[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index ][Thread Index ]

VOA-TEN YEARS OF RESISTANCE



2:32 AM 8/22/98DATE=08/15/98

TYPE=ON THE LINE

NUMBER=1-00663   

TITLE=BURMA: TEN YEARS OF RESISTANCE

EDITOR=OFFICE OF POLICY - 619-0037

CONTENT=

THEME:           UP, HOLD UNDER AND FADE

ANNCR:           ON THE LINE -- A DISCUSSION OF UNITED STATES 
                 POLICIES AND CONTEMPORARY ISSUES.  THIS WEEK, 
                 "BURMA: TEN YEARS OF RESISTANCE."  HERE IS YOUR 
                 HOST, ROBERT REILLY.

HOST:            HELLO AND WELCOME TO ON THE LINE.  TEN YEARS AGO
                 THIS MONTH, BURMESE SECURITY FORCES OPENED FIRE 
                 ON PRO-DEMOCRACY DEMONSTRATORS, KILLING 
                 THOUSANDS.  IN 1990, THE PEOPLE OF BURMA VOTED 
                 OVERWHELMINGLY FOR A DEMOCRATIC CIVILIAN 
                 GOVERNMENT AND AN END TO MILITARY RULE. EIGHT 
                 YEARS AGO THIS WEEK, THE MILITARY JUNTA REFUSED 
                 TO SEAT THE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PARLIAMENT, 
                 LED BY MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR 
                 DEMOCRACY.  SINCE THEN, THE MILITARY REGIME HAS 
                 ENGAGED IN SYSTEMATIC HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.  

                 JOINING ME TODAY TO DISCUSS BURMA AND U.S. 
                 POLICY ARE THREE EXPERTS.  SUSAN KEOGH IS 
                 DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF BILATERAL AFFAIRS IN 
                 THE BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS AND LABOR 
                 AT THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT.  MAUREEN 
                 AUNG-THWIN IS DIRECTOR OF THE BURMA PROJECT OF 
                 THE OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE. AND T. KUMAR IS 
                 ADVOCACY DIRECTOR FOR ASIA FOR AMNESTY 
                 INTERNATIONAL.  WELCOME TO THE PROGRAM.

                 MS. KEOGH, LET ME START BY ASKING YOU THE U.S. 
                 GOVERNMENT'S REACTION TO RECENT EVENTS IN BURMA,
                 WHICH HAVE INCLUDED BURMESE SECURITY FORCES 
                 PREVENTING THE TRAVELS OF THE N-L-D LEADER AUNG 
                 SAN SUU KYI, AS WELL AS THEIR REFUSAL TO ALLOW 
                 THE DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED PARLIAMENT TO 
                 CONVENE?

KEOGH:           WELL, DESPITE THE DEMONSTRATION IN 1990 OF THE 
                 BURMESE POPULATION'S OVERWHELMING DESIRE TO 
                 RETURN TO DEMOCRACY, THE MILITARY GOVERNMENT 
                 CONTINUES TO REPRESS BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.  AND 
                 THOSE ARE, OF COURSE, FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND 
                 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND 
                 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION.  ALL THOSE THINGS HAVE 
                 JUST BEEN DEMONSTRATED IN THE PAST WEEK'S 
                 STANDOFF WITH AUNG SAN SUU KYI'S BASIC 
                 INCARCERATION ON THE BRIDGE THIRTY KILOMETERS 
                 OUTSIDE OF RANGOON.  AND OF COURSE WE'LL HOLD 
                 THE MILITARY GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBLE FOR HER 
                 HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE.  AND THAT'S OUR 
                 IMMEDIATE GOAL, THAT SHE SHOULD BE SAFE AND 
                 SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROCEED OR RETURN AS SHE 
                 WISHES.  BUT THE BURMESE GOVERNMENT OF COURSE 
                 SHOULD NOW ENTER INTO A MEANINGFUL DIALOGUE WITH
                 THE DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION AND ITS LEADERS WHICH 
                 INCLUDES AUNG SAN SUU KYI.  I'M CAUTIOUSLY 
                 OPTIMISTIC THAT THERE WAS A SLIGHTLY POSITIVE 
                 DEVELOPMENT ON AUGUST THE EIGHTEENTH WHEN THE 
                 CHAIRMAN OF THE N-L-D MET WITH GOVERNMENT 
                 REPRESENTATIVES.  AND IT WAS A SHORT MEETING AND
                 I DON'T KNOW THAT A LOT WAS ACCOMPLISHED.  BUT 
                 IT COULD BE THE FIRST STEP OF A PROCESS AND 
                 THAT, OF COURSE, IS WHAT WE WANT TO SEE 
                 HAPPENING.  IT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN CALLING FOR ALL
                 ALONG.

