MONLAND VIEWPOINT

INDEPENDENT MON NEWS AGENCY (IMNA)

An Interview with Rev Palita, A Former Monk Political Prisoner


Introduction

Rev Palita is a former Buddhist monk political prisoner in Moulmein jail Mon State for his publication of Mon language magazine that contains political opinion against Rangoon government. He was also former General Secretary of Hitagavesii Mon Monk Association based in Rangoon in 1960s. He is now head of monastery in Kamawet village in Mudon Township. He wrote and published over thirty books and there are over ten books to be published in Mon language. He was awarded “Patriotic Prize” by New Mon State Party in 2002. IMNA’s Reporter has conducted an exclusive interview to highlight current Mon national politics and development of ceasefire process to Rev Palita in recent month. (Editor)

IMNA: Currently, New Mon State Party has voiced for formation of Federal of Union of Burma. Non-Burman nationalities also have drafted their own State Constitution in recently. How far a Mon monk community has understood the concept of Federalism?

Rev: They have written the constitution but we haven’t yet seen it now. When we went for a meeting we have heard once. You asked that how far our Mon monks understood the concept of it, no one seem like to study it. So, they knew what they are being doing among themselves. Generally, no one has learned about it. Federalism is a good one. As we haven’t seen it for the moment, it is hard to comment this issue.

IMNA: Does the monk community, especially political monk community accept the Mon people will be jointed to formation of Federal State within Buman State?

Rev: The concept of Federalism, we have only read the draft paper is written by New Mon State Party and we haven’t seen her (Burman) draft. We still don’t know how they have worked and drawn it. The draft paper of the New Mon State Party is so far look good. The Burman' paper, no we haven’t seen yet. They used to trick us. So, we don’t know how far is good. If it is not fair, how can we accept?

IMNA: The Burmese military regime never ever interest or voice the words of “federalism or democracy” but the only opposition political forces including its armed forces have campaigned for it. What is your opinion on this aspect?

Rev: The Burmese regime will not follow a path of opposition forces. We have planed a good structure and we always look to become better situation. But the Burmese regime will not easily agree everything what we have planed. Every Mon organization is banned. The regime banned not only the Mon but almost all of political parties. It is not easy to form a political party under this government (State Peace and Development Council). They always work within their own policy. They don’t allow others to form organizations. They still refuse for formation of political parties.

IMNA: The regime abolished Mon National Democratic Front in 1992. The New Mon State Party reached cease-fire agreement in 1995. Mr Ngwe Thein (Vice-Chairman of Mon National Democratic Front) and colleagues were jailed in 1998. If you look at this trend, how can Mon political campaign raise in the community?

Rev: The regime abolishes not only the Mon National Democratic Front but also other parties. Then, the New Mon State Party has agreed for ceasefire that now it has turned to seven- eight years. Yes, we have observed the process of ceasefire talk but now land of (local farmers) in part or Ye Town areas have gone (confiscated by Burman’ army). The Burman’s army has confiscated almost land and farms in both southern and northern Ye Town. Who can protest for the case? If they do, it is so relief. Our leaders were jailed for seven years. No one knew of the trail. Usually, prisoners are released pre-celebration of Independent Day (4 January). It seem that it wouldn’t be released soon until to seven years term.

IMNA: Many Mon people want independence and liberation. But if you look back a history, faction is a common attitude within the party (NMSP). Currently, Mon armed forces were splitting. Why disunity among the Mon takes place? And what make a unity of a resistance force is failed?

Rev: If we look a spirit (nationalism) of our Mon people, it has changed a lot and it does not seem like before. Our unity is failed indeed. It is not an attempt or an act of Burman people who break us a part. We have committed ourselves for this crisis. Even the Burman too always they are failed for unity among them. At the moment, again a unity is failed. We must search why unity is damaged.

IMNA: In Mr U Nu’s government era (1960s) Mon monks have actively involved in politics. But in late 1960, it has declined for participation. Why it has declined, please tell us with your claim?

