News, Personal Accounts, Report & Analysis on Human
Rights Situation in Mon Territory and Other
Areas Southern Part of Burma
The Mon Forum
Issue No. 8/2001
August 31, 2001
The
Publication of Human Rights Foundation of Monland (BURMA)
CONTENTS
News:
(1)
Rape case against Mon women in Yebyu township,
(2)
Conscription of forced porter by SPDC battalion before ILO visit,
Report:
(1) Military deployment and huge land confiscation in Ye Township,
Mon State.
SOME ACRONYMS IN THIS ISSUE
SPDC - State Peace and Development Council,
SLORC - State Law and Order Restoration Council,
IB - Infantry Battalion (of
Burmese Army),
LIB - Light Infantry Battalion (of Burmese
Army),
MOC -
Military Operation Command (of Burmese Army)
NMSP - New Mon State Party,
MNLA - Mon National Liberation Army,
KNU - Karen National Union,
KNLA - Karen National Liberation Army
ILO - International Labour Organization
NEWS
Rape cases against Mon women in Yebyu township
(August, 2001)
On July 28, two
members of Yapu village militia force raped two women and attempted to rape a
woman in Aleskan village, Yebyu township of Tenasserim Division, after they
were drunk.
In the evening of July 28, these militiamen from Yapu village, deputy-commander
of military force, U Aung Win and one of his followers, went and visited to
their friends in Aleskan village, which is about 10 miles far from their
village. During they were with their friends, they drank a lots of local
alcohol and were drunk at mid-night. So, their friends kept their guns and
proposed to give them back in the morning.
After they were drunk, thee two militiamen left from their friend's house and
tried to climb other villagers' houses with only women while their husbands
were away in farms or worked in fruit plantations. When they climbed to these
houses, they took their knifes along with them.
First at mid-night, U Aung Win's follower climbed to a woman, Ma Mi's house who
is about 50 years old. He tried to rape her by pointing with his sharp knife When the woman refused, he also cut her hands with knife,
and pointed his knife in her throat and other body parts and then raped her. As
she worried for the killing by the militiaman, he could not cry for help.
At the similar time, U Aung Win also climbed to another house, in where only a
woman, Mi Pae (about 40 years old) stayed and tried to rape her. When she
refused for his rape, he also cut Mi Pae's hands, beat her, pointed with knife
and raped her. After rape, she also lost consciousness because too much blood
came out. Then, U Aung Win climbed to another house nearby, in where only a
young lady, Mi Kyae Lun (about 20 years old) and tried to rape her again. As
she knew as the man tried to rape her, she urgently asked for help. When he
tried to cut her with knife, he ran around in her house and escaped.
After she cried loudly, the villagers came to help her. As they knew, two
militiamen raped some women in the village and they also helped other two
women, Mi Pae and Ma Mi. When the villagers arrived, Mi Pae had lost a lot of
blood in serious condition. The villagers also could not stop blood flow of her
and they urgently sent her by truck to Yapu village for treatment with a medic
in that village.
As Ma Mi did not have serious injury, the villagers did not bring her to medic
for treatment. Then Aleskan villagers arrested the two rapists and sent them to
Yapu village and told about the rape cases and violence against to the militia
commander. However, the rapists did not receive serious punishment as they were
dismissed from the group and got permission for retirement.
Conscription of Forced Porters by SPDC Battalion before ILO's Visit
(August, 2001)
Just before ILO's visit
to Burma for investigation about the requisition of forced labour, that has
been widespread in Burma, SPDC's LIB No. 232, which operated the military
activities in Kya-Inn-seikyi township of Karen State in July, arrested some
porters in Taung-bauk village tracks, used them for several days without
payment and the villagers also had to provide porter fees. On July 6, a column
of LIB No. 232, led by Maj. Kyaw Htoo Lwin, that moved from Anan-gwin village,
the border village of Karen and Mon States, on Three Pagoda Pas - Thanbyuzayat
motor road, arrived to Taung-bauk village tract. Soon after the troops arrived
into main village, Taung-bauk, they called a meeting with village headmen and
requested headmen to provide them with 18 porters to carry their ammunitions
and food supplies.
In Taung-bauk village
tract, there are four villages, namely, Taung-bauk, War-myin-gone, Kaw-paw-law
and Naung-pyae, and so that the village headmen have to manage to provide them
with 18 porters. Although the army commanders promised he would release them
and replaced with another villagers, but they broke the promise and took these
porters for 19 days totally.
