News, Personal Accounts,
Report & Analysis on Human Rights Situation in Mon Territory and Other
Areas Southern Part of Burma
The
Mon Forum
Issue No. 12/2000
December 31, 2000
The Publication of Human Rights Foundation of
Monland (BURMA)
Contents
News:
(1)
Conscription of forced labour by UB
No. 299 after order halting this practices by SPDC,
(2)
Conscription of forced labour in
Karen State,
(3)
SPDC forcible paddy buying
conditions in Mon State,
(4)
Land confiscation and fund
extortion for development projects in Mon State,
Report:
(1) Human Rights Situation in Paung Township,
Mon State.
Some Acronyms in This Issue
SPDC- State Peace and
Development Council,
SLORC- State Law and Order Restoration Council,
BSPP- Burmese Socialist Programme Party,
MOI- Ministry of Interior (of SPDC)
IB- Infantry Battalion (of Burmese
Army),
LIB- Light Infantry Battalion (of Burmese
Army),
USDA- Union Solidarity and Development
Association,
NMSP- New Mon State Party,
KNU- Karen National Union,
KNLA- Karen National Liberation Army,
News
Conscription of Forced Labour by LIB No. 299 After Order Halting This Practice by SPDC
(December
2000)
With dated October 27, 2000, although SPDC'S Ministry of
Interior (MOI) officially issued an order of stopping the practices of all
types of conscription of forced labour to its township, village tract and
village levels administration and military battalions, LIB No. 299, which bases
in southern part of Ye Township, still conscripted or requested civilian
porters from villages in southern part of Ye Township, Mon State, in early
December. These civilian porters were requested by that battalion when they
required to operate a military operations and planned
to deploy base in Three Pagoda Pass town, a border town with Thailand.
On December 1 and 2, before LIB No. 299 left to the border
town, battalion commander, Col. Aye Tun ordered the village headmen from 11 Mon
villages in Ye southern part area to send some numbers of villagers for
battalion to use them as porters. Depending on the sizes, population and
household number in the village, he ordered to send 5 villagers from Koe-mile,
6 villagers from Kalort-gyi, 8 villagers from Hangan, 2 villagers from
Ba-round, 4 villagers from Kaw-hlaing, 3 villagers from Singu, 3 villagers from
Toe-tet, 4 villagers from Ying-ye, 4 villagers from Yin-dein, 4 villagers from
Kabya and 8 villagers from Kapyar villages respectively. The commander also
requested 100,000 Kyat from these villages for expenses for foods to feed these
porters during their military operation to border town with Thailand. The
deadline to send these all porters was on December 3.
After the battalion gathered the required total 43 civilian
porters and porter fee, they started moving to border town on December from Ye town. From Ye town, to reach to Thanbyuzayat town, the
battalion took by trucks and from that Thanbyuzayat to border town of Three
Pagoda Pass town, the soldiers had to walk to avoid from the ambush attacks of
KNU/KNLA troops and so, the civilians had to carry ammunitions and food
supplies along over 60-mile-long Three Pagoda Pass - Thanbyuzayat motor road.
They had lasted about 3 days to reach to Three Pagoda Pass town and LIB No. 299
troops were also attacked by KNU/KNLA's Karen troops two times along their way.
But no porter was killed, while some soldiers injured.
After 3 days along the road, LIB No. 299 reached to Three
Pagoda Pass town and changed position with LIB No. 343, and transfer all
porters to LIB No. 343, which needed to return to Ye township again. In
principle, SPDC does not deploy a permanent battalion in Three Pagoda Pass town
and send about two columns of troops from a battalion from regular battalions
in Mon State and Karen State to take base in that town for three months. On a
quarterly basis, SPDC'S Southeast Command, which bases in Moulmein, the capital
of Mon State, has responsibility to send and change troops for three months
deployment in this town.
When LIB No. 343 returned to Ye township, 43 porters were
transferred and they were forced to carry ammunitions and food supplies for LIB
No. 343 again and it lasted about 3 days to reach to battalion base in northern
part of Ye township. Thus, these porters were used for two battalions, they were
taken for over one week for their homes and the battalions never provided them
with any payment.
Regarding for the arrest of porters, NMSP also sent a
complaint letter to concerned strategic commander in IB No. 61 battalion and
pointed out the issued order from MOI dated October 27, and send a copy to
Southern Command. However, Southeast Command did not reply to NMSP for their
subordinated battalions' wrong doings.
