[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
BurmaNet News: February 28, 2001
- Subject: BurmaNet News: February 28, 2001
- From: strider@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 21:38:00
______________ THE BURMANET NEWS ______________
An on-line newspaper covering Burma
February 28, 2001 Issue # 1746
______________ www.burmanet.org _______________
INSIDE BURMA _______
*AP:Suu Kyi firm to holding peaceful talks with junta
*US State Dept. Human Rights Report on Burma [Excerpt]: Citizens did not
have the right to change their government
*Salon: Profile--Aung San Suu Kyi
*Xinhua: Myanmar Promulgates Attorney General Law 2001
*DVB: KNU Groups warn Rangoon of retaliation if offensive continues
*Mizzima: Nagas from Burma continue to flee
REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL _______
*AP: Thailand repatriates 4,000 migrant workers to Myanmar
*Reuters: U.N.'s Robinson concerned about Myanmar refugees
*Bangkok Post: Drugs murder link
*Bangkok Post: Cash stashed in Bangkok highlights Burmese problem
ECONOMY/BUSINESS _______
*Xinhua: Myanmar, Japan Sign MOU on Purchase of Buckwheat Seeds
OPINION/EDITORIALS_______
*Summary of the Thai Press: Burma editorials
__________________ INSIDE BURMA ____________________
AP:Suu Kyi firm to holding peaceful talks with junta
YANGON, Myanmar: Myanmar democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, in a meeting
with a US official, has reaffirmed her commitment to holding a peaceful
dialogue with the ruling military regime, a US diplomat said Tuesday.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Ralph Boyce met with Suu Kyi at her
Yangon residence on Monday. He is the first American official allowed to
see her during five months of house detention that began after she tried
to travel outside the capital for political work.
Suu Kyi, who appeared to be in good health, told Boyce that she is
committed to peaceful dialogue and hopes it will lead to national
reconciliation, the diplomat said on customary condition of anonymity.
Boyce also held separate meetings with Lt. Gen. Khin Nyunt, the
third-ranking general in the regime, Foreign Minister Win Aung and some
central executive committee members of Suu Kyi's National League for
Democracy party, the diplomat said.
Suu Kyi and the regime began secret talks in October, their first direct
dialogue in more than six years. The NLD won general elections in 1990
but the military has refused to honor the result.
Boyce's one-day visit, during a 10-country swing through Asia, was aimed
at finding out how the dialogue between Suu Kyi and the junta is
progressing and to express the US government's support for the dialogue,
the diplomat said.
"The process of dialogue in Burma is of high interest not just to the
new administration in Washington but around the world," Boyce told
reporters in Bangkok Tuesday. "It's a welcome development." He refused
to say anything more.
State-run newspapers reported the meeting between Boyce and Khin Nyunt,
but gave no details.
Boyce is the first senior US official to visit Myanmar, also known as
Burma, since the new Bush administration took office. He said it was
premature to say whether the dialogue could lead to a softening in the
US stance on Myanmar.
The United States, one of the sternest international critics of the
regime, has imposed sanctions on Myanmar including a ban on new
investment because of the military's human rights record and suppression
of democracy.
Suu Kyi, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991 for her political work,
has been held incommunicado at her house since September 22 after she
twice defied authorities by attempting to hold meetings with members of
the NLD in the provinces.
The only other diplomats to have met her since then were visiting United
Nations special envoy Razali Ismail, a mission from the European Union
and Australian human rights commissioner Chris Sidoti.
Razali revealed after his latest visit in January that Suu Kyi had met
with Khin Nyunt at least twice since October. However, no details of the
talks are known.
Since the NLD election victory in 1990, thousands of its members have
been imprisoned or faced persecution from the military, which has ruled
Myanmar for nearly four decades. (AP)
___________________________________________________
US State Dept. Human Rights Report on Burma [Excerpt]: Citizens did not
have the right to change their government
[As excerpted by Asia Times]
What the report says Burma, Citizens did not have the right to change
their government. (Excerpts from the US State Department's "Country
Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2000")
Asia Times, February 28, 2001
The Government's extremely poor human rights record and longstanding
severe repression of its citizens continued during the year. Citizens
continued to live subject at any time and without appeal to the
arbitrary and sometimes brutal dictates of the military regime. Citizens
did not have the right to change their government. There continued to be
credible reports, particularly in ethnic minority areas, that security
forces committed serious human rights abuses, including extrajudicial
killings and rape.
Disappearances continued, and members of the security forces tortured,
beat, and otherwise abused prisoners and detainees. Prison conditions
remained harsh and life threatening, but have improved slightly in some
prisons after the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) was
allowed access to prisons in May 1999. Arbitrary arrest and detention
for expression of dissenting political views continued to be a common
practice. The Government held Aung San Suu Kyi incommu! nicado twice in
September, following attempts to travel beyond the bounds of Rangoon
City and to Mandalay.
At year's end, the Government continued to hold Aung San Suu Kyi in
detention; it also held 48 members-elect of parliament and more than
1,000 NLD supporters under detention, all as part of a government effort
to prevent the parliament elected in 1990 from convening. Since 1962
thousands of persons have been arrested, detained, or imprisoned for
political reasons; more than 1,800 political prisoners remained
imprisoned at year's end.
The judiciary is not independent, and there is no effective rule of law.
