[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Junta's old friend lends voice to t
Subject: Junta's old friend lends voice to the opposition.
JUNTA'S OLD FRIEND LENDS VOICE TO THE OPPOSITION
************************************************
Myanmar's military rulers have upset their former European ally, Germany,
which has now given its blessing to a deal to strengthen a dissident
radio station. However, Gemini News Service reports that human rights
activists should not get up hopes that Bonn is about to slap on trade
sanctions.
By HUGH WILLIAMSON,
3 December,
Cologne, Germany
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a key policy shift, the German Government has backed a deal that
allows the telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom to boost an
opposition radio station broadcasting into Myanmar (formerly
Burma).
The decision, announced in mid-November by German Foreign Minister Klaus
Kinkel, represents a withdrawal of earlier "misgivings" his ministry
expressed to Telekom over the $100,000-a-year contract.
If the deal now goes through, as looks likely, the German firm - a
state-owned company currently being privatised - will provide powerful
new transmitters for the Norway-based Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB),
which is backed by Burmese democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
The Foreign Ministry's U-turn is significant because, in the past,
Germany has been an important European ally for Myanmar. The decision to
back the DVB reflects growing frustration in Bonn with the military
rulers in Yangon (Rangoon), who recently tightened their political clamp
on opponents.
"Germany has had traditionally close ties with Burma and backs dialogue
[rather than sanctions] to bring change in Rangoon. But now Germany may
be losing patience," says Martin Smith, a London-based writer on Burmese
affairs.
Announcing the change of heart, an embarrassed Kinkel blamed low-level
officials for the original thumbs-down in July. He said he could find "no
reason in international law" to block the deal. His only proviso: that
the radio station does not promote violence or revolution.
DVB organisers responded by saying their aim was to broadcast accurate
information, not incitement to violence, and that talks with Telekom
would resume. DVB director Harn Yawnghwe, son of the first Burmese
President, Sao Shwe Thaike, welcomed the reversal, saying: "The
decision is more consistent with Germany's usual stance on human rights
and democracy."
The radio station is hoping to improve short-wave reception via new
frequencies and to expand air-time from the current one hour per day.
Established in Oslo in 1992 on the back of a wave of Norwegian support
following the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize award to Aung San Suu Kyi, the DVB
is the mouthpiece of the self-styled government-in-exile, the National
Coalition Government of the Union of Burma.
The $270,000-a-year operation is funded by Norwegian, Swedish, Danish and
US organisations, mostly with money originating from their national
governments, and by a foundation established by international currency
dealer George Soros.
Bonn's change of mind on the Telekom deal shows that it recognises the
need for information in Myanmar, "where the media is totally controlled,"
says Peter Traub, a Bangkok-based regional expert with the Friedrich
Naumann Foundation, which is close to Kinkel's Free Democratic Party.
He helped lobby for the change, and adds that it reflects a recent
toughening of Germany's stance towards the military junta.
This harder line is confirmed by Dietrich Mahlo, spokesman on south-east
Asia for the senior German coalition partner, the Christian Democratic
Union. "Relations with Burma reached a new low in February when Rangoon
refused a visit by our Development Minister," he says. In his view, Myanmar
wasted a chance to improve ties with one of its traditional allies
because it refused to allow the minister to meet Aung San Suu Kyi.
Until the military suppression of pro-democracy protests in 1988, Germany
was proud of its links with Myanmar, and was its second largest source of
development aid, behind Japan. When Yangon was internationally isolated
and aid cut off, Bonn moved quickly to distance itself from its former
friend, and from charges that a German state-owned arms company had
supplied weapons used in the suppression.
"Nowadays, Kinkel has no illusions about the character of the [ruling]
State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC)," says Traub. Yet despite
this, Germany still uses its weight within the European Union (EU) to
preach the need for dialogue, rather than trade sanctions, in fostering
change in Myanmar.
Several EU member states, led by Denmark, are demanding an embargo after
this year's harassment of members of Aung San Suu Kyi's National League
for Democracy, which was prevented by the military from taking power
after it won elections in 1990. In addition, preferential trade tariffs
could be suspended when an EU inquiry into forced labour in Myanmar is
concluded.
However, Traub points out that EU action will have little effect as long
as the Association of South East Asian Nations continues to lend "basic
support" to the SLORC.
Meanwhile, any hopes by human rights activists that Bonn might try to
prevent German firms from doing business with Myanmar seem in vain at
present.
Bilateral trade remains small, totalling about $50 million in 1994. But
several German holiday companies are promoting Burmese packages to
coincide with the SLORC's Visit Myanmar Year. Big firms such as
engineering giant Siemens and clothing multinational Triumph have set up
offices or joint ventures there. And in November, an important business
council, the German Asia-Pacific Business Association, felt confident
enough to open a liaison office in Yangon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[About the Author: HUGH WILLIAMSON is a Cologne-based freelance journalist
covering international affairs.]
[OneWorld, 9 January 1997].
------------------------------------------------------------------------------