During they were in the
porter service, LIB No. 232 requested the headmen to provide these porters with
1000 Kyat per day for porter fee. Thus, the headmen had to collect 18, 000 Kyat
every day and send to commander. As the headmen had to collect for 19 days,
they totally had to pay to LIB No. 232 commanders with 342,000 Kyat as porter
fees.
When the porters were
released, most of them said that they did not receive full amount of porter
fees and the commanders had not paid them with complete porter fees that they
received from the villagers.
Again, on July 31, 2001,
another military column of LIB No. 232 led by Maj. Soe Tun arrived into that
village tract and requested another 8 porters. Similarly to the previous
military column, the commander also asked 8000 Kyat per day for porter fee. The
army took the porters for two days and so that the village headmen had to
provide 16, 000 Kyat totally. Therefore, in the month of July alone, Taung-bauk
village tract provided 26 porters and paid 35, 800 Kyat of porter fee.
Actually, in July,
although the SPDC authorities had widespread explained about Order 1/99 that
claimed stopping the practice of forced labour in many parts of Burma for a
preparation to provide misinformation to ILO, before it conducted an
investigation on forced labour, LIB No. 232 was still using the civilians as
porters in dangerous battle-fields.
REPORT
Military Deployment and Huge Land Confiscation in Ye Township, Mon State
I. Background of Ye Township
Ye Township is in Mon State and it situates
in southern part of the State and the majority of local inhabitants in this township are Mon people and some Karen villagers also
stay in eastern part of township area.
Since the beginning of civil war in Burma until NMSP ceasefire deal with
the then military government, SLORC, the whole township area, except
Ye Town, was under the control of rebel armies and the whole township area was
in war zone.
The eastern part of this township borders with Thailand and western part of
township has a long seacoast with Andaman Sea. As geographical location, the local
inhabitants are mainly farmers who are growing paddy and fruit trees in the
area. Many villagers who are
inhabitants in coastal area involve in fishing works
along the area.
In Mon State, there are two main Districts and these are Moulmein (Mawlamyaing by
SPDC) District and Thaton District. Ye Township is in Moulmein township area,
and it has the largest township area among 10 Township of Mon State. It has about 1085 square miles. Township has good communication because the motor and railway road, which connect Mon State and
Tenasserim Division pass through Township area.
In this township, most of the areas are covered with rubber, fruit and betel
nut plantations in eastern part of Township area and with paddy-fields in
western part of the area. And, there
arc also many thousands acres of forests also cover in many part
of the area. Therefore, geographically,
both Mon and Karen rebels could take base and launch their military activities
against the Burmese Army properly. For
many decades, the troops of Burmese Army could not
suppress the rebellion.
As the local people are Mon and Karen inhabitants, normally, the rebel soldiers
have gotten supports from the civilians and so that the villagers
in the area were constantly accused as rebel-supporters. With this accusation, many Mon civilians
from this township area had been killed, tortured and some women were raped
during the course of armed conflict between NMSP and successive military
regimes in Rangoon until NMSP dealt ceasefire with the
then military regime, SLORC.
After NMSP entered for ceasefire, the abuses that related to suspicion of
rebel-supporters have been reduced. But a Mon splinter armed group still
operated their military activities against the Burmese Army in both southern
and northern parts of Township along the seacoast since
1997, while NMSP controls in eastern part of Township
area and along Ye river area (look in
the map). Thus, the civilians
outside of NMSP control area have been
still suffered from human rights
violations that related to suspicion of rebel-supporters.
Additionally, in duration before and after NMSP ceasefire, the civilians in both Ye town and villagers in various township area had to provide various types of taxation, contribute unpaid labour and food and
other supplies for the military
battalions, which have been active in the whole township area. Previously, in this township area, the Burmese Army four military
battalions, namely, IB No. 61, IB No. 106, LIB No. 343 and LIB No. 299.
When these military battalions operated military activities against
rebel armies in the area, the soldiers constantly took foods from
villagers and conscripted the villagers to be porters to carry their
ammunitions and food supplies. And,
whenever the army or township authorities implemented road construction and other development projects, the
civilians in the concerned area are forced to be unpaid labourers.
|
In 1999, when the Burmese Army deployed a new military battalion, LIB No. 299
in southern part of Ye Township area, that
battalion confiscated about 200 acres of lands, which were rubber and fruit plantations
owned by villagers by Koe-mile and Hangan (Look in the map). Then in 2000, LIB No. 343 confiscated
another 500 acres of lands that mostly grown with rubber and betel-nut
plantations owned by Aru-taung and Kun-duu
villagers.