Conscription of Forced Labour in Karen State
(December,
2000)
Similarly to some situation in Mon State that some military
battalions have conscripted of forced labour or arrest of civilian porters to
use them in military offensives after SPDC'S MOI issued order dated on October
27, some army battalions in Karen State such as IB No. 81, LIB No. 545, LIB No.
546, IB No. 32 have also forced local villagers to contribute unpaid labour in
battalions' rice-farms and other works.
In the period from the second week of December until the
end of that month, two military battalions, LIB No. 545, No. 546 and a Military
Intelligence Unit. 25, which base in Kawkareik township
have forced the villagers from Kyone-done and Kawbeik village tracts to
contribute free labour in their own 300 acres of farmlands for the work of
harvesting paddy crops. Army commanders have asked 40 villagers every day from
Kanni, Kaw-lyan, Thayet-taw, Tadar-oo, Kaw-kyaik, Kaw-khaik and others to
contribute labour in reaping ripe paddy plants for the whole day. When army
forced the villagers to contribute labour for harvesting, the commanders also
instructed villagers to bring their own foods and tools.
After SLORC/SPDC instructed its army commands and local
battalions to implement "self-help" plan, most battalions confiscated
lands and forced the villagers in all processes of farming. Additionally, some
battalions that confiscated lands close to rivers also have grown two seasons crops including dry season crop and unceasingly
force the local villagers for farming.
As an instance, from second week to third week of November,
a military battalion based in Pa-an township of Karen
State, IB No. 81 has forced the villagers from villages nearby to prepare lands
and grow dry season crops, soon after harvesting rainy season crops. The
battalion asked 60 villagers everyday from Than-hlae, Khaya, Kawlamu and Kawzin
villages to work in its 50 acres of land. The villagers had to plough lands,
bring water to lands and grow paddy plants. The battalion this 60 number of
villagers for 9 days and later it used small number of villagers to fill water
in farm plots and provide fertilizers in there. Besides the conscription of
villagers, the battalion also collected fund from the villages nearby for
expense used for gasoline for water pumping engines and to buy fertilizer. So, the
villagers had to provide for battalion from 20, 000 to 50, 000 Kyat per
village.
Similarly, to seek battalion fund, IB No. 32 that bases in
Kya Inn Seikyi township, also established a
brick-making factory near its base. In making earth bricks, the battalion needs
a lot of woods to burn them until it becomes harder. To get many tons of woods
to burn earth to get hard bricks, the army battalions have also forced the
villagers near Kya Inn Seikyi town to find woods in forests and give them.
According to
order in
early December, the battalion instructed the village headmen that to provide in
estimation 5 tons woods from Shwe-la-inn village, 5 tons wood from Kyauk-pone
village and 20 ton from Htee-paukho village respectively. Then the battalion
instructed them that to bring all woods to a designated place on Zami
riverbank. The battalions ordered boats from the villages nearby to carry many
tons of woods along Zami river to their factory.
Before this conscription of forced labour was done, IB No. 32 also forced many
villages from these villagers for harvesting in its 100 acres of rice farms.
Although SPDC officially ordered all its battalions and
army commands to stop all practices of using forced labour in rural area,
Burmese Army's battalions in remote areas of ethnic areas still have
conscripted forced labour like the previous situation.
SPDC Forcible Paddy-buying Conditions in Mon State
(December
2000)
Like previous years, SPDC and its respective township
authorities in Mon State, Karen State and Tenasserim Division has tried to buy
the set amount of paddy from local Mon and other ethnic inhabitants at low
price, which is lower than 2-3 times of market prices. To forcibly buy paddy
from farmers, the authorities have created various paddy-buying centers in Mon
areas and paid advance payment to farmers since November 2000. Depending on
amounts of crop production in each township, the authorities have defined
different amounts of paddy to be sold to paddy-buying center.
In Mon State, there are totally 10 Townships and three
townships of Mon State, Mudon, Chaung-zon and Paung, which could produce better
crops were instructed by Mon State PDC authorities to sell 15-16 baskets of
paddy (about 750 pounds in estimation) per acre to the nearest or designated
paddy-buying centers, while the authorities instructed to sell 10-12 baskets of
paddy per acre in other remaining townships.