HOST:            ALL RIGHT, LET ME CHECK WITH MAUREEN AUNG-THWIN.
                 THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR DEMOCRACY HAS ALREADY 
                 MADE A COMMENT, HAS IT NOT, ABOUT THIS INITIAL 
                 MEETING BETWEEN THE PARTY CHAIRMAN AND THE 
                 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE?

AUNG-THWIN:      I READ A COMMENT THAT U TIN OO, WHO IS ALSO ONE 
                 OF THE SENIOR MEMBERS OF N-L-D, SAID THAT THEY 
                 DON'T CONSIDER IT A REAL DIALOGUE AND THEY WILL 
                 NOT HAVE ANY FORMAL TALKS WITHOUT AUNG SAN SUU 
                 KYI.  BUT I THINK IT WAS NOT LIKE A NEGATIVE 
                 REACTION AT ALL.  I THINK THE FACT THAT IT 
                 HAPPENED SHOWED THAT BOTH GROUPS DECIDED THAT 
                 THEY BETTER START COMPROMISING A LITTLE BIT.

HOST:            WELL, SECRETARY OF STATE MADELEINE ALBRIGHT 
                 RECENTLY MADE THE COMMENT THAT THINGS ARE 
                 REACHING A CRITICAL POINT IN EITHER FORMING A 
                 DIALOGUE OR THERE ARE GOING TO BE SOME SERIOUS 
                 CONSEQUENCES.  CAN YOU COMMENT ON THE BACKGROUND
                 TO THIS CURRENT SITUATION -- AS TO WHY YOU THINK
                 AUNG SAN SUU KYI SAID THIS PARLIAMENT ELECTED 
                 EIGHT YEARS AGO SHOULD NOW BE ALLOWED TO MEET 
                 AND SHE GAVE A DATE OF AUGUST 21ST.  AND 
                 OBVIOUSLY THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ALLOWED TO MEET.  SO
                 WHY THE DEADLINE AND WHAT DO YOU THINK HAS BEEN 
                 ACHIEVED BY THIS?

AUNG-THWIN:      I THINK AUNG SAN SUU KYI AND THE N-L-D HAVE 
                 DECIDED THAT IT'S TIME TO REMIND THE WORLD THAT 
                 IT HAS BEEN TEN YEARS.  IT'S BEEN EIGHT YEARS 
                 SINCE THE 1990 ELECTIONS.  IT'S BEEN TEN YEARS 
                 SINCE THE CALL FOR DEMOCRACY.  AND THEY'RE 
                 PUSHING THE ENVELOPE A LITTLE BIT JUST BY GOING 
                 OUT TO TRAVEL.  THE GOVERNMENT SAYS YOU ARE FREE
                 TO TRAVEL.  EVERYBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL.  
                 THEY'RE SHOWING THAT THEY DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT 
                 TO TRAVEL.  AND SO WE ALSO HEARD THAT THERE ARE 
                 TWO N-L-D SUPPORTERS WHO TRIED TO CONTACT HER 
                 WHILE SHE WAS ON THE BRIDGE AND THEY WERE 
                 DETAINED.  SO PEOPLE ARE NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO 
                 TRAVEL TO SEE HER.  I THINK ALSO THINGS ARE 
                 GETTING SO BAD IN BURMA RIGHT NOW ECONOMICALLY 
                 BECAUSE OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND THE RECENT 
                 FLAP OVER THE EIGHTEEN FOREIGNERS BEING ARRESTED
                 AND THEN DEPORTED, WHICH REALLY REFOCUSED 
                 ATTENTION ON BURMA AGAIN.  I THINK ALL OF THIS 
                 IS BEING USED BY THE N-L-D VERY WELL.

