National and State constitutions, draft constitutions and amendments (commentary)

expand all
collapse all

Websites/Multiple Documents

Description: "....Finally, this amendment process must open up opportunities for future constitutional amendments. The Constitution sets an extremely high benchmark in order to pass amendments. It requires more than 75 per cent of all representatives in the national parliament, as well as more than half the votes at a national referendum. This leaves no doubt that the military controls the current constitutional amendment process, given that it occupies 25 per cent of the seats in parliament. The provision on amending the Constitution must be amended to ensure that this is no longer the case. The list of potential amendments could on: real guarantees for human rights, independence for the Union Election Commission, greater mechanisms for accountability of government action, just to name a few. Yet the above issues would be a real start. These formal and structural reforms to the legal order would then open the way for more substantive changes to take place. The 8888 anniversary is a time to reflect on 25 years of a heroic and prolonged struggle for democracy, one that continues today. But it must also be a time to look forward, and to see this opening for constitutional amendment as the key to a genuine and fair political contest in the 2015 elections...."
Creator/author: Melissa Crouch
Source/publisher: "New Mandala"
2013-08-08
Date of entry/update: 2014-07-16
Grouping: Websites/Multiple Documents
Language: English
more
expand all
collapse all

Individual Documents

Sub-title: Medical staff accuse military chiefs of prioritising their own interests above those of the public during the pandemic
Description: "Staff at dozens of hospitals across Myanmar stopped working on Wednesday as part of a growing civil disobedience campaign, one of the first organised acts of defiance against the military after it ousted the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi. Health workers in 70 hospitals and medical departments in Naypyidaw, Yangon and other towns and cities said they would not work under the military regime, accusing the generals of placing their own priorities above those of ordinary people during the pandemic. “We refuse to obey any order from the illegitimate military regime who demonstrated they do not have any regards for our poor patients,” the organisers said. A Facebook page coordinating the campaign accumulated nearly 150,000 followers in just 24 hours. “They will not stop this movement until the elected government is restored,” said Kyaw, a surgeon at West Yangon general hospital who has gone on strike. “I am upset about being apart from the patients, but I have no regrets, knowing that I did my best to help fight the pandemic,” he said, adding that he had resigned from the government hospital were he worked. Doctors are instead treating patients in their homes and at private clincis. The All Burma Federation of Students Union has also urged other government workers to strike. There have been no reports of street demonstrations against the army, but anger is simmering among the public, who lived under repressive military regimesfor five decades. On Wednesday night, the clanging of pots and pans echoed through the main city of Yangon, as people took to their balconies in a symbolic protest against the military. On social media, many adopted red profile pictures to signal their loyalty to Aung San Suu Kyi, who spent nearly 15 years in detention as she campaigned against military rule before being released in 2010. Within Myanmar, she is widely revered as a heroine of democracy, despite international condemnation over her treatment of the Rohingya..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "The Guardian" (UK)
2021-02-03
Date of entry/update: 2021-02-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Sub-title: Parliament decided a 10bn kyat public vote was not worth it to tweak language referring to the elderly and people with disabilities
Description: "It took more than a year of embittered parliamentary debate, large amounts of the legislature’s time and energy, and further strained State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi’s relationship with the military. Yet when the National League for Democracy’s attempt to change Myanmar’s constitution drew to a close in March, they had almost nothing to show for it; just four relatively minor changes to the charter’s wording. Now they have even less. On Thursday, parliament decided that it would be too costly to go ahead with the nationwide referendum required to approve two of the changes, and postponed the vote indefinitely. The national vote was needed to update language used to refer to the elderly and people with disabilities in sections 32a and 32b. But the Union Election Commission (UEC) estimated a referendum would have cost around 10bn kyat, roughly $7.1m. Than Aung of the UEC argued in parliament Thursday that the two articles were of marginal significance to the government’s ventures. He proposed saving the money for a future referendum when there are other constitutional amendments to approve at the same time. Aung San Suu Kyi promised in her 2015 election campaign that she would try to wrest power from the military by changing the charter. But the bid was doomed to fail because unelected soldiers in parliament can veto any changes even though her party commands a supermajority..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "Myanmar Now" (Myanmar)
2020-05-21
Date of entry/update: 2020-05-22
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Description: "After 58 years of military rule, Myanmar’s parliament will today close debate on how to amend its third and current constitution, which was written in 2008. In a lightly reported step, on February 20, the Burmese parliament approved a joint military-civilian committee to debate constitutional changes. The negotiations arise from the barring of Myanmar’s powerful National League for Democracy’s Aung San Suu Kyi from the presidency due to foreign family ties. Myanmar’s constitution privileges the military with a special status by reserving 25% of parliament and several key national executive appointments for military officers. The Burmese military had curtailed foreign influence in the domestic economy and political statecraft with six decades of absolute power, but as the country transitions to civilian rule, the ruling officers do not want to see their influence over Myanmar’s future dissipate. Having already stated their acceptance of a reduced role in Burmese politics, the military is looking to maintain a say in Myanmar’s statecraft. With a population expected to reach 65 million by 2050 and an economy quadrupling to $200 billion by 2030, the constitutional negotiations will determine whether Myanmar will transition to a stable civilian rule or retain an outsized military influence. Wake up smarter with an assessment of the stories that will make headlines in the next 24 hours. Download The Daily Brief..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "Foreign Brief"
2020-03-05
Date of entry/update: 2020-03-05
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Sub-title: Members of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw are preparing to vote on a series of amendments to the constitution but it is unlikely that any of them will be approved.