As preparation to get full set amounts of paddy from the
local farmers, the authorities have instructed the concerned paddy-buying teams
in every township and village tract to provide advance payment to farmers. By
giving advance payment to farmers, the authorities forced farmers to sign a
contract and give promise that they agreed to sell the set amount of paddy to
center after they harvested their crops. Although many farmers would not like
to take advance payment while they did not know how many baskets of paddy they
could produce, however, the authorities forced them to take and signed the
contract. It also meant if the farmers failed to sell the set amount of paddy,
they could be detained. But the authorities provided about 1500-2000 Kyat
advance payment that equal to half of paddy to be sold per one acre.
During the authorities paid advance payment to farmers,
they have paid about 300-350 Kyat per basket of paddy while the price in the
market was 800-1000 Kyat per basket. However, after harvest season, the paddy
price in Burma including Mon State dropped to 700 Kyat per basket and the
authorities re-instructed that they would pay only 250 Kyat per basket. Then,
the authorities ordered again that the farmers must sell paddy amounts that
equal to new price or if the farmers would like to sell their paddy, they must
pay money to authorities with price of paddy 600-700 per basket of paddy
accordingly to market price. Actually, when the paddy price drops, the
authorities would not like to get more paddy, but need
money instead of paddy.
As an instance, in Paung township,
the paddy price has been dropped to 600 Kyat per basket in December 2000. Thus,
the township authorities re-instructed that they would buy from farmers with
250 Kyat per basket. Or, they said, if the farmers are unable to sell paddy,
they must have to pay money that equal to the set amount of paddy required by paddy-buying
center. So the farmers in Paung Township are disappointed in dealing with
government authorities.
For farmers in Mon State, they could produce only about
25-50 baskets of paddy per acre and they needed to spend about 2000-3000 Kyat
per acre for hiring labour, buying fertilizers and other requirements. After
they produced paddy, they needed to sell them to government again, and so they
remained very little amount of paddy in their hands which could not support
them enough for their survival of their families.
Land Confiscation and Fund Extortion for
Development Projects in Mon State
(December
2000)
Since November until the end of December, 2000, when the
authorities are constructing gas-pipeline from Tenasserim Division via Mon
State into Karen State's Pa-an Township to provide
energy for extent cement factory in Myaing-kalar village, many hundreds of
farmlands, plantation lands, houses' gardens and houses are confiscated by SPDC
authorities and the villagers have not received any compensated costs. During
the authorities confiscated lands that owned by villagers in Thanbyuzayat township, the villagers were ordered to leave their houses
within three days without delay.
This was a gas-pipeline that connects from Yadana
gas-pipeline of Tenasserim Division to Mon State which comes along Ye-Moulmein
motor road or railway road. When it passes through farmlands along the roads
between Ye and Moulmein, Mon villagers' owned
farmlands were confiscated. Then, when it passed in Kyaikmayaw township of Mon
State, some farmlands and plantations were also confiscated. Accordingly to
claims by authorities before the pipeline is connected, they said, the pipeline
project would support the people in area to get enough electricity and energy
for their daily. But now, the people in the area know that gas is used only
cement factory and they just lost their lands.
Besides land confiscation for new gas-pipeline project, the
government authorities also confiscated lands and extorted money from villagers
for development projects especially for road building.
On November 10, 2000, Southern part of Chaung-zon Township
PDC township authorities instructed a village, Kwan-hlar village headmen U
Maung Than and secretary to confiscate lands, so there were about 200 acres of
paddy fields and 100 acres of toddy plantation were confiscated without
compensation. According to authorities, they would need to create a new village
and that was why they have to take these lands. But, the villagers said that
that land confiscation order must not come from higher authorities, they
themselves tried to collect the lands and sold to other people who needed
lands.
Because of government's order to half using forced labour
on October 27, later the village PDC authorities in some area tried to avoid
using forced labour, but collected more fund from civilians to implement
development projects. As an instance, in Thanbyuzayat township of Mon State,
when the authorities built 15 miles of motor road, that
passes through Karote-pi, Wae-galaung, Kaw-lay, An-kae, Htinn-yu and
Ah-nin and the authorities instructed that the civilians in these villages must
have to pay for all cost of road building. So the villagers from these villages
have to pay to authorities 3000 Kyat to 7000 Kyat depending on economic
conditions of one house. In these villages, there are over 3000 households
totally and the authorities could receive
Similarly, the government authorities have collected huge
amount of money from the villagers in eastern part of Ye Township area. In
August 2000, the government authorities planned to build a 10 mile-long motor
road from Ye to Kyaung-ywa village road. In building
this road, the authorities
requested about 7.9 million Kyat from 17 villages, which are near the motor
road. Since August until December, the village headmen have to send money to
authorities in Ye rationally before the authorities really built the road.