HOST:            MR. KUMAR, WHAT IS YOUR ASSESSMENT OF THE 
                 SITUATION IN BURMA?

KUMAR:           THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IS DETERIORATING FROM
                 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL'S POINT OF VIEW.  BEFORE I
                 GO INTO DETAILS, I'D LIKE TO COMMENT ON U.S. 
                 POLICY.  AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL IS EXTREMELY 
                 HAPPY THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT IS TAKING THE 
                 LEAD IN CONDEMNING THE ABUSES PERPETRATED BY THE
                 SLORC [STATE LAW AND ORDER RESTORATION COUNCIL] 
                 IN BURMA RIGHT NOW.  AND, AS A MATTER OF FACT . 
                 . . .

HOST:            THE SLORC IS THE MILITARY GOVERNMENT, OR AT 
                 LEAST THE OLD ACRONYM?

KUMAR:           WE STILL USE THAT ACRONYM ANYWAY.  AND THE U.S. 
                 IS THE ONLY GOVERNMENT WHICH IS TAKING A FIRM 
                 LEAD.  SO, WE'D LIKE TO CONGRATULATE THE U.S. 
                 GOVERNMENT FOR TAKING THE LEAD.  COMING BACK TO 
                 THE ISSUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES IN BURMA, IT 
                 DETERIORATED AFTER 1988, THE MASSACRE OF 
                 STUDENTS IN RANGOON, WHO WERE DEMONSTRATING FOR 
                 DEMOCRACY.  AT THE MOMENT, WE HAVE AT LEAST 
                 TWELVE HUNDRED POLITICAL PRISONERS. WE ARE 
                 TALKING ABOUT THE MINIMUM NUMBER.  THE REASON WE
                 ARE SAYING THIS IS MINIMUM IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE
                 ACCESS TO BURMA.  NOT ONLY AMNESTY BUT OTHER 
                 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS DON'T HAVE ANY ACCESS
                 TO BURMA.  SO THIS IS THE MINIMUM FIGURE WE HAVE
                 -- TWELVE HUNDRED POLITICAL PRISONERS WHO HAVE 
                 BEEN DETAINED THERE.  MANY HAVE BEEN TORTURED.  
                 THEY HAVE BEEN HELD IN CELLS MEANT FOR DOGS.  
                 THEIR MEDICAL ATTENTION IS BARE MINIMUM, IF NOT 
                 NONE.  AND EVEN THE DAY TO DAY TREATMENT OF 
                 THESE PRISONERS, TORTURE AND LACK OF FOOD, ARE 
                 OF EXTREME CONCERN TO US.  THAT'S WHY WE FIND 
                 PEOPLE DYING IN PRISONS IN BURMA AT THE MOMENT. 
                 AND ON TOP OF THIS, SOME HAVE BEEN TAKEN FOR 
                 SO-CALLED TRIALS.  AND THOSE TRIALS ARE 
                 BASICALLY SHOW TRIALS TO JUSTIFY THESE POLITICAL
                 PRISONERS BEING IMPRISONED UNDER A QUOTE-UNQUOTE
                 LEGAL SYSTEM.  THE OTHER ISSUES WE ARE CONCERNED
                 WITH ARE EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS, TAKING PLACE 
                 MAINLY IN THE ETHNIC MINORITY AREA, AND ALSO 
                 FORCED LABORING AND OTHER ISSUES WHICH ARE OF 
                 EXTREME CONCERN TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 
                 AT LARGE.

HOST:            AND IT'S YOUR POINT OF VIEW THAT THESE OFFENSES 
                 ARE GETTING WORSE?

KUMAR:           IT'S GETTING WORSE NOW.

HOST:            DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT, SUSAN KEOGH, THAT THE 
                 SITUATION IS DETERIORATING?

