THE NATIONAL CONVENTION

 

 


Tabayin (Depayin) Massacre which occurred on May 30 diminished all the expectations for the progress of a homegrown national reconciliation process as an aftermath of confidence building talks between Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) since October, 2000 and her subsequent release in July, 2003.  Evidences and testimonies of eyewitnesses confirmed conclusively that it was a premeditated attack by the pro-military thugs under the instructions of authorities and thus, the SPDC is accountable for it.

 

Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the key dialogue partner for the military if a substantive political dialogue takes place, narrowly escaped from the attack but was immediately detained by the regime. The entire National League for Democracy (NLD) leadership was either put under house arrest or detained in prisons and all NLD offices were closed down.

 

Tabayin (Depayin) Massacre was the biggest violent suppression of political dissidents after 8888 democratic uprising.  In response to such a situation, there has been growing international pressure including countries from the region.  Since the possibility for a homegrown national reconciliation process was no longer valid, consideration was given to formulate a framework or roadmap for democratic transition in Burma with the coordination of the UN Special Envoy, taking into account the visions of all parties concerned.  Thailand joined the process and took unilateral initiative to outline its proposal and started to consult with SPDC and some countries in the region.      

 

To encounter international efforts to formulate a roadmap for transition with a particular time frame and build up more pressure to materialize the democratic transition, SPDC made a reshuffle within its establishment and appointed intelligence chief, “Gen. Khin Nyunt” who was perceived as a pragmatist among Burmese generals by the international community, as the new Prime Minister.  Immediately, Gen. Khin Nyunt delivered a policy speech on 30 August and announced a seven-point roadmap for transition to a "disciplined democracy".

 

Gen. Khin Nyunt said, "... the government will be implementing in a step-by-step and systematic manner the following political program for building the nation. [1]

(1)  Reconvening of the National Convention that has been adjourned since 1996.
(2) After the successful holding of the National Convention, step by step implementation of the process necessary for the emergence of a genuine and disciplined democratic system.
(3) Drafting of a new constitution in accordance with basic principles and detailed basic principles laid down by the National Convention.
(4) Adoption of the constitution through national referendum.
(5) Holding of free and fair elections for Pyithu Hluttaws (Legislative bodies) according to the new constitution.
(6) Convening of Hluttaws attended by Hluttaw members in accordance with the new constitution.
(7) - Building a modern, developed and democratic nation by the state leaders elected by the Hluttaw; and the government and other central organs formed by the Hluttaw. .."

 

Since the entire leadership of the NLD was under arrest, they were not in the position to make a public response. However, according to the UN Special Envoy, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi did not make any particular comments on it.  Instead, she just expressed her readiness to have a dialogue with Gen. Khin Nyunt.

 

The NLD participated in the National Convention when it was started in 1993, and on 27 November 1995 it sent a letter to the military, requesting that the proceedings of the National Convention to be liberalized. The military rejected the NLD’s appeal and on the 28 December 1995, the NLD boycotted the National Convention. Almost immediately, all delegates from the NLD were expelled by the military from the National Convention. The National Convention was suspended in 1996. 

 

The National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma rejected the roadmap proposed by Gen. Khin Nyunt declaring that it is “nothing more than a political ploy to ease mounting international pressure and prolong military rule.” With regard to the National Convention, the NCGUB reaffirmed its position that “A convention of national importance should be an inclusive process with proper representation and conducted in a democratic manner under an unbiased authority. SPDC’s convention dominated by military commanders and delegates selected by the military is only there to rubberstamp SPDC’s own idea.”[2]

 

The Committee Representing People's Parliament (CRPP) also responded that “the roadmap proposed by SPDC fails to resolve the political-economic crisis that the country is facing.  It is indeed a continuous policy failure to implement the results of the 1990 general elections and disregard of the will of the nationalities and the citizens.  To repeat the process of holding another election on the same pattern of 1990 elections which it initiated and failed to implement, will not be acceptable by the people under any circumstances.”[3]

 

The United Nationalities League for Democracy (UNLD) which is the umbrella organization of 25 ethnic based political parties, urged the SPDC to begin dialogue with NLD in order to establish an interim government or authority comprised of the CRPP and representatives of the SPDC.  It further suggested that, “Should agreement be reached for the convening of a National Convention, it must be based upon the outcome of the 1990 elections. The elected representatives must be the basic force in the National Convention.  The interim government should act as a supervisory body to the National Convention and formulate the basic guide lines and requirements. It should be started afresh and not as a continuation of the defunct convention.[4]

 

Similarly, at a "tripartite" meeting held in Panghsang, 13-15 October, three ethnic nationality forces -- the Mong La, Shan, and Wa groups -- which have concluded cease-fire agreement with the SPDC, agreed on a five-point position as a prerequisite for the National Convention[5].  According to a joint statement released, the three forces wanted:  (1) Freedom of meeting among leaders of ethnic nationalities prior to the convening of the National Convention, (2) Delegates to the National Convention to be chosen freely by each nationalities concerned, (3) The National Convention must be all inclusive and participated by "proper" delegates, (4) Freedom of discussion and freedom of activities during the National Convention, and (5) To lay down democratic principles in order to establish a modern and developed new democratic state.

  

"The National Convention being deemed as central to the resolution of our internal problems, we have agreed to send delegates to attend it if we are invited under the principles of Adherence to democratic norms, Equality and Coordination," the statement added.