During the year, the Government intensified its campaign to eliminate
independent lawyers by arbitrarily arresting and sentencing them on
fabricated charges. The Government continued to infringe on citizens'
privacy rights, and security forces continued to monitor citizens'
movements and communications systematically, to search homes without
warrants, and to relocate per! sons forcibly without just compensation
or due process. During the year, those persons suspected of or charged
with prodemocratic political activity were subjected to regular
surveillance and harassment. Security forces continued to use excessive
force to violate international humanitarian law in internal conflicts
against ethnic insurgencies. The regime forcibly relocated large ethnic
minority populations in order to deprive armed ethnic groups of civilian
bases of support.
The SPDC continued to restrict severely freedom of speech, press,
assembly, and association. It has pressured many thousands of members to
resign from the NLD and closed party offices nationwide. Since 1990 the
junta frequently prevented the NLD and other prodemocracy parties from
conducting normal political activities. The junta recognizes the NLD as
a legal entity; however, it refuses to accept the legal political status
of key NLD party leaders, particularly the party's general secretary and
199! 1 Nobel laureate, Aung San Suu Kyi, and restricts her activities
severely through security measures and threats. The Government imposed
some restrictions on certain religious minorities. The junta continued
to restrict freedom of movement and, in particular, foreign travel by
female citizens; the junta also continued to restrict Aung San Suu Kyi's
freedom to leave her residence or to receive visitors.
In September Aung San Suu Kyi, actions that placed under house arrest
when she attempted to visit an NLD party office on the outskirts of
Rangoon, and again when she attempted to travel by train to Mandalay.
During the year, the SPDC intensified its systematic use of coercion and
intimidation to deny citizens the right to change their government. In
September 1998, the NLD leadership organized a 10-member Committee
Representing the People's Parliament (CRPP) to act on behalf of the
parliament. The junta responded by forcing several elected
representatives to resign from t! he parliament, by detaining dozens of
other elected representatives, and by pressuring constituents to sign
statements of no confidence. One member of the CRPP also was jailed, and
the other members of the committee were placed in detention during the
latter part of the year. However, late in the year, with encouragement
from U.N. Special Representative Ismail Razali, the Government opened
contacts with Aung San Suu Kyi, which appeared to produce some
relaxation in the restrictions on the NLD. Six of the NLD's 9 central
committee members and 80 NLD supporters were released from detention,
and press attacks on the NLD and Aung San Suu Kyi ceased.
In addition the NLD was able to resume some normal activities of a
political party.
The junta restricted freedom of religion; it maintained its
institutionalized control over Buddhist clergy and restricted efforts by
some Buddhist clergy to promote human rights and political freedom. The
Government also coercively promoted Buddhism over other religions in
some ethnic minority areas and imposed restrictions on certain religious
minorities.
The Government did not allow domestic human rights organizations to
exist and remained generally hostile to outside scrutiny of its human
rights record.
Violence and societal discrimination against women remained problems, as
did discrimination against religious and ethnic minorities. The
Government continued to restrict worker rights, ban unions, and use
forced labor for public works and for the support of military garrisons.
Forced labor, including forced child labor, remains a serious problem.
The forced use of citizens as porters by the army--with attendant
mistreatment, illness, and sometimes death--remained a common practice.
In November the International Labor Organization (ILO) Governing Body
judged that the Government had not taken effective action to deal with
the "widespread and systematic" use of forced labor in the country and,
for the first ti! me in its history, called on all ILO members to apply
sanctions to Burma. Child labor also is a problem and varies in severity
depending on the country's region. Trafficking in persons, particularly
in women and girls to Thailand and China, mostly for the purposes of
prostitution, remained widespread.
___________________________________________________
Salon: Profile--Aung San Suu Kyi
By David Rubien
Aung San Suu Kyi
Even when she's under house arrest, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning
resistance leader is a symbol of hope in the struggle for democracy in
Burma.
Feb. 27, 2001 | A question that has to haunt anyone pondering the
predicament of Burma's democratic resistance leader Aung San Suu Kyi is:
Why hasn't she been killed? She is, after all, a major thorn in the
sides of the military dictators who have been driving the Southeast
Asian nation to ruin for the past 38 years. Certainly she would not be
the first popular opposition leader to be murdered by despots.
The simple answer is they missed their chance. Suu Kyi (pronounced soo
chee), 55, was first confined to house arrest in 1989, months before her
National League of Democracy won Burma's last election in a landslide.
The dictators ignored the election results and proceeded to arrest all
the NLD leaders they hadn't already jailed previously, and continued the
kind of repression that had been the junta's modus operandi since 1962.
But in 1991 something happened that the dictators couldn't have
anticipated. Suu Kyi won the Nobel Peace Prize. The eyes of the world
suddenly became focused on this slight, Buddhist woman locked in her
home, forbidden from picking up her award. But her captors came under
international gaze as well, and killing Suu Kyi now would be too
reckless a move even for a junta that makes murder and slavery
cornerstones of its policy.
The Burmese dictatorship is known within and outside the country as
SLORC, for State Law and Order Restoration Council, the banner under
which the autocrats ran in the 1990 elections they conveniently
dismissed. Three years ago they changed their name to the even more
Orwellian State Peace and Development Council, but SLORC seems to fit
them better. In the manner of many dictatorships, SLORC is fond of
renaming. In 1988 SLORC decided to call Burma "Myanmar," but most of the
world, recognizing the illegitimacy of the government, ignores the name
change, much in the way "Kampuchea" is now nothing more than a synonym
for the evil visited on Cambodia by Pol Pot and his minions.