KEOGH:           WELL, I THINK CERTAINLY THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY 
                 SIGN OF IMPROVEMENT IN THE WAY THAT THE MILITARY
                 GOVERNMENT IS TREATING PEOPLE.  CERTAINLY, THE 
                 THINGS YOU'VE MENTIONED, POLITICAL PRISONERS -- 
                 ALL OF THOSE THINGS -- WE REPORTED IN OUR HUMAN 
                 RIGHTS REPORT LAST YEAR.  THERE'S ANOTHER ONE 
                 DUE AND I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING THAT INDICATES 
                 THAT THERE'S BEEN ANY PROGRESS.  AND CERTAINLY, 
                 AS YOU'VE POINTED OUT, THE ECONOMIC SITUATION IS
                 FOUNDERING IN THE COUNTRY AND BURMA NEEDS 
                 INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE.  IT NEEDS 
                 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO HELP IT 
                 OUT.  AND IT WILL REMAIN IN THIS POLITICAL 
                 ISOLATION WHILE IT CONTINUES TO REFUSE TO DEAL 
                 WITH THE DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION AND THE ETHNIC 
                 MINORITIES AND THEIR LEADERS.

HOST:            I BELIEVE THAT THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR 
                 ORGANIZATION JUST RELEASED A NEW REPORT UPON THE
                 CONDITION OF FORCED LABOR IN BURMA, WHICH IS 
                 EXTENSIVE AND UTILIZES BOTH CHILDREN, OLDER 
                 PEOPLE, WOMEN WHO ARE SUBJECTED TO ... AND ALSO 
                 MANY FROM ETHNIC AREAS WHO ARE FORCED INTO 
                 LABOR.

KUMAR:           AND ALSO FORCED PORTERING.

HOST:            FORCED PORTERING?

KUMAR:           THAT MEANS CARRYING AMMUNITION, ARMS AND 
                 AMMUNITION, FOR THE SOLDIERS.  AND THE SOLDIERS 
                 ARE INVOLVED IN OFFENSIVES AGAINST THESE ETHNIC 
                 MINORITIES.  AND MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE 
                 BEEN FORCED INTO LABOR -- FORCED PORTERING -- 
                 ARE HELD IN PRISON CONDITIONS.  AND AGAIN, THE 
                 CONDITIONS THERE ARE APPALLING.  THAT MEANS LACK
                 OF FOOD, LACK OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, ET 
                 CETERA.  AND TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT.

AUNG-THWIN:      AND RAPE FOR A LOT OF THE WOMEN PORTERS.  THAT'S
                 USED AS A WEAPON OF INTIMIDATION.  I WANTED TO 
                 COMMENT ABOUT WHY CONDITIONS ARE DETERIORATING. 
                 I ASSUME IT'S WORSE BECAUSE OF THE ECONOMIC 
                 SITUATION.  THERE IS NO MONEY TO MAINTAIN SOME 
                 OF THE BARE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT EXISTS IN BURMA.
                 SO I'M ASSUMING THAT THEY'RE RELYING MORE ON 
                 FORCED LABOR, PROBABLY TRYING TO DO IT IN A WAY 
                 THAT DOESN'T LEAVE SO MUCH TRACKS.  BECAUSE 
                 WE'VE SEEN DIRECTIVES SAYING THIS VILLAGE WILL 
                 SUPPLY X NUMBER OF LABORERS PER DAY.  AND YOU 
                 CAN BUY YOURSELF OUT IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THE
                 LABOR.  BUT NOBODY HAS ANY MONEY TO BUY 
                 THEMSELVES OUT.

HOST:            YOU HAVE MENTIONED THIS INITIAL MEETING BETWEEN 
                 THE CHAIRMAN OF THE N-L-D AND ONE OF THE LEADERS
                 OF THE MILITARY JUNTA.  AT THE SAME TIME, IT 
                 SEEMS THAT THE BURMESE JUNTA IS OBDURATE IN 
                 TERMS OF THE UNITED NATIONS, BY REFUSING TO 
                 RECEIVE A SPECIAL EMMISARY FROM [SECRETARY 
                 GENERAL] KOFI ANNAN.  AND, OF COURSE, U-N HIGH 
                 COMMISSIONER MARY ROBINSON HAS SPOKEN OUT VERY 
                 STRONGLY ABOUT THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.  
                 SPEAKING OF THE DETERIORATING SITUATION, WASN'T 
                 IT THIS PAST SPRING THAT A GROUP OF STUDENTS 
                 WERE CONDEMNED TO DEATH BECAUSE THEY ATTEMPTED 
                 TO CONTACT A U-N SPECIAL RIGHTS REPRESENTATIVE 
                 WHO WAS IN THE COUNTRY AT THAT TIME?

