Table of Contents: I. Introduction... II. Background: a. Documented Violations; b. Myanmar Government Actions; c. International Community Reactions and Recommendations ... III. Methodology ... IV. Findings & Legal Implications ... a. Situation Inside Myanmar ... b. Situation In Refugee Camps ... Recommendations ..... Specifically, the policy requiring the Rohingya to produce official documentation upon repatriation will likely hamper the Rohingya?s ability to return to their homes in Myanmar, due to their lack of citizenship status, noted above. HRN?s interviews with the Rohingya refugees confirmed the possibility that many Rohingya may be forced to return to Myanmar against the ir volition. For example, the 55 - year - old woman, the 29 - year - old man, and the 70 - year - old man, all expressed reluctance to return to Myanmar unless they had guarantees of certain rights (i.e. citizenship, living freely outside of a camp, and citizenship wi th fundamental rights, respectively). The 37 - year - old man and the 35 - year - old man both mentioned concern for lack of citizenship as a reason they do not want to return to Myanmar. Given the interviewees? explicit expressions of fear and reluctance to retur n to Myanmar, HRN is skeptical that a repatriation process that does not provide comprehensive protection of the Rohingya rights would be in compliance with international legal standards regarding the treatment of refugees. V. Recommendations Human Rights Now is gravely concerned with the allegations of systematic and gross violations of human rights and humanitarian law directed against Rohingya in Myanmar and with the urgency of the situation of displaced Rohingya. The Burmese military?s atrocities in Rak hine S tate include summary executions, rape , expulsion and the mass burning of villages. These abuses amount to crimes against humanity and resulted in widespread deaths and the displacement of over 650 , 000 Rohingya..."