[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index ][Thread Index ]

To Ko Aung Kyaw* (r)

Ko Than Soe,

I think you got the wrong person. I will repeat that the ABSDF is not my 
group. It means more than a group. I represent the ABSDF as the others 
come from the ABSDF do. Until today I feel myself as a part of the 

aung kyaw 

>From notes@xxxxxxx Wed Dec  3 20:06:14 1997
>Received: from cdp.igc.apc.org (root@xxxxxxxxxxx [])
>	by igc7.igc.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA09202;
>	Wed, 3 Dec 1997 19:48:48 -0800 (PST)
>Received: (from notes)
>	by cdp.igc.apc.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA01357;
>	Wed, 3 Dec 1997 19:47:26 -0800 (PST)
>Date: 03 Dec 1997 19:17:59
>Reply-To: Conference "reg.burma" <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>From: tsoe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: To Ko Aung Kyaw*
>To: Recipients of burmanet-l <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>X-Gateway: conf2mail@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Errors-To: owner-burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Lines: 198
>Ko Aung Kyaw:
>	    	  Min-Ga-Larr-Barr.
>You may be or may not be a friend of Ko Nyein Chan (NC). But, one 
>thing dead sure is that 
>1) What I am saying you is to directly contact KZY.   		
>2) Who is Ko Nyein Chan? Are you guarntee your accusing to your friend?
>   Can you hack his current location through NC's "juno" e-mail 
>   Friend, hundred percent I doubt you don't.
>3) The net-activists are not fool. If someone writes and posts wrong
>   rumours and news, the net-audience will be the judges. You can see,
>   as an example "OKKAR66127@xxxxxxx -(Shit-PDC) posting" --mostly,
>   OKKAR postings are fake, unrealistic, groundless, inhumane, 
>   and without dignity. So what? Delete! And, we, the net-audience 
>   "him(and his group)" as a pitiful creature of the pripcipleless
>   dictatorial regime, only. NONE LISTENS AND BELIEVES THAT POOR GUY! 
>4) Since, (as you write) you are the representative of your group, why
>   don't you try to explain back the accusation with manly manners
>   and factual clearfication as a press conference to the net (or media 
>   else). Do your group have Information & Media Department? I know you
>   will say "yes" ; So, those will be it's duty. For example, when RFA
>   aired about the past-act of your group, why don't your group try to
>   clearify it with official way? That was your group chance, but you
>   missed it. Who are wrong?  Don't say "Not the right time". Next ten
>   more years?
>   (Nine years period, man. Most exiled revolutionaries know who the
>   evil-standardless-revolutionaries are, but most of the time we try 
>   to shut our mouths to talk about those things because we don't want
>   the destorier of our nation "NeWinism SLORC(SPDC)" laugh. But,
>   history(records) can not be re-write).
>5) As I said you above you may or may not know NC. But, don't you 
>   know KZY? Friend, be open-minded and be sincere to me(us). Well, 
>   I donnot want to write the follwoing short quiz, I have to do 
>   you are trying to fool me and your friends;
>		-----------------------------------------
>		Aung Soe (a) Aung Kyaw = { ---  ---  -- }
>		-----------------------------------------
>		Aung Soe (a) Aung Kyaw = { _i_  _aw  O_ }    
>		-----------------------------------------
>   (Okay, from now on, please write to me DIRECTLY(not on the net) with
>   your real account, if you have something to say. I afraid our fellow
>   net subscribers will be angry with us, if we continue).
>Hope you understand.
>"There are thousands of martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the
>country. In the military regime's inhumane prisons, there are thousands 
>heroes who are risking their life for Peace, Liberty and Justice. So, 
>taking advantages of country's revolution, whoever trying to establish
>personal fame and gain are evil ; whoever trying to corrupt the
>revolutionary funds are evil".
>	"Down with evil regime. Down with evil revolutionaries."
>On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, aung soe wrote:
>> Ko Than Soe,
>> That's right. I've should have talked to Ko Nyein Chan directly if I 
>> his friend. This is the idea I've tried to raise. Why did not Ko 
>> Chan beheave the same to those organizations he was accausing?
>> First of all, you thought I disguise my name. I have nothing to do 
>> I wrote here because I believe what his beheaviour effects negative 
>> impact on the movement. You said Slorc is watching. It's dead right. 
>> future, Myat Khin Thit (Slorc's counter-movement magazine) will 
>> Burma net for their attack against the movement. They don't have to 
>> agents. This is my point. 
>> I have to defend anyone who is doing the right thing against the 
>> unappropriate beheaviour. He can write his idea or whatever but shold 
>> honest. This is what people are doing on the net. 