KUMAR:           SOME PEOPLE WERE SENTENCED TO IMPRISONMENT.

AUNG-THWIN:      PEOPLE ARE SENTENCED ALL THE TIME.  I WANTED TO 
                 MENTION THAT WHEN THE EIGHTEEN FOREIGNERS WERE 
                 DETAINED AND ARRESTED BRIEFLY AND GOT FIVE YEARS
                 HARD LABOR AND THEN RELEASED, TWO SUPPORTERS GOT
                 SEVEN YEARS FOR PASSING OUT SOME LEAFLETS THAT 
                 HAD TO DO WITH THEIR PARTY.

HOST:            JUST REFERRING TO THIS, IT WAS IN MAY THE JUNTA 
                 SENTENCED SIX STUDENT DEMOCRATIC ACTIVISTS TO 
                 DEATH AFTER CLOSED TRIALS FOR ALLEGED 
                 INVOLVEMENT IN ANTI-GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES.  JUST
                 BEFORE THAT, SAN SAN, AN OFFICIAL OF N-L-D, WAS 
                 SENTENCED TO TWENTY-FIVE YEARS FOR SPEAKING TO 
                 RADIO FREE ASIA AND THE B-B-C, I BELIEVE.  WHAT 
                 OTHER EXAMPLES DO YOU HAVE OF THIS KIND OF HUMAN
                 RIGHTS ABUSE?  FOR INSTANCE, IF YOU'RE CAUGHT 
                 WITH A FAX MACHINE IN BURMA TODAY.

AUNG-THWIN       YOU CAN GET UP TO SEVENTEEN YEARS IF YOU'RE -- 
                 NOT CAUGHT WITH A FAX MACHINE -- CAUGHT NOT 
                 HAVING REGISTERED YOUR FAX MACHINE.  BUT IT'S 
                 ACTUALLY A MODEM, SO IT'S ACTUALLY COMPUTERS AS 
                 WELL.  THEY DON'T GO AROUND CHECKING EVERYONE'S 
                 COMPUTER AND SAY WHERE'S YOUR REGISTRATION?  BUT
                 THEY USE IT TO INTIMIDATE SO THEY CAN GET YOU 
                 WHEN THEY WANT.

HOST:            OF COURSE, THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IS ONE OF 
                 THE CONCERNS OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, 
                 SUSAN KEOGH.  THERE ARE OTHERS, AREN'T THERE, 
                 CONCERNING DRUGS?

KEOGH:           THE THREE BASIC ONES ARE, OF COURSE, DEMOCRACY, 
                 BECAUSE WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT THAT'S RESPONSIBLE,
                 RESPONSIVE TO ITS PEOPLE, YOU EXPECT A LOT OF 
                 BAD THINGS TO GO ON FROM OUR POINT OF VIEW -- 
                 REFUGEES AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT AFFECT 
                 THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY.  THE ABUSE OF HUMAN
                 RIGHTS IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE HAD AS FAIRLY 
                 CENTRAL TO OUR WORLDWIDE POLICY FOR A LONG TIME.
                 IT HAS BEEN MORE PROMINENT FOR THE PAST TWENTY 
                 YEARS.  AND THEN, THIRD, THE COUNTERNARCOTICS 
                 AREA. YOU PROBABLY KNOW [THAT BURMA IS] THE 
                 LARGEST PRODUCER OF HEROIN AND OPIUM IN THE 
                 WORLD.

HOST:            AND, IN FACT, THAT PRODUCTION HAS INCREASED, HAS
                 IT NOT, OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS.

KEOGH:           ACTUALLY, I'M NOT SURE.  IN THE PAST YEAR, I'M 
                 NOT SURE IF IT INCREASED.  IT MAY NOT HAVE 
                 INCREASED IN THE PAST YEAR FOR REASONS THAT 
                 MAYBE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH . . .

AUNG-THWIN:      BUT IT'S DOUBLED SINCE THE SLORC OR THE CURRENT 
                 JUNTA CAME IN.

KEOGH:           RIGHT.  IT'S CLEARLY A WAY OF MAKING MONEY FOR 
                 THE COUNTRY.  THAT HAS A STRONG EFFECT ON OUR 
                 NATIONAL INTERESTS.  IT'S A HUGE PRIORITY FOR US
                 TO CUT DOWN DRUGS IN OUR OWN COUNTRY AND IN THE 
                 WORLD.  IT'S A THING THAT BRINGS EVERYBODY DOWN.
                 SO, ALL OF THOSE THREE, THEY'RE NOT EQUALLY 
                 IMPORTANT, BUT THEY'RE THINGS THAT WE ARE 
                 FOCUSING ON PARTICULARLY.

HOST:            I WANTED TO MENTION THE ASEAN MEETING IN THE 
                 PHILLIPINES.  AND OF COURSE SOME ATTENTION WAS 
                 FOCUSED ON THE PLIGHT OF AUNG SAN SUU KYI.  AND 
                 IT APPEARS THAT ASEAN MAY BE WILLING, BECAUSE OF
                 BURMA'S EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR, TO CHANGE THEIR 
                 LONGSTANDING POLICY OF NON-INTERFERENCE INTO A 
                 FORM OF ENGAGEMENT.  AND THERE WERE REMARKS BY 
                 THE THAI FOREIGN MINISTER, THE PHILLIPINE 
                 FOREIGN MINISTER, THAT BURMA HAS TO TAKE 
                 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS BEHAVIOR.  DO YOU FIND 
                 THAT AS A PROMISING DEVELOPMENT?

AUNG-THWIN:      I THINK IT'S GREAT.  AND I APPLAUD THE THAI 
                 GOVERNMENT FOR HAVING THE GUTS TO STAND UP.  
                 EVEN, I BELIEVE, IN MANILA, FOREIGN MINISTER 
                 SURIN [PITSUWAN]  WAS THE ONLY ONE.  NO ONE ELSE
                 WENT IN AND SAID, YES, WE ALL BACK IT.  
                 PRIVATELY, I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE, DIPLOMATS 
                 AND POLICY-MAKERS FROM THOSE ASEAN COUNTRIES, 
                 REALLY DO SYMPATHIZE.  HE'S TALKING ABOUT BEING 
                 A NEIGHBORING COUNTRY.  THAT'S WHY THE RATIONALE
                 IS THAT WHATEVER HAPPENS IN BURMA COULD SPILL 
                 OVER TO THAILAND.

HOST:            IT ALREADY SPILLS OVER IN THE FORM OF MASSIVE 
                 REFUGEES.

KUMAR:           MINIMUM EIGHTEEN HUNDRED REFUGEES IN THAILAND 
                 NOW.

AUNG-THWIN:      BUT HOW BURMA ACTS TAINTS ALL OF ASEAN TOO.

HOST:            WHAT, MR. KUMAR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE IN TERMS 
                 OF ADDITIONAL PRESSURE ON BURMA.  THE UNITED 
                 STATES HAS ECONOMIC SANCTIONS.  THERE ARE SOME 
                 EUROPEAN MEASURES DIRECTED AGAINST BURMA.  WHAT 
                 ELSE WOULD HELP?