Therefore, some slightly big village with 200 households have
to pay about 700,000 Kyat totally while village with 30 households have to pay
about 150, 000 Kyat to them. Thus, the smaller and poorer villages had to pay
more for fund to build this road.
Then, in Ye Township again, when the authorities tried to
build a new bridge in a village, Ah-zin, near Andaman Sea, Township authorities
instructed village headmen to collect about 1000 Kyat fund from a poor house
and about 3000-4000 Kyat from other families. In that village, there are about
500 households and the authorities received a lot fund from civilians.
On December 18, 2000, Mudon Township authorities also
called a meeting with six ferry teams that base in town and instructed them
that each ferry team must have to provide 150, 000 Kyat fund for authorities to
repair the road from Mudon to Chaung-htit-kwa village, a border village with
Karen State. The threat was if any team refused to provide, that team's ferries
must not run on the road. These fun was just for use
to buy some stones to lay in road, and instructed to individual trucks in town
to carry stones to designated places.
As conclusion, although SPDC has less use of forced labour,
they have collect more fund instead of conscription of
forced labour after October 27 order.
Report
Human Rights Situation in Paung Township, Mon
State
I. Background of Paung Township
Paung Township is in Taton district of Mon State and
situates northern part Moulmein, the capital of Mon State, and majority
inhabitants in this township are Mon people and the remaining are Pa-oh, Karen
and Burman. Economically about 80% of
township population are paddy growing peasant farmers
and so the main products in this township is paddy. Township has about 300, 000 population and
the main roads of Mottama-Rangoon motor and railway roads provide for smooth
communication and travel for the inhabitants.
This township is formed with three administrative areas and
these are (1) Mottama tract, (2) Paung main town tract, and (3) Zin-kyaik
tract. There are 10 villages in Mottama
tract; 4 town sections and 21 villages in main town tract; and 19 villages in
Zin-kyiak tract. Thus, there are 4 town
sections in Paung Town and 50 villages totally in township area.
Under the rule of military regime, SPDC, the administrative
officials are not elected democratically, but are appointed by higher SPDC
authorities. Normally, former BSPP members or former military commanders are
always appointed for Township PDC authorities and have the highest power to
rule the people. From Township PDC authorities, they appoint their supporters
in each town section and village to rule the civilians. Now, the people who
have connections with USD A (Union Solidarity and Development Association) are easily appointed
to be township or village PDC officials.
As Paung Township is under the absolute control of SPDC or
as "White Area" recognized by regime, only small number of troops are
deployed in township and Township SPDC authorities are the most powerful in
Township. Although the civilians in
this area have not suffered from violations that connected to
"rebel-supporters", they have been mainly suffered from conscription
of forced labour, various types of tax and fund collection, political
oppression and movement restriction and others.
II. Violation of Economic Rights and the
Conditions of Paddy Growing Farmers
With plan to buy paddy from farmers, which is also known as
yearly paddy tax, the farmers in Paung Township have been also forced by the
local Township paddy buying management committee to sell their paddy at low
price. Like previous year, the
paddy-buying authorities have paid advance payment to farmers and then forced
them to sell the set amounts of paddy to respective paddy-buying center.
In July and August, 2000, before the farmers knew how many
baskets of paddy they could produce, the government authorities gave them some
advance payment and instructed to farmers to sell 15 baskets per acre at price
350 Kyat per basket while the price in the market is about 800-1,000 Kyat per
basket. The authorities did not give money for all amounts of paddy that the
farmers needed to sell paddy and gave about 1500-2000 Kyat for one acre of land
that equal to about one-third of total payment.
