[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
THE NATION: EDITORIAL/Southern Seab
- Subject: THE NATION: EDITORIAL/Southern Seab
- From: suriya@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 18:56:00
Editorial & Opinion
EDITORIAL/Southern
Seaboard plan may wreck
environment
If you thought the controversy over the
Yadana gas-pipeline project was bad, wait
until you see the Southern Seaboard
Development Project (SSDP). For despite
all the talk of reform engendered by the
economic crisis, Thai authorities evidently
still love their huge, state-sponsored
development projects.
Current plans for the SSDP call for the
construction of two pipelines (one for crude
oil), two industrial ports (one on the Gulf
coast, the other on the Andaman coast),
tank farms, an industrial estate, an oil
refinery or two and all the infrastructure
necessary to support this grandiose
scheme.
To make matters worse, the mega-project
is to be led by two notorious state
enterprises: the Petroleum Authority of
Thailand (PTT), which has made such a
hash of the Yadana project, and the
Industrial Estates Authority of Thailand
(IEAT), which is responsible for the many
environmental debacles at Mab Ta Phud,
the centrepiece of the Eastern Seaboard
project.
Coordinating the project, and rounding the
unholy trio, is the National Economic and
Social Development Board (NESDB), the
architect of the whole top-down approach to
Thailand's industrialisation programme.
Although it has written some nice words
about human resources and
people-centred development in its Eighth
Plan, the NESDB's recent push for the
Southern Seaboard project has once again
revealed its true colours.
Thais seem to have a weakness for
economic fads: some business venture
becomes extremely popular and makes a
few people a lot of money until finally the
bubble bursts. First it was shrimp farms,
then it was golf courses and office blocks.
Now it seems to be seaboards.
The Southern Seaboard is aimed at
duplicating the economic success of the
Eastern Seaboard, which has become a
centre for the petrochemical trade.
Meanwhile, there are proposals to develop
the Western Seaboard, which would
actually revolve around an industrial area in
Tavoy in Burma but would also serve Thai
provinces such as Kanchanaburi and
Ratchaburi.
So what's next? a Northern Seaboard?
The SSDP is said to have a strategic
geographical advantage: its proponents
say it can serve as an alternative to the
Straits of Malacca as a trade route for oil
being shipped from the Middle East to the
markets of East Asia. Backers are also
basing their plans on predictions of rising
demand for petrochemical products in
China.
But following the economic crisis, demand
may not be as great as previously forecast.
China may also decide to build its own
petrochemical facilities. The Southern and
Eastern Seaboards may end up competing
with each other, and the Western
Seaboard, too, for that matter. They all will
have a tough time battling the
well-established infrastructure in
Singapore.
For all these reasons, private investors
have been understandably leery of putting
their money into the Southern Seaboard,
which is why Thai authorities are trying to
jump-start the project by wooing Japanese
financiers.
Meanwhile, there are serious environmental
questions about the SSDP. When Banharn
Silapa-archa was prime minister, he moved
the proposed deep-sea port on the
Andaman coast from Krabi to Phang Nga,
citing environmental reasons. (Politics
probably entered into the equation, too.)
In fact, there is no safe site to put an
industrial port on the Andaman coast.
Environmental officials have already
protested that the Phang Nga site is a vital
breeding ground for endangered sea
turtles. Wherever the port ends up,
industrial activity may destroy the Andaman
coast's flourishing tourist trade. Simply take
a stroll along a beach in Rayong on the
Eastern Seaboard and observe all the oil
spills washing ashore to see what will
happen to the beaches of Phuket or the
reefs of Koh Similan.
And yet, the Tourism Authority of Thailand
has not raised a peep of protest over the
Southern Seaboard. Given the political
nature of the project, environmental officials
may be silenced, too. Certainly it does not
appear that the lessons from the Yadana
fiasco will be heeded. It is therefore once
again up to environmental groups, villagers
and other NGOs to raise the alarm.
Hopefully, they will wake up to the Southern
Seaboard menace soon, before it is too
late.