ETHNIC NATIONALITIES SOLIDARITY AND COOPERATION COMMITTEE

 

(ENSCC)

MISSION STATEMENT

 

 

1. Background History, Mandate and Mission

 

The "Ethnic Nationalities Solidarity and Cooperation Committee" (ENSCC) was formed at the Ethnic Nationalities Seminar held in Kawthulee on August 26-30, 2001, to co-ordinate the following non-Burman political groupings:

 

1.         Political parties under the leadership of United Nationalities League for Democracy (UNLD)

2.         Armed groups which are members of National Democratic Front (NDF),

3.         Armed groups but not members of NDF, such as Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) and Shan State Army (SSA-South).

4.         Ceasefire groups.

 

The ENSCC, therefore, has been entrusted with task of fostering unity and cooperation between all Ethnic nationalities forces and promotes peaceful political settlement in Burma through Tripartite dialogue. It was also resolved that the ENSCC would:

 

(i)         Undertake pro-active and constructive actions to bring about peaceful

 resolution to the political conflict in Burma through a dialogue process

 involving the SPDC, the NLD led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, and the Ethnic Nationalities dialogue partners;

 

(ii)        Consult widely, cooperate, and work closely with all stakeholders in Burma and with the international community, international bodies and agencies, the UN, and humanitarian organizations to resolve the grave humanitarian crises in Burma, which most seriously effect the Ethnic nationalities populations;

 

(iii)       Strive to facilitate an orderly and peaceful democratic transition in Burma, and to rebuild the country in accordance with the spirit of Panglong, the principle of Equality, Self-determination, Democracy, and Justice.

 

 

MISSION

           

¨   Promote the Profile of the Ethnic Nationalities on the international stage.  

¨      ENSCC, coordinate and work for Tripartite Dialogue. 

¨   Reviving the Panglong Spirit, and nation-building.

¨      Build or facilitate Unity and Cohesion among all Ethnic Nationalities forces, inside and outside, including promoting and supporting political actions inside.

 

 

2. Dialogue Strategy

 

2.1. Tripartite Dialogue

 

One of the main objectives of forming the ENSCC, as mentioned above, is to take pro-active and constructive actions to bring about peaceful resolution to the political conflict in Burma through a dialogue process. In lines with this objective, the ENSCC has launching international and national campaigns, and produced its position papers under the title of “The New Panglong Initiative: Re-Building the Union of Burma”.

 

The ENSCC position is that any transitional authority arrangement before prior to tripartite dialogue will not be useful and could create serious problems for a smooth and orderly transition.  The ENSCC, therefore, wants a tripartite dialogue before the formation of the interim government. The ENSCC believes that this arrangement will ensure the smooth transition by forming widely accepted interim authority. In other words the tripartite element of the dialogue constitutes a strategic component of the ENSCC's strategy objective.

 

To ensure that there is tripartite dialogue and meaningful participation of the Ethnic Nationalities in the transition process, the ENSCC will work toward – push for – the convening of an Ethnic Nationalities Conference as broached very earlier on by Razali and the UN team. The ENSCC believes that the time is now ripe and conditions are now favorable for such a conference. In other words, a country-wide Ethnic Nationalities Conference (preferably outside Burma, in Malaysia, for example) will be a major lobbying and action platform of the Ethnic Nationalities and the ENSCC.

 

 

 2.2. Ethnic Nationalities Conference

 

1.      The ENSCC shall conduct Ethnic Nationalities Conference as soon as possible.

2.      The ENSCC should do the coordination for ethnic nationalities/organizations both inside and outside. (Detail work plan is not mentioned here).

3.      The criteria for selection of representatives to the Ethnic Nationalities shall be both state-based and ethnic-based representation.  

4.      The preparation for the Ethnic Nationalities Conference would be composed of three parts:


ONE:               Letters to Taksin, Razali,
Mahathir, Italy, Germany, and France

broaching this idea.

TWO:              International lobby trips – e.g., a lobby tour of Europe and/or lobbying EU

THREE:           Coordination works (preparation) between Inside and Outside Ethnic Nationalities forces.