  

Above mentioned positions of democratic and ethnic organizations on SPDC’s roadmap indicate the skepticism with the National Convention process which was designed to prolong and legitimize military rule against the will of the people as expressed through the 1990 general elections.

 

Should the military be serious about national reconciliation, there is no other option but to immediately begin a substantive political dialogue with the NLD led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and leaders of the ethnic nationalities in order to establish an interim national reconciliation government which will lead the course of democratic transition in Burma.

 

A constitution making process, which can produce a long lasting social contract among ethnic nationalities of Burma by accommodating the aspirations of all, can only take place in a democratic and participatory political environment guaranteed by a national reconciliation government.

 

Since the SPDC's real intention is to use the National Convention to impose the military’s way to "disciplined democracy" in Burma, the current session of UNGA needs to take a clear-cut stand on SPDC’s National Convention.

 

The following are highlights of the military constitution that would be drafted by the National Convention.[6]

 

 

THE MILITARY

 

  1. The military is to be an extra-constitutional organization.

2.      The Commander-in-Chief of the Defence Services is not subject to the constitution.

  1. The Commander-in-Chief will appoint twenty five percent of all members of the Union, State, and Regional Assemblies.
  2. The Commander-in-Chief of the Defence Services will also appoint the
    • Minister for Defence
    • Minister for the Interior
    • Minister for Border affairs

 

THE PRESIDENT

 

1.         The President is the Head of State. He must have military experience.

2.         The President must not have parents, a spouse, or children who are foreign nationals.

3.         The President must have lived continuously in Burma for 20 years.

4.         The President will appoint Ministers in the Union Government with the exception of those appointed by the Commander-in-Chief. The ministers appointed by the President may be military personnel.

5.         The President will also appoint a Chief Minister for each State and Region in the Union.

6.         The President will delegate all administrative and legislative functions of the State to the respective organs of the Union. Their functions are not derived from the constitution.

7.         The President will appoint Judges of the Supreme Court but the President is not obliged to comply with the rulings of the Supreme Court.

 

THE NATIONAL CONVENTION & ITS PROCEDURAL CODE

 

1.         All 702 delegates to the National Convention were pre-selected by the military.

2.         Only 99 delegates out of the total of 702 were elected representatives.

3.         The military directly controlled the proceedings of the National Convention through its organizing committees (including the NCCC and the NCCWC).

4.         Delegates may only speak before the National Convention if his or her speech had been pre-approved by the NCCWC.

5.         Delegates may not deviate from the approved discussion paper.

6.         Delegates may only express support for constitutional principles proposed by the military.

7.         Delegates must not indulge in "grandstanding speeches", nor "use language damaging to national unity", nor speak "defamatorily against the beneficence of the State".

8.         Delegates must not indulge in speeches "damaging the prestige of other organizations" (i.e. the military).

9.         Delegates are not permitted to form a collective view on any issue.

10.      Delegates may not distribute any papers on the convention premises, without the permission of the NCCWC.

11.      All information related to the National Convention, including discussion papers, is deemed to be "state secrets".

12.      Theoretically, it is 'illegal' to discuss even the colour of the floor coverings at the National Convention.

13.      All "news" in relation to the National Convention may only be released by the military's NCCWC.  (Breaches of these provisions are severely dealt with. One delegate, Dr Aung Khin Sint, was arrested and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for distributing a paper among delegates)

14.      Delegates to the National Convention are frequently subjected to intimidation by the military while the convention is out of session.

 

THE MILITARY'S DRAFT CONSTITUTION

 

The constitution presented to the delegates for ratification was drafted by the military prior to the convening of the National Convention. The delegates had no significant input.

 

1.         There are no guarantees of democratic procedures for the election of people's representatives.

2.         There are no general protections for the people in the constitution.

3.         There are no human rights protections.

4.         Freedom of association is not protected by the constitution.

5.         There are no guarantees of free speech or political activity.

6.         There is no freedom for the media.

 

LAW NO. 5/96

 

Following its walk out from the National Convention, the NLD announced that it would continue to work on a new democratic constitution for Burma. As a consequence, the military issued law No 5/96 titled: "The Law Protecting the Peaceful and Systematic Transfer of State Responsibility and the Successful Performance of the Functions of the National Convention Against Disturbances and Opposition". This law provides for the imprisonment of any person for up to 20 years or the banning of an organisation who/which:

 

-   draft and disseminate the constitution of the state,

-   carry out the functions of the National Convention,

-   deliver  speeches  or  make  statements  to  undermine,  belittle  and  make  people misunderstand the functions being carried out by the National Convention, and

-    deliver speeches or make statements in order to undermine the stability of the State.

 

 

 

National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma

 

Oct 21, 2003.



[1] Prime Minister Gen. Khin Nyunt clarifies future policies and programmes of the State, New Light of Myanmar, 31 August, 2003

[2] “NCGUB Says Military’s ‘Democracy Plan’ ‘Nothing more Than Political Ploy”, Press Release of the NCGUB on August 31, 2003.

[3] Statement of the Committee Representing the Peoples’ Parliament, September 16, 2003

[4] “The Political Roadmap of the United Nationalities League for Democracy and its Five Positions on the Current Political Situation”, September 29, 2003.

[5] "Politics" section of www.shanland.org: "Wa sets conditions for junta convention", 19 October 2003

[6] “Highlights-The Military Constitution-Burma: Impediments to Establishing A Democracy”, Distributed by Euro-Burma Office, Brussels-September, 2003.