[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
Response to MGG Pillai (r)
> From notes@xxxxxxxxxxx Tue Feb 6 01:48 PST 1996
> Errors-To: owner-burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Errors-To: owner-burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Errors-To: owner-burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: Conference "reg.burma" <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Response to MGG Pillai
> To: Recipients of burmanet-l <burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> In-Reply-To: <199601251943.EAA13172@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-Gateway: conf2mail@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Errors-To: owner-burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Precedence: bulk
> Lines: 26
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 788
> X-Lines: 26
>
> From: "M.G.G. Pillai" <PILLAI@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Date sent: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 08:26:47 -0800 (PST)
> > From: "W. Kesavatana-Dohrs" <dohrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "M.G.G. Pillai" <PILLAI@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Copies to: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Response to MGG Pillai
>
> >
> > It is a question of credibility, MGG. You said you are a journalist. I
> > asked for evidence. If I ask for credibility as a journalist, I am happy
> > to show proof that I am one. And you?
> >
> > LD
> >
>
> The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University would
> tell you who I am. But I still fail to see the relevance in this
> discussion. Are you telling me that anyone who comes with a contrary
> view must prove his credentials?
>
> MGG
>
> --
> M.G.G. Pillai
> pillai@xxxxxxxxx
>
TO YOUR HIGHNESS
May your Highness "Political refugees from Burma" allow me to
speak or talk ,PLEASE ?
I don't have any NOBLE CREDENTIALS like your HIGHNESSES do.
I am nobody . Just a plain,humble, ordinary human being.
But ,PLEASE,I promise I will FOLLOW your instructions as to when I shall "talk" and when I shall "shutup" ,MY LORD.
Please ,please don't beat me.Don't torture me.I beg you! I beg you,my lord! I just wanted to SPEAK WHAT YOU LIKE TO HEAR !
Now I understand why the so called "Burmese political refugees"
hypocrites,opportunists are not getting much support.
What a revelation !
JS