Development and sustainability
-
Development in Myanmar - general articles
Individual Documents
| Title: | | A Comparative Study of State-Led Development in Myanmar (1988–2010) and Suharto’s Indonesia: An Approach from the Developmental State Theory |
| Date of publication: | | 2011 |
| Description/subject: | | Abstract: "This article explores the institutionalization of state-led development
in Myanmar after 1988 in comparison with Suharto’s Indonesia. The
analysis centres on the characteristics and theory of developmental states
that emerged from the studies of East Asian countries like Japan, South
Korea, and Taiwan. In Southeast Asia, Suharto’s Indonesia was perceived as
a successful case and was studied by scholars in line with the characteristics
of the developmental state. The Tatmadaw (military) government in Myanmar
was believed to follow the model of state-led development in Indonesia
under Suharto where the military took the role of establishing economic and
political development. However, Myanmar has yet to achieve its goal of
building a successful state-led development. Therefore, this paper argues
that implementing an efficient and effective institutionalization is essential
for a successful state-led development (developmental state) in Myanmar."....
Keywords: Myanmar, Suharto’s Indonesia, state-led development, developmental
state, institutionalization....ISSN: 1868-4882 (online), ISSN: 1868-1034 (print |
| Author/creator: | | Sai Khaing Myo Tun |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 1/2011: 69-94 |
| Format/size: | | pdf (230K) |
| Date of entry/update: | | 21 August 2011 |
|
| Title: | | Excluded - Burma’s Ethnic Nationalities on the Margins of Development & Democracy |
| Date of publication: | | December 2012 |
| Description/subject: | | "This report presents documented evidence that ethnic nationalities directly affected by development
projects in Burma are systematically denied their right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC).
While development related abuse has been well documented, no report has shed light on the staggering
scale of the widespread denial of participation rights in Burma...Our research shows that:
• Close to 90% of those surveyed did not receive any information about the development project before it was started by a decision maker. In all but 2 sites, not one person was given any information.
• Approximately 80% of the total survey population did not know who to contact or where to go
to find out more information about the project. In 3 sites, the figure soared to 100%.
• Less than 1% said a public forum was held by a project decision maker where the local community
could attend.
• Of the total sample population, less than 2% felt they would not be punished if they sought information
about the project.
• Close to half (44.1%) felt unsafe seeking further information about the project, while 45.2% were
not sure whether it was safe or unsafe.
• Less than 1% experienced positive impacts from the development project...
This report is meant to serve as a warning of the risks entailed in denying participation rights as well
as a reminder to potential investors of their human rights obligations..." |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | Nationalities Youth Forum (NY-Forum) and Students Youth Congress of Burma (SYCB) |
| Format/size: | | pdf (1.9MB) |
| Date of entry/update: | | 15 May 2013 |
|
| Title: | | United Nations Strategic Framework 2012-2015 [Myanmar] |
| Date of publication: | | 19 January 2012 |
| Description/subject: | | Table of Contents:
Foreword...
Signatories: October 2011...
Acronyms and Abbreviations...
Map of UN offices in Myanmar...
Section I: Development Context...
Human Development and the MDGs....
UN in Myanmar....
Section II: The Strategic Framework...
Strategic Priority 1: Encourage inclusive growth (both rural
and urban), including agricultural development and enhancement
of employment opportunities ...
Strategic Priority 2: Increase equitable access to quality
social services.....
Strategic Priority 3: Reduce vulnerability to natural disasters and
climate change....
Strategic Priority 4: Promote good governance and strengthen
democratic institutions and human rights...
Section III: Resource Requirements...
Section IV: Management and Implementation....
Section V: Monitoring and Evaluation.....
Section VI: Operationalization of the UN Strategic Framework |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | United Nations Country Team in Myanmar |
| Format/size: | | pdf (2.6MB) |
| Alternate URLs: | | http://unic.un.org/imucms/userfiles/yangon/file/UN_Strategic_Framework_for_Myanmar_2012-2015.pdf |
| Date of entry/update: | | 21 November 2012 |
|
-
Development and the civil war
Individual Documents
| Title: | | Lessons from the Kachin “development” experience (Kachin, English, Burmese) |
| Date of publication: | | May 2012 |
| Description/subject: | | "Burma’s government is using the promise of development as a key component in its current peace negotiations with armed ethnic organizations, proposing ceasefire first, then development, and finally a national political agreement. This process has been tried before in Kachin State with disastrous consequences.