Under SLORC's reign, Burma has vied with a few other countries, such as
North Korea, Afghanistan and Algeria, for the honor of serving as poster
child for a nation destroyed by tyrants. By any objective measure Burma
-- as physically beautiful and as rich in natural resources as any
Southeast Asian country -- is in dire straits. It was ranked second to
last, after Sierra Leone, on healthcare spending per capita, according
to the World Health Organization. The result is that diseases (including
AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and anthrax) are rampant. AIDS is considered
more epidemic in Burma than in Thailand, on a par with the scourge in
southern Africa. Contributing to the problem is a robust drug trade:
Burma alternates with Afghanistan as the largest heroin producer in the
world, and burgeoning drug addiction within Burma is helping to spread
AIDS.
The Burmese armed forces are thought to be about 500,000 strong and are
ruthless in enforcing SLORC's will. Forced relocation is common, with
entire communities uprooted and moved to slums or barren lands where
they are barely able to survive. SLORC uses slave labor for construction
projects, including children, and Amnesty International reports that
thousands of Burmese are kidnapped each year and made to carry supplies
for the army through dense, mountainous jungle, where ethnic resistance
groups reside.
The Burmese economy is in shambles. People earn less than a dollar a
day, and many are illiterate because SLORC has closed down hundreds of
schools. The United Nations reports that Burma spends 28 cents a year
per student on public schools. Four out of 10 children are reported to
be malnourished, and the average life expectancy for Burmese is less
than 50 years. SLORC is paranoid about people congregating, and
gatherings of more than four people are forbidden. Unions, needless to
say, are prohibited, and SLORC owns all the media. It's illegal to
possess a home computer. Anyone who violates SLORC's capricious laws is
subject to lengthy prison sentences and torture, which, according to
Amnesty International, is a specialty of the junta.
In 1995, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., visited Burma while on a
fact-finding mission in Southeast Asia. Newsweek reported that Lt. Gen.
Khin Nyunt of SLORC welcomed McCain by screening for him a video of
machete-wielding thugs beheading Burmese villagers. McCain later said of
the junta members, "These are very bad people."
Yet despite the horror, hope lives on in Burma, and much of it rides on
Aung San Suu Kyi. It's a lot for one person to bear, but Suu Kyi seems
born to the task -- literally and constitutionally. Not only is she the
daughter of Aung San -- considered the father of Burmese democracy and
an assassinated martyr to the cause of freedom -- and as such revered
almost automatically, but her deep Buddhist training has made her
uniquely fit to weather a life of confinement and isolation. She
meditates daily, a discipline that provides insight into life beyond the
external reality most of us perceive, and she hews strictly to Buddhist
proscriptions against harming, hate, fear and ego.
In a 1995 interview with Alan Clements, an American author who lived as
a Buddhist monk in Burma for several years and who wrote the 1992 book
"Burma: The Next Killing Fields?" Suu Kyi alluded to another interviewer
who kept asking if she really was not frightened. "Why should I have
been frightened?" she said. "I'm not sure a Buddhist would have asked
this question. Buddhists in general would have understood that isolation
is not something to be frightened of." Then she added, "You cannot
really be frightened of people you do not hate. Hate and fear go hand in
hand."
Buddhism aside, Suu Kyi's commitment to Burma's freedom is bedrock, and
this also anchors her. At every opportunity presented she reiterates the
demand that SLORC must yield to the election results of 1990 and make
the country democratic. Her steadfastness has led to some almost comical
situations. In 1998, during one of the rare periods SLORC released her
from house arrest -- but still prohibited her from traveling outside the
capital -- she attempted to leave town to meet with another NLD
official. When soldiers blocked her way she refused to turn back and
ended up camping out in her car for six days before she was forcibly
returned home. She tried it again, she was taken home again and right
away she vowed to make another attempt, asserting that she was not
"legally restricted in any way." Finally SLORC reimposed house arrest.
Suu Kyi's father was born in 1915, when Burma was a colony of Britain. A
devout Buddhist, Aung San became a leader in Burma's struggle for
independence. During World War II, he believed that Japan would be the
route to Burma's freedom, and he fought with the Japanese when they
invaded the country. But when they proved to be even more despotic than
the British, Aung San and his compatriots switched sides and fought with
the British to expel the Japanese. At the end of the war, Britain and
Burma worked together to set up a parliamentary structure so that the
Burmese could take control of their country. Aung San's party swept the
elections, but only months later, in 1947, he and several members of his
government were shot dead by political rivals. Soon after that, Burma
descended into a civil war among ethnic groups.
Suu Kyi was 2 at the time of her father's death. Her mother, Khin Kyi,
was a vital figure in the early years of Burma's independence, serving
in several government capacities. In 1960 Khin Kyi was appointed
ambassador to India, moving to New Delhi with her daughter and two sons.
While Suu Kyi got a good British high school education, her mother made
sure that her daughter did not stray from the Buddhist path. Suu Kyi was
a voracious reader and had a particular fascination with Mahatma Gandhi.
In 1964, Suu Kyi enrolled at Oxford, getting degrees in philosophy and
economics in 1967.
In the 1991 Nobel Prize Annual, Irwin Abrams sketched a bit of biography
from Suu Kyi's time at Oxford. "The diminutive beauty from Burma was a
striking figure. Her close friend of those days, Ann Pasternak Slater,
remembers how her 'tight, trim lungi (the Burmese version of the sarong)
and her upright carriage, her firm moral convictions and inherited
social grace contrasted sharply' with the casual manners and ill-defined
moral standards of the English students.
