INTERNATIONAL LABOUR CONFERENCE C. App./PV.1
91st Session, Geneva, June 2003
'.
Committee on the Application of Standards
First sitting, 7 June 2003, 10.10 a.m.
Chairperson: Mr. S. Paixao Pardo
Special sitting to examine developments
concerning the question of the observance by the Government of Myanmar of the
Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29)
…………………………………………
CONCLUSIONS
The Committee recalled that its debate
was taking place at a moment when the international community was deeply
concerned at the events which were occurring in Myanmar, namely the incommunicado detention
of the leadership of the National League for Democracy, in particular its
General Secretary, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, and the alleged killing and
disappearance of an unknown number of people. In this connection, a number of
speakers expressed their concern at the personal situation of Daw Aung San Suu
Kyi and asked that she immediately be released. These events, and the resulting
climate of uncertainty and fear, called seriously into question the will and
ability of the authorities to make significant progress in the elimination of
forced labour. The Committee requested the Government representative to convey
its profound concern to his Government.
In its observation, the Committee of Experts had noted that the
three recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry had still not been
implemented: the Village and Towns Acts had not been amended, although Order
1/99 and its Supplementary Order could, if applied in good faith, provide a
statutory basis for ensuring compliance with the Convention in practice;
measures to stop the exaction of forced labour in practice, such as concrete
and specific instructions to the civilian and military authorities and
budgetary allocations for the replacement of forced and unpaid labour, had not
been taken; and there had been no prosecution of or sanctions imposed on
persons for exacting forced labour.
The Committee took note of the statement of the Government
representative, as well as the other information and documents before it. It
noted with appreciation the Government's cooperation with the ILO Liaison
Officer in Myanmar since she had taken up her position in October 2002. It had
to note, however, that the measures taken by the Government to publicize widely
Order 1/99 and its Supplementary Order, including the translation of these
texts into six languages of national minorities, and the field visits carried
out by the field observation teams of the Convention 29 Implementation
Committee, still had not resulted in tangible progress in the application of
the Convention. It was clear from the information available from various sources, including
the impressions of the Liaison Officer, as reflected in her report to the 286th
Session of the Governing Body, that recourse to forced labour continued in
practice and that the situation was particularly serious and appeared to have
changed very little in certain areas with a heavy presence of the army. It also
noted that despite the discussions between the authorities and the Liaison
Officer in the Convention 29 Implementation Committee, all the investigations
carried out by that Committee into the allegations of forced labour presented
by the Liaison Officer had found that these allegations were unfounded.
Taking into account the urgent need expressed repeatedly by the
Committee of Experts, the Governing Body and the present Committee to move from
procedural steps to substantive progress in putting an end to forced labour,
the Committee welcomed the fact that the Government and the ILO had agreed on
27 May 2003 on a joint Plan of Action for the elimination of forced labour and
expressed its support for this Plan. It noted with interest that, on the basis
of the recommendation made by the High-Level Team, the Plan envisaged the
establishment of an independent Facilitator to assist victims of forced labour
to obtain redress under national legislation. It was noted that the Facilitator
would carry out his functions throughout the country. Under the Plan of Action,
the Government had undertaken to strictly enforce the prohibition on forced
labour in the pilot region. While emphasizing that the implementation of the
Plan of Action was without prejudice to the general obligation of the
Government to put an end to forced labour in the whole of the country, the
Committee felt that this Plan of Action, if it was applied in good faith, could
enable tangible progress to be made in the elimination of forced labour and
could open the way to more substantial progress. The Committee urged the
Government to take all the measures required for this purpose. The reports of
the Facilitator to the Governing Body, as well as the evaluation reports on the
implementation of the Plan of Action, should allow the results obtained to be
judged.
For this reason, the Committee was bound
to deplore the situation created by recent events in Myanmar. A climate of
uncertainty and intimidation did not provide an environment in which the Plan
of Action, and in particular the Facilitator mechanism which it established,
could be implemented in a credible manner. The Committee trusted that the
Government would take the necessary measures to bring an end to this situation.
The Committee hoped that the implementation of the joint Plan of Action would
go ahead as soon as the Director-General considered that the conditions were
met for its effective implementation. The Director-General was expected to
report to the Governing Body at its November 2003 session on developments in
the situation, in the light of the discussions in the present Committee.
[N.B. this text
is the English translation of the verbatim report (French authoritative). The
official record may vary in some details of style.]