Description: "PROPOSALS to amend the 2008 Constitution are finally being discussed in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw and the debate has been lively. There have been heated exchanges between members of the politically dominant National League for Democracy and unelected military MPs and lawmakers from the Union Solidarity and Development Party, who oppose the NLD’s proposals for charter reform. Debate has been so robust at times that the speaker has directed that some outbursts be expunged from the parliamentary record. After its landslide victory in 2015, the NLD waited until January 2019 – almost three years after taking office – to begin implementing its election campaign pledge to reform the constitution. The NLD took a similar approach to that adopted by Thura U Shwe Mann in his capacity as speaker of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw during the USDP government, and appointed a constitutional amendment joint committee, which was tasked to prepare a draft bill to amend the charter. The unelected Tatmadaw MPs objected to the 45-member committee as being unlawful. While the NLD was trying to draft a constitutional amendment bill that incorporated the opinions of all parties in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, USDP and Tatmadaw MPs submitted five of their own amendment bills. In early February, the NLD-controlled joint bill committee finalised two amendment bills and sent them to parliament for debate alongside the five USDP and military bills. One bill contains changes that would also require approval at a national referendum, while the other contains those changes that only require Pyidaungsu Hluttaw approval. We can learn from these seven bills about the changes sought to the constitution by the NLD and ethnic parties on one side, and by the Tatmadaw and USDP lawmakers, on the other..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "Frontier Myanmar" (Myanmar)
2020-03-04
Date of entry/update: 2020-03-04
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Topic: 2008 Constitution, Constitution Amendment Committee, Democracy, Kokang Democracy and Unity Party, Military, National League for Democracy, NLD, Tatmadaw, U Myat Nyana Soe, veto
Topic: 2008 Constitution, Constitution Amendment Committee, Democracy, Kokang Democracy and Unity Party, Military, National League for Democracy, NLD, Tatmadaw, U Myat Nyana Soe, veto
Description: "Myanmar’s parliamentary committee tasked with proposing changes to the 2008 Constitution has finished drafting two amendment bills. Nearly 30 members from the National League for Democracy (NLD) and various ethnic parties on the committee approved the amendment bills on Monday. But all military representatives on the committee were absent from the meeting, said the committee’s secretary U Myat Nyana Soe, an Upper House lawmaker from the NLD. The Constitution Amendment Committee — the mechanism that the NLD and ethnic parties chose for reforming the military-drafted Constitution — was formed last February with 45 members from 14 political parties, independent representatives and members of the military bloc in Parliament. The NLD holds 18 seats on the committee, the military has eight and the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) was given two. The USDP, Arakan National Party and the National United Democratic Party quit the committee late last year. The military rejected the existence of the committee and its works as unconstitutional. Meanwhile, the military members submitted two amendment bills and three bills jointly with the USDP to the Parliament last year..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "The Irrawaddy" (Thailand)
2020-01-20
Date of entry/update: 2020-01-21
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Description: "Myanmar’s ruling party, the National League for Democracy (NLD) apparently has decided to go slow on the constitutional reform process until next year’s elections. Last month, the country’s State Counsellor and NLD leader Aung San Suu Kyi in an interview to Nikkei Asian Review said her party was “not building hopes for the next election on [its] ability to bring about constitution amendments within the next year.” The military-drafted constitution was passed through a controversial referendum in 2008 when Myanmar was under the junta. Against all democratic principles, the military regime guaranteed itself a prominent role in the country’s politics and administration. Some of the provisions that privilege the military include holding 25 percent of the seats of the parliaments (Art. 14) and reserving the nomination of ministers of defence, internal security and border affairs (Art. 17 b). The right to takeover power in a state of emergency (Art. 40 c) and the setting up of the National Defence and Security Council as the most powerful body during crisis with military representatives enjoying an upper hand (Art. 201). The NLD and ethnic-based parties did not accept the constitution and boycotted the 2010 general elections. Two years later, they participated in the 2012 by-elections and again in the 2015 general elections with the confidence that the undemocratic constitution was the first step towards democratising the country and hoped to bring about change from within the system..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "Observer Research Foundation (ORF)" (India)
2019-11-16
Date of entry/update: 2019-11-29
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Description: "Constitutional change was a 2015 election campaign promise of Myanmar’s National League for Democracy (NLD) and Aung San Suu Kyi. As the 2020 elections loom large, they are now revisiting the proposal to recapture the attention and support of the people. Over the past three years, the NLD government has been busy dealing with a wide range of governance issues. The peace process has been particularly difficult and hit a number of obstacles. It is unlikely that it will be able to show progress in this area. The NLD is instead turning to amending the military-enacted constitution to stimulate electoral momentum. Reforms could potentially affect the military’s role in governance, and so the move is mired in controversy. To begin with, the NLD raised this legislative motion on the date of the commemoration of U Ko Ni — a lawyer and former advisor to the NLD — who was assassinated on 26 January 2017. Ko Ni was the country’s most vocal advocate for constitutional reform. His death has had a chilling effect on efforts to amend the Constitution. When the NLD proposed forming a committee to amend the Constitution in the national legislature, the military claimed that they had failed to follow the correct procedure. All of the military members of parliament refused to vote on the motion as a show of defiance. They have done this on a handful of other occasions, such as when the NLD proposed creating the Office of State Counsellor specifically for Aung San Suu Kyi. The military has also suggested they may not participate in the legislative committee..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "East Asia Forum" (Australia)
2019-03-13
Date of entry/update: 2019-11-07
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
Format : pdf
Size: 43.68 KB (4 pages)
more
Description: "Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi met U.S. Assistant Secretary of State David Stilwell on Tuesday in Naypyidaw to discuss continued American support for the country’s democratic transition, a visit that came as supporters in Myanmar questioned her commitment to pledged reforms that helped her win power in 2015. Despite U.S. concerns and efforts, analysts in Myanmar say State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi has not made significant democratic progress in her three years in office as she must run her administration within the confines set out by the powerful military that directly ran the country from 1962-201. In an interview with Japan’s Nikkei Asian Review on Oct. 23, Aung San Suu Kyi said that Myanmar’s constitution drafted by a former military junta more than a decade ago must be changed in order for the Southeast Asian nation to achieve “complete democracy,” but that this would not occur before the next general election in late 2020..."
Source/publisher: "Radio Free Asia (RFA)" (USA)
2019-10-29
Date of entry/update: 2019-10-30
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Sub-title: Ruling NLD’s bid to legally amend a military-drafted constitution aims to win votes at 2020 polls but likely won’t succeed
Description: "In a move that could put Myanmar’s civilian government on a collision course with the powerful military, a parliamentary committee submitted this week proposed amendments to the country’s constitution. The anticipated report contains more than 3,700 recommendations for proposed changes to the military-drafted charter, which carves out a strong political role for the armed forces including via control of the defense, home and border affairs ministries. In 2015, the National League for Democracy (NLD) scored a landslide electoral victory, capturing 135 of the 168 seats up for grabs in the upper house and 255 of 323 in the lower. Despite the heavily touted transition from direct military to quasi-democratic rule, the military controls 25% of all seats in each legislative chamber through constitutionally allowed appointments of its khaki-wearing representatives. The NLD’s resounding election victory was won partly on a promise to amend the unpopular charter – and the party is now making the politically sensitive moves as it prepares for pivotal 2020 elections. The NLD has long advocated for changes to the charter’s article 436, which requires approval from more than 75% of MPs to amend crucial articles, and 59(f), which states that the president and vice president must be born of Myanmar citizens and cannot have foreign spouses or children..."
Creator/author:
Source/publisher: "Asia Times"
2019-07-17
Date of entry/update: 2019-07-17
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language:
more
Sub-title: Aung San Suu Kyi has more power over the military than you think.
Description: "...Although the party of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the National League for Democracy (N.L.D.), won a commanding victory in the last general election in 2015, the military still reaches far into Myanmar politics. And longtime Myanmar watchers, independent policy groups, various academics, mainstream media, the American ambassador to Myanmar and the United States Senate majority leader all agree that the 2008 Constitution of Myanmar can be amended with no less than a 75 percent majority in Parliament — and that 25 percent of Parliament is reserved for the military. They are wrong. The military, or Tatmadaw, does have the numbers to block reform at the moment, but that state of affairs isn’t guaranteed by the Constitution. The elected members of Parliament have the authority they need even under this very undemocratic Constitution to change the text itself — and to start changing the country — right now..."