"Slater recalls [Suu Kyi's] curiosity about Western ways. Despite
Buddhist injunctions, she took one little sip of an alcoholic drink just
to find out what it was like -- and didn't like it. And so that she
could know the experience of other woman students, who returned from
late dates after the gates were locked and had to climb over the garden
wall of their dormitory to get in, she had a friend from India bring her
back from a dinner date at midnight, so he could help her over the wall.
Slater also remembers the characteristic determination with which Suu
Kyi learned to bicycle in her lungi."
After graduating from Oxford, Suu Kyi moved to New York, where she
worked for the United Nations secretariat and volunteered as a social
worker at a New York hospital. In 1972 she married Michael Aris, a
scholar of Asian literature and history. While Aris studied in England,
they had two sons, Alexander and Kim. Suu Kyi taught Burmese studies at
Oxford while doing postgraduate research in her country's history. The
family returned frequently to Burma to spend time with Khin Kyi, who was
retired in her Rangoon home.
Things were not going well in Burma. For years the democratic government
had tried to maintain control during civil war, but a junta led by Gen.
Ne Win took over in 1958, and consolidated power in 1962. He abolished
the constitution, banned all political parties, nationalized many
businesses, installed military personnel in government positions and
announced he was leading Burma down the "socialist path." The downward
spiral had begun.
As economic and social conditions unraveled under the inept dictator's
mismanagement, civil unrest began to erupt in the '80s. Students
organized and held rallies demanding restoration of democracy and human
rights. On Aug. 8, 1988, a massive general strike and demonstration were
declared. Ne Win responded by calling out the troops. Over the next
several days, soldiers fired on crowds, killing between 1,000 and 10,000
civilians. Still, the demonstrations continued, and the government
actually seemed to back down. But then a new set of generals, calling
themselves SLORC, asserted that they were in control, and ratcheted up
the repression further.
Coincident with all this, Suu Kyi was in Rangoon, caring for her mother
(who had suffered a stroke) and watching the tumult from the sidelines.
After the massacres, she decided to take action. Speaking to a huge
crowd under a poster of her father, she said, "I could not, as my
father's daughter, remain indifferent to all that was going on." With
her simple and direct demands for civil rights and her insistence on
nonviolent resistance, she won over thousands of Burmese and became the
country's avatar of democracy.
Meanwhile, SLORC surprised everyone by announcing that a "free and fair"
election would be held in 1989, open to all parties. More than 200
parties registered to run, but the NLD, thanks to Suu Kyi's
participation, drew the most support. The organization was also one of
the few that had the courage to defy an SLORC ban on public assembly, an
edict that effectively precluded anyone from campaigning. Not only that,
SLORC insisted on vetting all public documents issued by political
parties. Suu Kyi, the NLD's nominal leader, simply refused to accede to
any of SLORC's demands. She continued to campaign around the country,
facing phalanxes of armed guards everywhere she spoke
In one famous incident, Suu Kyi and fellow NLD members were on the
campaign trail when they found themselves staring into the rifle barrels
of a squadron of soldiers. An SLORC officer seemed prepared to give the
order to fire, when Suu Kyi motioned her colleagues away and walked
straight toward the officer, staring him down. He ordered the troops to
withdraw. "It seemed so much simpler to provide them with a single
target than to bring everyone else in," she said afterward.
SLORC finally ordered Suu Kyi into house arrest, and rounded up most of
the other NLD leaders, sentencing several to years in prison. Many were
tortured. But then came the real shocker for SLORC: In the election held
in May 1990 the NLD won 392 seats in the National Assembly, compared
with 10 for SLORC. Far from transferring power, SLORC responded with
wave after wave of terror. Still, Suu Kyi would not be silenced. At
first SLORC permitted her visits from her husband and sons, and she was
able to get her writings out to the world through them. But in the fall
of '90 the junta forbade all visits, not even letting her get mail.
SLORC tried to play the family card, encouraging her to visit Aris and
the boys in England, but she refused, knowing she'd be barred from Burma
for good.
In 1995 SLORC relaxed restrictions on her, and she was able to receive
visitors, including several interviewers. She described her daily
routine to a reporter for Asia TV: "I get up at 4:30 in the morning. I
meditate for an hour. Then I listen to the BBC world service, then I
listen to the VOA [Voice of America] news in Burmese, and then the BBC
news in Burmese. If I could hear it, I would listen to the Democratic
Voice of Burma, but that is not always very clear. Then of course I take
a bath, have breakfast and then the rest of the day I divide into
periods for reading, for walking around the house and for playing a bit
of music."
Were it not for the radio, she said, she would not have known she won
the Nobel Prize.
In her interview with Clements, Suu Kyi elaborated on her attitude
toward her captors in answer to his question, "You have been at the
physical mercy of the authorities ever since you entered your people's
struggle for democracy. But has the SLORC ever captured you inside
emotionally or mentally?"
No, and I think this is because I have never learned to hate them. If I
had, I would have really been at their mercy. Have you read a book
called "Middlemarch" by George Eliot? There was a character called Dr.
