REPORT ON COMMUNICATIONS (9/6/96)

[uneoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

/* Written Sun 19 May 6:00am 1996 by DRUNOO@xxxxxxxxxxxx in igc:reg.burma */
/* -------------" Report on Communication (9/5/96) "--------------- */

LETTER TO THE U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE
*************************************
Dr U Ne Oo
48/2 Ayliffes Road
St Marys SA 5042
AUSTRALIA

May 9, 1996.

Hon Warren Christopher
Secretary of State
Main State Building - Room 7226
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520-7512
United States of America

Dear Secretary

RE: UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL ACTION ON BURMA

I call the Hon. Secretary's attention to the political and military
conflict in Burma and also the continuing plight of refugees and displaced
people in Thailand. With this letter, I enclosed (1) a copy of letter from
the Chairman of National League for Democracy party to the ruling State Law
and Order Restoration Council and (2) my letter to the U.N.
Secretary-general.

CEASEFIRE AND PEACE SETTLEMENT

1. Regarding with the ceasefire between Karen National Union and Burmese
army, major difficulties have arisen because of SLORC's refusal to declare
a nation-wide ceasefire and to make a political dialogue, with definite
time frame, following signing of the ceasefire agreement. The Karen
National Union has requested political dialogues to start within 30 days
after signing of the ceasefire.

On previous ceasefire talks in December 1995 and February 1996, the Karen
National Union and SLORC had not engaged in substantive issues in
discussion. On 29 April 1996, the Karen National Union's negotiation team
is again to meet with SLORC for ceasefire talk. In this time again, the
SLORC appears fail to take a concrete step towards implementing ceasefire
and peace settlements with Karen National Union.

2. Ethnic freedom fighters have threaten to use armed engagement if the
situation is not changed in their favour. It is well known that Burma's
armed conflicts have been at low level guerrilla warefare. This means that
the Burmese army will be unable to suppress - as in the last 40 years - the
resistance of the ethnic minorities; although the minorities attack may not
be able to threaten central authorities in Rangoon.

3. Such an escalation of conflict will not make an environment conducive to
the voluntary return of refugees from Burma. On contrary, the further
outflows of refugees will occur as a result of the fightings, forced
porterage and forced relocations.

THE NLD'S REQUEST TO FORM LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

4. On 25 March 1996, the Chairman of the National League for Democracy, U
Aung Shwe, wrote to the Chairman of the State Law and Order Restoration
Council, Senior General Than Shwe, informing the NLD's intention to convene
the People's Legislative Assembly in accordance with the result of the
27-May-1990 election.

5. On the issue of dialogue with the National League for Democracy and the
representatives of ethnic leaders, the SLORC in principle has agreed to use
the constitutional convention as a forum for such dialogue. However,
SLORC's promise for dialogue with the Opposition as well as its approach to
ceasefire with ethnim minorities are vague; it is clear that SLORC has been
deliberately delaying to engage in these negotiations.

THE MILITARY GOVERNMENT SEEKING ASSISTANCE FROM IMF

6. The SLORC has requested a review of U.S. policy regarding the IMF
assistance to make reform on Burmese currency.

APPEAL FOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT'S INITATIVES

7. Regarding the implementation of ceasefire and arms embargo for Burma, I
appeal the Government of the United States to take a leading role at the
United Nations Security Council. The U.N. Department of Political Affairs
has communicated on 10 March 1996 that such U.N. Security Council actions
are up to the decisions of the permanent members. I believe the U.N.
Security Council's attention will put the ceasefire and political
negotiations in Burma on the right track.

8. The International Committee of the Red Cross should be recommended to
supervise the nation-wide ceasefire. This is particularly important for
Burma's eastern Shan State where the present ceasefire agreements are
fragile. The peace initiative in Shan State is urgent to curb the increase
in drug productions. The U.N. Security Council can only pave ways for
getting un-hindered access to those humanitarian organizations, UNDCP, the
UNHCR and NGOs throughout Burma.