Creator/author: Jason Gelbort
Source/publisher: "The New York Times"
2019-02-21
Date of entry/update: 2019-02-22
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : html
Size: 344.85 KB
more
Description: ''Two years since Myanmar’s most prominent constitutional and human rights lawyer Ko Ni was assassinated in broad daylight and still there is no justice in sight. The lack of closure is all the more telling considering Ko Ni had high-level ties to the ruling National League for Democracy (NLD) party and was working from behind the scenes to amend a constitution that gives disproportionate political and administrative powers to the military. Ko Ni was shot and killed on January 29, 2017 while leaving a terminal building at Yangon’s international airport upon his return from a trip overseas. Kyi Lin, the gunman, was captured at the scene after a struggle in which he also shot and killed a taxi driver, Nay Win, who heroically ran after the assailant. Ko Ni’s burial in accordance with Muslim rituals, was carried out within 24 hours of his death. At his funeral, the road to the Muslim cemetery in Yangon’s North Okkalapa suburb was lined with cars, minivans and buses as thousands of people came to pay their last respects....''
Source/publisher: Asia Times
2019-01-29
Date of entry/update: 2019-01-31
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: ''“This brazen killing of a prominent democracy advocate demands a rigorous State response to show this type of crime will be fully punished,” said Frederick Rawski, the ICJ’s Director for Asia and the Pacific. Despite an official investigation and reports of more than 100 court hearings, nobody has been held accountable for U Ko Ni’s death – criminally or otherwise – and the circumstances have not yet been satisfactorily explained. “Myanmar simply cannot satisfy its international law obligations without conducting an impartial and independent investigation that is free of military influence. Such an investigation is a pre-requisite for conducting an effective prosecution in a fair trial setting,” added Rawski. U Ko Ni was well known as a vocal advocate for human rights and democratic reform in Myanmar. As an adviser to the National Legal of Democracy party, he was involved in creating the position of State Counselor, which formalized a leadership role for Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, despite a constitutional provision barring her from the Presidency...''
Source/publisher: International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
2019-01-29
Date of entry/update: 2019-01-31
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: "What? • A constitutional amendment alters the content of a constitutional text in a formal way... Why? • Constitutions need to be amended o ver time to adjust provisions that are inadequate, to respond to new needs, including supplementing rights, etc. Otherwise, the text of a constitution cannot reflect social realities and political needs over time. Yet the constitution also needs to be protected from short-sighted or partisan amendments... Why not? • Some form of formal amendment procedures are a near-universal feature of contemporary constitutions. Thus, for constitution- makers, the relevant question is not so much whether there should be a provision addressing formal amendments, but what needs to be considered while drafting it... Where? • All democratic countries in the world have a provision in their constitution regulating the conditions for amending it."
Source/publisher: International IDEA
2014-09-00
Date of entry/update: 2015-05-16
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: Overview: What Is a Constitution? The vast majority of contemporary constitutions describe the basic principles of the state, the structures and processes of government and the fundamental rights of citizens in a higher law that cannot be unilaterally changed by an ordinary legislative act. This higher law is usually referred to as a constitution.... The content and nature of a particular constitution, as well as how it relates to the rest of the legal and political order, varies considerably between countries, and there is no universal and uncontested definition of a constitution. Nevertheless, any broadly accepted working definition of a constitution would likely include the following characteristics: A constitution is a set of fundamental legal-political rules that: (1) are binding on everyone in the state, including ordinary lawmaking institutions; (2) concern the structure and operation of the institutions of government, political principles and the rights of citizens; (3) are based on widepread public legitimacy; (4) are harder to change than ordinary laws (e.g. a two-thirds majority vote or or a referendum is needed); (5) as a minimum, meet the internationally recognized criteria for a democratic system in terms of representation and human rights.."
Source/publisher: International IDEA
2014-08-00
Date of entry/update: 2015-05-16
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: "...The Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, Myanmar?s third and current constitution (?the Constitution”), was adopted following a referendum on 10 May 2008, held just eight days after Cyclone Nargis, the most devastating natural disaster in Myanmar?s history. There was little or no public participation in the production of the text of the Constitution; indeed the proposed text was published just one month before the referendum and was unavailable to a large part of the electorate.... 2. However, Myanmar has recently taken a significant step towards participatory democracy by inviting public views on the amendment of the Constitution. In July 2013 the Joint Committee for Reviewing the Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (?the Committee”) was established with the aims of: guaranteeing the perpetuation, peace, stability and development of the Republic; bringing eternal peace to all national races and ethnic people by bringing unity between them; and carrying on democratic reforms for building the state. One of the Committee?s first actions was, on October 3 2013, to announce a nationwide consultation exercise aimed at garnering advice from a broad range of political parties, organizations and individuals as to how the Constitution might be amended. This exercise ran until December 31 2013. The Committee has stated that it received 28,247 letters in response.... 3. During the consultation period, the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law (?the Bingham Centre”) took part in a project to encourage participation by the citizens of Myanmar in that consultation exercise. The Bingham Centre assisted in many well-attended workshops across different parts of Myanmar between October and December 2013. As a result of these workshops, over 500 people submitted responses to the Committee. A summary of the Bingham Centre?s experience of people?s priorities for reform is set out below.... 4. However, the immediate priority for reform identified by the overwhelming majority of delegates at the numerous workshops was to amend the onerous procedure for amending the Constitution, without which reform is likely to be extremely difficult. This paper seeks to put those popular concerns into context by comparing to other constitutions around the world the three elements of this procedure, which, in our view, combine to make it so onerous. Those three elements are:..."
Creator/author: Naina Patel, Alex Goodman, Naomi Snider
Source/publisher: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law (Working Paper No 2014/01)
2014-01-00
Date of entry/update: 2014-10-20
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 768.71 KB
more
Description: CONCLUSION: "Where the role of the courts is to assist in a state programme, rather than check executive power, policy directives can be implemented through the judiciary in the same way as through the administrative bureaucracy. By contrast, systems like those in Sri Lanka or Nepal may be defective and compromised but judges in them do still adjudicate more according to the terms of law than according to the dictates of executive officers. Ironically, a corrupted policy-implementing judicial system like that in Myanmar can be mistaken for an efficient system in contrast to its functionally separate counterparts, because its efficiency derives from the carrying out of orders and urgency to make money through the exercise of authority, not from integrity or professionalism of the sort that courts in other countries struggle to achieve, however imperfectly and half-heartedly. This is the real incongruity of habeas corpus as an element in the 2008 Constitution of Myanmar. Habeas corpus is premised on the idea that courts have the power to compel soldiers, police and other officials to follow their orders. In Myanmar, where the judiciary is a proxy for the executive, judges have this power only where they have the approval and backing of higher executive authorities. Whereas in certain authoritarian settings the courts have retained nominal legal power over other parts of government but have been unable or unwilling to exercise it at certain times because of extenuating circumstances, in Myanmar the problem is much more basic. Myanmar?s courts don?t have effective authority over other parts of government at all. Their capacity to review the activities of state agencies and agents is limited to what the executive permits them. Under these circumstances, not only is the reintroducing of habeas corpus a figment but so too is any constitutional commitment to protect the individual, because all such legal commitments are delimited by higher administrative imperatives. Only where legal and administrative objectives coincide can the former prevail. The incongruity of habeas corpus in the new constitution percolates throughout the charter?s contents, and through the extant state institutions that will be responsible for establishing new institutions in accordance with its terms following general elections. Where the armed forces rather than the judiciary have responsibility to safeguard the constitution and uphold the rule of law, statements of citizens? rights are perverse. Where the state has subordinated legality to policy and detached policy from any coherent ideology, no amount of technical or procedural rearranging can effect significant change. Because the new constitution is a vague expression that is not binding on its guardian, ultimately it contains no guarantees, whether for a political detainee, an ordinary under-trial accused or anyone else."