This report summarizes findings from seven years of research and demonstrates that the Kachin experience should serve as a warning to other ethnic groups attempting peace through a similar process. Without a political resolution first, there can be no just or sustainable development of Burma..." |
| Language: | | English, Kachin, Burmese |
| Source/publisher: | | Kachin Development Networking Group (KDNG) |
| Format/size: | | pdf (1MB-English; 770K-Burmese; 873K-Kachin) |
| Alternate URLs: | | http://www.kdng.org/publication/236-lessons-from-the-kachin-development-experience.html
http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs13/lessons_from_the_kachin_development_experience(bu)-red.pdf
http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs13/lessons_from_the_kachin_development_experience(kachin)-red.pdf |
| Date of entry/update: | | 17 May 2012 |
|
| Title: | | Rural development and displacement: SPDC abuses in Toungoo District |
| Date of publication: | | 13 January 2009 |
| Description/subject: | | "The SPDC has continued to militarise larger and larger swaths of Toungoo District under the false banner of 'development', subjecting local villagers to forced labour and extortion and forcing others to flee into hiding. Life is hard for villagers both under and outside of SPDC control: villagers living within SPDC-controlled areas are often forced to work for the SPDC rather than focus on their own livelihoods while villagers in hiding continue to struggle with a shortage of food. Ultimately, many residents of Toungoo face a mounting food crisis that is a direct result of SPDC policy. This report discusses incidents that occurred between May and September 2008..." |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | Karen Human Rights Group Field Reports (KHRG #2009-F1) |
| Format/size: | | pdf (850 KB) |
| Alternate URLs: | | http://www.khrg.org/khrg2009/khrg09f1.html |
| Date of entry/update: | | 31 October 2009 |
|
| Title: | | SPDC road construction plans creating problems for civilians |
| Date of publication: | | 27 January 2006 |
| Description/subject: | | "In the opinion of one KHRG field researcher, “The SPDC’s road construction plans are related to the Salween dam project.” The dam itself, however, is partly a weapon to extend the regime’s control. The SPDC and its predecessors have tried to military crush all resistance in the Karen hills for over 50 years already without success, so development projects’ like roads and dams are a new tactic for penetrating areas where resistance forces are strong and forcing villagers out of the hills to settle in state-controlled areas.
The first to suffer from the road construction are the villagers living under SPDC control, who have to secure the road construction, carry loads, act as messengers and provide food and materials. Many will also have their fields or irrigation systems destroyed and their livelihoods undermined. Then will come the effects on displaced villagers living beyond SPDC control, whose mobility and security will be threatened by the roads and increased militarisation, undermining their food security, physical security, and their children’s access to education. The SPDC forces would like these people to go and live under their control, but the villagers know that if they stay under SPDC control they will have to do forced labour as porters, carrying loads, and as messengers, and will face extortion and looting of their money, livestock and belongings.
There is some speculation that the dam project itself, by threatening the territory and supply lines of resistance forces, could also lead to intensified armed conflict, and villagers in the area would be the first to suffer from this. Dozens of villages and huge areas of forest and farmland would be inundated, most likely with no compensation offered to villagers except the option of moving to an SPDC-controlled village where they would be landless labourers, regularly exploited for forced labour. The future is therefore very uncertain for the thousands of Karen villagers living in this region." |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | Karen Human Rights Group Orders Reports (KHRG #2006-B1) |
| Format/size: | | pdf (338 KB) |
| Alternate URLs: | | http://www.khrg.org/khrg2006/khrg06b1.html |
| Date of entry/update: | | 28 January 2006 |
|
| Title: | | Why ceasefires fail in Myanmar |
| Date of publication: | | 18 May 2012 |
| Description/subject: | | "In northern Myanmar, government troops continue to push into the heartland of the ethnic Kachin armed opposition. Next month, the renewed conflict will mark its first birthday, and while protracted fighting has eased in other areas of the ethnically diverse country, the battle for Kachin State rages on.
The limited gains made by government negotiators with at least six ethnic rebel groups over the past year make the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) something of an anomaly. Lower House member of parliament Aung Thaung, whose hawkish persona was seen as ripe for the recalcitrant group, was recently retired from his post as peace broker. More than five high-level meetings with Kachin officials failed to net a result, and as additional battalions are deployed to the frontline, the prospect of a ceasefire anytime soon seems unlikely.
The narrative runs that the Kachin distrust the government, which they fear could renege on an agreement and rekindle the conflict at any time. But their reluctance to sign a ceasefire runs deeper; indeed it is their experience with the recent era of "peace" that makes the three-point roadmap demanded by Aung Thaung - entailing a ceasefire and then economic development before cementing a political solution - so objectionable.