II. New Plan of Military Deployment
As SPDC attempted to grip in power for longer term, it has orderly increased
the troops from the previous number of 300,000
up to 500,000 troops. Although it
dealt ceasefire with NMSP for over six
years, it never planned to settle political
problems by means of politics.
At the same time, by taking as a good opportunity in duration of ceasefire while NMSP stops fighting
against it, the Burmese Army or SPDC could deploy more of its soldiers in Mon State.
Although the objectives of SPDC are unclear to
prevent external enemy or internal enemy or ethnic rebels, the main
clear activity of SPDC is to block NMSP or MNLA troops in the future. With a proper plan, the Burmese Army could occupy the bases and restrict the activities of MNLA troops easily if NMSP resumed fighting against them.
In 2001, SPDC planned to deploy a Military Operation Command (MOC) and 9
military battalions under that command. The name of Military Operation Command is
MOC No. 19 and the battalions under this command are: LIB
No. 583; No. 584; No. 585; No. 586; No. 587; No. 588; No. 589, No. 590, No. 591. According to
formation of Burmese Army's Military Operation Command, each command has 10
battalions under it command and ordered them to operate military activities in
a specific area.
Like the previous military battalions, when the Burmese Army deployed its
battalions, army and the authorities confiscated many thousands acres
of lands from the civilians, in which they grew rubber trees and other fruit
plantations.
SPDC planned to deploy the headquarters of
MOC No. 19 on Ye Town and deployed other battalions' troops in various parts
of Township area. Although Ye township
has a wider wild land, in which the civilians never grew any trees, SPDC's
targeted only lands with rubber and other fruit trees. Why?
Since over 4-5 years, when the then military regime, SLORC, increased its troops number, because of its budget
shortage problem, it ordered to its military battalions to plan for
self-reliance or to support themselves with foods and
fund. Because of this order, the concerned military battalions confiscated
lands to grow paddy and other fruit trees, collected more fund to use in each
battalion's expenses and other costs.
Later, when the Burmese Army deployed new military battalions, the concerned
military commands planned to confiscate lands, in which valuable trees are
grown. Whenever the army confiscated
lands, they never paid any compensation cost to those who
lost the lands and trees. The
battalions also took the lands and trees and collected
rubber liquid and other fruits and sold them in the markets for their battalion
fund.
This land confiscation was started under the command of Southeast Military
Command. Since January 2001, Chief Commander of Southeast Military Command, Maj. Gen.
Sit Maung, who was killed in plane crush in late
February 2001, came to this area and looked for the lands that they could get
valuable trees for the battalions fund. After his return, the local military
battalions, IB No. 61 and LIB No. 343 have taken
responsibility to find the possible lands, measured the lands and then
confiscated and transferred to concerned new
battalions.
First in April, 2001, two new military battalions, LIB No. 583 and No. 591
confiscated lands in eastern part of township area and then, other
3 battalions confiscated the lands in northern part of township area. At the same time, MOC No.
19 confiscated lands in Ye Town.
III. The Serial Land Confiscation A. Land
Confiscation by MOC No. 19
A. Land confiscation by MOC No. 19
MOC No. 19 is the main command that has to control and administrate all
military activities of all military battalions, which
are under its command. It required a
safe place to command all its military activities and
so that it has taken some lands in Ye Town.
Ye town was established for many hundreds years and
generally, the citizens have stayed in the middle of town and they grew rubber
trees and other fruit trees in the surrounding area.
Recently, LIB No. 343 deployed its military barracks in 1990 in eastern part of
Ye town and confiscated some lands from the civilians in Ye town
area. Thus, LIB No. 343 had battalion
compound in town before it moved to new place and confiscated another lands in
northern part of township area, near Aru-taung village in 1999. In April of 2001, when SPDC or Southeast
Military Command planned to deploy MOC No. 19 in Ye
town, it replaced that command in LIB No. 343 compound.
However, as MOC No. 19 complained the space of lands was not enough, it
confiscated more lands that close to the compound. In land confiscation of Command No. 19, the
civilians in the list below lost their
properties and they did not receive any compensation costs from SPDC or the
concerned military battalions.
