[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index ]

Burma Related News - April 23, 2000.



WIRE:04/22/2000 21:32:00 ET
FEATURE-Opium market flourishes in Afghanistan
 
GHANI KHEL, Afghanistan, April 23 (Reuters) - Gilaz Khan's  opium shop is down a dusty road past a U.N. anti-narcotics  office surrounded by poppy fields, a Taleban government office  and a sign warning of the evils of drugs. 
The street in front of his store in Ghani Khel, an hour's  drive from Afghanistan's Khyber Pass border with Pakistan, has  the feel of any other in Asia where dozens of shops compete to  sell the same product. 
 
But in the case of Ghani Khel, it is opium, the raw material  for heroin, sold in quantities ranging from one kilo (2.2 lb)  "cakes" to shipments of hundreds of kilos. 
 
Afghanistan has now overtaken Myanmar and produces 75  percent of the world's opium. The United Nations estimates  Afghanistan produced 4,600 tonnes of opium in 1999, more than  double the previous year. 
 
Some Western anti-drug officials have accused the ruling  Taleban of profiting from the drug, while Taleban officials say  it has been part of the economy for decades and they need  international help to control it. 
 
Most of Afghanistan's opium ends up as heroin in Europe or  North America, said Bernard Frahi, the United Nations Drug  Control Programme (UNDCP) representative for Pakistan and  Afghanistan. Ample quantities also find their way into Iran and  the Russian republics. 
 
"Here is the start of the drug trafficking. Traffickers  come here to buy it, then process it into morphine, to heroin,  to pure heroin which is then sold on the streets," Frahi said  on a recent visit to Ghani Khel. 
 
Opium is illegal in Afghanistan and Khan -- who has been  selling the drug for five years -- was reluctant to speak about  what he did and refused to have his photo taken. 
 
The merchants in Ghani Khel quickly pull in their weighing  scales and shut their doors when unexpected visitors arrive. 
 
Khan rents one of the 80 to 100 opium stalls lining a  truck-filled street in the shadow of a sign in Pashto and  English that reads: "Drug abuse is a source of problems and  illegal deeds." 
 
PROFIT OF 100 RUPEES 
 
"I sell it for between 2,700 and 3,000 rupees (US$52-58) a  kilo, and make a profit of 100 rupees a kilo," said Khan,  gesturing towards several plastic bags in his shop containing  about 25 kg each of dried opium. 
 
He said he had sold 1,000 kg in the past year. 
 
Ten kilos of opium yields one kilo of morphine, which can be  processed into one kilo of heroin. 
 
The wholesale price of heroin in the United Kingdom can  reach $25,000 a kilo and $100-$160 per gram on the street. 
 
The Taleban, vilified by the United States for allegedly  harbouring terrorists and profiting from the misery of heroin  junkies, says poppy cultivation is a matter of economic  survival. 
 
It sees no contradiction between a strict ban on domestic  consumption and its widespread growth for export to the alleys  and "needle parks" of wealthy consuming nations. 
 
But Khan said he was less worried about Afghanistan's image  than with his business. 
 
"There's a lot of competition and business is just so-so,"  he said. "And new (harvest) opium will hit the market soon." 
 
Poppy fields in the eastern province of Nangarhar -- which  produces about 20 percent of Afghanistan's opium -- are  harvested in the second half of April. 
 
Southern Helmand province has about 50 percent of the poppy  crop. 
 
NO TAXES 
 
A visibly nervous Khan said he paid no levies to the  Taleban. 
 
"The Taleban do not tax opium. My only expense is the  14,000 rupee rent (a year) on my shop," he said. 
 
"Mostly I sell it to Pakistani traders. I don't know where  they take it. I think it goes over the mountains on mules,"  Khan said while standing in his musty mud-walled room that  lacked electricity and a proper floor. 
 
There are an estimated two million heroin addicts in  Pakistan, which has a population of 135 million. 
 
"They (Afghan merchants) do not sell morphine and heroin,  so that is positive. The second stage, in the near future, would  be to stop having this opium market," said U.N. representative  Frahi, who is with the United Nations on leave from the French  police. 
 
Frahi was in Nangarhar to witness the destruction of some  poppy fields as part of a pledge by the Taleban to slash opium  production by one-third this year. 
 
The destruction was part of efforts by local officials to  meet a decree last September by the Taleban's supreme leader,  Mullah Omar, to reduce poppy cultivation. 
 
