Accusations/Naing Aung (r)

[kzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

I don't have anything to do with this business but I find one thing very
funny that of your proof statement.   When you make statement about SPDC's
human rights abuses how many times can you really prove in accordance with
your statement?  Do you shut up your mouth for that?  No.  Have you
contacted ABSDF in Thailand and asked?  Another thing funny is who cares
your serious consideration?  What can you do if someone provides with
proof and evidence including ABSDF investigation time and data?  What
can you do about it?  What is that mean if nothing can do and asking for
proof?   
If you can really do something about it to correct, let me know for proof.
Only if you can really do something.  

Yours sincerely,
Kyaw Zay Ya



On 18 Oct 1998 pwebb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> No- we don't want anyone making love in front of us. But before your
> accusations can be taken seriously it is up to you to provide proof and not
> for us to go searching around Bangkok. Do you know what proof means? It
> means eye witnesses, times, places. This is evidence/proof. What someone
> told you or what you think may have happened is not evidence. Unless you can
> provide this,your accusations are either nasty gossip or just vindictiveness.
> And certainly does not help either the ABSDF or the on-going revolution.
> We wonder why you have started this smear campaign at this moment? What can
> you gain by it? We think that you should provide proper evidence or keep quiet.
> 
> ABSDF
> Darwin Branch
> Australia
>