However the price of paddy have
been gradually dropped and so the authorities worried about the price
drop. The paddy price dropped from
800-1000 Kyat per basket to 500-600 Kyat per
basket. So later when the farmers
started to harvest crops, the authorities re-instructed to all their paddy
buying centers that they would buy paddy from farmers with 250 Kyat per
basket. From calculating with payment
they paid to farmers, the authorities also replied that they would reduce
payment amounts and said all farmers should sell the set amount of paddy
required by authorities. Later, when
the authorities received orders that Agricultural Products Trading Department,
a main department of SPDC Agriculture Ministry did not want more paddy, the authorities also instructed to farmers that they
would pay money instead of paddy. Accordingly to instruction, if they would not
like to sell their paddy more, they would have to pay 450 Kyat per basket (by
abstracting 250 Kyat from 600 Kyat per basket of the market price) to
officials in paddy buying centers. So,
the farmers could choose whether they would pay money or give paddy to
centers. If they paid, they needed to
pay 6750 Kyat per acre of land and by combining with advance payment, they
needed to pay nearly 9000 Kyat per acre.
Therefore, for a farmer owns about 10 acres of land has to pay to
officials about 90, 000 Kyat to government officials and they remained only
little income for them.
During the farmers grow paddy, they needed to spend at
least 3000 Kyat per acre of land for labour cost and expenses for fertilizer,
and by subtracting these costs, the farmers left very little income and paddy
for their income and survival. In this
situation, some farmers also abandoned their lands and sought another types of
works.
In forcing the farmers to sell their paddy or to pay the
equal amounts of payment, the authorities also adopted a restriction against
farmers to not husk their paddy freely.
In Mon State, whenever the farmers husk their paddy to give polished
rice, they need to go the concerned town section or village PDC authorities to
ask permission for husking of their paddy.
In restriction against farmers during they forced them to sell the
paddy, the authorities instructed that if one farmer fails to sell such amount
of paddy, they do not permit to husk paddy.
It pushes farmers to be starved and then forced to sell the set amount
of paddy.
During 2000, because of government mismanagement and
centralized for paddy crop products trading, the paddy price has gradually
dropped. The government authorities have
not allowed any private traders to involve in the paddy products trading and
always accused that they would play the price. On the other hand, most paddy are husked in
government own low qualified paddy-husking mills and produced rice quality is
low. Then most countries that bought
rice from Burma stopped buying low quality rice and that was another reason why
the rice price has gradually dropped.
In addition, politically, because of SPDC'S worst human rights accords
and violations of international labour rights, and related sanctions, some
countries also stopped buying rice from Burma.
Because of the paddy price drop and huge amount of paddy
that the farmers have to pay to authorities, all farmers faced many
difficulties for survival. On the other
hand, because of high commodity costs in the markets, such as clothing and
foods, the farmers could not buy and their situation getting more and more
terrible. As a result, some farmers
also sold their lands and left to another places, where they could get works.
On December 12, a Mon farmer family with 9 members from
Zin-kyaik village, Paung Township, also abandoned their lands and the head of
the family, Nai Kyaw Win (47 Years old), explained his situation at his village
to our Human Rights Worker as below.
Now, he is at a border village with Thailand.
"I stayed at Zin-kyaik village, a big Mon village in northern
part of Paung town, it situates on Mottama -Rangoon motor road. Like last year, in Paung Township, the
authorities defined and told to farmers that they needed to sell about 15-16
baskets of paddy per acre to designated paddy buying center. If your land soil is good, you have to sell
16 baskets and for the normal lands, the farmers have to sell 15 baskets of
paddy.
"I need to sell my paddy in our village's paddy buying
center and so the authorities instructed me and our villagers to sell 16
baskets of paddy to their paddy buying center.
As they considered our farms could produce more paddy. But because off load and
insect attacks to my paddy plants, crop production in my farm was reduced and I
received only 30 baskets of paddy in average in my farm. And, I needed to sell 16 baskets of paddy to
government. So, I left nothing.
"After I paid for labour cast and fertilizers, I
failed to sell the set amount of paddy to paddy-buying center accordingly to
the request by authorities. Then, the
authorities threatened me they would arrest me and so l have to sell my
farms. Since many farmers are
disappointed to continue working as paddy growing farmers, the land price was
quite cheap. Anyhow, since I have to
sell the set amount of paddy or I could be arrested if I failed to sell, thus,
I sold my farms, with 40000 Kyat per acre.
With that money, I paid all my debt and then paid the authorities. Then I left from my village."
