BRIEFING PAPER ON THE

HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN BURMA 2003

In Conjunction with  the 59th Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights –

Burma: The Way Forward”


by Khin Ohmar


April 8, 2003

 


Continued violations of human rights and widespread discriminatory practices against ethnic and religious minorities:

 

The Burma army continues to commit a wide range of human rights violations in the context of its counter-insurgency activities. All the violations of human rights and widespread discriminatory practices against ethnic groups and religious minorities have continued in the past year, particularly in the Tenasserim Division and in the Shan, Mon, Karenni, and Karen States in the east of the country.

 

In the border areas of these states and division, the situation remains bleak with land confiscation, forced relocation, and forced labor continuing unabated. Low-intensity fighting between the Burma army and ethnic insurgent forces continues with ongoing reports of extrajudicial killings, torture and looting and burning of villages in those areas. These violations trigger large-scale displacement of persons and flows of refugees to neighboring countries, as well as an increasing number of internally displaced persons.

 

In addition, there is international concern over a report documenting a systematic campaign of rape by the Burmese military against ethnic minority women living in areas of armed conflict.[1] 

 

The trafficking of women and girls to neighboring countries and the growing domestic sex industry remains a concern.  The high rate of use of child soldiers – the Burma army is one of the worst offenders in the world - also remains a serious problem.

 

Instances of extrajudicial and summary executions, extortion of money, property and land confiscation, and forced labor, forced portering, forced relocations and displacement, rape and torture have documented this year by a number of human rights organizations.

 


Forced displacement and Land confiscation

 

Forced displacement continues to be used for both military and development purposes in urban and rural areas. For in stance on April 5, 2002, the army, riot and local police raided a residential neighborhood in Rangoon’s Kamaryut township destroying several homes and detaining people. Twenty-five families refused to leave. Authorities separated children and adults before sending both groups to different detention centers. Officials ordered the remaining families to vacate their homes by April 7. No reasons were given for the forced eviction and it is unknown whether those apprehended are still in detention.[2]

 

There continues to be displacement in the civil war areas of Papun, Taungoo and Nyaunglebin Districts of Karen State, in central Shan State, Mon State and Arakan (Rakhine) State. For example, thirty-nine families from a village in north-western Arakan state were relocated between 7-16 June 2002. They were dumped in inaccessible areas in Maungdaw Township where there are hardly any roads and materials for building houses are not available.

 

In August, the army confiscated 2000 acres of land from villagers in Northern Ye township, Mon state (a cease-fire area) for construction of artillery battalions and military bases. The army has already confiscated, without compensation, more than 1,000 acres in farmland in southern Ye and 2,050 acres in northern Ye in 2000-1 for military purposes.[3]  Cases of displacement have been reported with the implementation of land confiscation. 

 


Forced Labor

 

Forced labor is one of the most prevalent forms of human rights abuse in Burma.  The local military units have a great deal of autonomy and for the last few years have been forced to be self-sufficient due to Burma’s deteriorating economic situation but also for economic benefit. Cultivation of military farms (e.g., shrimp), construction of military camps, fortifications, and other projects related to the economic support of military units continues at rates consistent to or slightly greater than past years. Military units continue to use sentry duty, forced portering and human minesweeping in the civil war zones.[4]

 

On 19 March 2002, the ILO and the SPDC signed an understanding in Geneva which allowed an effective ILO representation in Burma from, at the latest, June 2002. An interim liaison officer was appointed in May. The understanding provides that she will cover all activities relevant to ensuring the "prompt and effective" elimination of forced labor in the country. Under the mandate, the liaison officer, in cooperation with the authorities, "will have to help establish strategies to effectively address the root causes of the forced labor situation in Burma". Unfortunately there continues to be reports of forced labor, especially in the rural ethnic nationality areas such as in Mon, Karenni, Arakan and Shan states.