Lydgate, whose marriage turned out to be a disappointment. I remember a
remark about him, something to the effect that what he was afraid of was
that he might no longer be able to love his wife who had been a
disappointment to him. When I first read this remark, I found it rather
puzzling. It shows that I was very immature at that time. My attitude
was -- shouldn't he have been more afraid that she might have stopped
loving him? But now I understand why he felt like that. If he had
stopped loving his wife, he would have been entirely defeated. His whole
life would have been a disappointment. But what she did and how she felt
was something quite different. I've always felt that, if I had really
started hating my captors, hating the SLORC and the army, I would have
defeated myself.
However, in a Vanity Fair article from 1995 she detailed her
tribulations: "'Sometimes I didn't even have enough money to eat,' she
went on. 'I became so weak from malnourishment that my hair fell out,
and I couldn't get out of bed. I was afraid that I had damaged my heart.
Every time I moved, my heart went thump-thump-thump, and it was hard to
breathe. I fell to nearly 90 pounds from my normal 106. I thought to
myself that I'd die of heart failure, not starvation at all. Then my
eyes started to go bad. I developed spondylitis, which is a degeneration
of the spinal column.' She paused for a moment, then pointed with a
finger to her head and said, 'But they never got me up here.'"
She didn't lose her sense of humor, either. When Clements asked her if
her phone was tapped, she said, "Oh, yes, probably. If it is not I would
have to accuse them of inefficiency. I would have to complain to Lt.
Gen. Khin Nyunt [SLORC's military intelligence chief] and say, 'Your
people are really not doing their job properly.'"
SLORC granted Suu Kyi some freedom of movement in 1995, but that didn't
extend to meeting with NLD colleagues. Worse, SLORC wouldn't let her
family into the country for visits, even when her husband was diagnosed
with prostate cancer in 1998. He was denied a visa to visit Suu Kyi a
final time in 1999 and died in London. The generals hoped she would
attend the funeral, but she knew the realities. She said simply, "I feel
so fortunate to have had such a wonderful husband who has always given
me the understanding I needed; nothing can take that away from me."
And nothing, it seems, can take Suu Kyi away from the SLORC generals.
Restrict her movement as they will, she goes on, making speeches,
handing out food to the poor, issuing papers and making it clear that
democratic aspirations in Burma live on. She will not stand down. And
here's something about the psychology of the totalitarian mind -- the
dictators must understand that Suu Kyi is good for them as well, because
as long as they let her live, the international community can say,
"Look, the government's not so bad; they keep that woman around." She's
SLORC's trump card.
So now there is communication. For the past four months SLORC agents
have been meeting with Suu Kyi regularly while reportedly releasing NLD
members from prison. The content of their meetings has not been
reported, and whether they have any real significance is impossible to
know right now, but it's hard to imagine SLORC ceding any real power.
Yet we can hope. If Vaclav Havel and Nelson Mandela could emerge from
lengthy prison sentences to lead their countries in freedom, perhaps Suu
Kyi will get a turn.
About the writer
David Rubien is a writer in San Francisco.
___________________________________________________
Xinhua: Myanmar Promulgates Attorney General Law 2001
YANGON, February 28 (Xinhua) -- The Myanmar State Peace and Development
Council (SPDC) has promulgated the Attorney General Law 2001, repealing
the old law enacted in 1988 when it came to power, official newspaper
The New Light of Myanmar reported Wednesday. Signed by SPDC Chairman
Senior-General Than Shwe and enacted on Tuesday, the Myanmar attorney
general law contains seven chapters and 11 provisions. The seven
chapters include appointment of the attorney general and the deputy
attorney general, duties and powers of the attorney general, formation
of the attorney general's office and the law offices in different
levels, and functions and duties of the law officers.
With respect to the duties of the attorney general, the law states that
the attorney general is to tender legal advice whenever needed by the
government, to appear in criminal cases on behalf of the state and to
appear on behalf of the government in civil cases in which the
government is a party as the plaintiff or defendant. The law also states
that the attorney general is to scrutinize, draft and translate laws,
and tender legal advice to the relevant government departments as to
whether or not the state should be a party to international conventions
and regional agreements as well as on matters related to bilateral or
multi-lateral treaties, memorandums of understanding, local and foreign
investment instruments and others.
___________________________________________________
DVB: KNU Groups warn Rangoon of retaliation if offensive continues
Text of report by Burmese opposition radio on 24 February
A statement has been issued today on the situation at the Thai-Burma
border and the views of the national races. The statement was issued by
three ethnic armed groups - the Shan State Army - southern region, SSA;
the Karenni National Progressive Party, KNPP; and the Karen National
Union, KNU. The statement noted that the SPDC [State Peace and
Development Council] forces have mounted offensives against the ethnic
peoples since last year and they have also committed human rights abuses
against the local people, such as arbitrary killings, rape, torture and
robbery. This year also they are preparing to launch offensives against
the Karen, the Karenni and the Shan armed groups, which will further
exacerbate the problems. The statement condemned the SPDC's planned
offensive with the use of force. If such ruthless offensives are
continued, the statement added that they will be severely retaliated.
Regarding these issues, DVB [Democratic Voice of Burma] contacted KNU
Spokesman Phado Mahn Shar and interviewed him. The interview was
conducted by Ko Moe Aye. The first question he asked was about the
objective behind the issuance of the statement.
[Phado Mahn Shar] Recently, the SPDC forces launched an offensive
against the SSA west of Tachilek. They also launched similar offensives
and reinforced their troops in the Karenni and Karen States as well. We
have prepared for the offensive. We are allies in the armed struggle. We
met on 21 February and reviewed the situation. We issued the statement
because we wanted to inform the local and international media how the
SPDC forces treated the national races last year in the Shan State, the
Karenni State and the Karen State, including the KNU's Tenasserim
Division.
