interesting rachel / FREE MAWDSLEY (r)

[dawnstar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Subject: Re: interesting rachel / FREE MAWDSLEY NOW!

FREE MAWDSLEY NOW!


I guess this slorchead "susu" wants Dawn Star in a Rangoon jail...we
know what you are "susu". do some real work, you don't what i do, hey,
aren't you the one who coached rachel, nice job, she works for your
people now, right? dance with the generals, you both got the footwork
all worked out...and the name is dawn star, anybody can smell what you
are a mile away, bye "susu", and thanks for the laughter! now get to
work. 

FREE MAWDSLEY NOW!
> 
> dear twinkle star,
> 
> until you have tested yourself in insein jail, twinkle, you have no right to
> criticize rachel.
> 
> why don't you shut up for a while, and go do what rachel and james did?
> really, why don't you go to rangoon? because YOU ARE COWARD! big "freedom
> fighter" prefer making speech in paris cafe -- such important work for
> movement! such sacrifice for burma!
> 
> love as always, susu
> 
> >From: Dawn Star <dawnstar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: dawnstar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: Sue Huang <susuhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >CC: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: interesting rachel / FREE MAWDSLEY NOW!
> >Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 05:54:39 +0100
> >
> >THERE SHOULD BE STRONG SINGLE MINDED DETERMINED MOVEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR
> >JAMES MAWDSLEY!!!!!!!!
> >
> >FREE JAMES MAWDSLEY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >re this general posting, rachael goldwyn has cut a deal with the
> >generals, and is somehow working with and for them, as is obvious by her
> >propaganda statements, she has become a mouthpiece for the regime, and
> >its friends, she has crossed the line and she is now contaminated and
> >disruptive to the movement, further can not be trusted now that she is
> >in close league with the dictatorship. ofcourse anyone is free to do
> >what they want with her, but regarding her independence and integrity
> >for free burma activism, she is now poisoned.
> >
> >beware of all this kind of pro junta propaganda of the kind below, it is
> >aimed to bring you in touch with them so they can manipulate and weaken
> >the movement and distract listeners in time with weakness and confusion.
> >
> >isnt it interesting that rachael goldwyn went into burma as some sort of
> >strong minded determined woman, and came out a pro-junta wreck.
> >
> >
> >Sue Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > dear burmanet friends,
> > >
> > > what to make of rachel? so much emotion! some people call her traitor,
> >or
> > > brainwash girl. but this is only emotion response,  "anybody disagree
> >with
> > > me is traitor" - like child, kick feet and cry.
> > >
> > > we should not make confusion between tactic and goal -- rachel sees
> > > different tactic, but same goal, democracy - so why is she traitor? she
> >is
> > > traitor only to tactic of confrontation.
> > >
> > > look at true fact: rachel now in very good position -- now she can talk
> > > direct with burma junta people -- in way that they will listen to her.
> >not
> > > like western activist, who only shout!! she can visit, work on solving
> > > problem like drugs. this makes sense.
> > >
> > > no junta people listen to activists -- activist only talk to themself.
> >and
> > > always say same cliche. so proud, so boring.
> > >
> > > i am always amazed -- people like rachel, or ma thanegi, who go to jail
> >for
> > > democracy in burma, are called "traitor" by safe western activist who
> >have
> > > never even been to burma?
> > >
> > > maybe should listen for a change instead of always shout shout shout
> > >
> > > love from, susu
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com