 

According to recent reports, forced labor is also occurring in cease-fire areas. SPDC authorities reportedly intimidated Kachin villagers in Machanbaw town who had passed information about forced labor in surrounding villages to exile-based broadcasters Radio Free Asia and the Democratic Voice of Burma. When the news was leaked that villagers were being forced to labor on constructing firms and buildings owned by the military, the military battalions in the area summoned the villages’ headmen and threatened them as well as teachers and other individuals. The authorities warned the headmen that all villagers would be severely punished if this kind of information reached exiled news agencies in the future.[5]

 

Prison labor camps continue to operate with little outside scrutiny in Sagaing, Rangoon, Irrawaddy and Tenasserim Divisions and in Mon, Karen and Kachin States. The death rate of prisoners in these camps is between 24-30% per year due to inadequate food, unsafe drinking water, malaria, ill-treatment, and insufficient medical care.[6] Prisoners, rather than civilian villagers, are increasingly being used as porters by the military. In order to comply with Regional military commanders request for porters, the Department of Prisons formed prisoner service units. Inside sources report that longer prison sentences are being given for minor crimes as the demand for prison labor increases. 

 


Refugees:

 

An average of 900 refugees a month have crossed into neighboring Thailand for the past 3 years, a number which attests to the high rate of human rights violations and the worsening humanitarian situation inside Burma.[7] Burma refuses to recognize claims of citizenship by Rohingya Muslims in Arakan state and in several states Muslims experience harassment and travel restrictions.  It is estimated that approximately 4,000 Rohingya refugees per month arrived in the Teknaf area of Bangladesh during the last 4 months of 2002 alone. 

 


Illegal/Undocumented Migrant Workers

 

In February and March 2002 Amnesty International interviewed some 100 migrants from Burma at seven different locations in Thailand. They were from a variety of ethnic groups, including the Shan; Lahu; Palaung; Akha; Mon; Po and Sgaw Karen; Rakhine; and Tavoyan ethnic minorities, and the majority Bamar (Burman) group. They originally came from the Mon, Karenni, Shan, and Arakan (Rakhine) States, and Bago, Rangoon and Tanintharyi Divisions. All said they left their homes because they could no longer survive. Many of those interviewed had been subjected to unpaid forced labor in the last 18 months. Types of labor included construction work on roads and in military camps, working on military farms, and acting as porters for soldiers for days or even weeks at a time. The migrants also faced constant demands for money and goods by the army. The army taxed the rice crop in kind which often meant that subsistence farmers were required to give or sell at well below the market rate a fixed amount of their rice, regardless of yields. This meant that farmers often did not have enough rice left over to feed their families.

 

The report also describes the life of Burmese migrant workers in Thailand, who face various threats as they make their way from their homes in Burma to Thailand. Migrant workers face abuses on both sides of the border, often at the hands of human smugglers. In February this year, Thai police found 20 bodies of Karen migrants near the border which were blindfolded, had their wrists tied and their throats cut.

 


State-sponsored violence against women:

 

Women remain highly vulnerable to human rights violations, especially in the non-Burman ethnic areas, forced relocation sites and armed conflict zones.

 

Terror and violence against women have been documented repeatedly as a tool used by the Burma army to terrorize ethnic minority communities. Women have been tortured, raped and killed, and women who speak against injustice have also been subjected to similar violence as examples of what happens to ‘trouble-makers’. 

 

A recent report entitled ‘License to Rape’, by the Shan Women’s Action Network and the Shan Human Rights Foundation, documents 173 cases of rape and sexual violence involving at least 625 girls and women by Burma army soldiers from 1996 to 2001 in Shan state, Burma. Most of the rapes took place in Central Shan State where over 300,000 villagers have been forcibly relocated from their homes since 1996 as part of an anti-insurgency campaign.[8]

 

Allegations of rape by the military have been made in other ethnic nationality areas. Credible international human rights organizations such as Amnesty International have reported on the use of rape by the armed forces. The International Labor Organization raised this issue in the context of its investigation into the use of forced labor. Previous Special Rapporteurs on the Human Rights Situation in Burma have addressed this issue in their reports to the UN. Language adopted by the U.N. General Assembly and the Commission on Human Rights resolutions by consensus addresses this problem. Most recently, Refugees International, another credible human rights organization has published a report entitled, “No Safe Place: Burma’s Army and the Rape of Ethnic Women” which documents sexual violence committed by Burma’s armed forces against women from the Karen, Mon, Karenni, and Tavoyan ethnicities.