In Burma, the farmers have no rights to complain to
authorities that they would not like to sell their paddy or about their crop
conditions. Although sometimes the
authorities widely knew about disasters and insect attacks that affected to
less crop production, they did not care and did not listen to the complaints
from farmers. Not only farmers from
Paung Township area, many farmers from other parts of Mon State, Karen State
and Tenasserim Division have also abandoned their farms after they could not
tolerate abuses committed by authorities.
III. Widespread Conscription of Forced Labour
In June 2000, although ILO (International Labour
Organization) warned to stop all practices of conscripting of forced labour
in the whole Burma, however SPDC State, Division, District, Town, Village
levels administration and army commands and battalions have not stopped using
civilians to contribute unpaid labour in various types of development projects
and to be civilian porters to carry ammunitions and food supplies in the
battle-fields.
In area under the control of SPDC, the civilians are
generally suffered from conscription of forced labour in government projects and
some works for government, while civilians in remote areas or conflict areas or
SPDC'S semi control areas have suffered from the arrest of forced labour and
use local civilians as forced porters.
In Paung Township, the civilians in township mainly
suffered from the conscription of forced labour in some SPDC'S development
projects and works in township. As this
township area is "White Area" fewer civilians are suffered from
porters. However, when the Burmese
Army operated military operations against rebel groups, sometimes, huge number
of civilians in this area were arrested to be porters to carry ammunitions and
food supplies for army for several days.
Since 1997 military offensives against KNU, there have been no more
arrests for porters in years later.
The
instances of conscription of forced labour are as below:
On October 1, 2000, Township PDC authorities forced the
civilians of all villages in which Mottama-Rangoon motorway in the township
part, to dear the bushes that are growing beside the motor-road. So, the villagers from that area had to
perform their so-called duty tasks started from October 2 and must be finished
by October 10, 2000. Furthermore, even
primary school students were forced to distribute their labour.
On October 5, even though the students from Basic Education
Primary School, Kada village, were too young to do hard work, they were afraid
of their teachers and had to clear bushes and grasses with hoes nearby school
and beside the motor way. Similarly, the
civilian from that village had to perform their so-called duty tasks during
October 4 and October 9, 2000.
Sometimes, when the authorities forced the civilians to
contribute unpaid labour, they gathered a huge number of villagers for one
place and let them do one specific without payment.
As
an instance,
On October 28, 2000, to celebrate a pagoda festival in one
place, the authorities asked 50 people from one town section to come to that
place to clear bushes and grasses in there.
So, the authorities received about 200 civilians totally from these four
town sections and forced them to work clearly bushes and grasses for the whole
day. Some civilians had to come to that
place for nearly one hour and the authorities did not arrange for
transportation of civilians who were far from workplace. The civilians had to take their own foods
and tools when they came to workplace.
Police, USDA members and township authorities took guard to these 200
civilians in workplace.
Such huge number of conscription of forced labour is
regular conscripted whenever Township PDC has occasions and festivals. If one
family fails to go and work in workplace, they must have to pay fine. Even ILO
warned the SPDC in June to stop all practices of using forced labour, these were the evidence that the civilians were
still forced to do works for government.
IV. Tax Extortion in Township
In Paung Township area, since it was under the control of
SPDC, the civilians in the whole township including villages that far from town, have been greatly suffered from the huge tax
extortion. By showing various reason, the authorities have collected various type of tax
from the civilians. Most tax collection
are not described in laws and so the authorities had
chance how much they would like to collect and whenever.
Sometimes, the government authorities although arranging
for the purposes of themselves or their ceremony, they have collected fund from
the civilians.
As instances,
On October 8, 2000, in Moe-nine, Paung township,
Nursing and Women Affair Association celebrated closing ceremony of the
eliminating of illiteracy 2-month-training. In order to
accomplish the dosing ceremony, every household in that area had to pay (150)
kyats respectively. It was started on August 5, 2000, and, firstly,
there were 40 trainees attended; however, the trainees remained only 30 people
at the end of the course. On closing
ceremony, the reward for the first price was 800 kyats; second price was 700 kyats, and 500 kyat for the third person. In Moe-nine,
thereare670 households and village PDC had collected fund more than 100, 000
kyats for closing ceremony. In fact, they spent only 30, 000 kyats for both
reward and entertainment, so the rest of them Village PDC didn't show the list
and distributed among themselves. On that day, Village PDC didn't invite the
civilians in that around area, but they invited only Township PDC, Women Affair
Association, trainees and teachers. They entertained the attendees with curried
rice and chicken curry and tea. Although the population In Moe-nine has more
than 3, 500, only a few people were finished this course; therefore,
apparently, Local SPDC authorities have no attention to the grassroots, but
they just want to have 'a good name' and to benefit for the sake of their
properties.