Among Kachin civilians, the 1994 ceasefire deal was seen to facilitate the rapacious development of the state, which 33 years of insurgency had somewhat stifled. The inflow of investment came with alarming levels of environmental degradation, particularly around areas rich in minerals, timber and hydropower potential. While the abuses associated with fighting lessened, including forced portering and rape, the number of people displaced by the development drive may well have taken a heavier toll than the years of conflict..." |
| Author/creator: | | Francis Wade |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | "Asia Times Online" |
| Format/size: | | html |
| Date of entry/update: | | 17 May 2012 |
|
-
Urban development
Individual Documents
| Title: | | A Visit to Chinatown |
| Date of publication: | | September 2009 |
| Description/subject: | | "Chinese influence is growing in Rangoon, but not everyone is happy about it..." |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | "The Irrawaddy" Vol. 17, No. 6 |
| Format/size: | | html |
| Date of entry/update: | | 19 January 2010 |
|
| Title: | | HUMAN SETTLEMENTS SECTOR REVIEW, UNION OF MYANMAR |
| Date of publication: | | 1991 |
| Description/subject: | | The oft-cited UN Habitat report on the 1989-1990 urban resettlement programme in Burma which the report estimates affected 1.5 million people (16 percent of the urban population). "...During the early months of 1990 international attention was focused on
the Yangon squatter clearance and resettlement programme launched by
the Government in 1989. The Mission found that the programme is not limited
to Yangon, but has broad national coverage. The scale and characteristics
of the land-development and other works was considered by the Mission to
be of such overwhelming significance to the present and future urban
situation that the Mission concentrated its resources on attempting to
assemble a comprehensive record of the programme and assessing the
impacts and implications.
The programme consists of: (a) land development for sites-and- services
resettlement schemes, and for complete housing units for public servants;
(b) new and improved roads; (c) urban rail transport; (d) road, rail and
pedestrian bridges; (e) parks and gardens; (f) redevelopment for commercial
and residential uses of sites cleared as a result of resettlement and fires; (g)
clean-up campaigns, building renovations, and repainting of facades; and
(h) rehabilitation of drains and water bodies.
For the size of the overall country population and for an urban population
of less than 10 million, the scale of works within the time period allocated is
probably unprecedented internationally. Based on visits to selected towns,
analysis of maps and layout plans, and the data supplied by GAD and HD,
the Mission estimates that the total population affected by the resettlement
and new housing components is in the order of 1.5 million, or 4 per cent of
the total population, and 16 percent of the urban population. Roughly 50 per
cent of this number is in Yangon, Mandalay, Taunggyi and Bago, all centres
visited by the Mission..." |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | The United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) |
| Format/size: | | pdf (2.1MB) |
| Date of entry/update: | | 10 January 2007 |
|
| Title: | | Yangon’s Development Challenges |
| Date of publication: | | March 2012 |
| Description/subject: | | Overview:
"Yangon is an attractive and relatively livable city that is on the brink of dramatic change. If the government of Myanmar continues its recent program of economic and political reform, the economy of the country is likely to take off, and much of the growth will be concentrated in Yangon, Myanmar’s largest city and commercial capital. This paper argues that Yangon is poorly prepared to cope with the pressures of growth because it has only begun to develop a comprehensive land use and development plan for the city that would guide the location of key activities including export-oriented industries and port terminals. In addition, the city lacks the financial resources to finance the infrastructure and other public services required to serve the existing population, let alone support a population that is larger and better off. Failure to address these challenges will not only make Yangon a less livable city but will also reduce the rate of economic growth for the entire country. Myanmar needs a dynamic and vibrant Yangon to thrive."..."...In sum, Yangon and Myanmar appear to be on the verge of explosive growth, making up for decades of stagnation or decline. Yangon is almost certain to become a key engine in the nation’s economic growth as Myanmar’s largest city, commercial capital, most important port and tourist destination, and most logical site for export-oriented manufacturing. But how well Yangon fulfills these roles depends on how well the city is managed. Yangon’s slow growth in the past had a hidden benefit in that it preserved many assets—greenery, parks and open spaces and historic buildings—that other Asian cities lost. As a result, Yangon has an opportunity to avoid becoming another sprawling, polluted and highly congested Asian megacity and grow instead into a greener and more livable metropolis. But it will do so only if it prepares a plan before development threatens to overwhelm it. And the plan will succeed only if it is based on thoughtful and realistic analyses of issues like the location of special economic zones and ports and the provision of affordable housing and quality infrastructure." |
| Author/creator: | | José A. Gómez-Ibáñez, Derek Bok, Nguyễn Xuân Thành |
| Language: | | English |
| Source/publisher: | | Ash Center, for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard University |
| Format/size: | | pdf (452K) |
| Date of entry/update: | | 08 July 2012 |
|
|