giving its go ahead to preparation of detailed plans for the proposed Ta Sang dam, it is holding its cards close to its military vest for the time being.  A November 15 meeting of the 'big five' SPDC generals heard from Electric Power Minister Tin Htut on studies related to the feasibility of hydro projects in Patheingyi (600 MW), Thandaung (150MW) and Bilin (280 MW) townships but apparently nothing publishable about the Ta Sang (3,600 MW) development.  Hydro projects currently underway are at Paunglaung in Pyinmana township (280 MW),  at Thapanseik (30 MW) on the Mu in Sagaing division, on Mon Creek (75 MW) in Magwe division and at Zaungtu on the Pegu river (20MW).  Except for the Zaungtu project, which is scheduled for completion in December, the others are at least two years away from production.

 

 

5. YEYWA, BILIN AND THAUKYEGAT DAM FEASIBILITY STUDIES PRESENTED

 

New Light of Myanmar,   11 November 1999

 

YANGON, 11 Nov-The Special Projects Implementation Committee  held  meeting No 2/99 at the  Office of the Commander-in-Chief (Army) this afternoon, with an address  delivered  by chairman  of the Special Projects Implementation  Committee Chairman of the State Peace and Development  Council  Commander-in Chief of the Defense  Services Senior General Than Shwe.

 

Also present at the meeting were  Vice-Chairman of the Special Projects Implementation  Committee Vice Chairman  of  the  State  Peace  and   Development Council Deputy  Commander-in-Chief  of the Defence Services  Commander-in-Chief  (Army) General Maung

Aye,    members    of   the    Special    Projects Implementation  Committee Secretary-l of the State Peace and  Development  Council Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt, Secretary-2 Lt Gen Tin Oo,  Secretary-3 Lt Gen Win Myint, Deputy Prime Ministers  Vice-Admiral  Maung Maung  Khin  and Lt  Gen  Tin  Tun,  and  who  was specially  invited to the meeting, Deputy Minister U  Tint  Swe  and   departmental   personnel   and Director-General    of   the   State   Peace   and

Development  Council  Office Lt-Col Pe Nyein acted as master of ceremonies.

 

Minister  Maj-Gen Tin Htut  presented  feasibility studies  on  implementation  of  the  600-megawatt Yeywa Hydel Power Project in Patheingyi  Township, Mandalay  Division, the l 50-megawatt  Thaukyekhat Hydel Power  Project in Thandaung  Township,  Bago Division,  and Bilin Hydel Power  Project with two stages, each with a 140-megawatt power station, in Bilin Township, Mon State.

 

 

6. SHAN PEOPLE DON'T WANT THE SALWEEN DAM: SHAN VILLAGERS:

 

Thursday, 25 November 1999:   Shan Herald Agency for News. Issue No: 11 - 17

 

SNA, S.H.A.N.'s reporter in eastern Shan State, reported from Kengtung, that a visit to the villages in mid-October along the Salween had convinced him people there were in great fear of the dam project.

 

SNA said he visited the villages on both banks of the Salween and talked to the people there. "I was accompanied by Sai Wan, 23, from Hparnglarng, 7 miles west of the Takaw Bridge on the river Salween, and Sai Inn, 25, from Sawnglak, 2 miles east of the bridge".

 

The villagers told them they had been worried about their future ever since "a group of foreigners" began surveying the area early this year. The group was believed to be members of the AAM, a consultant firm working in contract for the GMS Power, a Thai engineering company. It was reportedly escorted by a unit from the 7th Brigade, Shan State Army North, a ceasefire group, stationed in Kali, Loilem District, "in order to avoid unnecessary clashes with the SSA South of Yawdserk".

 

"In our opinion, there is no need for them to spend time and money doing Social Impact Assessment (SIA) or Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) anymore", said a villager, "since they are going to destroy both the society and the environment anyway and are not going to say sorry to us, let alone paying compensations for our losses".

 

///END\\\

 

For further information, please contact S.H.A.N. at:

P.O. Box. 15, Nonghoi P.O., 50007, Chiangmai, Thailand. Ph/Fax: (053) 807 121

e-mail: <[email protected]>

 

S.H.A.N. is a non-profit making, independent Shan media group. It is not

affiliated to any political or armed organization.