On September 2, 2000, Women Affair Association opened a training that Including sewing, decoration, and baking
cake. In that opening ceremony, (It was
held at Poung City Hall) township PDC chairman U Mya Kyalng and Nursing
Association Daw San San Yi gave speeches. The period of training was
2-month-long and there were 44 trainees have attended. In that area, It was divided into four sections and Township PDC demanded
fund 30, 000 kyat from each block and the trainees also had to pay 1000 kyats
per person for entrance. Moreover, township PDC extorted money 50 kyats per
family respectively.
In Paung Township area, there are many government servants
including police in township and normally, the government could provide them
with small amount of salaries. Those
servants could not survive from these salaries and the authorities always
extorted fund and foods from civilians to support their servants.
As an instance,
On October 15, 2000, Zin-kyaik village PDC, Paung township, collected fund from the civilians 100 kyats per
family, so they obtained tot ally over 500, 000 kyats. The source said that the
Village PDC did not delicate any evidence why they had to collect fund from the
civilians. After that, on October 18, 2000, Htan-pin-chaungyi village PDC,
Paung town, collected fund from the villagers 150 kyats per family
respectively, so local authorities obtained totally over 150, 000 kyats. In
that village, since on October 20, 2000, the civilians had to distribute to the
Burmese Patrol Police 2 cups of milk of rice whenever they husk their paddy;
besides, they also have to pay the police 10 tins of rice monthly. The police
own 3 acres of cultivation fields and they also conscripted the civilians to
harvest for them and If anyone failed to perform their so-called duties tasks,
they had to fine such as money and hard work in police station.
Sometimes, when Township authorities is
planning for development program in township, they did not receive budget from
the government, by have collected fund from the government. Or, sometimes, by
showing a reason as supporting social welfare, they also collected fund from
the civilians.
As
instances,
On October 26, 2000, SPDC local authorities demanded fund
from the civilians of Pan-koung village, which has82 households, Paung township, 1, 000 kyat per household and 2, 000 kyats from
rice-mill owner respectively and they obtained totally over 1, 000,000 kyats in
order to construct village clinic. Likewise, on October 28, 2000, SPDC local
authorities collected monthly fund from the villagers of Thabyuchaung village,
with over 700 households, Poung town, 100 kyats per family and received over
70, 000 kyats.
On October 10, 2000, Moe-nine village PDC led by chairman U
Kyaw Aye, and his accompany U Ngwe Hlaing and U Chit Ngwe extorted so-called
taxation monthly money from the civilians and have received more than 65, 000
kyats every month. Similarly, on that day, the civilians of Kada section, with
more than (1, 500) households, Paung town, also had to pay 250 kyat per
household respectively and totally SPDC local authorities have received over
375, 000 kyats. However, SPDC local authorities did not spent that fund in
social welfare, actually, they distributed that money
among themselves every month.
Sometimes when the authorities are arranging for sports,
they similarly extorted fund from the civilians.
As an instance,
On September 20, 2000, Paung township
PDC extorted money from the whole villages in Poung town 100 kyats per
household respectively, they haven't celebrated football competition until
September 30, 2000, yet. Moe-nine section football team had received invitation
for competing of Ottadar village soccer club, and the football team in Moe Nine
represented to the Township
PDC Chairman U Kyaw Aye and
his member to arrange uniform for players. SPDC
local authorities didn't allow organizing football team and replied that the
players had to spend their own fund if they want to. Therefore, although
township PDC had extorted fund from the civilians, they used that fund not for
the villagers, but for the sake of their benefits.
Because of Order issued by SPDC'S MOI to stop using forced
labour dated on October 27, the authorities tried to avoid using forced labour
in Township. However, the collected more fund for the civilians for the
development project in Township area.
