EBO “Burma News” 4 August 2003



News Summary:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Pressure on Burma tours

2. Criticism of Myanmar’s Junta Lacks Any Real Force of Change

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Pressure on Burma tours

The Guardian

Sunday August 3, 2003

 

By Tom Templeton

 

The Foreign Office says it will continue to increase the pressure on tour firms

operating to Burma until the military regime releases opposition leader Aung San

Suu Kyi and allows her National League for Democracy party (NLD) to operate freely.

 

British officials are due to meet the 18 UK travel companies still operating tours

to explain how their operations are supporting the military regime.

 

Foreign Minister Mike O'Brien launched a high-profile campaign two weeks ago

in direct response to the 30 May attacks by government-sponsored militia forces

which killed up to 70 NLD members and resulted in Suu Kyi's imprisonment.

 

It is estimated that Burma receives half a million visitors a year of whom just

6,000-8,000 are British. These visitors annually raise around £25 million in

foreign currency for the regime from entry certificates alone.

 

Many of Burma's tourism developments were built using forced labour, and have

caused forced relocation of the local people. The democratically elected NLD has

always argued that the benefit of the little tourism money that filters through

to the locals is outweighed by the cost to Burma's 42 million inhabitants

of propping up the current regime.

 

Western diplomats in the capital Rangoon report that the military junta and

their cronies are benefiting directly from recent tourism developments. A list of

owners of the hotel plots at the newest beach resort in the country, Ngwesaung,

reads like 'a Who's Who of generals and their cronies', one said. These include

the Htoo construction group, owned by U Teza who is barred from visiting

European Union countries as part of EU sanctions against the regime.

 

Htoo is also apparently building a new $3m complex - comprising a viewing

tower, souvenir shops, meeting rooms and a hotel - at the Bagan heritage site.

The tower, which is said to have appeared to Than Shwe, leader of the junta,

in a dream, will overshadow the tallest of the ancient pagodas there.

The residents of Bagan were not consulted about the complex.

 

Tour operator Abercrombie & Kent announced last week that it would drop Burma

from its 2004 brochure due to lack of demand. However, if a client insists on

visiting Burma after being advised of the political situation A&K will organise

their travel arrangements.

 

-----------------------------------

 

Criticism of Myanmar’s Junta Lacks Any Real Force of Change

South China Morning Post

August 4 2003

 

By Peter Kammerer

 

Asian nations lack the desire to do more than criticise Myanmar's military

regime for refusing to implement democracy, observers have agreed.

 

International pressure has forced the Association of South East Asian

Nations (Asean) to take the unprecedented step of criticising a member

country, but there was little more the group could - or would - do. Even a

much-publicised road map for democratic change proposed by Thailand was a

vague concept rather than a firm proposal, one observer said.

 

Myanmar's Foreign Minister, Aung Win, returned to Yangon last week after a

tour of Asean countries to discuss the moves. In Indonesia, after the US

toughened diplomatic and economic sanctions, he hinted that detained

opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi could be released before Asean's annual

summit in October. Asean, breaking its principle of non-interference in

the affairs of member nations, formally asked for the release of Ms Suu

Kyi and hundreds of her supporters and implementation of greater democracy

at a meeting of foreign ministers in Phnom Penh on June 18. They repeated

the call, along with their European counterparts, at the Asia-Europe

Meeting (Asem) in Bali on July 25. Days earlier, Malaysia's outgoing prime

minister, Mahathir Mohamad, suggested Myanmar could be expelled from Asean

for non-compliance with its demands.

 

Asean expert Amitav Acharya said the requests showed the organisation was

changing, although it was "not completely out of the non-intervention

mode". But he doubted the efficacy of Asean's cautious approach to

Myanmar's rulers.

 

"I don't think what Asean has done so far would make a big difference,"

said Dr Acharya, the deputy director of Singapore's Institute of Defence

and Strategic Studies. "It may lead to the release of Aung San Suu Kyi,

but that's addressing the symptom, not the cause - and even that happening

cannot be taken for granted."

 

He said China's backing of the regime was allowing it to retain power, and

while this continued, external efforts would achieve little.

 

Thailand-based observers agreed that Asean lacked the ability to force the

democratisation of Myanmar. An adviser to the Thai foreign affairs

committee, Sunai Phasuk, said that Asean was in a bind because Myanmar's

military had clearly indicated an intention to retain power indefinitely,

yet it had done its best to appease international pressure for action.

 

The pressure had been the reason for Thai Foreign Minister Surakiart

Sathirathai's road map, which the professor of political science at

Bangkok's Thammasat University described as "a slip of the tongue". Dr

Sunai claimed the announcement was made in the lead-up to the Asean

meeting without the consultation of either the junta or pro-democracy

groups, or the knowledge of Foreign Ministry officials and advisers.

 

Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra said after meeting General Aung Win

that he was willing to go to Myanmar to discuss the idea. He has already

offered to mediate between the junta and the international community.

 

Dr Sunai believed little would come of the plan - especially as Thailand,

like the junta, had never recognised the victory of Ms Suu Kyi's National

League for Democracy political party in 1990 elections.

 

Other than proposing Ms Suu Kyi's release, other details of the plan were

unclear. Dr Surakiart had spoken of unity for Myanmar and the assurance of

the status quo through armed groups giving up their weapons and Thailand

being a conduit for talks.

 

"In general, the idea is in favour of the junta and could endanger the

pro-democracy side by forcing those engaged in armed struggle to give up

weapons," said Dr Sunai, also a spokesman for the Thai human rights group

Forum Asia.

 

Debbie Stothard, co-ordinator of the Bangkok-based pressure group

Altsean-Burma, agreed that the lack of consultation made the road map

problematic.

 

She said Thailand was showing which side it really supported by cracking

down on most exiled pro-democracy groups from Myanmar based in Thailand.

 

                                                ###

 

If you do not wish to receive this daily newsletters, please reply

with your e-mail address and the "cancel" in the text section.

 

With many thanks,

Burma News

 

Euro-Burma Office

Square Gutenberg 11/2

1000 Brussels

Belgium

 

tel:  32 2 280 0691/280 2452

fax: 32 2 280 0310

e-mail: [email protected]