 

 

7. Statement of the Karen Youth Organisation on the 5 plans to build dams on the Salween River

 

1. We absolutely oppose the building of the dams without the consent of the local people.

 

2. There should be no projects drawn up until there is a government in Burma that truly represents the indigenous peoples.

 

3. The projects should only be carried out after proper assessment of all the impacts.

 

4. Any dam projects should be carried out from start to finish with complete transparency.

 

Karen Youth Organisation

Central Executive Committee

11 September 1999

 

 

8. RADIO MESSAGE FROM SSA SOUTH ON THE DAM PROJECT

 

 

NR. 4/315

772 to M.K.

D. 201600 Dec, 98 RG. 85

. . . . . . . . . . . . Whether the dam should or should not be constructed depends on the decision of the people of Shan State. If they (the dam builders) want to go on (without asking for the people’s opinion), they should obtain approval from the (Shan State) Army beforehand . . . . . . . . .

Yawdserk

D 2016 30 Dec 1998

 

The message was also in Burmese and Thai.  With the message was the following quote from the International Rivers Network:

 

“In general, opponents of large dams do not believe that no dam should ever be constructed. They do believe that dams (and other development projects) should only be built after all relevant project information has been made public; the claims of project promoters of the economic, environmental and social benefits and costs of projects are verified by independent experts; and when affected people agree that the project should be built”.

 

 

9.  MEETING POSITION ON THE PLANS BY THE BURMESE MILITARY REGIME TO BUILD A DAM ON THE SALWEEN RIVER IN SHAN STATE

 

(Note: Due to danger of reprisals, exact details of the participants, date and place of the meeting have been withheld)

 

On  XXXXXXX 1999, in the town of  XXXXXX in Shan State, a meeting was held between representatives of the Shan Sangha, representatives of the various political parties in the Shan State that contested in the 1990 election, and representatives of the Shan armies that have a ceasefire agreement with the Burmese military regime.

 

At the meeting all the above representatives unanimously agreed to oppose the building of the dam on the Salween River at Ta Sarng, and any other plans to build dams on the Salween River in Shan State. Since they have no democratic rights inside Burma, they are unable to voice this opposition openly. However they asked that people outside the country, particularly the overseas Shan State Organisation, do whatever possible to oppose the dam.

 

Shan State Organisation

Chiang Mai

September 10, 1999

 

 

10. BURMA HINTS AT WORLD BANK TIES

 

[From the World Bank's Development News November 16, 1999]

 

In a possible reversal of policy, Burma (Myanmar)'s military regime yesterday suggested it would be open to closer cooperation with the World Bank, reports the International Herald Tribune (p.17). The apparent shift follows the disclosure of a recent World Bank report that condemns the Burmese government's economic management and calls for domestic political reforms.

 

Responding to questions yesterday, the government said in a terse statement that it wanted to develop a dialogue with the development bank. "The government of Myanmar has invited the World Bank representatives for further discussions," it said. "For the time being, there is no comment to give on the World Bank's findings."

 

The Bank welcomed the reaction, but added that many hurdles remained before it could follow up with further aid. "We are very pleased by this government response," World Bank spokesman Peter Stephens is quoted as saying. "We will consider their request, but it is clear that much will be required before we can begin considering a lending or advisory program."

 

The Bank's involvement will be greatly restricted by Burma's status as a longstanding delinquent debtor and an automatic veto imposed on new lending by the US and other Western nations. "Myanmar will need to demonstrate commitment to a broad-based reform policy that would address not only the economic issues, but also the other concerns of the international community," the Bank report is quoted as saying.

 

Assessing the government's statement, Georgetown University Professor of Asian Studies David Steinberg meanwhile said, "Their conciliatory tone shows they are now very keen not to rule out foreign assistance. Until recently, the top generals have said they could do just fine without any outside help.

 

 

11. JAPANESE BUSINESS INTEREST IN BURMA

BBC: 7 December, 1999

 

A delegation from the Japanese Federation of Economic Organisations Keidanren is in Burma to study investment and business opportunities. 

 

State-controlled media in Burma said the visit followed two previous trips by the federation since 1997, and was intended to produce specific plans.

 

Leading Japanese companies are said to be represented in the delegation, including Mitsubishsi, Mitsui and Sumitomo.

