[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
U.S.: Transnationals Win Court Vict
- Subject: U.S.: Transnationals Win Court Vict
- From: suriya@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1998 04:29:00
Subject: U.S.: Transnationals Win Court Victory Over Grassroots Activists
U.S.: Transnationals Win Court
Victory Over Grassroots Activists
Inter Press Service
WASHINGTON, (Nov. 5) IPS - U.S. and other transnational
(TNCs) have scored a major victory against state and local
governments in the
United States that penalize companies doing business in
A federal court judge ruled late yesterday that a
law which makes it more difficult for companies that do
business in Burma
(Myanmar) to win state contracts violates the U.S.
U.S. District Court Judge Joseph L. Tauro found that the
law, which adds a
ten-percent penalty to bids for contracts by companies with
Burma, "impermissibly infringes on the federal government's
power to regulate
"State interests, no matter how noble, do not trump the
exclusive foreign affairs power," according to the ruling.
A spokesperson for the Massachusetts Attorney General
intimated today that a
bid would be made to have the ruling overturned by a higher
court. "We expect
to appeal although we want to analyze the decision further,"
spokesperson, Marsha Cohen.
Some observers believe the case will eventually have to be
decided by the
The judgement has major implications not just for human
rights activists opposed
to the military regime in Burma, but also for the
relationship between state and
other local political jurisdictions, on the one hand, and
the federal government on
"The impact of this decision goes far beyond Massachusetts,"
Stumberg, a law professor at the Georgetown Law Center here
recognized expert on the U.S. federal system. "It would deny
the cities and
states the power to use moral standards for choosing their
business partners if
foreign commerce is affected," he noted.
The Massachusetts law is one of dozens of so-called
"selective purchasing" laws
which have been used by state and local jurisdictions for
more than 20 years to
pressure companies to cease doing business with repressive
abroad. Such laws are designed to force TNCs to choose
between bidding on
often lucrative state and local government contracts and
continuing operations in
the target country.
They were used most successfully during the late 1970s and
1980s to force U.S.
TNCs to withdraw from apartheid South Africa. Such laws were
the exodus of scores of some of the biggest U.S.
corporations, like Coca-Cola,
IBM, and General Motors, from South Africa between 1976 and
Congress imposed its own sanctions against Pretoria over the
then-president Ronald Reagan.
Similar laws in New York, California, Pennsylvania and other
states and cities
targeting Swiss banks and insurance companies which had
failed to account
adequately to Nazi Holocaust survivors and their families
after World War II
helped prompt a settlement of outstanding claims last August.
Some two dozen states and cities have enacted selective
purchasing laws against
companies doing business in Burma, where a military junta
has repressed the
democratic opposition led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung
San Suu Kyi.
Other jurisdictions have targeted companies with operations
in Nigeria, China
TNCs have naturally opposed these initiatives because they
curb their freedom
to do business where they like. But, until now, they have
been reluctant to bring
a legal challenge to such laws, in part because of the
negative publicity that might
accrue to any company claiming a right to do business with
This case, however, was brought by the National Foreign
(NFTC), an association of 580 of the largest U.S.
corporations and U.S.
affiliates of foreign TNCs. Early in the case, the judge
denied the state's request
that the NFTC identify specific companies which had been
harmed by the
Burma law in order to establish their standing to bring the
Tauro, in one decision that may be part of an appeal,
permitted the NFTC to
assert that more than 30 of its members had been affected.
The NFTC claimed vindication here today. "The ruling rests
constitutional grounds, and should significantly deter
states and cities from
imposing their own foreign-policy sanctions," said Frank
Kittredge, the council's
"We share concerns over reported human rights abuses in
Burma, (but) our
system of government was not designed to allow the fifty
states and hundreds of
municipalities to conduct their own individual foreign
policies," he added.
The Burma sanctions law has also provoked major interest
The European Union (EU) filed a brief to the court in
support of the NFTC's
position, an action which earned it a strong rebuke from
state officials and
Massachusetts lawmakers in the U.S. Congress.
The EU and Japan also filed formal challenges to the law
with the World Trade
Organization (WTO) in Geneva, claiming that it violates a
Procurement Agreement with Washington which forbids states
non-economic criteria in deciding on contract bids.
The administration of President Bill Clinton, which
initially tried to persuade
Massachusetts lawmakers to amend the law so that the EU and
drop their WTO action, has since pledged to defend it in the
International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and
Unions, which represents more than 20 million workers, last
month called on the
EU to withdraw its WTO complaint and "sever all trading
links with Burma until
democracy is restored there."
"We're pleased with the decision, and we're assessing the
implications for the
WTO case," said Maeve O'Beirne, the EU's spokesperson here.
If the big TNCs were jubilant, supporters of the Burma
measure were defiant
today. "Boycotts based on human rights have been a
cornerstone of our
democracy since the Boston Tea Party," said Simon Billeness,
a senior analyst at
Franklin Research and Development Corp. and a top leader of
effort behind the law. "We cannot allow a few corporations
to remove this
democratic tool so that they can profit from a murderous
"If selective purchasing had been banned ten years ago,
President) Nelson Mandela might still be in prison today,"
said State Rep. Byron
Rushing, chief sponsor of the bill in the Massachusetts
© 1998 Cable News Network, Inc. A Time Warner
All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this
information is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Custom News is built on technology.