[Moe Aye] Yes. In accord with the prevailing situation, what are the
conditions of the SPDC offensives and clashes in the Karen State and
adjacent regions?
[Phado Mahn Shar] There are frequent clashes in the SSA region. The
situation is similar in the Karenni and the Karen States where clashes
are always occurring. There are on average about three to four battles
daily in the KNU region. They are also destroying and burning villages
in line with their offensives.
[Moe Aye] What we saw in the statement was that you wanted to solve the
current problems justly and peacefully. Is there any overture by the
SPDC to hold talks with the national races or has the invitation not
been extended?
[Phado Mahn Shar] So far there is nothing that we know of. They are
still using the policy of collective ruling. That is what I want to say.
[Moe Aye] The SPDC have hinted to the world that the SPDC and the
National League for Democracy's Daw Aung San Suu Kyi have been engaging
in talks. On the other hand they are practising the policy of total
annihilation of the ethnic armed groups. What is your opinion of that?
[Phado Mahn Shar] We think it is a repetition. On the meeting with Daw
Suu, we are not sure whether the talks have reached a reliable stage
because the top leaders from the NLD are either under house arrest or
they are in prison. As long as this situation persists, we believe that
the talks have not reached a fair and just state. Moreover, they are
also engaging in an offensive against the other national races. This is
an unwarranted matter. If in their talks with Daw Suu they agree to hold
a meaningful dialogue, as Daw Suu has always requested, then we will see
signs of cooperation. In other words, if meaningful talks have begun,
the matter of political prisoners, NLD leaders' freedom of movements and
the NLD party must be considered. The offensive against the national
races must also be either reduced or stopped entirely. If these things
do not occur, then we are not in a position to believe in the talks
between the SPDC and Daw Suu.
[Moe Aye] The final part of the statement noted if the SPDC continued to
oppress the people and continued its policy of total annihilation, it
urged the cease-fire groups to participate in the armed struggle against
the SPDC. Can you explain the condition of the cease-fire groups?
[Phado Mahn Shar] The cease-fire groups signed the agreements in the
hope that one day the political problems will be solved politically. In
practice, there are only cease-fire agreements and no political problems
are being solved. This implies technically that the ethnic groups and
the SPDC remain enemies. On the other hand, they have urged the
cease-fire groups to go into business. Thus now the revolutionaries have
become businessmen and have drifted away from the public. Gradually,
there will be an economic crisis. I believe these are unwarranted
conditions. That is why we have urged them to join hands with us in our
political struggle.
Source: Democratic Voice of Burma, Oslo, in Burmese 1245 gmt 24 Feb 01
___________________________________________________
Mizzima: Nagas from Burma continue to flee
Imphal, February 25, 2001
Mizzima News Group (www.mizzima.com)
The use of forced labour and military campaigns of the ruling junta have
forced more than four thousand Christian Nagas from Burma to leave their
native places and take shelter in India. Majority of them are currently
in Manipur and Nagaland, the two northeastern states of India bordering
with Burma.
Speaking to Mizzima News Group, Mr L. Longsa, General Secretary of the
Naga National League for Democracy (NNLD), which is now based in
Indo-Burma border said that Nagas from Burma continue to leave their
villages in the Naga Hill due to forced labor and military campaigns
launched by the Burmese army. Sixty mile-long Htamanthi-Layshi is one of
the motor roads where the Burmese army continues to use forced labor in
the Naga Hill.
In Nagaland of India, Mon District and Tunsang District are the two
places where not less than three thousand Nagas from Burma are taking
shelter. Most of them fled to India after their villages were burnt down
by the Burmese army in its attacks on NSCN (Khaplang) camps in Burma
last year. The National Socialist Council of Nagaland (Khaplang) is one
of the separatist Naga armed groups fighting India.
Mr. Longsa explained that these refugees came from various parts of the
Naga Hill such as Hkanti, Layshi, Nanyun, Lahel and Homelinn towns.
Although there is no influx of Naga refugees to India lately, Nagas from
Burma continue to cross the Indian border in small number almost
everyday to escape from the abuses of the Burmese army, Mr. Longsa said.
The Naga refugees, living in remote and difficult terrain in India,
survive either by working in hill farms or with whatever support they
received from local Church organizations. There is no support so far
from the international humanitarian organizations.
According to Mr. Longsa, although there is no recent official record,
the Naga population in Burma is estimated to be five hundred thousands.
___________________ REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL___________________
AP: Thailand repatriates 4,000 migrant workers to Myanmar
Feb. 28, 2001
MAE SOT, Thailand (AP) More than 4,000 migrant workers were repatriated
to Myanmar on Tuesday and Wednesday, Thai immigration officials said.
The workers, all illegal immigrants, were rounded up over the past week
from several Thai provinces bordering Myanmar, immigration police Col.
Rutchata Sibsai-on said Wednesday.
Thailand in late 1999 began implementing a long-term policy to expel
Myanmar migrants, who form the vast majority of an estimated one million
illegal immigrants from poorer, neighboring countries. There are
periodic crackdowns and roundups.
Previously, the presence of foreign workers was tolerated because they
provided low-wage labor, but after the economy took a sharp downturn in
1997, they were increasingly regarded as a burden.