 

 

12. JAPAN OFFERS TO HELP REFORM MYANMAR ECONOMY, SPECIAL MISSION COMING

 

MANILA, Nov 28 (AFP) - Japan on Sunday announced a new initiative to help Myanmar rebuild its crippled economy but warned the junta it must prove its sincerity by undertaking genuine economic and political reform.

 

Japanese Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi said at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit here he would send former Japanese premier Ryutaro Hashimoto on a mission to assess Yangon's economic needs on Tuesday.

 

Obuchi told the junta leader, Senior General Than Shwe, during a meeting that if Myanmar proved its willingness to embark on radical reforms it could count on Japan for help.

 

"If your country is to tackle economic reform seriously, we are ready to support your country's economic reform with our experience," he was quoted as saying by a Japanese official.

 

"I would like government officials of the two countries to discuss what exactly we can do for you."

 

"Former prime minister Hashimoto is to visit Myanmar on November 30 -- please welcome him," Obuchi said, according to the official who hinted Japan may offer technical assistance to Yangon if the initiative prospers.

 

A World Bank report leaked to a newspaper this month reportedly warned that Myanmar's economy was on the verge of collapse, submerged in debt, choked by inflation and starved of foreign investment by Asia's crisis and international sanctions.

 

The country is viewed as an international pariah by Western nations which accuse the junta of gross human rights violations including forced labour and torture and of suppressing the democratic opposition led by Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi.

 

A reported initiative supported by the United Nations and the World Bank last year to barter aid for political reform came to nothing, with the junta apparently reluctant to ease its iron grip on the country's tortured political climate.

 

The Japanese official said Than Shwe was well aware of the need for economic liberalisation, saying, "economic reform is indispensible."

 

He said the junta, known as the State Peace and Development Councilalso planned to hand over power eventually to a democratic government, "but we are still in the middle of it."

 

Critics say a constitution currently being drafted by a commission in Myanmar is little more than an attempt to exclude Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy from a meaningful role in politics.

 

The party won a sweeping election victory in 1990 but the military, surprised at the scale of the party's support, has refused to hand over power.

 

World Bank sources have said any new initiative in Myanmar would first aim to build confidence similar to the bank's efforts in North Korea. There is little prospect of substantial aid being granted early in the process.

 

Observers in Yangon detect no sign the junta is ready to embrace a purported aid-for-reform payoff mooted by diplomats as a "carrot and stick" drive for reform last year.

 

Ministers said recently Myanmar looked towards the outside world for help but was prepared to go it alone and hinted it could endure a subsistance level of existence.

 

Signs of Myanmar's economic morrass are obvious on the streets of Yangon where inflation runs at around 30 percent and the beleagured kyat currency trades on the black market at 350 to the dollar, compared to the official rate of around five.

 

Power cuts are frequent, plunging streets into darkness at night.

 

Copies of the scathing World Bank report were delivered secretly to Yangon's top generals and Aung San Suu Kyi by a World Bank envoy accompanying a special representative of United Nations chief Kofi Annan last month.

 

A Myanmar spokesman told AFP this month the government had "invited the World Bank representatives for further discussions."

--

+============ Burma Group Tuebingen ============+

| Heiko Schaefer                  | [email protected]     |

| Beim Herbstenhof 42             |                         |

| 72076 Tuebingen, Germany        | Tel: ++49 7071 55 25 54 |

+-----------------------------------------------------------+

|              http://www.burmagroup.de/    

               |

 

13. Obuchi Will talk to Myanmar Leader

 

BURMANET - November 20, 1999

 

 

Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi plans to meet with the leader of Myanmar's military junta on the sidelines of a Nov. 28 Asian summit in Manila, Japanese government sources said Friday.

 

The summit will bring together the leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations plus China, Japan and South Korea.

 

Tokyo is now making final arrangements for the meeting with Gen. Than Shwe, prime minister and chairman of the State Peace and Development Council, the sources said.

 

The meeting would be the first between a Japanese prime minister and a leader of the junta, which seized power in 1988.

 

Obuchi reportedly has yet to decide whether to include Myanmar in a new initiative, expected to be announced at the summit, to facilitate the flow of "people, money, goods and information" between Japan and other Asian nations to help revitalize Asian economies.

 

With the announcement, Tokyo has shown it is assuming a policy of "constructive engagement" with the junta. And it comes only days after Myanmar's military rulers said they are open to a dialogue with the World Bank, which recently issued a blistering report on the state of the country's economy.