Creator/author: Nick Cheesman
Source/publisher: "Ruling Myanmar From Cyclone Nargis to National Elections", Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), Singapore, pp. 90-111
2010-08-25
Date of entry/update: 2014-08-18
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 177.47 KB
more
Description: "During the third week of May, Aung San Suu Kyi?s supporters gathered for two mass rallies in Rangoon and Mandalay, Burma?s two biggest cities. (The demonstration in Mandalay, the most important commercial city in upper Burma, drew an estimated 25,000 supporters.) Both rallies called for amending Article 436 of the 2008 constitution, which essentially gives the military a veto over any amendments. The article stipulates that any amendments require the support of more than 75 percent of members of the parliament, where unelected military representatives control a quarter of the seats. Aung San Suu Kyi?s camp have to get rid of this provision before they can amend the article that prevents her from holding the presidency. There?s no doubt that Burma?s constitution is deeply flawed. The excessive power that it grants the military and the obstacles it places in the way of amendment are only two of the most obvious problems. Ideally, of course, these provisions can be changed or abolished. In reality, matters are a bit more complicated..."
Creator/author: Min Zin
Source/publisher: "Foreign Policy"
2014-06-05
Date of entry/update: 2014-06-06
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: "For many years, we have learned about cryptic events in Burma/Myanmar from rumors. We had hoped that this would change with the elimination of censorship, and there has been much progress. But rumors still abound and decision-making is often still opaque. According to some reports, Aung San Suu Kyi has said that if the 2008 Myanmar constitution is not changed to allow her to compete for the presidency, her party - the National League for Democracy (NLD) - will boycott the 2015 elections. Others in the party say this is not true. She is currently prohibited from being (indirectly) elected by the Burmese parliament (Hluttaw) for the presidency or vice presidency because family members hold foreign passports..."
Creator/author: David I Steinberg
Source/publisher: "Asia Times Online"
2014-03-07
Date of entry/update: 2014-05-27
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: "In at least some cases - and Burma is one - seeking trust, integration, and unity in the abstract may be neither useful nor even possible. Instead, a reconciliation process should seek, quite specifically, to find constitutional common ground well before drafting begins; it should be oriented toward developing a shared constitutional vision that will provide the warring sides with reason to commit to the new proposed regime. As the contending sides come to realize that they might share specific and concrete constitutional desires, they also come to realize that cohabitation might be possible. The moral of the story is that constitution making (broadly defined) is part and parcel of the creation of social integrity and not merely its consequence...Part I offers an overview of the constitutional history of Burma to the year 2000. Part II explains the constitutional processes going on today-not only the military government?s "roadmap to democracy" but also the democracy movement?s alternative process (or processes, depending on your perspective). As will become plain, the two processes are very different: the junta?s roadmap has yielded a written constitution that will shortly become the law of the land but which lacks all legitimacy.6 By contrast, the democracy movement?s alternative will not become sovereign law anytime soon, but it has set in train social dynamics that might, in the long run, build the conditions necessary for genuine constitutional rule..."
Creator/author: David C. Williams
Source/publisher: Indiana University Maurer School of Law Faculty Publications. Paper 492.
2009-00-00
Date of entry/update: 2012-05-17
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 740.15 KB
more
Description: "The retrospective analysis of an institutional breakdown – democratic breakdown – in the union of Burma demonstrates that over six decades of conflict in Burma is rooted in a constitutional arrangement that fails to recognize the existence of ethno-cultural cleavages, resulting in the denial of power to territorially concentrated ethnic national minorities. Therefore, in this article, I argue that an asymmetrical federation with a written constitution is the most viable governance framework for a democratic future Burma due to its multi-ethnic segmental cleavages such as ethnicity, language, religion, culture, and territory. Such a constitutional federation will ensure shared rule for a common Union and self-rule for federating states drawn upon ethnic lines. To contextualize an institutional design for future Burma in a comparative international perspective, I examine the core arguments put forward by the integrationist and accommodationist camps as a theoretical framework within which to discuss the management of societal divisions, including their implications and applicability to Burma. To prove that a constitutional federation that draws together elements of both integrationist and accommodationist theory, I revisit and analyse reasons behind the constitutional crises of Burma, the basis upon which Burma emerged as a country, the composition of its ethnic fragmentations, and competing visions of the Union of Burma itself. With respect to an institutional design for a future Burma, there are two main components in my proposal: a disproportional upper chamber in the union legislature, whereby I envision an equal number of representatives from each constituent state; and separate legislatures and constitutions for each federating unit, dividing power between central and state governments along the line of US states and Canadian provinces. Lastly, I look at the current provisional constitution drafted by leaders of a democratic opposition – seven ethnic national minorities - in anticipation of a future federal Union of Burma..."
Creator/author: Zaceu Lian
Source/publisher: Burma Centre for Ethnic Studies (Working Paper No. 1)
2012-05-00
Date of entry/update: 2012-05-17
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 377.03 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: "Burma?s constitution was ratified in the days following cyclone Nargis in May 2008 by an alleged 92 percent of the population, out of a total 98 percent who turned out to vote, the ruling junta asserted. International observers have said however that voter intimidation and corruption, not to mention the deaths of 140,000 people from the cyclone, distorted the real picture, particularly as the cyclone prevented millions from accessing polling booths. The constitution will play a key role in the results of elections this year; several clauses bar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from participating, while other deliberately vague laws appear to permit use of intimidation and threats against opposition by the government. Critics of the ruling junta have already said that the elections will be a charade aimed at cementing military rule in Burma..."
Creator/author: Aung Htoo
Source/publisher: Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB)
2010-03-06
Date of entry/update: 2010-10-26
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: CONTENTS:Forewords (David Williams)... PART ONE:THE BASIC PRINCIPLES: 1. Federalism, Constitution Making and State Building in Burma (Lian H. Sakhong) Introduction ... Federalism: Theoretical Analysis... Federalism in Burmese Contexts: Lessons from 1947... Nation-Building and the Problem of Forced Assimilation ... State-Building and Unity in Diversity: An Option for the Future... Conclusion: Finding Equilibrium between Nation-Building and State Building .... 2. The Basic Principles for Future Federal Union of Burma (Lian H. Sakhong)... Preamble ... The Basic Principles of Federalism at the time of Union Formation ... Proposal for the Future .... PART TWO:CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN FOR BURMA... 3. Constitutional Design for Burma:The First Lecture (2003) (David C. Williams)... A. The Purpose of a Constitution ... (i) Electoral Systems ... (ii) Separation of Powers ... (iii) Federalism .... (iv) Individual Rights ... B. Securing the Basis of Consent ... C. Federalism ... D. Electoral Systems ... E. The Union Constitution ... F. Judicial Review ... 4. Constitutional Design for Burma:The Second Lecture (2004) (David C. Williams)... A. Introduction ... B. State-Building and Nation-Building ... (i) States ... (ii) Nations ... (iii) States and Nations ... C. Federalism ... D. Federalism in Foreign Affairs ... (i) The States? Ability to Make Their Own Foreign Policy ... (ii) The States? Participation in Foreign Policy ... (iii) Political Pressure ... (iv) Implementation ... (v) Direct Participation ... (vi) Permanent Staffs ...E. Electoral Systems ... (i) Majoritarian Systems ... (ii) Proposal Systems ... (iii) Combing Systems ... F. Conclusion .... PART THREE:CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS... 5. Constitutional Drafting and Fundamental Rights:The Example of Religious Freedom (Susan H. Williams) ... 6. Constitutional Drafting and Fundamental Rights:The Example of Gender Equality (Susan H. Williams) ....