The list of land owners, the amounts of lands, trees grown
in these lands and the estimation cost of the
lands are described as below:
List 1:
|
Names of No. land Owners |
Amount of
land (in acres) |
Types of trees & numbers of |
Estimation cost of
lands and trees (in Kyat) |
|
|||||||
|
Rubber |
Betel-nut |
Lime |
|
||||||||
|
1. NaiKalar |
5 |
150 |
- |
- |
300,
000 |
|
|||||
|
2. Nai Twit |
3.5 |
40 |
- |
100 |
700, 000 |
||||||
|
3: Nai Thar San |
4 |
70 |
|
100 |
700, 000 |
||||||
|
4. Nai Aung Win |
3.5 |
200 |
200 |
50 |
700, 000 |
||||||
|
5. Nai Han Pe |
1 |
- |
- |
400 |
1,000,000 |
||||||
|
6. Nai Aung Thar |
0.5 |
30 |
- |
- |
50, 000 |
||||||
|
7. Nai Tun Ngwe |
1.5 |
200 |
- |
- |
100,000 |
||||||
|
8. Nai Shwe Hla |
6 |
- |
200 |
100 |
700, 000 |
||||||
|
Total |
31 |
690 |
400 |
750 |
4, 250, 000 |
||||||
Because of this land confiscation 8 families
of 59 people became landless and jobless.
Normally, most Mon inhabitants in Ye town are mainly
farmers and they have only skills working in agriculture. Only little number of them works other occupations such as traders,
vendors and other. When the army took their
lands, they have no other choice to select works and would become jobless for
longer time. As they have no experience of working other works, they tried to be
labourers in agriculture works of other people.
B. Land
Confiscation by LIB No. 588
In March 2001, with a plan to deploy a new
military battalion, LIB No. 588 under the command of MOC No. 19, that battalion confiscated lands near Tamort-kanin village, (Look
in the map), which is about 20 miles far
from Ye town in northern part. The
lands which confiscated by LIB No. 588 were on Moulmein-Ye
motor road. As the lands in various
parts of Ye Township, Mon villagers from Tamort-kanin village have grown rubber and various fruit trees.
Accordingly to Tamort-kanin villagers, "the army confiscated about 329
acres of lands' from 21 families of the villagers. As Tamort-kanin villagers took these lands
for many years and have maintained since their ancestors, each plantation is
quite large and the cost for lands is also quite high because the land soil is good for rubber and other fruit trees. In these lands, the villagers have used
growing rubber and betel-nut plantations and some lands are
paddy-growing farms.
The list of villagers who lost the lands, area of lands,
types of trees in lands and estimated cost of lands are mentioned as below:
List 2:
|
Names of No. land Owners |
Amount of land (in
acres) |
Types of trees & numbers
of trees |
Estimation cost of lands and trees (in
Kyat) |
||||||||
|
Rubber |
Betel-nut |
Rice-field |
|||||||||
|
1. Nai Maung Aye |
35 |
2500 |
.1000 |
- |
7, 000, 000 |
||||||
|
2. NaiWa |
19 |
2000 |
100 . |
- |
3, 800. 000 |
||||||
|
3. Nai Pe |
50 |
4000 |
1500 |
- |
10,000,000 |
||||||
|
4. NaiNaing |
25 |
1600 |
- |
500 baskets |
4, 000, 000 |
||||||
|
5. Nai Pan Sein |
5 |
500 |
- |
- |
500, 000 |
||||||
|
6. Nai Ha Mae |
6 |
600 |
- |
- |
500, 000 |
||||||
|
7. Nai Lin |
10 |
1200 |
- |
- |
1,800,000 |
||||||
|
8. Nai Late Khae |
20 |
'1500 |
- |
- |
2, 500, 000 |
||||||
|
9. Nai Pay |
8 |
900 |
- |
- |
1,000,000 |
||||||
|
10. NaiPhoKalar |
10 |
1200 |
- |
- |
1,800,000 |
||||||
|
11. NaiYat |
16 |
750 |
450 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
||||||
|
12.