 

It also comes as ASEAN members are divided on how to move the grouping forward in a quickly globalizing world. At an ASEAN foreign ministers meeting in July last year Thai Foreign Minister Surin Pitsuwan suggested that the group consider easing its policy of noninterference in member countries' internal affairs.

 

Surin got support only from the Philippines, and the proposal failed to change ASEAN's basic noninterference stance.

 

But the democratic reforms in Indonesia and the recent election of President Aburrahman Wahid has changed the region's political makeup.

 

All of which could lead other ASEAN members into Surin's camp from where they could encourage democratization in Myanmar.

 

Obuchi appears to be stepping in that direction. He is expected to press for economic and political reforms in Myanmar and to urge the junta to promote dialogue with the National League for Democracy, a prodemocracy force led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi that was the overwhelming choice of voters in 1988 elections.

 

The NLD won 392 seats out of 485 in the 1990 general elections, but the junta insisted that a new constitution is necessary before transferring power to a new government.

 

Out of the 485 candidates elected in 1990, only 176 remained as of the end of October, according to official Election Commission records.

 

The rest have died, resigned or been disqualified by the junta. Most of those disqualified are either in prison or out of the country.

 

But there are signs the junta may be taking a new direction.

 

In Yangon, one military leader recently hinted at the junta's readiness to transfer power to a government that will emerge after a new constitution is completed and adopted by a new parliament, according to news reports.

 

Government newspapers quoted Lt. Gen. Khin Nyunt as saying, "The military has no intention of holding power for a long time."

 

But Khin Nyunt, the first secretary of the State Peace and Development Council, said any move toward democracy would take time because of "special circumstances" in Myanmar. He did not elaborate.

 

He made the comment while speaking Thursday at the Foreign Ministry.

 

"Some Western countries are pressuring us for not establishing a democratic system immediately, (but) they should realize we have the common objective of establishing a democratic system in Myanmar," he told Myanmar diplomats who were attending a course in diplomacy.

 

No formal talks between Japan and Myanmar have been held so far, although then Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto exchanged some words with Gen. Than Shwe when they sat next to each other at a dinner in the 1997 ASEAN summit.

 

Myanmar was admitted in 1997 as a full member to ASEAN, which also comprises Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

 

 

14. ANALYSIS-JAPAN'S MYANMAR MOVES REFLECT CHINA WORRY

 

By David Brunnstrom, Reuters - BANGKOK, Dec 8, 1999

quoted in Burmanet - December 8, 1999

 

High-level contacts between Japan and Myanmar reflect growing concerns both in Tokyo and Southeast Asia about China's influence in the military-ruled country, diplomats and analysts say.

 

The concern appears two-fold -- that Myanmar's chronic economic weakness make it a security liability should China ever become expansionist in future and that Japan risks losing long-term influence to Beijing in a country with substantial economic potential.

 

Like Western powers, Japan wants democratic progress in Myanmar, but analysts say strategic and economic considerations remain paramount and Tokyo is looking for ways to help stabilise Yangon's economy and improve conditions for Japanese investment.

 

Tokyo's worries prompted the first meeting of a Japanese prime minister and his Myanmar counterpart in 15 years when Keizo Obuchi met Senior General Than Shwe in Manila late last month. This was followed by a visit to Yangon by Japan's former premier Ryutaro Hashimoto, Obuchi's senior foreign policy adviser.

 

Hashimoto met senior members of the ruling military council, including Senior General Than Shwe, to discuss Obuchi's offer to help should Myanmar embark on serious economic reform.

 

Toshiro Kudo, a researcher at the Institute of Developing Economies, a semi-governmental Japan think tank, said Myanmar had grown in Japan's strategic consciousness since it joined the Association of South East Asian Nations in 1997.

 

``Myanmar used not to be considered so strategically important, but it's getting more and more so when it comes to formulating diplomatic policy. It also has significant resources and Japan doesn't want to give up economic interests to China.''

 

JAPAN OBLIGED TO BE PRAGMATIC

 

A European diplomat in Yangon said Japan, given its geography, felt obliged to take a more pragmatic approach through ``constructive engagement'' than Europe or the United States, which use sanctions to try to push Myanmar to democratise.

 

``They are worried that if this country gets weaker, China might take it as an opportunity to do something -- ASEAN and Japan take this as a real danger,'' he said.