According to Col. Rutchata, the government has allocated a budget of 80
million baht (dlrs 1.9 million) to detain and repatriate 300,000 migrant
workers this year.
The crackdown has a double edge. Owners of Thai factories and
enterprises needing heavy manual labor, such as fishing, complain that
even with a tightened job market, they still cannot get enough native
Thais to work for them.
And because the Myanmar immigrant population is so large in several
border provinces, some small business owners say expelling Myanmar
migrants will cause them to lose a substantial number of customers.
___________________________________________________
Reuters: U.N.'s Robinson concerned about Myanmar refugees
BANGKOK, Feb 28 (Reuters) - United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights Mary Robinson said on Wednesday she was concerned about the
living conditions of ethnic minority refugees from Myanmar in camps
along the Thai border.
The issue flared up last year when the then U.N. High Commissioner for
Refugees, Sadako Ogata, slammed conditions at a refugee camp in
Thailand, saying it was very overcrowded and sanitation was poor.
Robinson told reporters after meeting new Thai Prime Minister Thaksin
Shinawatra that she raised her concerns with him.
``I did discuss the refugees on the border and I raised my concerns and
I refered to the concern that Mrs Sadako Ogata expressed when she was
here,'' Robinson told a news conference.
``The prime minister acknowledged that this was a problem. We didn't go
into any other discussions on that issue.''
There are 11 camps along the border housing some 140,000 refugees, most
of them minority people who have fled from Myanmar army offensives
against autonomy-seeking rebels.
Last October, Ogata visited a refugee camp at the Thai village of Ban
Tham Hin on the border with Myanmar, around 150 km (95 miles) west of
Bangkok. She said she was ``shocked'' to see such a crowded camp.
Ogata said she had asked Thailand that the UNHCR be given a wider role
in running the camps.
But Thai officials have defended the camps, saying conditions there are
no different from those in nearby Thai villages.
Robinson is in Thailand to attend a U.N. workshop on human rights in
Asia and the Pacific, which will end Saturday.
She said she was assured by Thaksin that his newly formed government
would put a priority on human rights
___________________________________________________
Bangkok Post: Drugs murder link
BKK Post, 28 Feb, 2001
Suspected involvement in the drug trade or business conflicts in Burma
might be behind the murder of Saengsanit Chaisri, an influential figure
in Mae Sai district, police said.
Saengsanit, better known as Kamnan Daeng, was gunned down by a sniper
near his sand-dredging operation on Monday.
Pol Lt-Gen Sombat Amornvivat, a deputy police chief, said Saengsanit was
reportedly contracted to carry out construction projects for the United
Wa State Army at Mong Yawn in Burma, including a road from Tachilek to
Mong Yawn.
Police thought he may have been involved in drugs but had no evidence to
substantiate the suspicion.
Suspected involvement in the drug trade or business conflicts in Burma
might be behind the murder of Saengsanit Chaisri, an influential figure
in Mae Sai district, police said.
Saengsanit, better known as Kamnan Daeng, was gunned down by a sniper
near his sand-dredging operation on Monday.
Pol Lt-Gen Sombat Amornvivat, a deputy police chief, said Saengsanit was
reportedly contracted to carry out construction projects for the United
Wa State Army at Mong Yawn in Burma, including a road from Tachilek to
Mong Yawn.
Police thought he may have been involved in drugs but had no evidence to
substantiate the suspicion.
___________________________________________________
Bangkok Post: Cash stashed in Bangkok highlights Burmese problem
Wednesday, February 28, 2001
By David Swartzentruber
Police raids on the home of a suspected United Wa State Army financier
in the Bang Phlat district of Bangkok on Monday and Tuesday of this week
yielded a total of 25.5 million baht ($607,000).
That's a lot of baht and one wonders how many other "financiers" are
stationed in Thailand to expedite the drug traffic flowing out of Burma.
All of this highlights the difficulties that will be facing the new Thai
government as it deals with the difficult Burmese border. However,
Thailand may not be standing alone, as it appears that the Burmese drug
problem now is impinging on India and China.
The Bangkok Post on Monday quoted R. Sundarakingam, a drug consultant to
the Interpol Secretariat, "Synthetic drugs are coming into India in a
major way through Burma."
Burma seems rather oblivious to outside criticism and the only internal
force that seems to be a threat is the Shan State Army, which for years,
along with other ethnic groups, has been fighting the central government
in Rangoon. The recent offensive of the Burmese and its allies, the
United Wa State Army, has apparently been critically timed.
"The opium crop was picked and in their (Wa) hands just before the
border fighting started," the Bangkok Post quoted a Western source. The
source continued that a large amount of methamphetamine and similar
pills had been shipped out of Burma to China, India and Thailand, so
that drug sellers and consumers would not notice the short break in the
supply chain due to the border fighting.
In an extensive editorial on Tuesday, the Bangkok Post projected that
Burma's offensive to drive the Shan people south to central Burma is to
strengthen the control of the Wa Army to create an unencumbered drug
highway.
The Post said: "If Rangoon succeeds, Thailand and China will be
border-to-border with an unfettered, unchallenged drug cartel."
The conflict comes as a new government steps into power in Thailand and
initial statements from them indicate a change in Thai foreign policy.
Press services quoted new Foreign Minister Surakiart Sathirathai on
Tuesday that the new government's policy would be to follow the "Asian
way" of non-interference in foreign policy, which may indicate a
softening in attitude toward Burma from the previous Chuan Leekpai
regime.
