who is ShweZthar@erols.com ? (r)

[aungsoe@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Hey Ma/Ko Htet:

What kind of postings do u think will make u healthy and fresh?
Have courage to speak for urself.  As far as i am concerned, Ma Aye Aye 
Soe Win's contributions keep me alive as an activist. If i think i have 
no such friends in US and elsewhere, i am afraid i will still be in this 
movement.  she is voluntarily checking backstabbings and corruptions 
practiced by people at high places.  it is on our behalf because we are 
literally no where next to these people.  

u need special attention and enough practical experience to read the 
meaning between  the lines appeared in her postings.

if u desire so much, i can post messages that would amuse your mind and 
soul on daily baisis. 

But u should be aware that we are in the process of redefining the whole 
revolution.  It will be unpleasant and bitter for those who have never 
experienced troubles and bitterness of working as selfless 
revolutionaries. However it is not a self-promoting behavior.

Please identify your gender at least.
Peace......

Aung Soe (BKK)



==================================
----Original Message Follows----
Date: 09 Jul 1998 17:05:11
Reply-To: Conference "reg.burma" <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: who is ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx ?
To: Recipients of burmanet-l <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear BurmaNet Readers,
                       We are sick  and tired of the so-called activists 
like Aye Aye Soe Win who promotes herself  and seeks identity without 
being of any help to the opposition but has become a destructive element 
to the democracy movement.The term "destructive element" is used by 
SLORC.In this scenario she is destructive to the democracy movement not 
to SLORC.And she is filling up BurmaNet with trashy postings which bear 
no fruit.

Again we are sick and tired of self-promoting postings on this 
forum.Please stop nonsense postings that are not volatile at all for 
anybody.Please!Please!

For Peace's sake.

Htet
>Date: 09 Jul 1998 12:21:31
>Reply-To: Conference "reg.burma" <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>From: ShweZthar@xxxxxxx
>Subject: who is ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx ?
>To: Recipients of burmanet-l <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Internet Audience,
>
>This morning, I received a private e-mail message from a non-Burmese 
friend.
>This non-Burmese friend asked me if I have two accounts or which is 
mine ? The
>following is the message from him. Look at this carefully. 
>
>
>To:	ShweZthar@xxxxxxx ('Aye Aye Soe Win'), 
>      ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx ('Aye Aye Soe Win 2')
>
>
>Dear Aye Aye,
>
>I hope you have received my previous emails.  There have been a few.  
Please 
>let me know which is the proper address.  I have two:
>     ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx
>     ShweZthar@xxxxxxx
>
>**********************************************8888
>My analysis
>
>(1) Someone has deliberately copied my screen name and put "Aye Aye Soe 
Win 2"
>in parenthesis after ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx, which I consider very sneaky 
and
>illegal because he/she did it without my knowledge of his/her using
>ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx and my name marked with 2.
>
>(2) This someone must have wanted to use this fake account to carry out 
some
>sneaky intentions against me. On the net, I have been engaged in our 
fair
>debate on the accountability of NCGUB and the illegal existence of 
FTUB, and
>it is very possible that someone wants to make two
>accounts---ShweZthar@xxxxxxx(aye aye soe win) and ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx 
(aye aye
>soe win 2) similar enough to make confusion among us.
>
>(3) It is not such a coincidence that ShweZthar@xxxxxxx and 
>ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx exist as burmanet-suscribers. ShweZthar is no 
common name.
>Besides, even if someone simply got so fascinated with the screen name
>"ShweZthar" (which in fact is my youngest cat's name) that he/she could 
not
>resist copying it from my screen name, there wouldn't be another Aye 
Aye Soe
>Win marked with 2 in the parenthesis. So the creation of 
ShweZthar@xxxxxxxxx
>is deliberate, intentional, and sneaky. The person behind this fake Aye 
Aye
>Soe Win 2 knows why he/she has done it.
>
>(4) There are a few individuals on a different front who enjoy our 
questioning
>of the financial and organizational matters of FTUB and NCGUB. These 
people
>could be working for SLORC/SPDC, and to me their strategy is not only 
putting
>fuel to the subject-matter which generates and requires strong 
arguments form
>all sides but also pushing away our process of discovering the truth in 
the
>wrong direction. 
> 
>(5) A great many Burmese students and activists have become 
psychologically
>grown-ups to overcome so many tricks from the backstage that they now 
know
>which course of actions should be pursued and retained to upgrade their
>movement despite all sorts of balck magic and pressure coming from 
nowhere. 
>
>Thanks.
>
>aye aye soe win
> 
>  
>
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com





______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com