 

Already northern Myanmar was heavily dependent economically on China, which imports more and more of Myanmar's rice.

 

``Of course, at the moment China is not going to take any big steps that would provoke international reaction, but say this country is in a mess and cannot peacefully ship rice to China, I could imagine a scenario China had to get rice directly.

 

``I believe the Japanese see the danger in the middle to long-term and they see a relatively stable Myanmar as a better guarantee against Chinese temptation,'' the diplomat said.

 

Even so, analysts do not foresee a full-scale resumption of Japanese aid, suspended after Myanmar's military killed thousands to crush pro-democracy uprising in 1988, any time soon.

 

Obuchi told Than Shwe it would be easier for Japan to provide aid if there were ``visible'' signs of democratic change.

 

A Japanese diplomat said this could include resumption of dialogue between the generals and Aung San Suu Kyi, Nobel Peace prize winning leader of the National League for Democracy (NLD).

 

Myanmar appeared to seek credibility points when it told Hashimoto it planned to reopen college campuses closed for much of the past decade to prevent student activism.

 

NO RAPPROCHEMENT IN SIGHT

 

But it has made clear no rapprochement with the opposition is in the offing, by reviving hardline rhetoric denouncing opponents as ``traitors'' and ``axe handles of neo-colonialists.''

 

An Asian diplomat was not filled with optimism.

 

``There seems no way out of the Myanmar problem. We've been trying very hard for the past 10 years to engage Myanmar but we haven't succeeded. We are trying to continue the process, but there seems to be no change in the NLD and military stances.

 

``They are totally confronting each other and it's very hard to imagine any substantial change could be made in the future.''

 

The Japanese diplomat said the most likely result of Japan's initiative was a continuation of Japan's policy of providing relatively small-scale aid on a case-by-case basis. This could include Japanese expertise to assist economic reform.

 

Japan wants Myanmar to cut trade tariffs and reform its foreign investment environment to make it more attractive to Japanese firms, many of which have lost money in the country.

 

Kudo could not see significant Japanese money going in without firm commitments to reform obstacles to progress, including the parallel exchange rate and moribund state sector.

 

Apart from political considerations, there were practical difficulties, including the need for Myanmar to repay past loans. Kudo said over a third of Myanmar's $5 billion foreign debt was owed to Japan.

 

 

15. Earthquake Hits China's Southwest

 

Associated Press;  Wednesday, 24thh November 1999

From: Rangoon Post <[email protected]>

 

 BEIJING (AP) - An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 5.2 rocked a county in southwest China on Thursday, killing at least one person and injuring three others, the state-run Xinhua News Agency said.

 

The early morning quake hit Chengjiang county in Yunnan, a province that borders Myanmar and Laos, Xinhua said. Chengjiang is about 30 miles south of Yunnan's provincial capital, Kunming.

 

The brief Xinhua report gave no other details.

 

AP-NY-11-24-99 2049EST

 

 

16. WHAT YOU MAY BE ABLE TO DO ABOUT THE SALWEEN DAM PLANS

 

Salween Watch suggestions and requests:

(a draft list to be added to as suggestions and new ideas arise)

 

 

(1.)  Monitor the possible / actual hidden roles of the Japanese Government, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, German institutions [banks? govt? private corporations?] in organizing for the dams

 

(2.)  Write a letter or statement of opposition to the harmful and unsustainable developments on behalf of your group or yourself.

 

(3.)  Encourage as many other organisations to write similar statements or letters, or to endorse an email petition (to be prepared and circulated soon).

 

(4.)  Help to build a national and international coalition to lobby in opposition to the dams through informing and organising people in environment, human rights, pro-democracy, cultural survival and other groups you may be associated with.

 

(5.)  Stage or facilitate events like talks by guest speakers, demonstrations, displays, etc.

 

(6.)  Help find support for local groups struggling to address the issue. This could be in the form of providing good contacts, helping find funding and equipment, or as volunteers who can work with us and them to investigate, collect info, write up information, etc.

 

(7.)  Help find good publications that will publish articles written by indigenous or Burma / Thai based researchers or summaries of the situation surrounding the Salween dam plans

 

(8.)  Consult with the Burmese democratic opposition for their views on the dams, especially the elected ethnic MP's who most truly represent the people in the areas to be affected by the dams.