Creator/author: David C.Williams, Lian H.Sakhong, Susan H.Williams
Source/publisher: ENC "PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE: Towards Federal Union of Burma [Series No.10]"
2005-00-00
Date of entry/update: 2010-08-30
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 723.42 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "This paper deals with the absence or the non-existence of a functional relation between the state in Burma and broader society which is also made up of non-Burman 1 ethnic segments that inhabit the historical-territorial units comprising the Union of Burma. 2 Introduction: Putting the Country Back Together Again The paper looks into the problems related to the task, as yet to be accomplished, of "putting the country back together again", in contrast to the claim of the military and its state is "keeping the country together". It is here argued that although the military has, in a manner of speaking, "kept the country together", it has also distorted the relation between the state in Burma and broader society by monopolizing power and excluding societal elements and forces from the sphere of the state and from the political arena. The military?s centralist, unitary impulse, informed by it ethnocentric (Burmanization) national unity formula, has contributed to a dysfunctional state-society relation, that has in turn brought about the present crisis of decay and general breakdown, making Burma a failed state..."
Creator/author: Chao-Tzang Yawnghwe
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2010-07-15
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 35.76 KB
more
Description: "This briefing paper is intended to give a concise overview of the main provisions of the electoral laws and bylaws issued by the Myanmar authorities in March 2010, and to discuss some of the implications of the most important provisions. These laws establish the detailed framework for the first elections in Myanmar for 20 years, which will take place later this year on a date yet to be announced. These elections, while they will not be free and fair, nevertheless represent the most important political shift in a generation. A new political space will be created ? however constrained it may be ? along with a set of new State institutions. The ageing military leadership will also hand over the reins of power to a new generation. It is therefore vital to have a clear understanding of this legislation and its likely consequences; however, much of the debate so far has been based on a hasty and often erroneous reading of the laws..."
Creator/author: Richard Horsey
Source/publisher: Conflict Prevention and Peace Forum
2010-03-31
Date of entry/update: 2010-04-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: 1. Introduction 2. Genesis of the Act 3. Some Features of the Act 4. Provincial Part of the Act 5. Federal Part of the Act 6. Gambles Taken by the British Government 7. Indian Reaction to the Proposed Federation 8. The Working of the Act 9. Postscript
Creator/author: David Steinberg
Source/publisher: House of David
2008-02-01
Date of entry/update: 2010-03-17
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: Burma?s rulers will continue to lean heavily on the judiciary to impose their vision of a ?discipline-flourishing democracy?... "After decades of military rule, many Burmese are no longer aware that their country had one of the most progressive judicial systems in the region after independence in 1948. Judges had secure salaries and could only be removed for misbehavior or incapacity. The courts were not afraid to challenge the executive, and the Supreme Court proclaimed that the 1947 Constitution should be interpreted in a ?liberal and comprehensive spirit.? Even at the height of insurgencies against Rangoon in the late 1940s, the Supreme Court ordered police to release men who had been detained illegally. ILLUSTRATION: HARN LAY/THE IRRAWADDY The slide from a judiciary with integrity to its present role as defender of the military began when the late Gen Ne Win seized power and imprisoned Chief Justice Myint Thein for six years—longer than he imprisoned former Prime Minister U Nu. When Ne Win drafted the 1974 Constitution, he removed any remaining separation between the judiciary and the government. He packed the Council of People?s Justice, which replaced the Supreme Court, with members of the Burma Socialist Programme Party. The Constitution required the court to ?protect the socialist system? rather than the rights of Burmese citizens. Although the military revived the Supreme Court in 1988, Human Rights Watch maintains that judges still ?serve at the whim of the SPDC and must follow the directives of the military.?..."
Creator/author: Arnold Corso
Source/publisher: "The Irrawaddy" Vol. 17, No. 8
2009-11-00
Date of entry/update: 2010-02-28
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: Without the rule of law, there are no guarantees the economy will be free of state interference under the 2008 Constitution... "The economic aspects of Burma?s 2008 Constitution have been notably absent from the recent written analysis of its implications for Burmese society. Though constitutions are not primarily economic documents, Burma?s latest Constitution does contain clauses that have economic import, and it is worth looking at them carefully. There is an important caveat, however, and this is that a regime that consistently honors the rule of law only in the breach and has many incentives (financial and otherwise) for maintaining the status quo is unlikely to change its behavior anytime soon; therefore, the Constitution may amount to little. Regardless of whether the military abides by its Constitution, however, the document can provide insight into the thinking of its drafters..."
Creator/author: Sean Turnell
Source/publisher: "The Irrawaddy" Vol. 17, No. 8
2009-11-00
Date of entry/update: 2010-02-28
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Source/publisher: National Union of the Union of Burma (NCGUB)
2009-08-00
Date of entry/update: 2010-02-12
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: Burmese
more
Description: "...The deeply flawed 2008 Constitution further entrenches arrangements for abuses of the sorts outlined above, and any serious attempts from the international community to take up issues of concern to the people of Myanmar in the lead up to and after the anticipated election must respond to the peculiar variety of unconstitutional constitutionalism that it envisages. In particular, the following aspects of the charter must be brought to the foreground and addressed before it is possible to proceed to more in-depth discussion about human rights in Myanmar under a government operating according to its parameters:..."