Rev: Under current political climate, no political organization is allowed to form. We are banned to engage in politics. I have voiced for formation of Hitagavesii Association but many of us still fear. As we are banned to form political organization our politics is death. We only could do (teach) for language training. I don’t know whether we could form political organization in one day.

IMNA: Many of textbooks in monastic education are pretty old and out of date. It is no mush to be used in this modern era. There are a few good books in Mon language such as Rajadhirit History (a Mon King History) and Dhamasat Text (a Mon Legal Text). Do you thing that it is good idea to introduce local monks community to study these books as text or do you want to leave it and use an old system?

Rev; We have no access to teach and learn our language in public school then we only could teach in monasteries. It is only to maintain it for cultural heritage. We have taught history but yes, you are right, no one though about Dhamasat and even no one is able to lecture it now. We teach not only an old system but also a new system. After the government imposed us to use its own textbooks, we are forced to translate them into Mon language then we teach local children accordingly. We only can teach a little module for our own textbooks but the authority does not allow it. We now have translated textbooks of the government into our language for 21 year.

IMNA: Do you think that we should teach English language in monastery, if yes why we should do it?

Rev: A few Monasteries teach English language now. You cannot simply develop yourself if you don’t read English in modern era. Some of us don’t have an opportunity and time because we have to prepare for the State examination. There is no English subject for the State Examination (Buddhist Monk Examination).

INMA: United Nations leads a campaign to pressure Burma through its commissioners, International Labor Organization and Amnesty International Body has taken a strong measure towards Burma for change. Have you aware of these campaigns and do you support them?

Rev: Pressure of foreign countries has taken place. Yes, we have heard news but we don’t know insight story. They often talk and met leaders of National League for Democracy. But they don’t release accurate news to public. Despite foreign countries give strong pressure; no newspaper has covered about the issue in the country. They don’t allow newspaper to cover the story. Yes, pressure from foreign countries is fine but don’t only give lip service. They need to take relevant action. They need very strong sanction and cut off diplomatic relations. You know man, it is not so easy to remove them (SPDC).

IMNA: Many of young men and women went to Thailand for employment. What is your concern in this regard and could you do any protection?

Rev; Our civilians said that they can earn good income in foreign countries and they said that they couldn’t survive at home. Despite they claim that some of them are arrested, received transmitted disease, killed and abused in foreign land. A few of them return home with HIV/AIDS and die shortly after they arrived home. They don’t concern a dangerous of social life. A few women were forced to be sex workers. It is so disappointed story. I think local border authority should take a good measure to monitor the border route.

IMNA: For over seven-eight years, a ceasefire process between Mon and Burman (NMSP-SPDC) is emerged. Who win or lost for the game and politically, who takes or receives more advantages on the process?

Rev: Well, if we talk one side of story then we have to think about the actors that may undermine their efforts. It is very hard to answer this question to you guy! It is up to their perception for them but for my personal belief, there is no advantage for us. We have been talking this matter for long. Who can protest when they (Burman’s Army) confiscated our land? On the other hand, the Mon NMSP is banned for military training but they (SPDC) has increased a massive military personals and occupied land larger than Pegu’ Farm. (It is a local term). Technically, ceasefire process is obliged to reduce military force for both sides but now they (SPDC) increase its armed force and extend regiments (in Mon State). I don’t want to make them unhappy on the other hand to frankly say about this process. Yes, we have access easily for traveling and live with no much fear of fire. They (SPDC) repair roads and build brides then it has gone year by year. All the cost is not provided by SPDC and local civilians are imposed to pay for remaining cost. They allocate very little grant and forced local people to pay the rest for all constructions. SPDC even don’t allocate full budget for covering living cost of military personals of the Mon as they agreed. Well, over seven-eight years, we lost but they win.

IMNA: What is your prediction the role of Mon and its political goal in another ten years?

Rev; if a political system hasn’t changed our role in politics is bleak. If this government (SPDC) is removed and elected government is stalled then a political change would be emerged. Our role (rights) in the future is also uncertain.