 

(9.)  Research and write articles focussing on various aspects of the dams and their impacts

 

(10.)       If visiting Burma, visit any of the 102 places where the SPDC / SLORC claims to have built dams since 1988, and ask the people whether they were consulted, forced to labour or compensated for land, time, loss of health, etc. Also use any such opportunity to really investigate the realities of the matter - don't just accept things at face value….

 

(11.)       Collect human rights interviews and other information relating to the forced relocations in areas in Salween Basin that would be impacted by the dams, the roads that would serve them, and anything else associated with the dam making.

 

(12.)       Help affected groups and researchers to access information and insights into the dam plans and what they imply. Useful information would include:

 

·        Documents relating to the dam from subcontractors, govt. depts., financial institutions, army and intelligence units, multilateral banks, academics and others working in association with the project(s)

·        Reports and news clippings / articles relating to the actions and history of those promoting the projects (such as EPDC, NEWJEC, Nippon Koei, Italian Thai, MDX / GMS, Marubeni, AIT, UNU, the ADB(?), World Bank(?), etc.)

·        Further detailed information from and about the areas that will be affected themselves (such as 1:50,000 scale maps, UN agency reports, information from groups and individuals working  in Burma

·        Feasibility and pre-feasibility studies such as::

§                     The feasibility study for the Tasang Hydropower Project prepared by the Electric Power Development Corporation of Japan in 1999

§                     The Pre-feasibility Study Tasang Hydropower Project in the Union if Myanmar, 1998 Myanmar Economic Corporation, prepared by Lahmeyer International

§                     The Preliminary Feasibility Study of Hutgyi Hydropower Project in the Union if Myanmar, prepared for MEPE by NEWJEC Inc, 1998

§                     The Pre-feasibility Study of the Moei – Salween- Chaophraya Diversion Project, prepared for the DEDP by Panya Consultants in 1995

§                     Any recent study on the power transmission interconnection plans from EGAT, MEPE, DEDP, ADB, JICA or other organisations

 

(13.) Follow up contacts within academia to find what papers have been prepared and by who, and who is involved in the current and planned studies. As a start, attention could be given to the following institutions and academics for their role in the promotion and planning of the dam :

·        Chiang Mai University, Thailand -- Ajarn Suporn

·        Rangoon University, Burma

·        Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand -- Prof. Ashim Das Gupta & Dr M.S. Babel

·        United Nations University, Tokyo, Mr Luohui Liang & Dr Zafar Adeel

·        Mekong Institute [Institute for Economic Development and Cooperation for the Greater Mekong Sub-region], Khon Kaen University, Dr  Vanchai Vatanasapt

 

(13.)       Help facilitate for people from affected areas to go on speaking tours in countries where companies, institutions & governments are or may be playing a role in promotion or financing of the dam [Japan, Germany, etc?]

 

(14.)       Find out about the legal requirements for environmental and social impact assessments for approving and financing the dam construction in regard to the Thai constitution, multi-lateral banks, ECA’s and ODA.

 

(15.)       Find out what UNEP and Hans Seidel Foundation have been doing in regard to advising and facilitating on the EIA law drafting process in Burma, and if it is possible to get a draft of the EIA law (may now also be possible through Rangoon University or CMU) pull it apart to see what is wrong with it. It is bound to be full of gaping loopholes.....

 

 

17. SENIOR LEADER MAUNG AYE STRESSES SELF-SUFFICIENCY

 

BBC Summary of World Broadcasts

 

Myanmar, Rangoon, in Burmese 1330 GMT 22 Aug 99

 

Speaking at a ceremony to commission the Wegyi Dam, Burma's senior leader Maung Aye has said the main thing is "to ensure self-sufficiency in food, clothes and shelter". He said dams were being built as part of an endeavour to conserve water for agricultural use during the dry season, and that the expansion of arable land would ensure food sufficiency for the future population.

 

Excerpts from report by Burmese radio on 22nd August A ceremony to commission the Wegyi Dam, constructed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, was held at 0845 [local time] this morning in Paungde Township, Pegu Division...

 

Speaking at the ceremony, Lt-Gen Tin Oo, secretary-2 of the State Peace and Development Council [SPDC], explained the Wegyi Dam, which is part of the western network of dams in Pegu Division, is capable of irrigating 45,000 acres of farmland... Lt-Gen Tin Oo said that since 1988, the Defence Services government has constructed and commissioned 100 dams which have the combined capability of irrigating 1.4m acres of farmland...