Source/publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission via UN Human Rights Council (A/HRC/12/NGO/21)
2009-09-07
Date of entry/update: 2009-12-04
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 36.07 KB
more
Description: Executive Summary: "The bizarre prosecution and conviction of opposition leader and Nobel Peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi for violating her house arrest has returned attention to repression in Myanmar, as preparations were underway for the first national elections in twenty years, now scheduled for 2010. This further undermined what little credibility the exercise may have had, especially when based on a constitution that institutionalises the militaryâ�" a number of prominent regime opponents have been arrested and sentenced to prison terms over the last year â�" the constitution and elections together will fundamentally change the political landscape in a way the government may not be able to control. Senior Generals Than Shwe and Maung Aye may soon step down or move to ceremonial roles, making way for a younger military generation. All stakeholders should be alert to opportunities that may arise to push the new government toward reform and reconciliation. At first glance, the obstacles to change seem over­whelming. The 2008 constitution entrenches military power by reserving substantial blocs of seats in the national and local legislatures for the army, creating a strong new national defence and security council and vesting extraordinary powers in the commander-in-chief. It prevents Aung San Suu Kyi from standing for president, even if she were not imprisoned. It is extremely difficult to amend. And while not all regulations relating to the administration of the elections have been an­nounced, they are unlikely to offer much room for manoevre to opposition parties. But the elections are significant because the controversial constitution on which they are based involves a complete reconfiguration of the political structure â�" establishing a presidential system of government with a bicameral legislature as well as fourteen regional governments and assemblies â�" the most wide-ranging shake-up in a generation. The change will not inevitably be for the better, but it offers an opportunity to influence the future direction of the country. Ultimately, even assuming that the intention of the regime is to consolidate military rule rather than begin a transition away from it, such processes often lead in unexpected directions. This report looks at the elections in the context of Myan­marâ�™s constitutional history. It examines key provisions of the 2008 constitution and shows how many of the controversial articles were simply taken from its 1947 or 1974 predecessors. Noteworthy new provisions include strict requirements on presidential candidates, the establishment of state/regional legislatures and governments, the reservation of legislative seats for the military, military control of key security ministries, the authority granted to the military to administer its own affairs (in particular military justice) and the creation of a constitutional tribunal. Criticism of the constitution from groups within Myan­mar has focused on military control, ethnic autonomy, qualifications for political office, and the very difficult amendment procedures. The main reaction of the populace to it and the forthcoming elections is indifference, rooted in a belief that nothing much will change. Some of the so-called ceasefire groups â�" ethnic minorities that have ended their conflicts with the government â�" are endorsing ethnic political parties that will take part in the polls. These groups take a negative view of the constitution but feel that there may be some limited opening of political space, particularly at the regional level, and that they should position themselves to take advantage of this. There are increased tensions, however, as the regime is pushing these groups to transform into border guard forces partially under the command of the national army. The National League for Democracy (NLD), winner of the 1990 elections, has said it will only take part if the constitution is changed, and it is given the freedom to organise. Assuming this will not happen, it is not yet clear if it will call for a complete boycott in an attempt to deny the elections legitimacy or urge its supporters to vote for other candidates. A boycott could play into the hands of the military government, since it would not prevent the election from going ahead and would mainly deprive non-government candidates of votes, potentially narrowing the range of voices in future legislatures. The Myanmar authorities must make the electoral process more credible. Aung San Suu Kyi and all other political prisoners must be released now and allowed to participate fully in the electoral process; politically-motivated arrests must cease. It also critical that key electoral legislation be promulgated as soon as possible, in a way that allows parties to register without undue restriction, gives space for canvassing activities and ensures transparent counting of votes. The international community, including Myanmarâ�™s ASEAN neighbours, must continue to press for these measures while looking for opportunities that the elections may bring. This will require a pragmatic and nuanced strategy towards the new government at the very time, following a deeply flawed electoral process, when pressure will be greatest for a tough stance. The new Myanmar government, whatever its policies, will not be capable of reversing overnight a culture of impunity and decades of abuses and political restrictions. But following the elections, the international community must be ready to respond to any incremental positive steps in a calibrated and timely fashion. To have any hope of inducing a reform course, it is critical to find ways to communicate unambiguously that a renormalisation of external relations is possible..."
Source/publisher: International Crisis Group (Asia Report N°174)
2009-08-20
Date of entry/update: 2009-08-24
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 2.49 MB
more
Description: Contents: I Purposes of constitutions and constitution making processes . 1 II Context of Constitutional Reform .. 4 III Process .. 6 Process for the preparation of the Constitution .. 7 IV Constitution. 11 Objectives and Basic Principles of the Constitution 11 Overview of the structure of the Constitution .. 12 Electoral system ... 16 Legislative bodies 20 State and Regional legislatures 22 Union territory legislature 22 Self-administered zone or division legislature . 23 Executives and Presidency ... 23 Constituting the Union government . 24 Powers and responsibilities of the President 25 Accountability of the President 26 Tatmadaw and Commander in Chief ... 26 Judiciary ... 28 Constitutional Tribunal 29 The relationship between the Union, States and Regions, and Self-Administered Areas . 31 Compatibility of laws ... 32 Finance and resources: relations between the Union and State, Regions and Self-Administered Areas . 33 Executive: relations between the Union and State, Regions and Self-Administered Areas 33 Emergency Powers... 34 Amendment Procedure. 36 Transitional Provisions 36 V Assessment ... 37
Creator/author: Yash Ghai
Source/publisher: Yash Ghai
2008-12-00
Date of entry/update: 2008-12-19
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : pdf
Size: 216.74 KB
more
Description: Hunderttausende Menschen in Burma leiden - doch die Militärjunta verkündet Erfolgsmeldungen: Den Generälen zufolge wurde die neue Verfassung mit über 92 Prozent Zustimmung angenommen. Ausländische Hilfe lassen die Machthaber weiter nur eingeschränkt zu - die Uno ist frustriert; referendum 2008; cyclone Nargis; UN aid programmes;
Source/publisher: Spiegel Online
2008-05-15
Date of entry/update: 2008-05-15
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: German, Deutsch
more
Description: Am 10. Mai wird Burmas Bevölkerung an die Urne gerufen, um über die neue Verfassung abzustimmen. Dabei legt die burmesische Militärjunta ein kleines Lehrstück vor, wie Demokratie bei einer Volksabstimmung zur Farce wird. politische Gefangene; referendum 2008; political prisoners
Creator/author: Christine Pluess, Arbeitskreis Tourismus & Entwicklung
Source/publisher: Fairunterwegs
2008-04-29
Date of entry/update: 2008-05-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: German, Deutsch
more
Description: 1947-2008
Source/publisher: Human Rights Watch
2008-05-01
Date of entry/update: 2008-05-01
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: "...On May 10, 2008, the Burmese military government will hold a referendum on a draft constitution that it claims will usher in a new era of ?discipline-flourishing genuine multiparty democracy.” However, the generals? referendum, reflecting 46 years of brutal military rule, will not bring the people of Burma any closer to a democratic and rights-respecting government they so desperately seek, and for which they have courageously struggled. Instead, the draft constitution that the generals are demanding the Burmese people approve is designed to perpetuate military control in Burma, and obstruct any steps toward a meaningful multiparty democracy that upholds human rights. The environment in Burma prior to the referendum has been one of continuing intimidation of the political opposition and general populace, denial of basic freedoms of expression, association, and assembly, and arbitrary arrests and detention. Under such widespread repression and a pervasive climate of fear, no free and fair referendum can take place in Burma. Since the military crackdown on monks and pro-democracy protestors in August-September 2007, foreign governments and intergovernmental bodies have responded in varying ways. International criticism may be partly responsible for the referendum being announced, in February 2008, but it will not ensure that the vote is conducted freely. Concerted public pressure and targeted sanctions by the military government?s international supporters as well as its detractors is needed if there is to be any hope that real democratic progress, rather than further constitutional travesties, can be achieved..."