9. With regards to the repatriation of refugees, there has been continuing
concerns by the international Non-Government Organizations and Human Rights
groups. The Burmese military government through its local Law and Order
Restoration Councils are making use of the practices on a wide-scale of
(1) forced labour (2) informal taxations and forced procurement of
agricultural products and (3) lawless activities such as confiscation of
private properties. The NGOs concerns are that unless those lawless
practices in Burma are being changed, there can be no improvement of
situation for the refugees and displaced people to return to Burma.

10. According to the NLD's letter of 25 March 1996, the Election Commission
still need to formally announced the result of 27-May-1990 multi-party
election. Regarding to the request by the NLD to convene the People's
legislative Assembly, appropriate measures must be made at a later time so
that the elected representatives can exercise their legislative power to
the full. This must be done in accordance with U.N. General Assembly
resolutions. However, it is more urgent in transition period for the
elected representatives to exercise legislative power specifically to
protect the population from human rights abuses cited in para 9. The U.N.
Security Council should take a note of the fact that because of the nature
of these human rights abuses, it could only be protected by the legislative
measures.

11. Regarding the Military Government's request of assistance from IMF to
have the currency reform, there is no dispute on the need of such a reform.
However, the International Financial Institutions should be aware that the
Military Government of Myanmar is illegitimate and have no authority to
make borrowing from foreign Banks on behalf of the people of Burma. Whoever
make the borrowing now, the monies will have to be repaid by the people of
Burma later. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure the openness in financial
borrowings in future and that the elected representatives should be allowed
to scrutinize in the country's financial matters. Even if the elected
representatives might not be able to exercise legislative power on the
financial matters in the interim period, they still must have the power to
scrutinize the financial matters. There is a true danger of the SLORC
become using the loans to procure its military hardware.

Therefore, the International Financial Institutions should make
considerations of loans to Burma only at the ocndition of openness made to
the elected representatives in financial matters.

In closing, I thank you and the Government of United States for your
continuing attention to Burma matters.

Yours respectfully and sincerely
Sd. U Ne Oo.

Copy to:
1. Dr Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Secretary-General of the United Nations,
United Nations, New York NY 10017, USA.
2. Mr Alvaro de Soto, Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs,
United Nations, New York NY 10017, USA.
3. Ms Sadako Ogata, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, Case Postale 2500,
CH-1211 Geneva 2 Depot, Switzerland.
4. Professor Yozo Yokota, U.N. Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in
Myanmar, c/- U.N. Center for Human Rights, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland.
5. The Hon. Alexander Downer, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Parliament
House, Canberra ACT 2600 for information.

ENCLOSURES
1. Letter from U Aung Shwe, Chairman of National League for Democracy, to
Senior General Than Shwe, State Law and Order Restoration Council, dated 25
March 1996.
2. Letter to Dr Boutros Boutros-Ghali, U.N. Secretary-General, Dated 26
February 1996.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

LETTER TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS
******************************************************

May 16, 1996.

Max Hadorn
Head of South Asia Desk
International Committee of the Red Cross

Dear Mr Hadorn,

Thank you for your letter of 22 February 1996 and clarifications of ICRC's
position regarding operations in Burma. Enclosed letter is my appeal to the
Secretary of the United States, Warren Christopher, to take appropriate
measures in regards to U.N. Security Council action on Government of
Myanmar. The military government of Myanmer has constantly refusing to
allow the operation of humanitarian organizations, such as UNHCR and ICRC,
throughout Burma. My hope is that the Security Council's attention may pave
ways for getting the un-hindered access for these humanitarian
organizations to the people who are in need of help.

The ICRC's continuing attention to situation in Burma and its efforts made
in regards to increased operation in Burma are most appreciated by us - the
people of Burma.

Yours sincerely
Sd. U Ne Oo.

/* Endreport */