 

He said Pegu Division, which plays a vital role in the production of paddy, is also growing other crops such as beans, pulses, oil crops and sugar cane on 1m acres of land. He said the Pegu Division hopes to increase the acreage to 1.2m this year...

 

Lt-Gen Tin Oo spoke on the need to have unity and explained that the government, the people and the Defence Services are working together for economic, social and infrastructural development of the country.

 

He said the dams, roads, bridges and railway lines had been built in the country with its own internal resources, without any foreign assistance. These accomplishments, he added, demonstrated to the world the ability of the Myanmar [Burma] experts and the resourcefulness of the people of Myanmar.

 

They demonstrated the Myanmar people's ability to determine their own destiny and to stand on their own feet. 

 

He said while united and determined endeavours are being made in the interests of the farmers and the nation, the internal destructionist group, which cannot bear to see the success being achieved in the public welfare endeavours, is engaged in instigations aimed at undermining national unity, the unity of the Defence Services, and national progress. He warned against these divisive instigations being carried out under the pretext of human rights and democracy. He said this destructionist group is foolishly and mistakenly interpreting the patience and goodwill of the government as a sign of weakness. This destructionist group, which enjoys the support and encouragement from some Western powers, is towing the non-constructive path of subversion and conflict. They live off the Myanmar land, but they have become the lackeys and political prisoners of the West. Their path runs against the interests of the national path. They are disintegrating by the day and are being punished by the people.

 

As for the SPDC, which upholds the correct national belief that the internal strength of the country lies within the country, it will continue to work for the national peace and stability and preservation of the Union, in accordance with its correct national path with the participation of the national people. He then called upon the local farmers to understand and to be aware of the stratagem of the subversive elements and safeguard the Union, while striving to improve their agricultural production.

 

He said the new force in the country's agricultural sector – the national entrepreneurs - are employing new technology and equipment in developing thousands of virgin and fallow land into productive farmland. He said 21 private groups are currently engaged in the development of farmland in the Pegu Division... He said the potential for future development of the nation is very promising and that no matter who tries to deprive the country of a good future, the country has a firm potential for development.

 

He called on the national people to further promote the nation's development through their labour and productivity...

 

Speaking at the ceremony, Gen Maung Aye, chairman of the Central Committee for Development of Industries, deputy chairman of the SPDC, deputy commander-in-chief of the Defence Services, and commander - in - chief of the Army, said our country stood on its own feet and relied on agriculture behind the closed-door policy for 26 years. He said the open-door policy is being practised in the country, while endeavours are being made for integrated development on all fronts. As long as we have sufficiency in food, clothes and shelter, we do not have to care about anybody.  The main point, he said, is to ensure self-sufficiency in food, clothes and shelter.

 

He said the country's population would reach over 60 million by the year 2010 and 100 million by the year 2050. By that time, the government alone will not be responsible for sufficiency food, clothes and shelter, but it will be the responsibility of the people as well. Therefore, the people of today are responsible for ensuring sufficiency in basic necessities of the future generation.

 

Gen Maung Aye explained efforts are being made to cultivate 14m acres of monsoon paddy and 4m acres of summer paddy, out of the 45m acres of arable land. He said the expansion of arable land will ensure food sufficiency for the future population. He said when the arable land acreage has reached the limit, measures should be taken to acquire improved farm technology, multi-cropping and quality seeds. He said dams, such as this Wegyi Dam, are being built as part of the endeavour to dam and conserve water from the rivers, streams, creeks and lakes for the use in agriculture during the dry season. He said the Wegyi Dam is the 100th dam to be built as part of these measures.

 

Gen Maung Aye said these are the works of the constructive force in the country which comprised of the government, the Defence Services and the people - the auxiliary force. He said construction of infrastructure throughout the country has boosted the Union spirit and patriotism. He attributed the achievements in the economic, social and administrative affairs to the cooperation of the people. He said these are the works of the constructive forces. He said internal and external destructive elements are, meanwhile, scheming together through various means to undermine the country's economy by discouraging foreign investment, tourism and economic opportunities. The country would have achieved more economic progress had they not hindered these efforts. Therefore, he urged the government, the Defence Services, and the people to work together in accordance with the desire of the people...