NaiLaing |
10 |
1200 |
200 |
- |
1,300,000 |
||||||
|
13. NaiKunBa |
23 |
2000 |
1500 |
- |
3, 500, 000 |
|
|||||
|
14. NaiPaRoy |
12 |
1200 |
- |
- |
1,200,000 |
|
|||||
|
15. Nai Tun Aung |
12 |
900 |
1000 |
- |
2, 500, 000 |
|
|||||
|
16. NaiSoe |
8 |
800 |
- |
- |
800, 000 |
|
|||||
|
17. Nai Ye |
15 |
1000 |
1000 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
|||||
|
18. NaiLun |
7 |
300 |
600 |
- |
800, 000 |
|
|||||
|
19. Nai Yaw |
8 |
800 |
- |
- |
800, 000 |
|
|||||
|
20. Nai Raw |
15 |
1500 |
- |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
|||||
|
21. NaiLein |
15 |
1000 |
600 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
|||||
|
Total |
.329 |
27450 |
8350 |
500 baskets |
51,800,000 |
|
|||||
In this case, LIB No. 588 confiscated the
lands from which they could get both rice for the main foods and other rubber and fruits to be sold for their general
expenses. Soon after land confiscation,
the soldiers have definitely stopped the plantation or land owners to not come
into these areas and if someone come they would be arrested.
Although some villagers requested to battalion commanders to
allow them taking their fruits and rubber liquid for some months, but they were
not permitted. According to
villagers, LIB No. 588, which does not have enough fund or budget for their own
expenses also cut some aged rubber trees and sold the fire-wood to local villagers for their income.
LIB No. 588 had not only confiscated lands but the soldiers had conscripted
forced labour from the villagers nearby to build military barracks. On June 6, 2001, with a purpose to build a
military barrack in their military battalion, the battalion
commander ordered the villagers from Tamort-kanin, Bay-ka-lawe, Don-phee,
San-pya, Hnin-son, Bay-iamu, and Wet-sut-phu villages to find lumbers, thatches
and bamboo for battalion and send them to the place,
where military barrack was planned to be built. The villagers have to find these materials in forests, in their farms, collected them and
sent to designated places. But they did
not receive any payment for labour and material
costs. For the villages which were far
from the battalion, the commanders instructed them that if they
could not provide materials, they must pay money. According to instruction, the village
leaders collected 100 Kyat from each household.
C. Land
Confiscation by LIB No. 587
Similarly to another battalion's land
confiscation, another military battalion, LIB No. 587, which is under MOC No. 19 also confiscated lands in area between Kun-duu and
San-kha-le village. They confiscated about 500 acres of lands
including some paddy-growing lands.
About 28 families of Kun-duu and San-kha-lae
villagers lost their lands and the plantation of rubber, betel-nut and lime
trees. These lands and plantations have been
transferred from their ancestors and maintained for several years. Some villagers, who have large lands and much trees lost about 5 million
Kyat. These total confiscation
of lands have destroyed the livelihoods of the rural villagers.
The list of villagers who lost the lands,
space of lands, types of trees and estimated cost for these properties are mentioned as below:
List 3:
|
Names of No. land Owners |
Amount of land (in acres) |
types of trees & Numbers of trees |
Estimation cost of lands and trees (in Kyat) |
||
|
Rubber |
Betel-nut |
Lime |
|||
|
1 . Nai Tee |
12 |
900 |
1000 |
- |
2, 400, 000 |
|
2. Nai Myint Aung |
7 |
700 |
- |
- |
1,400,000 |
|
3. Nai Laing |
10.5 |
1000 |
- |
- |
2, 100, 000 |
|
4. Nai Naing |
8 |
800 |
- |
- |
1,600,000 |
|
. Nai Ba Kwan |
5 |
350 |
500 |
- |
1,000,000 |
|
6. Nai Ba Lar |
16 |
1600 |
- |
- |
2, 300, 000 |
|
7. Nai San Nyein |
22 |
2000 |
650 |
- |
4, 400, 000 |
|
8. Nai Sein Maung |
9 |
500 |
1200 |
- |
1,800,000 |
|
9. Nai Maung Ngal |
11 |
1000 |
250 |
- |
2, 200, 000 |
|
