[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
No Subject Given
Organization: Forum for Democracy and Human Rights
To: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 14:19:47 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Subject: Indian News Paper
Reply-to: chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: free-burma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
may@xxxxxxxxx
Return-receipt-to: chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.10) & WPEGWAF v0.7
The Asian Age: US considering visa ban on Burma officials
September 20, 1996
Washington Sept. 19: The Clinton administration is expected to outlaw US v=
isas
for officials in Burma=92s military government and anyone else who benefit=
s from
its rule, possibly within the next week.
A senior administration official, noting increased support in Congress for=
a
tougher Burma policy, said the White House wanted it act on its own with a=
proclamation rather than wait for legislator to impose a travel ban. =93Th=
is gives
us greater flexibility,=94 said the official, who asked not to be named.
Similar proclamations in the past -against Nigeria, for example - have gra=
nted
those =93who formulated, implement, or benefit from the policies that impe=
de a
democratic transition,=94 the official said, adding: =93That=92s the templ=
ate.=94
It was not immediately clear when the White House would announce the visa
ban, or how many people it would prevent from traveling to the United Stat=
es.
But the sources following the issue expect the proclamation to come in the=
next
few days and Burmese dissidents say relatively few Burmese government
officials or their relatives now visit the United States.
Legislators are currently considering a broad 1997 Foreign Aid Bill that w=
ould
permit US economic sanctions against Burma in the ruling junta- the State =
Law
and Order Restoration Council- cracks down harder on its critics.
The provision won broad support after the Clinton Administration and
legislators from defeated an effort in July to ban all US trade with and
investment in Burma if the Slorc arrests, harms, or exiles democracy leade=
r and
Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi or suppress her followers on a l=
arge
scale.
How broad a crackdown it would take to trigger sanctions, whenever the
provision becomes law remains unclear. After the Slorc, which marks its ei=
ght
year in power this week, jailed 30 opposition members in late August, the =
State
Department said it was discussing economic sanctions against the regime wi=
th its
allies. (AFP)
******************
Singapore Opposition leader speaks on Myanmarese issue
Mr. Chee Soon Juan, the Secretary General of Singapore Democratic Party
(SDP) addressing the Foreign Correspondents Association:
///snapshots///
he was somewhat critical of Singapore=92s attitude and approach to Myanmar=
.
He was not against investment there, but wanted it to be benefit the peopl=
e. He
said =93Miss Aung San Suu Kyi has a point when she says that constructive
engagement must involve a dialogue with both sides. If the Government can =
deal
with the Slorc (junta), they must also talk to her. There is also the susp=
icion that
the Slorc is in some way involved with the problem of drug trafficking in
Myanmar. Are we doing the right thing in engaging the Slorc if that is tru=
e?=94
=3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D E.O.F. =3D=
=3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D