Source/publisher: Human Rights Watch
2008-05-01
Date of entry/update: 2008-05-01
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: As analysts and activists debate how to respond to the regime?s draft constitution, others ask if it will cement the generals? hold on power or trigger a popular uprising... "FOR the generals who rule Burma, it is a step closer to the coveted goal of permanent military control of the country?s politics. For its detractors, it is a potential lightning rod for decades of pent-up discontent. But for most, it is still a mystery, as they wonder if this is really a distant light at the end of the tunnel or the headlights of an impending disaster. The Burmese regime?s draft constitution, which Burmese voters will be asked to endorse or reject in a referendum in May, has drawn many reactions from people both inside and outside the country. Although there is little consensus on the constitution, which was 14 years in the making, few doubt that the referendum, if it actually goes ahead, will be the junta?s most significant political move since elections in 1990, when voters unequivocally signaled a desire for an end to military rule..."
Creator/author: Kyaw Zwa Moe
Source/publisher: "The Irrawaddy" Vol. 16, No. 4
2008-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2008-04-27
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: Burma has always been cursed by its constitutions. So, is the upcoming referendum a chance for progress or a step back for the people?
Creator/author: Dominic Faulder
Source/publisher: "The Irrawaddy" Vol. 16, No. 4
2008-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2008-04-27
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
more
Description: Drafting a constitution in Burma. "Federalism is not quite understood in Burma. In fact, it would not be wrong to say it is grossly misunderstood by -- among many others -- the Burman population segment, or at least by its armed elites (or elites in uniform). To armed Burman elites, Federalism is synonomous with the destruction or the disintegration of the Union. The Burman-dominated military led by General Ne Win introduced and entrenched this idea when they usurped power in 1962..."
Creator/author: Chao-Tzang Yawnghwe
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 3 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
1999-05-00
Date of entry/update: 2004-08-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 9.08 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: Drafting a constitution in Burma. Comparison of the constitutional history of Burma and Thailand and a list of elements needed in a new Burmese constitution.
Creator/author: Vitit Muntarbhorn
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 3 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
1999-05-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 15.25 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "...Has Burma really been on the brink of fragmentation since independence? Are the ethnic nationalities and the politics of ethnicity the root cause of the problem? Was General Ne Win correct when he claimed in 1962 that he had to seize state power to prevent Burma from disintegration? The current State Peace and Development Council also claims that there are 135 languages and 8 major races in Burma requiring a strong centralized military to keep the country together. Is this true? ..."
Creator/author: Harn Yawnghwe, B. K. Sen
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 9.66 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: "...The nation's constitutional and election history highlights the difficulties that have been encountered in securing peace with the people, particularly as the armed forces (Tatmadaw) have long ruled Burma. There is no culture of consent between the governed and the government and this is a constant of political life. Until this is remedied, the country embroiled in its own civil war for 52 years will stay at war in one form or another..."
Creator/author: Janelle Saffin
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 7 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
2000-12-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm pdf
Size: 11.79 KB 598.79 KB
more
Description: "...This article has discussed the draft constitutions for Burma proposed by the National Convention, the body established by the ruling party, and that proposed by the opposition National Council of the Union of Burma. It has reviewed aspects such as the process of constitution of drafting, the electoral system, constitutional supremacy and amendments and appointments to and function of the courts, as well as a Bill of Rights, a Human Rights Commission and declarations of states of emergency. The National Convention's constitution contains many strongly anti-democratic provisions and is silent on several key issues. In contrast, the NCUB's constitution attempts to create a democratic system, but includes several provisions that should be reworked to strengthen democratic checks and balances and prevent future state abuse of power."
Creator/author: Jeremy Sarkin
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 4 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
1999-10-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 43.69 KB
more
Description: "According to Burma's two supposedly superseded constitutions, that of 1947 and 1974, the Pyithu Hluttaw (the People's Assembly) is the body charged with exercising State power. The 1989 Pyithu Hluttaw Election Law (called the Election Law), under which the 1990 elections were conducted, also provides that the duty of representatives elected in accordance with the Election Law is to form the Pyithu Hluttaw (Section 3). The ruling military junta, the people of Burma and the international community acknowledged without qualification that the May 1990 general election was free, fair and lawful. It then follows that those representatives elected by the people in the 1990 election have the lawful right to form a Pyithu Hluttaw that exercises legislative power and appoints a government in accordance with the legal norms of Burma..."
Creator/author: Burma Lawyers' Council
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 3 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
1999-05-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 7.96 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: "An intensive people's movement for the restoration of democracy and human rights has been existing in Burma for more than a decade. In the meantime, both government and opposition groups have been drafting constitutions, to be put into force during the transition to a more open and democratic system of government..."
Creator/author: Khin Maung Win
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 8 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
2001-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm pdf
Size: 9.71 KB 594.79 KB
more
Description: Critique of the National Convention. Comparison between the constitution-drafting processes and principles of the Burmese military, the NLD and the NCUB, with additional comparison with the constitution-drafting processes in the Philippines and Thailand.
Creator/author: Burma Lawyers' Council
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 3 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
1999-05-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 14.76 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "From January 4, 1948, the day the Union of Burma came into existence as an independent nation, the people and their leaders have been divided over how to achieve national unity and structure their state. Until 1988, it was federal in name and theory, but unitary in practice. After five decades of political discussion, peaceful movements for secession or autonomy and warfare, the majority Burmans and most of the ethnic minorities remain disunited. From time to time efforts have been made by the Government of Burma and the minorities, either alone or in groups, to end revolt and disunity, but none have succeeded. Today, the basic problem is the same as the one the nation?s founding fathers faced fifty years ago: how to construct a political system wherein diverse peoples feel free and equal, able to govern themselves in their own areas, protect and preserve their languages, cultures and traditions, while at the same time give their political loyalty to the nationstate..."
Creator/author: Josef Silverstein
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 25.43 KB
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "Federalism has, for many decades now, been seen an answer to the challenges posed by multi-ethnic societies the world over. In some cases, the idea has worked, while in others it manifestly has not. Where it has failed, the reasons have often lain as much with human deficiencies as with systemic shortcomings..."
Creator/author: Venkat Iyer
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 14.72 KB
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "The author of the article "The Panglong Spirit Lives On" (Chao-Tzang Yawnghwe in The Irrawaddy, July 2001) argued that the guiding principle of the Panglong Accord is "unity in diversity". He raised the question as to whether there is a formula for ending Burma?s decades of ethnic strife, and answered it himself with "Yes, and it is none other than the political vision that brought modern Burma into existence half a century ago". This is begging the question: what is this political vision, which is abstract in terms of people?s understanding? The meaning of terminology such as "unity in diversity" is academically attractive, but in the understanding of the activists it helps little. However, Yawnghwe retrieved much of the ground lost in the struggle evolving a viable concept for the establishment of a stable Burma by stating that the major goal is the establishment of a democratic, federal Union of Burma, to be composed of self-determining states living together in equality and peace. It is argued that core issues must be addressed, and the debate has to be brought to a fruitful end..."