10. NaiNyunt |
4 |
400 |
- |
- |
800, 000 |
|
11. Nai Oo Ngal |
17 |
1700 |
- |
- |
3, 400, 000 |
|
12. NaiPe |
20 |
2000 |
- |
- |
4, 000, 000 |
|
13. Nai Thaung Shein |
25 |
2500 |
- |
- |
5, 000, 000 |
|
14. Nai Shwe |
13 |
1300 |
- |
•- |
2, 600, 000 |
|
15. Nai Win |
10 |
1100 |
- |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
16. Nai Maung Shin |
25 |
3000 |
- |
- |
5, 000, 000 |
|
17. Nai Pan Din |
25 |
1500 |
500 |
- |
5, 000, 000 |
|
18. NaiHtoke |
10 |
1200 |
- |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
1 9. Nai Maung |
10 |
1100 |
600 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
20. Nai Aung Won |
10 |
1200 |
- |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
21. Nai Kun Ba |
12 |
1500 |
- |
- |
2, 400, 000 |
|
22. Nai San Tun |
20 |
3000 |
- |
- |
4, 000, 000 |
|
23. Nai Saw Aung |
10 |
900 |
- |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
24. Nai Byoke |
10 |
800 |
500 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
25. Nai Sein |
10 |
1000 |
500 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
26. Nai Yin |
8 |
500 |
300 |
- |
1,600,000 |
|
27. Nai Htoo |
5 |
600 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
28. Nai Su San |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
600, 000 |
|
Total |
347.5 |
34150 |
6500 |
- |
68, 600, 000 |
The list of villagers who lost the lands, trees grown in
the lands and the estimation cost are mentioned as
below:
List 4:
|
Names
of No. land Owners |
Amount of land (in acres) |
Types of trees & Numbers of trees |
Estimation cost of lands and trees (in Kyat) |
||
|
Rubber |
Betel-nut |
Lime |
|||
|
1 . Nai Sataw |
30 |
4000 |
2000 |
700 |
6, 000, 000 |
|
2. Nai Kun Balar |
12.5 |
1500 |
2000 |
|
3, 000, 000 |
|
3. Nat San Ya |
9.5 |
2000 |
800 |
200 |
1,500,000 |
|
4. Nai Tun Shwe (Mi Yin) |
6 |
700 |
1000 |
100 |
1,500,000 |
|
5. Nai Tun Shwe |
9 |
2000 |
800 |
- |
2, 500, 000 |
|
(Mi Thaung Yin) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Nai Kyaw Thein |
8.2 |
1200 |
1000 |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
7. Nai Chit Sein |
37 |
7000 |
• - |
- |
4, 500, 000 |
|
8. Nai San Din |
10 |
2000 |
- |
- |
1,500,000 |
|
9. Nai Khin Maung |
13 |
2300 |
- |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
10. Nai San Tin |
4.2 |
1200 |
- |
- |
500, 000 |
|
11. Nai Win Maung |
14 |
4000 |
- |
- |
5, 000, 000 |
|
12. Nai Maung Pyay |
14 |
2000 |
- |
- |
4, 000, 000 |
|
13. Nai Myaw |
18 |
3200 |
- |
- |
1,300,000 |
|
14. Nai Maung Oo |
6 |
1600 |
- |
- |
700, 000 |
|
15. Nai Aung Pan |
20 |
3000 |
- |
- |
3, 000, 000 |
|
16. Nai Gwin |
6 |
1000 |
- |
- |
500, 000 |
|
17. Nai Soe Ngal |
40 |
5000 |
- |
- |
4, 500, 000 |
|
18. Mi Sein Chit |
8 |
1200 |
- |
- |
700, 000 |
|
19. Mi HIa Shwe |
5 |
500 |
500 |
|
500, 000 |
|
20. Nai Chein Ye |
3 |
500 |
- |
- |
400, 000 |
|
21. Nai San |
3.5 |
- |
- |
1000 |
500, 000 |
|
22. Nai Aung 23. NaiLun |
5 6 |
800 1000 |
. |
|
600, 000 600, 000 |
|
24 NaiTin Soe |
2 |
- |
700 |
|
500, 000 |
|
25. Nai Win Tin |
2 |
- |
800 |
- |
500, 000 |
|
26. Nai Maung San |
3 |
1000 |
|
- |
500. 000 |
|
27. Na iSoeShein |
7 |
900 |
|
- |
500, 000 |
|
28. Nai Pyu |
4 |
400 |
500 |
|
500, 000 |
|
Total |
305. 88 |
50000 |
10100 |
3600 |
49, 800, 000 |
E. Land Confiscation by LIB No. 591 and No. 583
On April 8, 2001, another two military battalions, LIB No. 591 and No. 583
confiscated about 153 acres of lands near Kyaung-ywa village to
deploy two new military battalions, which arc under the command of MOC No. 19.
The confiscated lands are situating in eastern part of Ye Township area, along
Ye river that flows from Thailand-Burma border, opposites of Kanchanabun Province of
Thailand. Because of this land confiscation, about 27 land owners of Kyaung-ywa
village lost their lands, which is cost about 83. 6 million Kyat totally.
