[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
Comments: Question to Freedom Fight (r)
- Subject: Comments: Question to Freedom Fight (r)
- From: Winston_Lee@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:49:00
Subject: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
There is a clear cut between people who are "armed" & those who are not.
Now, unless the author was trying to parallel those <outside Burma fighting
peacefully in non-violent way for a good cause> to armed Shinning Path or
bloody Sinn Fein from Northern Eire ...
I absolutely agree with Lisa. There aint no comparison whatsoever.
Extremist is extremist whether supported by common people or those who are
privileged. Likewise, terrorism shouldnt be encouraged in a good cause at
>Subj: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
>Date: 97-04-28 23:43:49 EDT
>Reply-to: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Conference reg.burma)
>To: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Recipients of burmanet-l)
>From: Lisa Booth Brooten <lb252689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru (fwd)
>It is dangerous to equate the situation in Burma with the TUPAC-AMARU,
>which is not, as I understand it, supported by a majority of the Peruvian
>people, and for however noble their reasons, was acting with violence
>against innocent people to make their point. Also -- wasn't Fujimori