As
an instance,
On November 15, 2000, when Paung authorities planned to
build and tar a road between Kyawe-chan village and Kaw-kayin village which is
about 3 miles long, Village PDC authorities have collected 2,000 Kyat from
every farmer, which farms were near the road. Then, the authorities collected
500 Kyat collected from every household.
There are about 830 households in Kyawe-chan village and 500 households
in Kaw-karin village, and the authorities could collect about 3, 830, 000 Kyat
totally to build this new road.
Actually, the authorities do not need to spend these
amount of money for this road building, and villagers knew they would
take some of fund into their pockets.
Actually, like other townships in Mon State, Paung Township
civilians are quite poor and many of them are unemployed under the
mismanagement of the government. Additionally, those civilians have to serve a
lot of extorted fund for authorities, and their situation became more worst.
V. Political Oppression against the Civilians
Since before, Even though the rural area could gather and
discuss things such as religious association, Youth association, and others,
nowadays, they are forbidden from participating even trivial activities by
Burmese military ruling junta SPDC. On
the other hand, SPDC forcibly conscripted the teenagers in rural areas or
remote villages to participate in USD A, which found by SPDC. In order to grip power for a long term, SPDC
establishes organization, such as USD A, Red Cross, Women Affair Association,
and etc... Therefore, the inhabitants in that area have lost their fundamental
rights, and they have to survive under fear and repression of SPDC troops.
As instance of religious restriction against the
civilians,
On October 12, 2000, it was the day of religious ceremony
for Buddhism, (the day of special full moon and the end of the lent for
Buddhism) and most of residents in Paung Town are Buddhist, so as they preserve
their old traditional, the Buddhism have been celebrating the Buddhist ceremony
every year. However, this years was not as crowd as last year because Paung
Township PDC and Village PDC have constantly been watching and issued an order
to prevent the civilians from gathering and discussion each other.
Similarly, the villagers especially the teenagers were not
allowed to participate into Youth Association or Religious Association, but
they were forcibly to join associations, such as Union of Stability and
Development Association (USDA), Women Affair Association, Myanmar Red Cross
Society (MRCS), and Nursing, by SPDC local authorities. Furthermore, the youngsters who have not
participate into USDA and MRCS yet, SPDC local authorities have been giving
pressure in order to involve into association mentioned above, which are under
SPDC control.
As an instance,
On October 23, 2000, USDA in Paung Township took census
every village and then conscripted the families who haven't entered into SPDC
sub-associations. Moreover, USDA in Paung village tract has been watching the
Youth Association closely and then represents to the above.
Sometimes, when the authorities heard about the activities
of rebel armies, which is rarely happening in this
township area, the authorities always made movement restrictions against the
local civilians.
As an instance,
Since on October 11, 2000, SPDC local authorities in Paung
town issued an order that nobody couldn't cross the railway
before 6 a.m. and after 6 p.m., and local authorities also reminded if
they saw somebody who across the railway, they would shoot to death without
asking any question. The majority inhabitants in that around area live off
cultivation crops, and as their cultivation fields situate in the west of
railway, the peasants in that area have been encountering many difficulties in
order to get to their farmlands. In this case, the peasants in that area are
facing difficulties such as personal affairs, transporting supplies, and etc.,
according to the source.
Since 1990, after SLORC/SPDC decided to not transferred to 1990 election winners, NLD and other ethnic
nationalities political parties' People Representatives, the regime formed USDA
and strengthened it and used this organization to support the regime and
whenever they arranged rallies against democratic oppositions, this
organization mainly arranged for these rallies. Whenever, SPDC is appointing Town section or
village PDC, they always selected from USDA members. Later, SPDC has extent more organizations
such as MRCS and others to use as their supporters. They also give special favour to those
organizations' members.
VI. Conclusion
In this report, although we have described a specific
situation in a Township in Mon State, the other townships also have been
suffered similar abuses and violations.
Among ten townships of Mon State, about 8 townships are under the absolute
control of SPDC, the civilians in these townships similarly suffered of
political oppression, conscription of forced labour, fund extortion and other
abuses which are daily committed by authorities.
In remaining two townships of Ye
and Thanbyuzayat, in where the rebel troops sometimes arrive, the civilians in
these townships are not only suffered from the above mentioned abuses, but also
suffered from abuses and violations that connected Burmese Army's accusations
of rebel-supporters. Therefore, the population displacement occurred in Mon
State not only because of war, but also violations of economic rights and
fundamental political rights