Western anti-drug experts have said they are doubtful of  that, and Frahi said it would take until September to determine  how successful the campaign was. 
 
The U.N. office monitors the size of poppy fields,  encourages farmers to switch to legal crops and repairs dams and  water pumps in exchange for guarantees the water will not be  used for poppies. 
 
But Frahi admitted it was difficult to break farmers'  dependence on the poppy, which has been grown in Nangarhar for  five decades. 
 
How difficult that task is can be seen from a glance out of  the windows of the UNDCP field office in Ghani Khel, which is  surrounded by flowering poppy fields. 
 
"These are small farmers and they do not listen to us,"  said local leader Haji Murad Ali, when asked by Frahi why the  poppy fields were there. 
 
"We realise it is part of the grassroots, part of the  socio-economic environment...having said this, we of course,  cannot tolerate opium markets," Frahi said.
 
kistan, has  the feel of any other in Asia where dozens of shops compete to  sell the same product. 
 
But in the case of Ghani Khel, it is opium, the raw material  for heroin, sold in quantities ranging from one kilo (2.2 lb)  "cakes" to shipments of hundreds of kilos. 
 
Afghanistan has now overtaken Myanmar and produces 75  percent of the world's opium. The United Nations estimates  Afghanistan produced 4,600 tonnes of opium in 1999, more than  double the previous year. 
 
Some Western anti-drug officials have accused the ruling  Taleban of profiting from the drug, while Taleban officials say  it has been part of the economy for decades and they need  international help to control it. 
 
Most of Afghanistan's opium ends up as heroin in Europe or  North America, said Bernard Frahi, the United Nations Drug  Control Programme (UNDCP) representative for Pakistan and  Afghanistan. Ample quantities also find their way into Iran and  the Russian republics. 
 
"Here is the start of the drug trafficking. Traffickers  come here to buy it, then process it into morphine, to heroin,  to pure heroin which is then sold on the streets," Frahi said  on a recent visit to Ghani Khel. 
 
Opium is illegal in Afghanistan and Khan -- who has been  selling the drug for five years -- was reluctant to speak about  what he did and refused to have his photo taken. 
 
The merchants in Ghani Khel quickly pull in their weighing  scales and shut their doors when unexpected visitors arrive. 
 
Khan rents one of the 80 to 100 opium stalls lining a  truck-filled street in the shadow of a sign in Pashto and  English that reads: "Drug abuse is a source of problems and  illegal deeds." 
 
PROFIT OF 100 RUPEES 
 
"I sell it for between 2,700 and 3,000 rupees (US$52-58) a  kilo, and make a profit of 100 rupees a kilo," said Khan,  gesturing towards several plastic bags in his shop containing  about 25 kg each of dried opium. 
 
He said he had sold 1,000 kg in the past year. 
 
Ten kilos of opium yields one kilo of morphine, which can be  processed into one kilo of heroin. 
 
The wholesale price of heroin in the United Kingdom can  reach $25,000 a kilo and $100-$160 per gram on the street. 
 
The Taleban, vilified by the United States for allegedly  harbouring terrorists and profiting from the misery of heroin  junkies, says poppy cultivation is a matter of economic  survival. 
 
It sees no contradiction between a strict ban on domestic  consumption and its widespread growth for export to the alleys  and "needle parks" of wealthy consuming nations. 
 
But Khan said he was less worried about Afghanistan's image  than with his business. 
 
"There's a lot of competition and business is just so-so,"  he said. "And new (harvest) opium will hit the market soon." 
 
Poppy fields in the eastern province of Nangarhar -- which  produces about 20 percent of Afghanistan's opium -- are  harvested in the second half of April. 
 
Southern Helmand province has about 50 percent of the poppy  crop. 
 
NO TAXES 
 
A visibly nervous Khan said he paid no levies to the  Taleban. 
 
"The Taleban do not tax opium. My only expense is the  14,000 rupee rent (a year) on my shop," he said. 
 
"Mostly I sell it to Pakistani traders. I don't know where  they take it. I think it goes over the mountains on mules,"  Khan said while standing in his musty mud-walled room that  lacked electricity and a proper floor. 
 
There are an estimated two million heroin addicts in  Pakistan, which has a population of 135 million. 
 
"They (Afghan merchants) do not sell morphine and heroin,  so that is positive. The second stage, in the near future, would  be to stop having this opium market," said U.N. representative  Frahi, who is with the United Nations on leave from the French  police. 
 
