[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
CORRUPTION and ABUSE OF POWER are p
- Subject: CORRUPTION and ABUSE OF POWER are p
- From: MSoe9872@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 09:30:00
Subject: CORRUPTION and ABUSE OF POWER are part of the STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE.
http://www.stuent.ipfw.edu/~soem01
Militarized Nondemocratic System vs. Burma
Militarized nondemocratic systems operate in many L.D.C or third world
countries. Central America, Asia, for example, have been the scene of
powerful military rulers and attempted takeovers in nations such as Burma,
Panama, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and El Salvador.
A small wealthy class is sometimes allied with the military government, with
its members serving in high-level government posts. Human rights and
democratic freedoms may be severely curtailed by the government (eg. More
recently, pressures from many sources have focused on alleged abuses of human
rights in countries such as China, Burma and Nigeria) .
The press and media are normally government controlled and used for
propaganada purposes. Unions, religious organizations, and some professional
groups (eg. artists, teachers, writers, lawers, musicians) are watched
carefully by government authorities to keep them from becoming vocal
political opponents. Outwardly, the socioeconomic may appear to be a mixed
system of private and state enterprise. Private markets may be tolerated and
many privately owned business may exit.
The dictatorship government or military government may welcome foreign
investment and foreign corporations. However, foreign companies and
corporations will immediately withdraw their investments from those countries
due to economic factors, political factors, social factors, human right
factors, infracture factors, techonological factors, and skilled labors
factors. There will be opposition political parties, although the opposition
is unlikely to win or won in elections, which are usually controlled and
oppressed by the government and military.
These military regimes have sometimes been pawns of the superpowers as they
engaged in skirmishes in different parts of the region. for example, Burmese
military generals were long supported by the China, its allies as a way of
keeping Burma's natural resources away from the global and western market.
Sometimes they have been the result of the ambition of local military
officers, impatient with other forms of democratic self-government ( eg.,
Nigeria, North Korea, and Burma are the among the current restrictive brutal
military regimes).
Military-political regimes present serious ethical and strategic problems for
business leaders. In an effort to generate economic activity, such regimes
may make attractive deals with foreign companies.
Low taxes, low wages, freedom from criticism in the press, and weak
enviromental rules and regulations are among the attractions that a military
regime can creat through its power.
Still, if a company knows that human rights are suppressed, that military
leaders are lining their own pockets with money that should go to the
country, and that CORRUPTION and ABUSE OF POWER are part of the STANDARD
OPERATING PROCEDURE.
Business leaders must pause and think about long-term consequences. The
strategic business question is an ethical question:
Do the benefits of doing business in such a system outweigh the economic,
human, and social costs?
Msoe
Indiana University
Reference:
James E. Post, A.T. Lawrenece and J. Weber. "Corporate Strategy, Public
Policy, Ethics"; Business and Society.