[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
NLD Labour report submitted to 1997
- Subject: NLD Labour report submitted to 1997
- From: nldburma@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:28:00
Subject: NLD Labour report submitted to 1997 May conference (translation)
1997 May 27
NLD
CENTRAL LABOR AFFAIRS WORKING GROUP
Labor Affairs Report
Introduction
1. The National League for Democracy was established on 27
September
1988, and since then the party has aimed to serve all social classes.
Therefore, the Farmers' Affairs Working Group, the Professionals and
Intellectuals Group, the Trading and Business Group and the Labor
Affairs Working Group were formed at the beginning of 1989.
2. The Central Labor Affairs Working Group was formed with the
following members on 26 March 1989.
U Sein Win President
U Than Tun
U Thaung Kyi
U Khin Maung Kyi
U Maung Ko
U Tint Lwin
Daw San San Secretary
3. The working group carried out some highly prominent activities
prior to the General Election of May 1990, as follows-
(a) On May Day 1989, released the "May Day Statement" at the
Workers'
Day events held by the NLD.
(b) Wrote a protest letter to the ILO Congress of June 1989,
stating
that the Burmese delegates claiming to be representatives of all
workers in Burma were not real representatives of the workers,
because even though Burma has ratified ILO Convention No. 87, it has
not been implemented and workers have been prevented from forming
trade unions.
(c) The NLD Draft Policy for the 1990 General Election
included the
following points on labor affairs-
(1) Trade unions are not to be omitted from a
democratic system.
Trade unions have to be independent from political parties.
(2) Trade unions have the right to demand justice
within the law.
(3) Solving collective bargaining problems must be
fair and in
accordance with the law.
4. Prior to the multi-party General Election campaign of May
1990,
the Central Labor Affairs Working Group assisted township level NLD
members who sought advice regarding labor issues. Occasional lectures
were also given to members at the township level so as to improve
their knowledge of labor matters. However, due to the Central Labor
Affairs Working Group's strident efforts during the election
campaign, it's movements were subsequently halted, for various
reasons.
5. After the NLD General Secretary was released from detention on
19
July 1995, the NLD was optimistic that the party would become unified
and increasingly systematic in its activities. There was also greater
concentration on class issues as demanded by the circumstances. The
Central Farmers' Team, The Central Women's Affairs Working Group and
other social assistance teams started to implement their activities.
6. On 21 August, and 18 September 1996, U Tin Oo, a Central
Executive
Member and Vice President of the NLD attended the Central Labor
Affairs Working Group's meeting. He assigned the following persons
the responsibility of ascertaining and reporting upon the current
situation of workers in Burma and furthermore to outline the NLD's
future program of action in this regard-
U Tin Oo
U Lun Maung
U Maung Maung Gyi
U Than Tun
U Khin Maung Kyi
U Sein Win and
Daw San San.
7. The Current Situation of Workers in Burma
Even though Burma has been opening up to a market economic system in
recent years, agriculture products are still the primary produce of
the country. Burma's population of 44.74 million (1996) includes
26.34 million people who are between 15 to 59 years of age and being
as such have productive capacity. This figure includes 11.72 million
farmers, out of a total productive population of 17.59 million.
Therefore, the labor force amounts to 39.3% of the country's total
population and 66.8% of the population that have productive capacity.
The grassroots workers and farmers, that is, the human resources are
the main force for the country's potential economic, political and
social success under Burma's developing market economy.
Matters of industrial peace, decent living standards, social justice
and employment regulations are the main problems facing workers in
the current circumstances. The labor laws used for many years are far
from perfect. Moreover, given current levels of inflation and
excessive policy emphasis on the market economic system, some laws
are no longer conceptually or practically acceptable, causing workers
to have lost their rights. The NLD's policy allows people to enjoy
full democratic rights and basic human rights. In this regard, it is
necessary to study the weakness and requirements of the 21 labor laws
currently enacted in Burma and find the ways to change these.
Under the market economic system imposed during the period of SLORC
governance, workers in foreign investment and joint venture projects
and factories have had to suffer the following;
(a) According to job appointment rules, the employer has the
right to
dismiss any worker from employment without giving one months advance
notice, as outlined in existing labor laws. This grants excessive
opportunities to the employer to prevent a stable workforce forming
at work sites.
(b) There is no process or system by which workers grievances
can be
aired, no mechanisms for demanding labor rights, no trade unions
permitted at workplaces and departments, no clear mechanisms for
resolution of cases where a worker was forced to resign (or rather,
workers are afraid to complain) and no step by step appeal programs
(for negotiations, interventions and plenary discussion) therefore,
workers suffer considerably.