Creator/author: B. K. Sen
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 27.9 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "International Community can help via systematic study and consideration of the world?s federations, in pursuit of an understanding of what federalism can achieve when presented with a range of entrenched political and/ or ethnic problems. The international community thus provides and becomes the backdrop, and the actor/ participants can research, inform, educate, and consider whether and in what ways federalism can provide some solutions to the crisis of governance in which they flounder. Burma has never progressed past the polarised and prevailing view of federalism, yet for so long an aspiration of many of Burma?s leaders, notably the National Democratic Front (NDF) since its formation in 1976, and still today. 1 The United Nationalities League for Democracy (UNLD) an umbrella political organisation of non-Burman nationalities that formed in 1989 likewise embraces federalism as a path to political, therefore constitutional settlement, that will bring peace and prosperity. 2 Until the political actors in and of Burma have this debate, its ability to resolve its political differences by political means to effect a constitutional settlement will elude them. National reconciliation will remain a catch cry..."
Creator/author: Janelle Saffin
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 50.43 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: "Constitution can be a strong foundation for every country to be established as a just, free, peaceful and developed society. Burma is in the process of producing a new constitution. By amalgamating lessons from previous historical experiences and current practical situation of the country, it is hoped that a proper constitution for future Burma might be produced. Major concern is that without finding ways and means to resolve the underlying issues of a country, production of constitution superficially is meaningless and constitution might not be effective from positive aspect in our future society. In this account, the constitution making process or the way, how a constitution will be produced, is of paramount importance. In attempting to produce a constitution, onesided or unproper guidance to the people should be avoided. In a genuine constitution making process, the people, regardless of race, social origin, gender and etc, should be allowed to uncover their sufferings frankly, propose possible solutions positively, and express their will to restructure the society freely thereby leading the process to be more and more participatory. Any kind of discrimination should not be exercised within a genuine constitution making process whether be it federal or state constitution making processes..."
Creator/author: Aung Htoo
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 48.41 KB
more
Description: Federalism in Burma: (Sao Seng Suk is the Chairman of the Shan State Constitution Drafting Committee. Following is a literal transcript of the interview he had with U Aung Htoo and B. K. Sen). "Do you consider the constitution to be the core issue in a peaceful political settlement in Burma?" Sao Seng Suk: "Yes, I certainly do. Because all problems arose since Pyidaungzu was established in 1947 from the then constitution. If all accept democratic constitution, historical problems can be settled peacefully and the country rebuilt according to constitution, as there will be many kinds of freedom, freedom of expression, freedom of activities, etc." "What type of Constitution will be viable?" Sao Seng Suk: "Federal type constitution, federal is suitable for us..."
Creator/author: U Aung Htoo, B. K. Sen
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 11 (Burma Lawyers? Council)
2002-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 8.39 KB
Local URL:
more
Description: "This paper seeks to provide an introduction to the concept of self-determination, and to suggest the importance of this concept in Burma. A comprehensive analysis of either topic is beyond the scope of this paper, which is aimed at readers without great familiarity with either area. Suggestions for further reading may be found in the references. The paper begins by discussing the concept of self-determination, and its varied meanings. A brief history of the development of the concept follows, in which the meaning of self-determination beyond decolonisation is touched upon. The situation of minorities within a state is then considered. The second section of the paper is a discussion of the particular case of Burma..."
Creator/author: Louise Southalan
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 5 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
2000-04-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 57.7 KB
more
Description: Drafting a constitution in Burma "As the peoples and leaders of Burma approach the task of writing a third constitution, a good place to begin is by asking the question, why did the previous constitutions fail to unite the indigenous ethnic minorities and the government in peaceful viable polity. At the heart of the problem is the questions which vexed the founding fathers-how to construct a union in which people who formerly were separated could be joined together so as to benefit from unity while remaining nominally autonomous in their own areas on matters of political rule, economy and culture. Probably the clearest and most direct statement on the question was made by the AFPFL- the nationalist party which led the nation to independence- just before Aung San went to England to discuss Burma's future with the British Prime Minister..."
Creator/author: Josef Silverstein
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 3 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
1999-05-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 24.35 KB
more
Description: "One of the major issues proving to be an obstacle to the achievement of national reconciliation in Burma is the rival constitution writing processes initiated by opposing forces. As the competing political forces use the constitutional drafting process as a political football, the chance for dialogue and prospects for national reconciliation remain dim. The State Peace and Development Council's (SPDC) constitution drafting process, which started in January 1993, emerged as a method utilized by the junta to deter the National League for Democracy (NLD) from taking power. As the junta strictly controls the entire constitution writing process, other forces including the NLD and ethnic organizations who have signed ceasefire agreements with the junta, have been denied the right to freely participate in the junta initiated process..."
Creator/author: Khin Maung Win
Source/publisher: Legal Issues on Burma Journal No. 7 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
2000-12-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm pdf
Size: 7.07 KB 598.79 KB
more
Description: "The word 'secession' has originated from the concept of 'self-determination'. Apart from its historical context, 'self-determination' can also be seen in its plain meaning. The Oxford Dictionary defines 'self-determination as, 'The right of a nation or people to decide what form of government it will have or whether it will be independent of another country or not'. The second part of this definition is easy to understand. A nation or people has the right to be independent of another country when under subjugation of that country. But sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a nation striving for selfdetermination is actually a nation..."
Creator/author: B.K. Sen
Source/publisher: "Legal Issues on Burma Journal" No. 10 (Burma Lawyers' Council)
2001-12-00
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm pdf
Size: 34.13 KB 558.64 KB
more
Description: by Janelle M. Diller, Legal Director International Human Rights Law Group, December 14, 1991 Oxford, England. "We find ourselves in an era of accelerated change. Many nations around the world, including Mongolia, Nepal and the countries of Eastern Europe, are thrusting themselves into the process of democratization and democratic constitution-making. Such momentum persists even though, in many cases, democracy has not been a part of the political, social, economic or legal infrastructures of the changing countries. Yet in Burma, nearly one and a half years after the peaceful election of a People's Assembly, the people of Burma continue to be governed by the ruling military State Law and Order Restoration Council ("SLORC"). The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Aung San Suu Kyi this week has helped dispel the prevailing complacency in the international arena with regard to the current situation in Burma. However, just and equitable governance continues to evade the people of Burma. Into the SLORC-controlled environment in which an electoral mandate continues to be withheld and reports of human rights abuses appear with disturbing frequency, the SLORC has announced a plan for arriving at a national consensus which will pave the way for a new constitution to be drafted. How can the Burmese people exercise such a supreme act of popular sovereignty under these conditions? And what international legal standards govern the constitution-making process and its result? Let me briefly review events leading up to the present scenario in order to provide insight into the complexities involved in the establishment of a constitutional culture in Burma. The term 'constitutional culture' here refers to the capacity of political, social and legal infrastructures to cultivate and practice a respect for some sort of supreme law of the land that governs both rulers and governed. Such a culture nurtures both individual and institutional respect for the rule of law..."
Creator/author: Janelle M. Diller
1991-12-14
Date of entry/update: 2003-06-03
Grouping: Individual Documents
Language: English
Format : htm
Size: 180.38 KB
Local URL:
more