1.      Religious groups

2.      Thai/China borders groups

3.      NMSP/ MNLD

4.      KIO (Zaw S)

5.      International Conference

 

 

2.3. International Lobby Trips

 

(i)                  The UN and USA trips.

(ii)                The EU Lobby trip: ASEM conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, 22 September 2002.

 

 

2.4.Panglong Initiative: More Concrete Plan (on Humanitarian Aid, Cease Fire, and Political Dialogue)

 

(i)         The most important decision is an agreement on going ahead with the H-Aid initiative (as a strategic link of the PangLong Initiative].  HY is charged with the task of preparing a concrete H-Aid Initiative DRAFT Plan.

 

(ii)        To be included in the plan are the 10 points on H-Aid agreed upon at the SCC Meeting in February 2002 (See appendix).  Other components agreed upon are Cross-Border aid (to reach the most vulnerable population and most in need), Official Consultation (as opposed to mere “consultation” or informal consultation), and multilateral (joint) implementation and mechanism.  An issue which could be worked into the DRAFT plan is “nation-wide” cease-fire, if needed or suitable. 

 

(iii)               The H-Aid Initiative DRAFT Plan is to be submitted to the ENSCC for further consultation and decision. If the ENSCC agrees to adopt the H-Aid plan (after making necessary changes as needed), the ENSCC will consult with the mother organizations and push for support.

 

(iv)         The ENSCC agreed that there should be an “independent” Ethnic Nationalities stand on H-Aid and initiative because their population is the worst affected and most vulnerable.  Also, the ENSCC is of the opinion that unless clear conditions are established, or are tabled and debated, the “free” or unconditional flow of H-Aid will mostly, if not only, benefit the regime directly and indirectly.

 

 

3.1.  Tactics & Strategy : Federalism vs. Independence

 

3.1.1.    Regarding policy goals and tactical positions, the ENSCC recognized that the Karenni (KNPP) position regarding independence vs. federalism is or should be the model, and the SSA/S tactical position is the most suitable.  The SSA/S tactical position is that it accepts Tripartite Dialogue, and that it recognizes that the people will decide what is best for the people of Shan State.  The RCSS representative stated that if the SSA/S do not recognize and accept reality, it will be marginalized and will wither away.

 

3.1. 2.  It was clarified and agreed that federalism is an issue that is separate from “Joining with Burma Proper”, and that there is another option – i.e., establishing a federal union without Burma Proper (……if Burman leaders do not want to be part of a federal union).  

 

NOTE: The above option, a Federal Union among territorial states that are committed to federalism (i.e., the Panglong spirit and principle), is a strategically relevant, strategically useful,  option – vis-à-vis both the Burman and international actors -- which has not been much thought about and/or developed by the Ethnic Nationalities.  The unfortunate fact is that federalism has been confused with “joining with Burma Proper”. As a result, the thinking of the Ethnic Nationalities on federalism have been dominated by an issue that has nothing much to do with federalism – i.e., the “joining with Burma Proper” issue.   

 

 

3.2.      The Mode of Representation: States- or Ethnic-based?

 

3.2.1        On the matter of representation mode, the ENSCC prefers a flexible mode where both the state-based and ethnic-based representation mode is recognized.

 

[NOTE: it was earlier suggested the ENSCC should adopt a “States representation” mode at the EU-ASEM lobbying and other tours.]

 

3.2.2.   It was clarified that the Karen were very earlier on oriented to the notion of ethnic equality and ethnic rights – from the colonial period – because they were part of Burma Proper, did not have a separate state.  Whereas the Shan and Karenni are state-oriented because they “possessed” their own states since pre-colonial times, and as well in the colonial period.

 

3.2.3.   Because of the above historical-political context, there has been much confusion over who represents what. For example, the NDF's goal is federalism, a federation of equal and self-determining states, but it political language is about ethnic equality, ethnic self-determination, not about states.