The lands were grown with fruit and rubber trees for several decades and the
villagers have been relied on these lands and trees for regular income and
survival of their families. The army
did not pay them any compensation cost.
The list of villagers who lost the lands, the amounts of their
lands and the estimation cost of these properties are as below:
List 5:
|
Names of No.
Land Owners |
Types of trees and amount of lands |
Estimation cost of lands and trees (in Kyat) |
||
|
Betel-nut
(in acres) |
Rubber
(in acres) |
Lemon (in acres) |
||
|
1. Nai San Shwe |
3 |
3 |
- |
3, 600, 000 |
|
2. Nai Han Shwe |
3 |
4 |
- |
4, 000, 000 |
|
3. Nai Halae |
2 |
3 |
- |
2, 800, 000 |
|
4. Mi Ngwe Nyein |
1 |
1 |
- |
1,200,000 |
|
5. Nai Aung Than |
2 |
1 |
- |
2,800,000 |
|
6. Nai Chan |
3 |
3 |
- |
3, 600, 000 |
|
7. Nai Myint |
1 |
2 |
- |
1,200,000 |
|
8. Nai Hpine |
2 |
1 |
- |
1,800,000 |
|
9. Nai Apone |
' |
1 |
- |
400, 000 |
|
10. Nai Kyan |
1 |
2 |
- |
1,400,000 |
|
11. Nai Aung Myint Soe |
1 |
1 |
- |
1,100,000 |
|
12. Nai Aung Pe |
1 |
2 |
- |
1,600,000 |
|
13. Nai Aung |
1 |
1 |
- |
1,100,000 |
|
(Mi Sanda) |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Nai Aung |
- |
1 |
- |
300, 000 |
|
15. Nai Thaung Nyunt |
2 |
3 |
- |
1,700,000 |
|
16. Nai Than Htay |
2 |
2 |
- |
1,500,000 |
|
17. Nai Kha
|
- |
2 |
- |
600, 000 |
|
18. Nai Kyway |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3, 600, 000 |
|
19. Nai Tin |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2, 900, 000 |
|
20. NaiThein |
5 |
5 |
1 " |
6, 800, 000 |
|
21. Nai Tin Aung |
6 |
6 |
4 |
10,400,000 |
|
22. Nai Shout |
10 |
10 |
4 |
12,000,000 |
|
23. Nai Aung Kyi |
2 |
V |
- |
2, 000, 000 |
|
24. Nai Moun Tha |
3 |
4 |
1 |
4, 300, 000 |
|
25. Nai Nyo |
3 |
2 |
- |
3, 200, 000 |
|
26. Nai Doe |
2 |
3 |
- |
2, 500, 000 |
|
27. Nai Kon Cha |
3 |
3 |
- |
3, 600, 000 |
|
Total |
63 |
75 |
15 |
81,600,000 |
Similarly to the other villagers in northern
part of Ye Township area, Kyaung-ywa villagers, who lost their lands
and properties in the lands have not received any
compensation costs by the authorities or army commanders. Soon after the lands were forcibly
confiscated, they were not permitted to go to their tree plantations even to
gather vegetables in there, cut bamboo for home uses and do other things.
Although some villagers who lost the lands complained to their village headmen
to request compensation costs from the battalion commanders and
authorities, no headmen were dared to talk about this unfair situation to
higher authorities, as they knew the order came from Southeast Military
Command, bases in Moulmein, the capital of Mon State.
IV. Total Loss and Continuous Suffering of the Villagers
In northern part of Township area, the battalions have confiscated the lands
from the border with Thanbyuzayat township, up to near Ye
Town. Recently, LIB No. 343 already
confiscated about 500 acres of lands that grown with rubber, betel-nut and lime
trees owned by Kun-duu and Aru-taung villagers. These plantation lands are
situating about 8 Kilometers in northern part of Ye town, which are along motor
road connecting Thanbyuzayat and Ye Town.
Now, another three military battalions under the command of MOC No. 19, namely,
LIB No. 586, No. 587 and No. 588 continuously confiscated 983 acres of lands
that owned by civilians and in where fruit and
rubber trees are grown. Because of land
confiscation of fruit and rubber trees plantations, about 77 families of
Mon people in the area lost about 170. 2 million Kyat totally
for their lands and trees at the current
market prices. Some land owners these different types of
trees in their plantations for about 40 years, while some newly grew trees
about 3-5 years ago. So
that some trees are quite big and could product
a lot of fruit or rubber. However, the authorities or army never
considered supporting and assisting these land loss people with new
lands or with available compensation.
