BURMA PRESS SUMMARY
From the Rangoon "The New Light of Myanmar"
Compiled for the Burma Studies Group by Hugh C. MacDougall
Published by the Center for East Asian and Pacific Studies, University of
Illinois
Volume IX, No. 2, February 1995
NATIONAL
CONVENTION
National Convention Working Sessions
NATIONAL CONVENTION
National
Convention Working Sessions
[News stories sometimes list speakers, and
often note when the next meetings are due, but very little of substance is
included.]
Jan. 31: Two groups met. State service
personnel: compilation was completed on chapters on Legislature, Executive, and
Judiciary for the Plenary Session. Representatives-elect: presentation of
proposal papers on Judiciary was discussed. (NLM 2/1)
Feb. 1: One group met. Political parties: the
Panel of Chairmen scrutinized a paper on Executive. (NLM 2/2)
Feb. 2: One group met. State service personnel:
the Panel of Chairmen scrutinized a proposal paper on Judiciary. (NLM 2/ 3)
Feb. 3: One group met. State service
personnel: proposal papers on Executive were read. (NLM 2/4)
Feb. 10: One group met. Political parties:
the Panel of Chairmen discussed proposal papers on Judiciary. (NLM 2/11)
Feb. 14: One group met. Political parties:
proposal papers on Judiciary were presented. At a meeting of the National
Convention Convening Commission, Management Committee Chairman Brig-Gen. Tin
Aye said that all proposal papers on self-administered areas, and on
Legislative and Executive chapters, have been received. Proposal papers on
Judiciary have been received from all delegate groups except political parties
and representatives-elect, which are still being compiled. (NLM 2/15)
Feb. 17: One group met. Political parties:
the Panel of Chairmen scrutinized proposal papers on Judiciary. (NLM 2/18)
Feb. 20: Two groups met. Political parties:
the Panel of Chairmen scrutinized proposal papers on Judiciary. Representatives-elect:
the Panel of Chairmen received a proposal paper on Judiciary. (NLM 2/21)
Feb. 21: Two groups met. Political parties: a
proposal paper on Judiciary was heard, and the remaining parties were invited
to submit papers. Representatives-elect: the Panel of Chairmen scrutinized
proposal papers on Judiciary. (NLM 2/22)
Feb. 23: One group met. Political parties:
the Panel of Chairmen scrutinized the proposal paper on Judiciary. (NLM 2/24)
Feb. 24: Two groups met. Political parties:
proposal papers on Judiciary were presented. Representatives-elect: the Panel
of Chairmen heard positions papers on Judiciary. (NLM 2/25)
Feb. 27: Two groups met: Political Parties:
the Panel of Chairmen scrutinized a proposal paper on Judiciary.
Representatives-elect: proposal papers on Judiciary were read. (NLM 2/28)