Frahi was in Nangarhar to witness the destruction of some  poppy fields as part of a pledge by the Taleban to slash opium  production by one-third this year. 
 
The destruction was part of efforts by local officials to  meet a decree last September by the Taleban's supreme leader,  Mullah Omar, to reduce poppy cultivation. 
 
Western anti-drug experts have said they are doubtful of  that, and Frahi said it would take until September to determine  how successful the campaign was. 
 
The U.N. office monitors the size of poppy fields,  encourages farmers to switch to legal crops and repairs dams and  water pumps in exchange for guarantees the water will not be  used for poppies. 
 
But Frahi admitted it was difficult to break farmers'  dependence on the poppy, which has been grown in Nangarhar for  five decades. 
 
How difficult that task is can be seen from a glance out of  the windows of the UNDCP field office in Ghani Khel, which is  surrounded by flowering poppy fields. 
 
"These are small farmers and they do not listen to us,"  said local leader Haji Murad Ali, when asked by Frahi why the  poppy fields were there. 
 
"We realise it is part of the grassroots, part of the  socio-economic environment...having said this, we of course,  cannot tolerate opium markets," Frahi said.
 
Bangkok Post - April 23, 2000.
FOREIGN RELATIONS

Expert calls for review of Burma policy

Asean's stance not necessarily the best

Supamart Kasem

Thailand should review its policy towards Burma and take a different stance than Asean's if necessary, to protect its own interests, an Asian studies expert said.

"Flexible engagement" might be a better policy than Asean's "constructive engagement", said Wittaya Sujaritthanarak, former director of the Asian Studies Institute.

"Our interests are different from Asean's. We have to show Burma we wish to maintain a friendly relationship but we are also ready to protect our interests."He was speaking at a session on ways to improve Thai-Burmese relations and secure the 2,400km border. It was organised on Thursday by the Supreme Command at the National Defence College and chaired by Gen Sommai Vichavorn, deputy chief-of-staff.

Participants included representatives from the army, navy and air force, Foreign and Interior ministries and chambers of commerce in Chiang Rai, Tak and Ranong.

Mr Wittaya said Asean's policy towards Rangoon was intended to serve Asean's needs, which might not necessarily work for Thailand.

"Flexible engagement" might be the answer.

Thailand earlier proposed that Asean adopt a policy of flexible engagement towards Rangoon. Only the Philippines endorsed the idea. Thursday's session was prompted by Burma's attitude toward solving various disputes and problems over the past decade.

Gen Sommai said Burma's reluctance to put a co-operation agreement into practice was a sign the relationship between the two countries could be deteriorating.

"Drug trafficking, refugees and territorial disputes affect Thailand's border security. Burma has always agreed to solve the problems in principle. But when it is time for implementation, Burma steps back and says it is not ready," said Gen Sommai.

Thailand and Burma opened diplomatic relations in 1949 and used the ethnic minority groups along the border as buffer states. Bangkok later lifted the buffer state policy and took a neutral stance toward Burma and the minority groups.

Gen Sommai said despite all assurances, Burma still did not trust Thailand, and this affected security along both land and sea borders.

Chatchavej Chartsuwan, deputy director-general of the East Asia Department, said Thailand and Burma had different views on national interests.

"Burma sees the security of the State Peace and Development Council as being the national interest, while Thailand looks to trade," he said. Whenever a conflict arose, Burma used trade to bring pressure on Thailand.

The Foreign Ministry would propose that the government review its Burmese policy, he added.

Washington Post
Letter to the Editor
Think Globally, Act Federally
Thursday, April 20, 2000; Page A32
 

In her paean to her home state [Outlook, April 9], Mary McGrory lauded Massachusetts for its independent spirit in foreign affairs, especially its refusal to have any dealings with the government of Myanmar (Burma) or anyone who does business with that government.
 
On the same day there was a news story about the so-called Cuba Affidavit, whereby any arts group seeking funds from Miami-Dade County must sign a statement that it or anyone it does business with is free of ties to Cuba. The article rightly pointed out that this made Miami-Dade the only county in the United States with its own cultural embargo, in effect its own share of foreign policy.
 
We can't have every state or county marching to its own drummer when it comes to foreign policy. Foreign policy is properly the constitutional responsibility of the federal government. If Massachusetts or Miami-Dade wants to vent its displeasure about some foreign government, let it pass harmless resolutions but refrain from interference in the conduct of that policy.
 
ALLAN S. NANES