(c) Foreign employers and investors establish factories in
Burma as
well as Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. Although the products are
of the same quality, Burmese workers receive much less money than
other countries' minimum wages, because of the non-application of the
minimum wage law. Some employers who are willing to raise salaries
have to first consider workers' salaries in nationalized factories,
and in circumstances of inequality there can be conflict between
private and government enterprises. Thus, they cannot raise wages
even if they wish to and so the workers are unable to attain a fair
income.
(d) According to Burma's "Leave and Holiday Act", shift
workers must
work a maximum 48 hour week, and for offices and service industries
42 hours per week. However staff and workers in supermarkets and
factories, which have appeared as a result of the developing market
economy, have to work about 10 hours a day in defiance of labor
protection laws. Working on Saturday and over time duties are also
required, but there is no appropriate recompense, the employees being
paid a small amount of money or being issued some food. Social
welfare laws are also ignored. Although the wage rates set are not
equivalent to the current pace of inflation, there have been no
changes and improvements. For example, the Labor Compensation Act
excludes by definition workers earning over 400 Kyats per month, so
employers can claim that their workers are not covered by the
Compensation Act.
8. Concerning current conditions for workers in Burma, we state
that-
(1) Existing labor affairs laws are not suited to the present
situation and system. There are weak points that need to be revised.
Legal mechanisms to protect workers have dwindled away, so a worker,
who independently demands his or her rights, will not succeed and
also can be threatened with his or her job. Medical assistance,
social assistance and job security programs are not systematically
organized.
Burma is an independent country and a member of the United Nations.
It is also a member of the International Labor Organization (ILO)
which is part of the United Nations. The ILO holds an annual meeting
in Geneva, Switzerland, each June.
(2) Labor, employer and government representatives combine in
a
tripartite system of discussion at the ILO annual meeting. Burma
sends representatives of all three categories. If the member
countries of the ILO have accepted the ILO conventions, having taken
into consideration their own political, economic and social systems,
then they have to follow and implement the conventions as prepared
and approved by the representatives of the ILO assembly.
(3) Convention No. 29---Since Burma became a member of the
ILO, it
accepted the ILO Convention on Forced Labor No.29 (1930). However,
having ratified this Convention, the government has failed to
implement it, even though it was approved over 40 years ago (in
1955). During the ILO Assembly of 12 June 1996, the resolution on
Burma stated that "In particular, forcing children to work is not
only a violation of basic human rights but also ignores human dignity
and is the practice of criminals. Violating the rights of children
and their rights to education, which are outlined in the
International Bill of Human Rights amounts to destroying the
children's future. Burma has not followed and implemented Convention
No. 29, forced labor on construction of roads and bridges, forced
labor to clear forests in front-line areas and forced portering
should be stopped" as urged by the workers' and employers' delegates
of the member states.
(4) Convention No.87--- Convention No.87 states that workers
have
rights to organize and freely associate. Burma ratified it in 1955
and even enacted the law within the country. But instead, rights to
organize and form trade unions are prohibited in Burma. In that
regard, the ILO Assembly of 1996 discussed and reaffirmed that Burma
should promote and implement Convention No.87.
Furthermore, a high level ILO investigation team for technical
assistance, having been formed at the request of the SLORC, was
denied access to Burma upon arrival in Bangkok.
That postponement amounts to a lost opportunity for some good advice
regarding Burma's labor affairs and the manner by which enacted labor
rights have not been practiced. Problems such as a lack of job
security, decent working conditions and insufficient income leading
to poverty cause concerns among the workers, and as such there has
been a decline in the general character of the work force.
The Central Labor Affairs Working Group considers trade unions
essential for the reclamation of lost labor rights, establishment of
systematic mechanisms for the protection of these rights, and
implementation of the rights to organize and to freedom of
expression.
9. The ILO and Burmese labor affairs
At the 83rd Session of the ILO Assembly held in Geneva, Switzerland,
June 1996, delegates and representatives from around the world
strongly condemned Burma's labor conditions and the failure to
implement the resolutions and conventions of the ILO. Some
statements and discussions by ILO delegates in 1996 are outlined
below.
"Since 1981, Burma has been called upon to implement
Convention No.
87 nine times, and out of 15 reports by the ILO Committee of Experts,
12 reports have specifically referred to that Convention and urged
its implementation in Burma. However, Burma has not responded. As
yet there is no freedom of association in Burma, no labor
organizations and no trade unions, and even contact with other trade
unions and political parties is denied. For example Burmese sailors
are granted permission to accept jobs in international companies only
after signing a bond claiming that they will never contact and
participate in any seafarer unions world wide." Swedish labor
representative.
"The Assembly has on several occasions urged Burma to cease human
rights violations, but the Burmese government has not taken any
action. The media and freedom of speech are strictly controlled and
nowadays people are subject to mass arrests." Japanese labor
representative.
"Burma has been under military control for several years and there
are no labor organizations and unions. The loss of political and
social rights is shameful for Burma. The counter arguments presented
by the Burmese delegate are absolute lies." - Indian labor
representative.
