[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
BURMA/U-S BUSINESS
DATE=3/19/97
TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT
NUMBER=5-35977
TITLE=BURMA/U-S BUSINESS
BYLINE=AUNG HLA
DATELINE=WASHINGTON
CONTENT=
NOT VOICED:
/// ACTS AVAILABLE OUTSIDE THE ENGLISH BUBBLE ///
INTRO: IN CALIFORNIA AND CONNECTICUT, BILLS HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED
TO PROHIBIT THE GOVERNMENTS OF THOSE STATES FROM DOING BUSINESS
WITH COMPANIES OPERATING IN BURMA. AS AUNG HLA OF V-O-A'S
BURMESE SERVICE REPORTS, LEGISLATORS CONCERNED ABOUT POLITICAL
REPRESSION AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BURMA ARE TRYING TO
FOLLOW THE EXAMPLES OF MASSACHUSETTS AND 11 U-S CITIES WHERE
"SELECTIVE PURCHASING LAWS" WERE APPROVED:
TEXT: STATE REPRESENTATIVES IN CALIFORNIA AND CONNECTICUT
INTRODUCED THEIR BILLS SHORTLY AFTER THE NEW YORK CITY COUNCIL
HELD A SECOND HEARING ON A PROPOSED SELECTIVE PURCHASING BILL.
IN CALIFORNIA, REPRESENTATIVE DION ARONER, WHO INTRODUCED THE
BILL IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE, EXPLAINS WHAT THE LEGISLATION WILL
DO IF IT BECOMES LAW:
// ARONER ACT //
TRIPLE EIGHT (888) IS THE NUMBER OF THE BILL HERE IN
CALIFORNIA. AND IT ALSO PROHIBITS THE STATE FROM DOING
BUSINESS WITH ANY ENTITY WHICH HAS ECONOMIC TIES TO
BURMA. SO IT IS A VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD MEASURE, LOOKS
VERY MUCH LIKE WHAT WE DID ABOUT SOUTH AFRICA MANY YEARS
AGO WHEN WE WERE TRYING TO HAVE AN ECONOMIC IMPACT ON
SOUTH AFRICA SO THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THEIR POLITICAL
REGIME.
// END ACT //
CALIFORNIA HAS THE SEVENTH LARGEST ECONOMY IN THE WORLD. AS THE
ANNUAL BUDGETS OF CALIFORNIA AND CONNECTICUT ARE 45 BILLION AND
10 BILLION DOLLARS RESPECTIVELY, LEGISLATORS SPONSORING THE BILLS
SAY THEY COULD HAVE A BIG IMPACT.
JESSIE STRATTON INTRODUCED THE BILL IN THE CONNECTICUT STATE
LEGISLATURE. IN A V-O-A INTERVIEW, SHE SAYS IT WILL SEND A
MESSAGE TO THE MILITARY GOVERNMENT IN BURMA:
// STRATTON ACT //
NOT ONLY HAVE I GOT A VERY POSITIVE RESPONSE TO MY
INTRODUCING THIS BILL IN CONNECTICUT, BUT IT IS CLEAR
THAT CORPORATIONS ARE INDEED RESPONDING AND THAT IT IS
HAVING AN EFFECT. AND THEN YOU START TO SEE MAJOR
GIANTS, LIKE KODAK AND HEWLETT PACKARD, PULL OUT OF
BURMA IN RESPONSE BOTH TO LEGISLATION LIKE WE PROPOSED
AND ALSO TO POLITICAL PRESSURE FROM AMERICANS, JUST
SAYING WE DON'T WANT TO BE A PART OF SUPPORTING THIS. I
THINK THAT HAS TO BE A VERY POSITIVE MESSAGE TO THE
PEOPLE IN BURMA WHO ARE TRYING TO RESTORE DEMOCRACY TO
THEIR COUNTRY.
// END ACT //
THE SELECTIVE PURCHASING CAMPAIGN IN THE UNITED STATES IS
CONTINUING -- DESPITE PROTESTS BY JAPAN AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
THAT A SIMILAR LAW APPROVED IN MASSACHUSETTS VIOLATED WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATION (W-T-O) RULES.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR PETE WILSON STIRRED CONTROVERSY IN JANUARY
WHEN HE SAID, DURING AN ASIAN TOUR, THAT SELECTIVE PURCHASING
LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
ACTIVIST JANE JEROME IS A MEMBER OF THE (SAN FRANCISCO) BAY AREA
BURMA ROUNDTABLE -- ONE OF THE ORGANIZATIONS LEADING SELECTIVE
PURCHASING EFFORTS. SHE SAYS THE SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT
SUCH LAWS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL. AND SHE DESCRIBES BURMA AS A
SPECIAL CASE COMPARED TO OTHER COUNTRIES THAT MIGHT BE AFFECTED
BY SUCH LEGISLATION:
// JEROME ACT //
BURMA IS AN EXCEPTION, AND EXCEPTIONAL CASES REQUIRE
SPECIAL EFFORT, GIVEN THAT THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR
DEMOCRACY AND OTHER DEMOCRACY SUPPORTERS HAVE CALLED FOR
SANCTIONS, AND GIVEN THAT THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN 1990
WHOSE RESULTS HAVE NOT BEEN UPHELD. I CAN'T SAY THERE
HAVE BEEN ELECTIONS ELSEWHERE, IN INDONESIA OR IN CHINA.
SO THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTIONS REALLY HAVE TO BE
HONORED AND SLORC (BURMA'S RULING STATE LAW AND ORDER
RESTORATION COUNCIL) HASN'T DONE THAT.
// END ACT //
IF SELECTIVE PURCHASING BILLS ARE ENACTED IN CONNECTICUT AND
CALIFORNIA, MARKETS WORTH BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WILL BE CLOSED TO
COMPANIES THAT HAVE BUSINESS TIES TO BURMA.
MEANWHILE, IN THE EASTERN STATE OF VERMONT, STATE LEGISLATORS
CONCERNED ABOUT THE SITUATION IN BURMA SAY THEY INTEND TO
INTRODUCE A SIMILAR BILL. (SIGNED)
BURMESE SVC/AH/DAR/KL