KUMAR:           ASEAN SHOULD TAKE THE LEAD.  IT'S A GOOD 
                 BEGINNING AS YOU MENTIONED, BUT ASEAN SHOULD 
                 TAKE THE LEAD AS ONE OF THEIR PARTNERS, AS A 
                 MATTER OF FACT.  AND ALSO THERE ARE TWO OTHER 
                 COUNTRIES WE SHOULD NOT FORGET.  ONE IS INDIA.  
                 THE OTHER ONE IS CHINA.  INDIA IS KIND OF HAVING
                 SOME ROLE IN TERMS OF BRINGING THESE TWO GROUPS 
                 TOGETHER, BUT WE ARE NOT SURE HOW FAR IT'S 
                 GOING.  AND CHINA IS A MAJOR PLAYER.  WE 
                 UNDERSTAND THAT PRESIDENT CLINTON RAISED THE 
                 ISSUE OF BURMA WHEN HE WAS IN BEIJING DURING THE
                 SUMMIT.  WE DON'T KNOW THE OUTCOME, WHAT 
                 TRANSPIRED IN THEIR CLOSED DOOR MEETINGS.  SO, 
                 DEFINITELY WITHOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF INDIANS 
                 AND CHINESE, ALONG WITH ASEAN, IT WILL BE 
                 DIFFICULT TO MAKE ANY CHANGES.  THAT'S MY 
                 ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION THERE.

KEOGH:           IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT INDIA WAS 
                 SUPPORTIVE IN GENEVA AT THE U-N HUMAN RIGHTS 
                 COMMISSION ON SOME OF THE EFFORTS MADE TO CHECK 
                 THE ABUSES, ET CETERA, OF THE MILITARY 
                 GOVERNMENT.  SO I THINK INDIA HAS IN FACT MADE 
                 SOME EFFORTS IN THE PAST.  I'M NOT SURE WHERE 
                 THEY ARE NOW.  BUT CERTAINLY, WE ARE TRYING TO 
                 FORGE AN INTERNATIONAL COALITION.  AND ASEAN IS 
                 ONE OF THE FOCUSES.

HOST:            LET ME END BY ASKING YOU, SUSAN KEOGH, WHAT IS 
                 IT THAT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WOULD LIKE TO SEE 
                 HAPPEN NEXT?  WE HAVE THIS STANDOFF BETWEEN AUNG
                 SAN SUU KYI, THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR DEMOCRACY 
                 AND THE MILITARY JUNTA.  WHAT MESSAGE?

KEOGH:           THE MESSAGE IS THAT AUNG SAN SUU KYI AND THE 
                 DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION HAVE PROVED THEMSELVES TO 
                 BE FLEXIBLE AND RESPONSIVE.  THEY'VE NEVER 
                 CALLED FOR THE VIOLENT OVERTHROW OF THE 
                 GOVERNMENT.  THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY NOW TO BEGIN
                 A DIALOGUE, TO BEGIN THE POLITICAL FUTURE OF THE
                 COUNTRY.  THERE'S BEEN ONE SMALL STEP TAKEN.  OF
                 COURSE, WE WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE TO SEE THAT STEP
                 GOING FURTHER, AND MOVING FORWARD IN ANOTHER 
                 PHASE.  BUT IT MUST INCLUDE, OF COURSE, AUNG SAN
                 SUU KYI AND THE LEADERS OF THE ETHNIC 
                 MINORITIES.  AND IT CAN'T BE USED AS SOMETHING 
                 JUST TO DIVIDE AND SEPARATE PEOPLE.  AND I THINK
                 WE'LL BE WATCHING VERY CAREFULLY AND PUTTING ANY
                 PRESSURE WE CAN TO SEE THAT HAPPENING.  FRANKLY,
                 WE DON'T WANT TO SEE BURMA FAIL.  WE WANT TO SEE
                 BURMA SUCCEED BADLY.  AS A DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY 
                 WHERE IT LOOKS AFTER ITS OWN PEOPLE AND IT'S 
                 PART OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY.

HOST:            I'M AFRAID THAT'S ALL THE TIME WE HAVE THIS 
                 WEEK.  I'D LIKE TO THANK OUR GUESTS -- SUSAN 
                 KEOGH FROM THE BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS
                 AND LABOR AT THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT;  MAUREEN
                 AUNG-THWIN FROM THE BURMA PROJECT OF THE OPEN 
                 SOCIETY INSTITUTE; AND T. KUMAR FROM AMNESTY 
                 INTERNATIONAL -- FOR JOINING ME TO DISCUSS U.S. 
                 POLICY AND BURMA.  THIS IS ROBERT REILLY FOR ON 
                 THE LINE.





21-Aug-98 12:02 PM EDT (1602 UTC)
NNNN

Source: Voice of America
 .