 

NOTE:  The ethnic equality, ethnic representation, ethnic self-determination orientation can be very confusing for international and academic actors as well because it implies that politics in Burma is about ethnicity, ethnic equality, ethnic self-determination – and not about federalism (or Panglong). The SPDC has used the ethnic oriented language (of the Ethnic Nationalities) to say that there are over 130 ethnic groups, thus making it necessary to have a military-dominated centralized state, to prevent ethnic conflict and the disintegration of the country.

 

 

4. Statement on the Release of Daw Aung Suu Kyi:

(Date: 9 May 2002)

 

The Ethnic Nationalities Solidarity and Cooperation Committee (ENSCC) commends the unconditional release by the SPDC of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from a 19-months unlawful house arrest, and with respect to the meeting of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi with Khun Htun Oo and other ethnic nationalities leaders, the ENSCC welcomes Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's statesman-like and correct stand on the right of the ethnic nationalities: their right to self-determination and the right to resolve their own problems within the national reconciliation framework.

 

The ENSCC, formed to achieve national reconciliation in Burma through tripartite dialogue, is encouraged by the recent development in Burma owed to the efforts and good office of Special Envoy H.E. Razali Ismail, and will continue to work closely with all parties in Burma, with the U.N., and with international supporters of peace and national reconciliation.

 

The ENSCC calls upon the SPDC to respond constructively to the high expectations raised by its release of Daw Aung Suu Kyi and urge the SPDC to recognize the rights of the ethnic nationalities to fully and meaningfully participate in the national reconciliation process.  In this respect, there is a need for ethnic national leaders and organizations to meet to resolve Burma's problem.  Specifically, the ENSCC looks forward to the SPDC's cooperation in the on-going efforts of the ethnic nationalities to build a peaceful and harmonious federal Union of Burma in accordance with the Panglong spirit.

 

 

5. The ENSCC Committee Members:

 

1.      Saw Ba Thin,                                  Chairman, Karen National Union

2.      Dr. Chao Tzang Yawnghwe            National Reconciliation Program

3.      Hteh Bupeh                                    Chairman,  KNPP

4.      Sao Seng Suk                                 Shan Democratic Union

5.      Teddy Buri                                     President, Members of Parliament Union

6.      Khun Okka                                    Joint Secretary General of  NDF

7.      Dr. Lian H. Sakhong                       Secretary of UNLD-LA  

 

● Mr. Harn Yawnghwe                         Official Advisor

● Saw David Taw                                 Personal Assistant to Saw Ba Thin

 

 

 

 

Appendix:

 

SCC Position on Humanitarian Aid: Decision made at the SCC meeting held in January 2001.

 

1.      The Strategy Consultation:

  1. Believes that the root cause of the on-going humanitarian crisis in Burma is the lack of a democratic government accountable to the people and the military’s focus of holding on to power instead of promoting the interest of the nation. These fundamentals need to be exposed.
  2. Contends that humanitarian assistance from the international community should be designed to contribute to positive democratic changes in Burma.
  3. Defines humanitarian assistance as food, clothing, shelter and health care, which are the basic necessities of the people.   
  4. If humanitarian assistance is to be delivered to the people of Burma, the following criteria must be met. The assistance must -

1.      Be delivered directly to people.

2.      Be delivered to the most needy areas.

3.      Be delivered through credible international NGOs.

4.      Not be delivered through the SPDC or organizations under its control.

5.      Be delivered only after prior consultation with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD.

6.      Be delivered to border areas where the need is greatest. In order to do this, SPDC should declare a nation-wide cease-fire.

7.      Be delivered only after prior consultation with independent local leaders and community organizations.

8.      Be monitored by an independent impartial body.

9.      Be delivered by NGOs that abide by an international Code of Conduct, which will be agreed to by all parties.

10.  The Strategy Consultation further agrees to encourage the delivery of humanitarian assistance across national borders.

 

2.      The Strategy Consultation supports the formation of the ENSCC to prepare the ethnic nationalities for a tripartite dialogue and its efforts to bring about a tripartite dialogue.

 

3.      The Strategy Consultation further supports the ENSCC’s ‘New Panglong Initiative’, which is aimed at national reconciliation. The organizations participating in the Strategy Consultation undertake to work together to promote the concepts and principles of the ‘Initiative’ and for their acceptance national-wide.