>> What he is doing is dishonest by using different names on the net and 
>> attacking others. Criticising others is easy with a disguished names 
>> this criticised person is painful. There are lots of political arena 
>> can play if he wants by saying who I am.
>> I whish I would be his friend so that I know his intention.
>> Aung Kyaw
>> >Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 22:08:11 -0500 (EST)
>> >From: Than Soe <tsoe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >X-Sender: tsoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Reply-To: Than Soe <tsoe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >To: aungkyaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >cc: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Subject: To Ko Aung Kyaw*
>> >
>> >
>> >Ko Aung Kyaw (--- --- --):
>> >
>> >It is not a nice thing to write and grill a friend on the public 
>> internet.
>> >
>> >If you are sure who is the person using the name "Ko Nyein Chan", 
>> >don't you try directly contacting him, first ; Then try to discuss 
>> >differences --such as why he/she is using the nick name, what is the
>> >intention and goals. There will be reasons and solutions for both of 
>> you.
>> >
>> >We all love our motherland, the Union of Burma, very much and 
equally ;
>> >None is above someone in the degree of love for the country. At the
>> >mean time, we have lots of things to serve the Nation. We may have 
>> >differences in idealogy and style of approaches to our
>> >revolutiony and country affairs, but we still have a long way to go,
>> >and we better ought to establish understanding among the 
>> revolutionaries.
>> >So, don't try to make new enemy after new enemies. (I am not 
>> >you, please).
>> >
>> >While you are accusing Ko Kyaw Zay Ya, do you think nobody know who 
>> >are? Many activists, including me, know who "Aung Kyaw" is. (It is 
>> >easy to hack). Why don't you use your real name? (I do not want your
>> >answer ;  I know you have reason, and I try to understand it. If 
>> something
>> >I disagree with you, I will write to your real e-mail account. That 
>> my
>> >way, but I will not make you feel being grilled on the net).
>> >
>> >If someone reveal your real name, (which you do not want to show to 
>> >public with some reason), on the public net, what kind of feeling 
>> will
>> >get. Okay friend, you know the situation. SLORC (Shit-PDC) is 
>> >
>> >Ary you sure who "Nyein Chan (NC)" is? If you think KZY is NC, try 
>> >write or call him directly. Since, you guys are friends and know 
>> >other very well, there will be soultion for the current 
>> misunderstanding
>> >between you guys. 
>> >
>> >Please, don't try to ploitically kill the fellow activists. Please, 
>> to
>> >cheer, understand and support the fellow activists. We all are, now, 
>> >the same boat.  
>> >
>> >Hope you understand me.
>> >
>> >	   "Down with evil regime. Down with evil revolutionary."
>> >
>> >
>> >(P.S ... Don't write me back on the net. I have not subscribed the
>> >BurmaNet, yet. I got you e-mail from someone. I try to be quiet, but
>> >things are not in favor. Why do you do like that, man?)  
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >Date: 02 Dec 1997 10:04:52
>> >From: aungkyaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Reply-To: "Conference reg.burma" <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >To: Recipients of burmanet-l <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >Subject: deceitful Nyein Chan (a) ???
>> >
>> >Dear all,
>> >
>> >I have been sick with some people who are making noise in net with
>> >different names.  First, writing on the net is very common in 
>> >politics. However, I found out someone who is using different names 
>> >the net to play some slam area polotics. This person has been 
>> >different issues which can allure the audience and supporting his
>> >assumption by different names.
>> >
>> >Nyein Chan (a) Kyaw Za Ya is the person that I found out after 
>> >his notes on the net. At first, I'm wondering why Kyaw Za Ya is so
>> >sensative when some people hit Nyein Chan. He defend Nyein Chan 
>> on
>> >the net. Unsuprisingly, the ideas what Nyein Chan wrote and what 
>> Za
>> >Ya are almost the same. Below is the some parts of two messages from
>> >Nyein Chan and Kyaw Za Ya to me. You will find that the same idea 
>> >sometime same usages in the same day. There are many messages on the 
>> net
>> >with  the same facts by those two names.
>> >
>> >It shows deceitful of his intention on the net. I don't know there 
>> >how many of his names doing the same thing on the net.  I'm tired of
>> >being argued with that kind of hypocritical person. He should  find 
>> >political ground in other place else to play such kind of thing and
>> >considerate others on the net.
>> >
>> >Aung Kyaw
>> >
>> >______________________________________________________
>> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com