The earlier foreign minister, Surin Pitsuwan, the press services said, "
had often suggested that other Southeast Asian nations should be more
vocal in promoting human rights and democracy in Myanmar, whose junta
refuses to hand over power to an elected government."
Meanwhile, back at the border a meeting of the Thai and Burmese military
generals in the district resulted in a "smiles and handshake" photo
opportunity but little else as the border remains closed and tensions
run high.
Future meetings between Thailand and Burma have been "kicked upstairs"
to higher-ranking authorities. Thai Third Army chief Maj-Gen Tawat said
Monday's meeting was "but an attempt (by Burma) to present a good
image," according to the Post.
All of these developments would seem to leave Thailand at greater risk.
Already its civilians have been killed and its soldiers wounded at the
northern border, let alone the ravages of the drugs that have been piped
into the country from Burma.
Burma's escalating drug empire may have overreached itself by bringing
recent protests from India and China. Involvement of these large
countries in the border conflict may help to bring a quick resolution to
the problem and might even initiate other changes in Burma.
In any event, playing the India-China card lies solely in the province
of the new foreign minister in the new Thaksin Shinawatra government, Mr
Surakiat. Throughout the election campaign little attention was given to
foreign affairs. As of yesterday Mr. Surakiat's line was "to foster
better co-operation with Burma to crack down on drugs."
Whether this soft style of diplomacy will work with Burma is open to
debate. However, the new government may find it necessary to employ
other methods possibly seeking the aid of India and China, to deal with
the Burmese drug and border problem.
_______________ ECONOMY AND BUSINESS _______________
Xinhua: Myanmar, Japan Sign MOU on Purchase of Buckwheat Seeds
YANGON, February 28 (Xinhua) -- Myanmar and Japan have reached a
memorandum of understanding (MOU) on purchase of 20 tons of buckwheat
seeds from Japan for cultivation of buckwheat, an opium- substitute
crop, in northern Shan state of Myanmar, official newspaper The New
Light of Myanmar reported Wednesday. According to Tuesday's MOU, the
Japanese government is to provide 95,000 U.S. dollars to the Myanmar
association for the move. Myanmar and Japan agreed in 1992 to substitute
opium poppy with buckwheat in Myanmar's poppy-growing northern Shan
state and it was realized in 1997 with trial cultivation successfully
conducted in the state's Tarshwetang area. Cultivation of
opium-substitute crops plays a key role in tackling the food problem of
these poppy-growing areas as well as in consolidating Myanmar's
achievements made in drug control. According to official statistics, in
2000, the cultivated areas of poppy-substitute crops in Kokang area of
northern Shan state reached 17,520 hectares, of which buckwheat took up
1,320 hectares, while sugarcane represented 16,200 hectares. The growing
of the crops were greatly assisted by Japan and China respectively.
_______________OPINION/EDITORIALS_________________
Summary of the Thai Press: Burma editorials
[Summary of the Thai Press is an Internet newsletter that provides
summary translations of articles in the Thai language press. The
editorials mentioned below appeared on February 15, 2001. Thai Rath is
the largest circulation Thai newspapers. Naeo Na and Siam Rath are also
tabloid format general circulation newspapers.]
Naeo Na editorial, Thai Rath editorial, and Siam Rath editorial
similarly criticize the Burmese junta for allowing its troops to invade
the northern Thai border in the course of the formation of a new Thai
Government. The military attack is presumably aimed at the SSA to
protect amphetamine producing and trafficking by Wa Daeng in Burma's own
interest. Naeo Na and Thai Rath take it as a test of the THAKSIN
Government's strength and oppose the planned visit to Burma by PM
THAKSIN and prospective Defense Minister Gen CHAWALIT YONGCHAIYUT on the
grounds that it is untimely and inappropriate.
________________
The BurmaNet News is an Internet newspaper providing comprehensive
coverage of news and opinion on Burma (Myanmar) from around the world.
If you see something on Burma, you can bring it to our attention by
emailing it to strider@xxxxxxx
To automatically subscribe to Burma's only free daily newspaper in
English, send an email to:
burmanet-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to The BurmaNet News in Burmese, send an email to:
burmanetburmese-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can also contact BurmaNet by phone or fax:
Voice mail or fax (US) +1(202) 318-1261
You will be prompted to press 1 for a voice message or 2 to send a fax.
If you do neither, a fax tone will begin automatically.
Fax (Japan) +81 (3) 4512-8143
________________
Burma News Summaries available by email or the web
There are three Burma news digest services available via either email or
the web.
Burma News Update
Frequency: Biweekly
Availability: By fax or the web.
Viewable online at http://www.soros.org/burma/burmanewsupdate/index.html
Cost: Free
Published by: Open Society Institute, Burma Project
The Burma Courier
Frequency: Weekly
Availability: E-mail, fax or post. To subscribe or unsubscribe by email
celsus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Viewable on line at: http://www.egroups.com/group/BurmaCourier
Cost: Free
Note: News sources are cited at the beginning of an article.
Interpretive comments and background
details are often added.
Burma Today
Frequency: Weekly
Availability: E-mail
Viewable online at http://www.worldviewrights.org/pdburma/today.html
To subscribe, write to pdburma@xxxxxxxxx
Cost: Free
Published by: PD Burma (The International Network of Political Leaders
Promoting Democracy in Burma)
________________
____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01