 


Trafficking:

 

The U.S. State Department’s second annual “Trafficking in Persons Report 2002”, released on 5 June,[9] notes that Burma is a country of origin for women and girls trafficked to Thailand, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Japan for sexual exploitation, domestic and factory work. Burmese women and girls are sold into sexual slavery at an alarming rate, and the regime does not comply with even the most minimum standards for the elimination of human trafficking, earning the nation the ignominy of a "Tier III" designation. The regime does not cooperate in international efforts, including extradition, investigations, or conferences and has not signed or ratified related treaties and conventions. The regime is not actively involved in protection of victims, or in funding of NGOs to provide assistance to victims. Victims of trafficking for prostitution may be treated as criminals and incarcerated or fined in some cases.

 

The report notes that Thailand is believed to be the primary destination with an estimated 40,000 Burmese women and children - most of them from ethnic groups working as sex workers. [10] A new trend shows that trafficked girls are increasingly virgins who are in demand due to the belief that young girls are less likely to the HIV positive. In practice, young girls are sold as virgins several times until the amount for which they can be sold steadily decreases. When girls are no longer profitable because of pregnancy or disease they are often turned out on the street.[11]

 

 

Child Soldiers:

 

According to a new 220-page report by Human Rights Watch, “My Gun was as Tall as Me: Child Soldiers in Burma,” 20% or more of active duty soldiers in the Burma army may be children under the age of 18. Although there is no way to precisely estimate the number of children in Burma’s army, it appears that the vast majority of new recruits are forcibly conscripted and there may be as many as 70,000 soldiers under the age of 18. This makes Burma the largest recruiter and user of child soldiers in the world, and the number is growing.

 

Recruiters for Burma’s army frequently apprehend boys at train and bus stations, markets and other public places, threatening them with jail if they refuse to join the army. The boys are given no opportunity to contact their families, and are sent to camps where they undergo weapons training, are routinely beaten, and brutally punished if they try to escape. HRW received several accounts of boys who were beaten to death after trying to run away.

 

Once deployed, boys as young as 12 engage in combat against opposition groups, and are forced to commit human rights abuses against civilians, including rounding up villagers for forced labor, burning villages, and carrying out executions.[12]

 

 

 



[2] Kyaw Zwa Moe and John Moncrief, ‘Authorities raid neighborhood’, Irrawaddy, 8 April 2002.

[3] ‘More land confiscated by Burmese army’, Kao Wao News, 31 August 2002.

[4] See EarthRights International, More of the Same: Forced Labor Continues in Burma (October 2000- September 2001), found at: www.earthrights.org/pubs/moreofthe same.html ).  The report documents the widespread continuance of forced labor in Karen State, Shan State and the Tenasserim Division.

[5] Mizzima Newsgroup, “Authorities attempt to ban leaking of news on forced labor”, 12 September 2002.

[6] Source: Network Media Group:  ‘Two hundred prisoners replaced for 120 prisoners

in hard labor camp - ICRC suggested some prisoners are not suitable for hard labor’, 17 October 2001 and ‘Fugitive cases continue in hard labor camps ‘, 2 November 2001.  See also, Zin Linn, ‘Forced Labor: The Junta’s Revenge’ The Irrawaddy, Vol. 9 No. 7 – August-September 2001, at 8 for description of conditions in prison labor camps and forced labor generally.

[7] See Burma Border Consortium Relief Program January to June 2002 report, p. 1.

[9] U.S. Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, ‘Trafficking in Persons Report’, 5 June 2002. Found at: http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2002/10679.htm.

[10] Ibid.

[11] See Women’s Organizations of Burma Shadow Report to the 22nd Session of CEDAW-New York, January 2000, at pp. 30-31.

[12] From October 16, the report will be available online at: http://hrw.org/reports/2002/burma/.