"Although Burma has annually promised to follow ILO Convention No.
87, several times, there has been no implementation. We as a group of
five countries express our concern regarding Burma's human rights
abuses. We request the right of workers to form trade unions and
associate freely." - Norwegian delegate (on behalf of Scandinavia).
"For the Burmese government, the world's opinions and comments
cannot
be ignored. Just saying 'our government approaches these matters with
goodwill' is not enough, Burma needs to change practically and in
accordance with law." -Netherlands delegate.
The representative for the United Nations Secretary General stated
that in accordance with the Burmese government's letter of request
dated 4 April 1996, a team led by a senior officer of the Norms and
Standards Inspection Department was sent to Burma. When that team
arrived in Bangkok, Thailand, on transit to Rangoon, the Burmese
government informed them by telegram that the trip was postponed
because of unexpected matters.
Thus, this representative also
requested the ILO Assembly to strongly condemn Burma in it's report.
Moreover, even though Burma ratified ILO Convention No. 29 (1930) in
1955, it remains unimplemented. In preparing Burma's Visit Myanmar
Year for the promotion of tourism, not only men, but even under-aged
children and women were required to work without payment on
constructions of tourist facilities and attractions. For instance,
thousands of people were required to work in shifts 24 hours a day in
order to prepare Mandalay moat, violating ILO Convention No 29.
Therefore, the ILO assembly adopted a condemnatory resolution using
strongly critical words regarding Burma's breaches of ILO Conventions
No.87 and 29, and warning the Burmese government regarding it's
failure to implement these Conventions.
Moreover, the Burmese government was instructed to follow the
resolutions laid down by the Third Committee during the 50th session
of the United Nations General Assembly, issued on 11 December 1995.
We are very disappointed that the Burmese government continues to
violate human rights.
With reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we urge
the Burmese government to create opportunities for all people to be
involved in politics and to develop a democratic system, especially
to transfer power to those persons elected through due democratic
process.
We strongly urge the government of Burma:
· To respect and permit human rights, including rights to organize
and freedom of speech,
· To protect indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities,
· To respect the right to life and cease violations of human dignity
· To cease torturing, rape, forced laboring, forced relocation,
summary execution and disappearances.
We are extremely concerned by continued violations of human rights in
Burma as observed by the United Nations special rapporteur, noted to
include - execution; arbitrary arrest; detention; restrictions on
freedom of speech, publicity and the right to association; torture;
forced labor; forced portering and other enormous violations during
military operations, and forced relocation for reasons of economic
development.
Article 26 of the ILO Constitution states that if a country fails to
meet the world's labor norms and standards and violates human rights,
then the ILO has the right to form a special commission of
investigation. Therefore the Burmese government needs to deal with
its failure to follow the Conventions and its violations of human
rights, lest action be taken in accordance with Article 26 of the ILO
Constitution.
Furthermore, on December 12, 1996, the United Nations General
Assembly strongly condemned Burma for the practice of forced labor
(ILO Con. 29) and for denying the rights to organize and freedom of
association (ILO Con. 87).
The Assembly also demanded that Burma follow the ILO Conventions.
10. NLD Aims for labor affairs
The Central Labor Affairs Working Group of the NLD aims to
regain and
protect these labor rights, notably the rights to organize and
associate freely, to demand legitimate labor rights, and the right to
form trade unions for workers in factories, industries and
departments. Therefore, the following projects are planned to
achieve these aims.
11. Projects
The following projects of the NLD's Central Labor Affairs
Working
Group are designed to achieve these aims;
(a) To study whether or not the current market economy and
existing
labor laws are complimentary.
(b) "The Public Workers' Basic Rights and the Duties Act",
revised in
1964 from the "Trade Conflict Act (1929)" was designed in part as a
mechanism for resolution of industrial conflicts, but is now in a
state of collapse and is implemented only at township levels. As
such, we must examine current industrial conflicts of both recent and
extended nature such that we might establish a systematic process for
resolutions.
(c) To collect and outline labor rights grievances, to find
ways to
attain rights not yet enjoyed by all workers, and to prepare minimum
wage and salary policies for workers, who are struggling with
insufficient income. To collect information by which to revise labor
laws.
(d) To study the constitutions of trade unions from democratic
countries.
(e) To hold seminars and training programs among the NLD's
state,
division and township level members regarding labor laws and other
labor issues.
(f) If necessary, the Central Labor Affairs Working Group will
have
to increase its membership size.
12. Conclusion
These are the activities of the Central Labor Affairs Working Group,
accountable to the Central Executive of the NLD Party. Under the
guidance of the NLD, we will do our utmost for the benefit of all
workers throughout Burma.
The Central Labor Affairs Working Group
27 May 1997
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com