These 77 families have 305 adults over 16 years old and 392 children under 18
years old. These populations have totally relied on the products of plantations for
several years, because they have to invest in these lands and have grown
and taken care trees for many years. Additionally, many paid labourer families who have relied in these lands also became
jobless. As the Mon farmers like to
grow big plantation for business reason, each land owner have at least a
permanent worker and family. While the
77 families of land owners are losing their lands, more labourer families have
lost their permanent works.
In most cases, some workers are permanently hired by land owners and are paid
to do daily works. During harvest seasons of
rubber and other fruits, more seasonal labourers are hired with daily pay.
Thus, many villager families who have no lands have much relied on the
works in these plantations. Accordingly to
land owners, nearly 100 permanent labourers and about 200 seasonal labourers
will lose their jobs, which provided
them income for survival. About 1000 of adults and children who have relied on
these plantation works have to find new works after this land confiscation.
|
Similarly, about 8 families in Ye town also lost their lands and properties
after about 31 acres of lands were confiscated by MOC No.
19. These 8 families lost about 4. 25 million Kyat worth for their plantations. They also grew trees in these confiscated
lands for about 30-40 years. Most of
land owners received these lands from their ancestors. These families just have relied on the
products from the plantations and
themselves worked in these plantations.
So that they lost both regular income and properties.
As tradition, the Mon people in most rural areas are farmers of paddy
cultivation, growing of rubber, betel-nut and
other fruits are their traditional works which are brought since their
ancestors.
When the
farmers lost their lands, actually, they need to find the lands instead to
continue their agriculture activities. But
it is not easy. Most the lands that
close to villages or in the village surrounding areas are already occupied by
the villagers, if they would like to get lands, they
have to go very far from their
villages. As many parts of Ye Township
are under armed conflict zone, the civilians are not safe to work in places where are far from their native
homes. They could be accused as
rebel-supporters by Burmese Army.
Or, as they lost everything they have, it is quite hard to get enough
money to buy new land and to change new jobs.
The only and possible chance that the civilians who lost the lands is to be day labourers for other people
works. But in Burma, as many people are
unemployed because of economic mismanagement, these people could be very
difficult to get regular works for income.
As normal condition, when the people have no work in their native place of Burma, they always migrate into
Thailand to seek works.
V. Conclusion
The objectives of SPDC in land confiscation are varied. First, the regime, SPDC, like the previous racist military regime, it have conducted
"population transfer" to non-Burman ethnic areas to increase Burman population in most area. This is it's constant
plan in implementing "Burmanization policy" to assimilate
other ethnic people to be Burman by language and population domination.
Additionally, in the program of SPDC's
population transfer, the regime has settled their soldiers' families, retired
and disable soldiers' families by providing them with lands confiscated
from the local civilians and they uses them as their supporters. Normally, the soldiers like these valuable
lands which are rich with soil and enormous products, because most of them came from many parts of poorer areas or middle
part of Burma. This implementation creates conflict the local community people and
regime-supporters, who received the
valuable lands without payment or
labour. As SPDC increases the troop
number, it also has responsibility to take care soldiers and their families.
The second objective would be for military purposes. When NMSP and its military faction, MNLA, agreed for ceasefire with regime, SLORC/SPDC, the regime has not had commitment to solve the political problems by means of politics and considered to NMSP as entering legal fold, which means NMSP must surrender one day in the future. It also includes a
consideration that if NMSP refused for surrendering, it
must use armed forces to put pressure.
On the other hand, KNU and KNLA troops have still fought
against the Burmese Army and made a lot of troubles to them. So that SPDC is trying to oppress all Karen revolutionary groups" activities.
The third objective could be for the security of the area. Now, SPDC have some
foreign investments in Tenasserim Division, Mon
State and Karen State. For the safety
of cement factory, gas-pipelines and other
Investments, they have needed more troop numbers to stop any
troubles from rebels.
Definitely, the more troop number in the area, the local population would face more sufferings. Currently, many of them already became
landless and jobless. Later, the soldiers from many battalions will request more tax from the local villagers, conscript labour and porters for military service and
make more threat against the villagers to not support
the rebels. Additionally, because of
assimilation policy, more and more
restriction against the Mon people such as closing of Mon national schools, stopping dry season Mon literacy training and banning of important Mon
national occasions could be made by the battalion commanders concerned.